Effect of two brooding systems and four stocking densities on immune response and stress indicators of broiler chicks during the brooding period

References

• Abo Ghanima MM, Abd El-Hack ME, Taha AE, Tufarelli V, Laudadio V, Naiel MA. 2020. Assessment of stocking rate and housing system on performance, carcass traits, blood indices, and meat quality of French Pekin ducks. Agriculture. 10(7):273. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10070273.
   Google Scholar
• Abuelgasim E, Shah S, Abuelgasim B, Soni N, Thomas A, Elgasim M, Harky A. 2021. Clinical overview of diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for cardiovascular death. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 22(2):301–314. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2202038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Mahmud A, Hussain J, Javed K. 2019a. Morphometric traits, serum chemistry and antibody response of three chicken genotypes under free-range, semi-intensive and intensive housing systems. Braz J Poult Sci. 21(1): 001–008. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Mahmud A, Hussain J, Javed K. 2019b. Productive performance, egg characteristics and hatching traits of three chicken genotypes under free-range, semi-intensive, and intensive housing systems. Braz J Poult Sci. 21(2): 001–010. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed Z, Akhter S. 2003. Role of maternal antibodies in protection against infectious bursal disease in commercial broilers. Int J Poultry Sci. 2(4):251–255. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2003.251.255.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Bahouh M, Y. Al-Nass A, K. Abdulla F, Ragheb G, M. Mashaly M. 2012. Production performance of different broiler breeds under different housing systems. Int J Poultr Sci. 11(3):190–195. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2012.190.195.
   Google Scholar
• Alqhtani AH, Qaid MM, Al-Garadi MA, Al-Abdullatif AA, Alharthi AS, Al-Mufarrej SI. 2022. Efficacy of Rumex nervosus leaves or Cinnamomum verum bark as natural growth promoters on the growth performance, immune responsiveness, and serum biochemical profile of broiler chickens. Italian J Anim Sci. 21(1):792–801. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2065941. [InsertedFromOnline
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Campbell A, Crump A, Arnott G, Newberry R,. Jacobs L. 2021. 2021. Effect of environmental complexity and stocking density on fear and anxiety in broiler chickens. Animals. 11(8):2383. 10.3390/ani11082383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astaneh IY, Chamani M, Mousavi SN, Sadeghi AA, Afshar MA. 2018. Effects of stocking density on performance and immunity in Ross 308 broiler chickens. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 24(4):483–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atilgan A, Koknaroglu H. 2006. Cultural energy analysis on broilers reared in different capacity poultry houses. Italian J Ani Sci. 5(4):393–400. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2006.393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2022. Annual report of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Networks on Animal Welfare 2022. Technical report. Report of the Networks on Animal Welfare 2022. Rep. No. 2397-8325. Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Azzam M, El-Gogary M. 2015. Effects of dietary threonine levels and stocking density on the performance, metabolic status and immunity of broiler chickens. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 10(5):215–225. doi: 10.3923/ajava.2015.215.225.
   Google Scholar
• Beloor J, Kang H, Kim Y, Subramani V, Jang I, Sohn S, Moon Y. 2010. The effect of stocking density on stress-related genes and telomeric length in broiler chickens. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 23(4):437–443. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2010.90400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs S, Keeling L, Rettenbacher S, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens F. 2009. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poult Sci. 88(8):1536–1543. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra RK, Newberne PM. 2012. Nutrition, immunity, and infection: mechanisms of interactions. New York and London: Plenum press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Jiang W, Tan H, Xu G, Zhang X, Wei S, Wang X. 2013. Effects of outdoor access on growth performance, carcass composition, and meat characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 92(2):435–443. doi: 10.3382/ps.2012-02360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choct M. 2009. Managing gut health through nutrition. Br Poult Sci. 50(1):9–15. doi: 10.1080/00071660802538632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb. 2012. Cobb 500 broiler performance & nutrition supplement. http://cobb-vantress.com.
   Google Scholar
• Costantino A, Fabrizio E, Ghiggini A, Bariani M. 2018. Climate control in broiler houses: a thermal model for the calculation of the energy use and indoor environmental conditions. Energy Buildings. 169:110–126. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeke S. 2007. Suitability of hay-box brooding technology to rural household poultry production system. Livestock Res Rural Dev. 19(3):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dozier W, Thaxton J, Purswell J, Olanrewaju H, Branton S, Roush W. 2006. Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poult Sci. 85(2):344–351. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisen MB, Brown PO. 2022. Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions this century. PLOS Clim. 1(2):e0000010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010.
   Google Scholar
• England AD, Musigwa S, Kumar A, Daneshmand A, Gharib-Naseri K, Kheravii SK, Pesti G, Wu S-B. 2023. Sex proportion as a covariate increases the statistical test power in growth performance based experiments using as-hatched broilers. PloS One. 18(1):e0280040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feddes J, Emmanuel E, Zuidhoft M. 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult Sci. 81(6):774–779. doi: 10.1093/ps/81.6.774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese KJ, He H, Swaggerty CL, Kogut MH. 2013. The avian heterophil. Dev Comp Immunol. 41(3):334–340. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.03.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanima MMA, Abd El-Hack ME, Othman SI, Taha AE, Allam AA, Abdel-Moneim A-ME. 2020. Impact of different rearing systems on growth, carcass traits, oxidative stress biomarkers, and humoral immunity of broilers exposed to heat stress. Poult Sci. 99(6):3070–3078. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami M, Chamani M, Seidavi A, Sadeghi AA, Aminafschar M. 2020. Effects of stocking density and environmental conditions on performance, immunity, carcase characteristics, blood constitutes, and economical parameters of Cobb 500 strain broiler chickens. Italian J Anim Sci. 19(1):524–535. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1757522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross W, Siegel H. 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Diseases. 27(4):972–979. doi: 10.2307/1590198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckert R, Estevez I, Russek-Cohen E, Pettit-Riley R. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult Sci. 81(4):451–457. doi: 10.1093/ps/81.4.451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann TM. 2021. Impact of housing environment and rearing condition on the immune system and welfare of laying hens.
   Google Scholar
• Houshmand M, Azhar K, Zulkifli I, Bejo M, Kamyab A. 2012. Effects of prebiotic, protein level, and stocking density on performance, immunity, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult Sci. 91(2):393–401. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha R, Singh AK, Yadav S, Berrocoso JFD, Mishra B. 2019. Early nutrition programming (in ovo and post-hatch feeding) as a strategy to modulate gut health of poultry. Front Vet Sci. 6:82. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Fan X, Yang L, He T, Xu Y, Chen X, Liu P, Geng Z. 2019. Effects of rearing systems on growth performance, carcass yield, meat quality, lymphoid organ indices, and serum biochemistry of Wannan Yellow chickens. Anim Sci J. 90(7):887–893. doi: 10.1111/asj.13220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konsman JP. 2023. A History of Immune and Neuroendocrine System Interactions. In Neuroendocrine-Immune System Interactions, p. 3–30. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen I, Williams A, Kyriazakis I. 2014. The effects of welfare-enhancing system change on the environmental impacts of broiler and egg production. Poult Sci. 93(2):256–266. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Jiao H, Buyse J, Decuypere E. 2006. Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 62(1):71–86. doi: 10.1079/WPS200585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martrenchar A, Morisse J, Huonnic D, Cotte J. 1997. Influence of stocking density on some behavioural, physiological and productivity traits of broilers. Vet Res. 28(5):473–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirelles LdS, Covas DT. 2011. Phenotypic analysis and differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells. In Mesenchymal Stem Cell Assays and Applications, p. 331–350. Springer: Humana Press American Publishing company.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr MA, Alkhedaide AQ, Ramadan AA, Abd-El Salam EH, Hussein MA. 2021. Potential impact of stocking density on growth, carcass traits, indicators of biochemical and oxidative stress and meat quality of different broiler breeds. Poult Sci. 100(11):101442. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawarathne S, Kumari M, Nayananjalie W. 2020. Effect of stocking density at brooding stage on performances and stress response of broiler chickens. Rajarata Uni J. 5:8–64.
   Google Scholar
• Peebles ED, Keirs RW, Bennett LW, Cummings TS, Whitmarsh SK, Gerard PD. 2004. Relationships among post-hatch physiological parameters in broiler chicks hatched from young breeder hens and subjected to delayed brooding placement. Int J Poult Sci. 3(9):578–585. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2004.578.585.
   Google Scholar
• Qaid M, Albatshan H, Shafey T, Hussein E, Abudabos A. 2016. Effect of stocking density on the performance and immunity of 1-to 14-d-old broiler chicks. Rev Bras Cienc Avic. 18(4):683–692. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0289.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindran V, Abdollahi MR. 2021. Nutrition and digestive physiology of the broiler chick: state of the art and outlook. Animals. 11(10):2795. doi: 10.3390/ani11102795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran V, Thomas DV, Thomas DG, Morel PC. 2006. Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation. Animal Sci J. 77(1):110–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00327.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relić R, Sossidou E, Dedousi A, Perić L, Božičković I, Dukić-Stojcić M. 2019. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 66:423–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS-Institute. 2004. SAS Institute. User’s Guide: statistics, version 9.2. Cary, North Caroline, USA: SAS Inst. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shini S. 2003. Physiological responses of laying hens to the alternative housing systems. Int J Poultr Sci. 2(5):357–360. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2003.357.360.
   Google Scholar
• Summers J. 2006. Early chick and poultry mortality. Ceva Animal Health Pacific 5(2006):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Thaxton J, Dozier W, Branton S, Morgan G, Miles D, Roush W, Lott B, Vizzier-Thaxton Y. 2006. Stocking density and physiological adaptive responses of broilers. Poult Sci. 85(5):819–824. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.5.819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbrook A, Fisher A. 2020. Stress, health and the welfare of laying hens. Anim Prod Sci. 61(10):931–943. doi: 10.1071/AN19666.
   Google Scholar
• Vanan TT, Thiagarajan M, Ramesh V, Gnanaraj PT, Sivakumar T. 2014. Performance of broiler chicken under cage and floor systems of management fed differently processed feeds. Indian J Animal Sci. 71(10):985–988.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira S, Moran E. Jr, 1999. Effects of egg of origin and chick post-hatch nutrition on broiler live performance and meat yields. World’s Poult Sci J. 55(2):125–142. doi: 10.1079/WPS19990009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virden W, Kidd M. 2009. Physiological stress in broilers: ramifications on nutrient digestibility and responses. J Appl Poult Res. 18(2):338–347. doi: 10.3382/japr.2007-00093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis WL, Murray C, Talbott C. 2002. Campylobacter isolation trends of cage versus floor broiler chickens: a one-year study. Poult Sci. 81(5):629–631. doi: 10.1093/ps/81.5.629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan L, Lv Z, An S, Xing K, Wang Z, Lv M, Choct M, Guo Y, Zhou G. 2021. Effects of rearing system and narasin on growth performance, gastrointestinal development, and gut microbiota of broilers. Poult Sci. 100(3):100840. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar