Biodiversity and genetics of beef quality, a review

References

• Allais S, Levéziel H, Hocquette JF, Rousset S, Denoyelle C, Journaux L, Renand G. 2014. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying sensory meat quality traits in three French beef cattle breeds. J Anim Sci. 92(10):4329–4341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avilés C, Polvillo O, Peña F, Juárez M, Martínez AL, Molina A. 2013. Association between DGAT1, FABP4, LEP, RORC, and SCD1 gene polymorphisms and fat deposition in Spanish commercial beef. J Anim Sci. 91(10):4571–4577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbut S, Sosnicki AA, Lonergan SM, Knapp T, Ciobanu DC, Gatcliffe LJ, Huff-Lonergan E, Wilson EW. 2008. Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat Sci. 79(1):46–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedhane M, van der Werf J, Gondro C, Duijvesteijn N, Lim D, Park B, Park MN, Hee RS, Clark S. 2019. Genome-wide association study of meat quality traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using imputed whole-genome sequence data. Front Genet. 10:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellinge RHS, Liberles DA, Iaschi SPA, O’brien PA, Tay GK. 2005. Myostatin and its implications on animal breeding: a review. Anim Genet. 36(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry DP, Conroy S, Hegarty PJ, Evans RD, Pabiou T, Judge MM. 2021. Inter-animal genetic variability exist in organoleptic properties of prime beef meat. Meat Sci. 173:108401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Mason SL, Bekhit AEDA. 2018. Role of calpain system in meat tenderness: a review. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 7(3):196–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan MSA, Kim HJ, Lee DH, Lee SH, Cho SH, Yang BS, Kim SD, Lee SH. 2017. Genetic parameters of carcass and meat quality traits in different muscles (longissimus dorsi and semimembranosus) of Hanwoo (Korean cattle). J Anim Sci. 95(8):3359–3369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G. 2011. Italian animal genetic resources in the domestic animal diversity information system of FAO. Ital J Anim Sci. 10(2):e29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G, Bergamaschi M, Qianlin N, Patel N, Toledo-Alvarado H, Cecchinato A. 2023. Veal and beef meat quality of crossbred calves from dairy herds using sexed semen and semen from double-muscled sires. Ital J Anim Sci. 22(1):169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G, Cecchinato A, Tagliapietra F, Verdiglione R, Simonetto A, Schiavon S. 2018. Crossbred young bulls and heifers sired by double-muscled Piemontese or Belgian Blue bulls exhibit different effects of sexual dimorphism on fattening performance and muscularity but not on meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 137:24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G, Negrini R, Bergamaschi M, Cecchinato A, Toledo-Alvarado H. 2020a. Pure-breeding with sexed semen and crossbreeding with semen of double-muscled sires to improve beef production from dairy herds: factors affecting heifer and cow fertility and the sex ratio. J Dairy Sci. 103(6):5246–5257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G, Negrini R, Bergamaschi M, Cecchinato A, Toledo-Alvarado H. 2020b. Short communication: pure-breeding with sexed semen and crossbreeding with semen from double-muscled sires to improve beef production from dairy herds: weight and value of calves. J Dairy Sci. 103(6):5258–5262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G, Negrini R, Bergamaschi M, Ni Q, Patel N, Toledo-Alvarado H, Cecchinato A. 2021. Purebreeding with sexed semen and crossbreeding with semen from double-muscled sires to improve beef production from dairy herds: live and slaughter performances of crossbred calves. J Dairy Sci. 104(3):3210–3220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittante G, Savoia S, Cecchinato A, Pegolo S, Albera A. 2021. Phenotypic and genetic variation of ultraviolet–visible-infrared spectral wavelengths of bovine meat. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonny SP, O’Reilly RA, Pethick DW, Gardner GE, Hocquette JF, Pannier L. 2018. Update of meat Standards Australia and the cuts based grading scheme for beef and sheepmeat. J Integr Agric. 17(7):1641–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukha A, Bonfatti V, Cecchinato A, Albera A, Gallo L, Carnier P, Bittante G. 2011. Genetic parameters of carcass and meat quality traits of double muscled Piemontese cattle. Meat Sci. 89(1):84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukha A, De Marchi M, Albera A, Bittante G, Gallo L, Carnier P. 2007. Genetic parameters of beef quality traits for Piemontese cattle. Ital J Anim Sci. 6(1):53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bovenhuis H, Visker MHPW, Valenberg HJF, Van Buitenhuis AJ, Arendonk JV. 2015. Effects of DGAT1 polymorphism on test-day milk production traits throughout lactation. J Dairy Sci. 98(9):6572–6582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrow HM, Moore SS, Johnston DJ, Barendse W, Bindon BM. 2001. Quantitative and molecular genetic influences on properties of beef: a review. Aust J Exp Agric. 41(7):893–919.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell KHS, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I. 1996. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature. 380(6569):64–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas E, White SN, Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M, Riley DG, Chase CC, Johnson DD, Smith TPL. 2006. Effects of calpastatin and μ-calpain markers in beef cattle on tenderness traits. J Anim Sci. 84(3):520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchi F, Russo C, Preziuso G, Cianci D. 2004. Il miglioramento genetico della qualita della carne della razza chianina: l’ereditabilita. Ital J Anim Sci. 3(2):191–198.
   Google Scholar
• Cheong HS, Yoon DH, Park BL, Kim LH, Bae JS, Namgoong S, Lee HW, Han CS, Kim JO, Cheong IC, et al. 2008. A single nucleotide polymorphism in CAPN1 associated with marbling score in Korean cattle. BMC Genet. 9(1):33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. 2018. Status and trends of animal genetic resources - 2018. Rome, Italy: Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; p. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 1982. Beef carcass classification. Regulations council regulations 1358/80, 1208/81, 1202/82. Commission regulations 2930/81, 563/82, 1557/82. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Coopman F, Krafft A, Dewulf J, Van Zeveren A, Gengler N. 2007. Estimation of phenotypic and genetic parameters for weight gain and weight at fixed ages in the double-muscled Belgian Blue Beef breed using field records. J Anim Breed Genet. 124(1):20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crews DH, Lowerison M, Caron N, Kemp RA. 2004. Genetic parameters among growth and carcass traits of Canadian Charolais cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 84(4):589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Nadai Bonin M, Pedrosa VB, da Luz e Silva S, Bünger L, Ross D, da Costa Gomes R, de Almeida Santana MH, de Córdova Cucco D, de Rezende FM, Ítavo LCV, et al. 2021. Genetic parameters associated with meat quality of Nellore cattle at different anatomical points of longissimus: Brazilian standards. Meat Sci. 171:108281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries M, van Middelaar CE, de Boer IJM. 2015. Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci. 178:279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do C, Kim S, Park B, Park S, Lee D, Park C, Wasana N, Song H, Lee S, Kim H. 2016. Genetic parameter estimates of carcass traits under national scale breeding scheme for beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 29(8):1083–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunner S, Miranda ME, Amigues Y, Cañón J, Georges M, Hanset R, Williams J, Ménissier F. 2003. Haplotype diversity of the myostatin gene among beef cattle breeds. Genet Sel Evol. 35(1):103–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman PD, McFarland DC, Mironov VA, Matheny JG. 2005. Commentary: in vitro-cultured meat production. Tissue Eng. 11(5–6):659–662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Parliament 2015. Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits. News. [accessed 2022 Aug 10]. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits.
   Google Scholar
• FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. 2015. In: Scherf BD, Pilling D, editors. The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO Fernando GL& M. 2019. Developing sustainable value chains for small-scale livestock producers. Rome: FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 21.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2020. World food and agriculture - statistical yearbook 2020. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2021. A primer on cloning and its use in livestock operations. Saf heal. https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/animal-cloning/primer-cloning-and-its-use-livestock-operations.
   Google Scholar
• Feitosa FLB, Olivieri BF, Aboujaoude C, Pereira ASC, de Lemos MVA, Chiaia HLJ, Berton MP, Peripolli E, Ferrinho AM, Mueller LF, et al. 2017. Genetic correlation estimates between beef fatty acid profile with meat and carcass traits in Nellore cattle finished in feedlot. J Appl Genet. 58(1):123–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiems LO. 2012. Double muscling in cattle: genes, husbandry, carcasses and meat. Animals (Basel). 2(3):472–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiems LO, De Boever JL, Vanacker JM, De Campeneere S. 2015. Maintenance energy requirements of double-muscled Belgian blue beef cows. Animals (Basel). 5(1):89–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foraker BA, Frink JL, Woerner DR. 2022. Invited review: a carcass and meat perspective of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. Transl Anim Sci. 6(2):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill JL, Matika O, Williams JL, Worton H, Wiener P, Bishop SC. 2010. Consistency statistics and genetic parameters for taste panel assessed meat quality traits and their relationship with carcass quality traits in a commercial population of Angus-sired beef cattle. Animal. 4(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoletto L, Ferraz JBS, Oliveira HR, Eler JP, Bussiman FO, Abreu Silva BC, Baldi F, Brito LF. 2020. Genetic architecture of carcass and meat quality traits in Montana tropical® composite beef cattle. Front Genet. 11:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinan FL, Wiggans GR, Norman HD, Dürr JW, Cole JB, Van Tassell CP, Misztal I, Lourenco D. 2023. Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection. J Dairy Sci. 106(2):1110–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall SJG. 2016. Effective population sizes in cattle, sheep, horses, pigs and goats estimated from census and herdbook data. Animal. 10(11):1778–1785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häyry M. 2018. Ethics and cloning. Br Med Bull. 128(1):15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Botreau R, Picard B, Jacquet A, Pethick DW, Scollan ND. 2012. Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality. Meat Sci. 92(3):197–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Renand G, Picard B, French ICM. 2005. Genetic effects on beef meat quality. Aust J Exp Agric. 41(7):893–919.
   Google Scholar
• Hornyák Z, Frickh JJ, Fürst-Waltl B. 2008. Meat quality traits in Pinzgau bulls. Zuchtungskunde. 80(3):175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijaz M, Li X, Zhang D, Hussain Z, Ren C, Bai Y, Zheng X. 2020. Association between meat color of DFD beef and other quality attributes. Meat Sci. 161:107954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Churchill Society. 2018. No bull. Churchill Bullettin 115. https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/churchill-bulletin/bulletin-115-jan-2018/no-bull/.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston DJ, Reverter A, Ferguson DM, Thompson JM, Burrow HM. 2003. Genetic and phenotypic characterisation of animal, carcass, and meat quality traits from temperate and tropically adapted beef breeds. 2. Abattoir carcass traits. Aust J Agric Res. 54(2):135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Juárez M, Lam S, Bohrer BM, Dugan MER, Vahmani P, Aalhus J, Juárez A, López-Campos O, Prieto N, Segura J. 2021. Enhancing the nutritional value of red meat through genetic and feeding strategies. Foods. 10(4):872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juszczuk-Kubiak E, Sakowski T, Flisikowski K, Wicińska K, Oprza̧dek J, Rosochacki SJ. 2004. Bovine μ-calpain (CAPN1) gene: new SNP within intron 14. J Appl Genet. 45(4):457–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keefer CL. 2015. Artificial cloning of domestic animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112(29):8874–8878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MZ, Ma Y, Ma J, Xiao J, Liu Y, Liu S, Khan A, Khan IM, Cao Z. 2021. Association of DGAT1 with cattle, buffalo, goat, and sheep milk and meat production traits. Front Vet Sci. 8:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobolák J, Gócza E. 2002. The role of the myostatin protein in meat quality - A review. Arch Anim Breed. 45(2):159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkman I, De Vliegher S, Hoflack G, Van Aert M, Laureyns J, Lips D, De Kruif A, Opsomer G. 2007. Protocol of the caesarean section as performed in daily bovine practice in Belgium. Reprod Domest Anim. 42(6):583–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohmaraie M. 1996. Biochemical factors regulating the toughening and tenderization processes of meat. Meat Sci. 43(1):193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Lambe NR, Krzęcio-Nieczyporuk E, Koćwin-Podsiadła M, Bünger L. 2015, Influence of major genes on meat quality. In Przybylski W, Hopkins D, editors. Meat quality: Genetic and environmental factors. CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA. DOI: 10.1201/b19250–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber MR, Peñagaricano F, Fourdraine RH, Clay JS, Fricke PM. 2023. Characterization of semen type prevalence and allocation in Holstein and Jersey females in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 106(5):3748–3760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal-Gutiérrez JD, Mateescu RG. 2019. Genetic basis of improving the palatability of beef cattle: current insights. Food Biotechnol. 33(3):193–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Ekerljung M, Lundström K, Lundén A. 2013. Association of polymorphisms at DGAT1, leptin, SCD1, CAPN1 and CAST genes with color, marbling and water holding capacity in meat from beef cattle populations in Sweden. Meat Sci. 94(2):153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londoño-Gil M, Cardona-Cifuentes D, Rodríguez JD, Brunes LC, Magnabosco CU, Pereira ASC, Peripolli E, Lôbo RB, Baldi F. 2022. Heritability and genetic correlations between marbling in longissimus dorsi muscle and conventional economic traits in Nellore beef cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod. 54(5):274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães AFB, Schenkel FS, Garcia DA, Gordo DGM, Tonussi RL, Espigolan R, Silva RdO, Braz CU, Fernandes Júnior GA, Baldi F, et al. 2019. Genomic selection for meat quality traits in Nelore cattle. Meat Sci. 148:32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makanjuola BO, Miglior F, Abdalla EA, Maltecca C, Schenkel FS, Baes CF. 2020. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations. J Dairy Sci. 103(6):5183–5199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini RA, Ramanathan R. 2019. Molecular basis of meat color. Meat quality analysis: advanced evaluation methods, techniques, and technologies. Cambridge (MA): p. 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Marsoner T, Egarter Vigl L, Manck F, Jaritz G, Tappeiner U, Tasser E. 2018. Indigenous livestock breeds as indicators for cultural ecosystem services: a spatial analysis within the Alpine Space. Ecol Indic. 94:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minick JA, Dikeman ME, Pollak EJ, Wilson DE. 2004. Heritability and correlation estimates of Warner-Bratzler shear force and carcass traits from Angus-, Charolais-, Hereford-, and Simmental-sired cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 84(4):599–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer SI, Przybylski W. 2016. Breeding strategies for improving meat quality. In: Przybylski W, Hopkins D, editors. Meat quality genetic and environmental factors. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; p. 257–286.
   Google Scholar
• Mwangi FW, Charmley E, Gardiner CP, Malau-Aduli BS, Kinobe RT, Malau-Aduli AEO. 2019. Diet and genetics influence beef cattle performance and meat quality characteristics. Foods. 8(12):648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan Y. 2023. Mother cow, mother India a multispecies politics of dairy in India. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ni Q, Amalfitano N, Biasioli F, Gallo L, Tagliapietra F, Bittante G. 2022. Bibliometric review on the volatile organic compounds in meat. Foods. 11(22):3574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovaska U, Bläuer A, Kroløkke C, Kjetså M, Kantanen J, Honkatukia M. 2021. The conservation of native domestic animal breeds in Nordic countries: from genetic resources to cultural heritage and good governance. Animals. 11(9):2730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pećina M, Ivanković A. 2021. Candidate genes and fatty acids in beef meat, a review. Ital J Anim Sci. 20(1):1716–1729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prache S, Adamiec C, Astruc T, Baéza-Campone E, Bouillot PE, Clinquart A, Feidt C, Fourat E, Gautron J, Girard A, et al. 2022. Review: quality of animal-source foods. Animal. 16:100376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon W, Mullen AM, Sweeney T, Hamill RM. 2010. Association of polymorphisms in candidate genes with colour, water-holding capacity, and composition traits in bovine M. longissimus and M. semimembranosus. Meat Sci. 86(2):270–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoia S, Albera A, Brugiapaglia A, Di Stasio L, Cecchinato A, Bittante G. 2019. Heritability and genetic correlations of carcass and meat quality traits in Piemontese young bulls. Meat Sci. 156:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoia S, Albera A, Brugiapaglia A, Di Stasio L, Ferragina A, Cecchinato A, Bittante G. 2020. Prediction of meat quality traits in the abattoir using portable and hand-held near-infrared spectrometers. Meat Sci. 161:108017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoia S, Albera A, Brugiapaglia A, Di Stasio L, Cecchinato A, Bittante G. 2021. Prediction of meat quality traits in the abattoir using portable near-infrared spectrometers: heritability of predicted traits and genetic correlations with laboratory-measured traits. J Animal Sci Biotechnol. 12(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavon S, Bittante G. 2012. Double-muscled and conventional cattle have the same net energy requirements if these are related to mature and current body protein mass, and to gain composition. J Anim Sci. 90(11):3973–3987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavon S, Tagliapietra F, Dalla Montà G, Cecchinato A, Bittante G. 2012. Low protein diets and rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid increase nitrogen efficiency and reduce the environmental impact of double-muscled young Piemontese bulls. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 174(1–2):96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi M, Gao X, Ren H, Yuan Z, Wu H, Jiao L, Zhang L, Gao H, Junya L, Xu S. 2011. Association analysis of CAPN1 gene variants with carcass and meat quality traits in Chinese native cattle. African J Biotechnol. 10(75):17367–17371.
   Google Scholar
• Short RE, MacNeil MD, Grosz MD, Gerrard DE, Grings EE. 2002. Pleiotropic effects in Hereford, Limousin, and Piedmontese F2 crossbred calves of genes controlling muscularity including the Piedmontese myostatin allele. J Anim Sci. 80(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha N, Patil S, Kesigan U, Sai Chaitanya T, Panigrahy S, Tandon GD. 2019. Ethical concerns in animal cloning: possible risks and assessment. Glob Bioeth Enq J. 7(3):128.
   Google Scholar
• Thaller G, Kühn C, Winter A, Ewald G, Bellmann O, Wegner J, Zühlke H, Fries R. 2003. DGAT1, a new positional and functional candidate gene for intramuscular fat deposition in cattle. Anim Genet. 34(5):354–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorrez L. 2023. Cell-based meat: what we know, what we don’t know and what we need to know? Ital J Anim Sci. in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. 2010. What is biodiversity? New York (NY): World Conservation Monitoring Centre. https://www.unesco.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/BIODIVERSITY_FACTSHEET.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eenennaam AL, Li J, Thallman RM, Quaas RL, Dikeman ME, Gill CA, Franke DE, Thomas MG. 2007. Validation of commercial DNA tests for quantitative beef quality traits. J Anim Sci. 85(4):891–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdiglione R, Bittante G. 2013. Influence of genotype and diet on the characteristics of semitendinosus muscle in crossbred young bulls derived from Brown Swiss cow and double muscled bulls. Agric Conspec Sci. 78(3):285–288.
   Google Scholar
• Watson JD, Crick FHC. 1953. Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature. 171(4356):737–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Węglarz A, Balakowska A, Kułaj D, Makulska J. 2020. Associations of CAST, CAPN1 and MSTN genes polymorphism with slaughter value and beef quality-a review. Ann Anim Sci. 20(3):757–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseldijk LW, Tybur JM, Boomsma DI, Willemsen G, Vink JM. 2023. The heritability of pescetarianism and vegetarianism. Food Qual Prefer. 103:104705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Casas E, Cundiff LV, Koohmaraie M. 2001. The effects of Piedmontese inheritance and myostatin genotype on the palatability of longissimus thoracis, gluteus medius, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris. J Anim Sci. 79(12):3069–3074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener P, Woolliams JA, Frank-Lawale A, Ryan M, Richardson RI, Nute GR, Wood JD, Homer D, Williams JL. 2009. The effects of a mutation in the myostatin gene on meat and carcass quality. Meat Sci. 83(1):127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolcott ML, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Iker CL, Thompson JM, Burrow HM. 2009. Genetics of meat quality and carcass traits and the impact of tenderstretching in two tropical beef genotypes. Anim Prod Sci. 49(6):383–398.
   Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat. 56(645):330–338.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong X. 2023. Meat and meat alternatives: where is the gap in scientific knowledge and technology? Ital J Anim Sci. in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Li J, Li J, Gao X, Gao H, Xu S. 2013. Effects of DGAT1 gene on meat and carcass fatness quality in Chinese commercial cattle. Mol Biol Rep. 40(2):1947–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwambag A, Kelly M, Schenkel F, Mandell I, Wilton J, Miller S. 2013. Heritability of beef tenderness at different aging times and across breed comparisons. Can J Anim Sci. 93(3):307–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar