626
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ReviewS

Deviation of behavioural and productive parameters in dairy cows due to a lameness event: a synthesis of reviews

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 739-748 | Received 28 Apr 2023, Accepted 24 Jul 2023, Published online: 03 Aug 2023

References

  • Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. 2015. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 13(3):132–140. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
  • Bach A, Dinarés M, Devant M, Carré X. 2007. Associations between lameness and production, feeding and milking attendance of Holstein cows milked with an automatic milking system. J Dairy Res. 74(1):40–46. doi: 10.1017/S0022029906002184.
  • Beer G, Alsaaod M, Starke A, Schuepbach-Regula G, Müller H, Kohler P, Steiner A. 2016. Use of extended characteristics of locomotion and feeding behavior for automated identification of lame dairy cows. PLOS One. 11(5):e0218546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155796.
  • Bennett RM, Barker ZE, Main DCJ, Whay HR, Leach KA. 2014. Investigating the value dairy farmers place on a reduction of lameness in their herds using a willingness to pay approach. Vet J. 199(1):72–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.068.
  • Bicalho RC, Warnick LD, Guard CL. 2008. Strategies to analyze milk losses caused by diseases with potential incidence throughout the lactation: a lameness example. J Dairy Sci. 91(7):2653–2661. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0744.
  • Blackie N, Bleach E, Amory J, Scaife J. 2011. Impact of lameness on gait characteristics and lying behaviour of zero grazed dairy cattle in early lactation. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 129(2–4):67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.10.006.
  • Blackie N, Maclaurin L. 2019. Influence of lameness on the lying behaviour of zero-grazed lactating Jersey dairy cattle housed in straw yards. Animals. 9(10):829. doi: 10.3390/ani9100829.
  • Bonfatti V, Ho PN, Pryce JE. 2020. Usefulness of milk mid-infrared spectroscopy for predicting lameness score in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 103(3):2534–2544. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17551.
  • Borghart GM, O’Grady LE, Somers JR. 2021. Prediction of lameness using automatically recorded activity, behavior and production data in post-parturient Irish dairy cows. Irish Vet J. 74:4.
  • Calderon DF, Cook NB. 2011. The effect of lameness on the resting behavior and metabolic status of dairy cattle during the transition period in a freestall − housed dairy herd. J Dairy Sci. 94(6):2883–2894. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3855.
  • Caird J, Sutcliffe K, Kwan I, Dickson K, Thomas J. 2015. Mediating policy-relevant evidence at speed: are systematic reviews of reviews a useful approach? Evid Policy. 11(1):81–97. doi: 10.1332/174426514X13988609036850.
  • Chapinal N, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Wagner S. 2010. Automated methods for detecting lameness and measuring analgesia in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 93(12):5758–5763. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3426.
  • Chapinal N, de Passillé AM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Rushen J. 2009. Using gait score, walking speed, and lying behavior to detect hoof lesions in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 92(9):4365–4374. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2115.
  • Charlton GL, Bouffard V, Gibbons JM, Vasseur E, Haley DB, Pellerin D, Rushen J, de Passillé AM. 2016. Can automated measures of lying time help assess lameness and leg lesions on tie-stall dairy farms? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 175:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.02.011.
  • Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers
  • Contla Hernández B, Lopez-Villalobos N, Vignes M. 2021. Identifying health status in grazing dairy cows from milk mid-infrared spectroscopy by using machine learning methods. Animals. 11(8):2154. doi: 10.3390/ani11082154.
  • Cook NB, Bennett TB, Nordlund KV. 2004. Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. J Dairy Sci. 87(9):2912–2922. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73422-0.
  • Cook NB. 2020. Symposium review: the impact of management and facilities on cow culling rates. J Dairy Sci. 103(4):3846–3855. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17140.
  • DerSimonian R, Laird N. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 7(3):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
  • Galindo F, Broom DM. 2002. The effects of lameness on social and individual behavior of dairy cows. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 5(3):193–201. doi: 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0503_03.
  • Gomez A, Cook NB. 2010. Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. J Dairy Sci. 93(12):5772–5781. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3436.
  • González LA, Tolkamp BJ, Coffey MP, Ferret A, Kyriazakis I. 2008. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 91(3):1017–1028. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0530.
  • Green LE, Hedges VJ, Schukken YH, Blowey RW, Packington AJ. 2002. The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 85(9):2250–2256.
  • Grimm K, Haidn B, Erhard M, Tremblay M, Döpfer D. 2019. New insights into the association between lameness, behavior, and performance in Simmental cows. J Dairy Sci. 102(3):2453–2468. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15035.
  • Gudaj R, Brydl E, Posta J, István K. 2012. Effect of lameness on milk production in Holstein-Friesian farms in Hungary. Állattenyésztés Takarmányozás. 61:66–77.
  • Hernandez JA, Garbarino EJ, Shearer JK, Risco CA, Thatcher WW. 2005. Comparison of milk yield in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 227(8):1292–1296. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1292.
  • Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. 2022. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
  • Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 327(7414):557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
  • Ito K, Von Keyserlingk MAG, Leblanc SJ, Weary DM. 2010. Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 93(8):3553–3560. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2951.
  • Juarez ST, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Price EO. 2003. Impact of lameness on behavior and productivity of lactating Holstein cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 83(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00107-2.
  • King MTM, DeVries TJ. 2018. Graduate student literature review: detecting health disorders using data from automatic milking systems and associated technologies. J Dairy Sci. 101(9):8605–8614. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14521.
  • King MTM, LeBlanc SJ, Pajor EA, DeVries TJ. 2017. Cow-level associations of lameness, behavior, and milk yield of cows milked in automated systems. J Dairy Sci. 100(6):4818–4828. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12281.
  • Kramer E, Cavero D, Stamer E, Krieter J. 2009. Mastitis and lameness detection in dairy cows by application of fuzzy logic. Livest Sci. 125(1):92–96. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.02.020.
  • Lora I, Gottardo F, Contiero B, Zidi A, Magrin L, Cassandro M, Cozzi G. 2020. A survey on sensor systems used in Italian dairy farms and comparison between performances of similar herds equipped or not equipped with sensors. J Dairy Sci. 103(11):10264–10272. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17973.
  • Machado VS, Caixeta LS, McArt JA, Bicalho RC. 2010. The effect of claw horn disruption lesions and body condition score at dry-off on survivability, reproductive performance, and milk production in the subsequent lactation. J Dairy Sci. 93(9):4071–4078. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3177.
  • Magrin L, Gottardo F, Contiero B, Brscic M, Cozzi G. 2019. Time of occurrence and prevalence of severe lameness in fattening Charolais bulls: impact of type of floor and space allowance within type of floor. Livest Sci. 221(1):86–88. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.021.
  • Mandel R, Harazy H, Gygax L, Nicol CJ, Ben-David A, Whay HR, Klement E. 2018. Short communication: detection of lameness in dairy cows using a grooming device. J Dairy Sci. 101(2):1511–1517. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13207.
  • Miguel-Pacheco GG, Kaler J, Remnant J, Cheyne L, Abbott C, French AP, Pridmore TP, Huxley JN. 2014. Behavioural changes in dairy cows with lameness in an automatic milking system. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 150:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.11.003.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  • Nechanitzky K, Starke A, Vidondo B, Müller H, Reckardt M, Friedli K, Steiner A. 2016. Analysis of behavioral changes in dairy cows associated with claw horn lesions. J Dairy Sci. 99(4):2904–2914. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10109.
  • Norring M, Häggman J, Simojoki H, Tamminen P, Winckler C, Pastell M. 2014. Short communication: lameness impairs feeding behavior of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97(7):4317–4321. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7512.
  • O'Leary NW, Byrne DT, O'Connor AH, Shalloo L. 2020. Invited review: cattle lameness detection with accelerometers. J Dairy Sci. 103(5):3895–3911. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17123.
  • Oehm AW, Knubben-Schweizer G, Rieger A, Stoll A, Hartnack S. 2019. A systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors associated with lameness in dairy cows. BMC Vet Res. 15(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2095-2.
  • Olechnowicz J, Jaskowski JM. 2011. Behaviour of lame cows: a review. Vet Med. 56(12):581–588. doi: 10.17221/4435-VETMED.
  • Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Becker LA, Pieper D, Hartling L, Chapter V. 2020. Overviews of Reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1. Cochrane. (updated September 2020). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
  • Proudfoot KL, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MA. 2010. Behavior during transition differs for cows diagnosed with claw horn lesions in mid lactation. J Dairy Sci. 93(9):3970–3978. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2767.
  • R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from https://www.R-project.org/
  • Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. 2011. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 342:d549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d549.
  • Rutten CJ, Velthuis AGJ, Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H. 2013. Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. J Dairy Sci. 96(4):1928–1952. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6107.
  • Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rücker G. 2015. Meta-analysis with R. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, p. 252.
  • Shahinfar S, Khansefid M, Haile-Mariam M, Pryce JE. 2021. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of lameness in dairy cows. Animal 15(11):100391. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100391.
  • Shim SR, Kim SJ. 2019. Intervention meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiol Health. 41:e2019008. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019008.
  • Solano L, Barkema HW, Pajor EA, Mason S, LeBlanc SJ, Nash CGR, Haley DB, Pellerin D, Rushen J, de Passillé AM, et al. 2016. Associations between lying behavior and lameness in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. J Dairy Sci. 99(3):2086–2101. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10336.
  • Solano L, Barkema HW, Pajor EA, Mason S, LeBlanc SJ, Zaffino Heyerhoff JC, Nash CGR, Haley DB, Vasseur E, Pellerin D, et al. 2015. Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. J Dairy Sci. 98(10):6978–6991. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9652.
  • Steeneveld W, Hogeveen H. 2015. Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management. J Dairy Sci. 98(1):709–717. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8595.
  • Thomsen PT, Munksgaard L, Sørensen JT. 2012. Locomotion scores and lying behaviour are indicators of hoof lesions in dairy cows. Vet J. 193(3):644–647. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.046.
  • Thorup VM, Munksgaard L, Robert PE, Erhard HW, Thomsen PT, Friggens NC. 2015. Lameness detection via leg-mounted accelerometers on dairy cows on four commercial farms. Animal 9(10):1704–1712. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115000890.
  • Thorup VM, Nielsen BL, Robert PE, Giger-Reverdin S, Konka J, Michie C, Friggens NC. 2016. Lameness affects cow feeding but not rumination behavior as characterized from sensor data. Front Vet Sci. 3:37. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00037.
  • Van Hertem T, Maltz E, Antler A, Romanini CE, Viazzi S, Bahr C, Schlageter-Tello A, Lokhorst C, Berckmans D, Halachmi I. 2013. Lameness detection based on multivariate continuous sensing of milk yield, rumination, and neck activity. J Dairy Sci. 96(7):4286–4298. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6188.
  • Walker SL, Smith RF, Routly JE, Jones DN, Morris MJ, Dobson H. 2008. Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 91(12):4552–4559. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1048.
  • Warner D, Vasseur E, Lefebvre DM, Lacroix R. 2020. A machine learning based decision aid for lameness in dairy herds using farm-based records. Comput Electron Agric. 169:105193. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105193.
  • Weigele HC, Gygax L, Steiner A, Wechsler B, Burla JB. 2018. Moderate lameness leads to marked behavioral changes in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 101(3):2370–2382. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13120.
  • Westin R, Vaughan A, de Passillé AM, DeVries TJ, Pajor EA, Pellerin D, Siegford JM, Vasseur E, Rushen J. 2016. Lying times of lactating cows on dairy farms with automatic milking systems and the relation to lameness, leg lesions, and body condition score. J Dairy Sci. 99(1):551–561. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9737.
  • Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF. 2003. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet Rec. 153(7):197–202. doi: 10.1136/vr.153.7.197.
  • Yunta C, Guasch I, Bach A. 2012. Short communication: lying behavior of lactating dairy cows is influenced by lameness especially around feeding time. J Dairy Sci. 95(11):6546–6549. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5670.