First evaluation of the practicability of the CLASSYFARM welfare assessment protocol in Italian small-scale mountain dairy farms - a case study

References

• AACTING. 2021. Network on quantification of veterinary antimicrobial usage at herd level and analysis, communication and benchmarking to improve responsible usage. JPI- AMR: joint programming initiative on antimicrobial resistance. [accessed 2023 Mar 9]. https://aacting.org/monitoring-systems/classyfarm/?lid=1439.
   Google Scholar
• Agrar-und Forstbericht. (2021): [Agriculture- and forestry report]Agrar- und Forstbericht. 2021. Hg. v. Autonome Provinz Bozen - Südtirol, Abteilung Landwirtschaft, Abteilung Forstwirschaft, Versuchzentrum Laimburg, Deutsche Bildungsdirektion, Agentur Landesdomäne und Freie Universität Bozen. [accessed 2023 Mar 8]: https://www.provinz.bz.it/landforstwirtschaft/landwirtschaft/agrar-forstbericht.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Armbrecht L, Lambertz C, Albers D, Gauly M. 2019. Assessment of welfare indicators in dairy farms offering pasture at differing levels. Animal. 13(10):2336–2347. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott G, Ferris CP, O’Connell NE. 2017. Welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal. 11(2):261–273. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglini L, Bovolenta S, Gusmeroli F, Salvador S, Sturaro E. 2014. Environmental sustainability of Alpine livestock farms. Ital J Anim Sci. 13(2):3155. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2014.3155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battini M, Vieira A, Barbieri S, Ajuda I, Stilwell G, Mattiello S. 2014. Invited review: animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats. J Dairy Sci. 97(11):6625–6648. S doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraitareanu S, Vidu L. 2020. Antimicrobial Resistance: a One Health Perspective. Dairy farms biosecurity to protect against infectious diseases and antibiotics overuse. London, UK: intechOpen. Sp. 113–124. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.93200.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson B, Greko C. 2014. Antibiotic resistance–consequences for animal health, welfare, and food production. Ups J Med Sci. 119(2):96–102. S doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertocchi L, Fusi F, Angelucci A, Bolzoni L, Pongolini S, Strano RM, Ginestreti J, Riuzzi G, Moroni P, Lorenzi V. 2018. Characterization of hazards, welfare promoters and animal-based measures for the welfare assessment of dairy cows: elicitation of expert opinion. Prev Vet Med. 150:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertocchi L, Fusi F, Lorenzi V. 2020. Valutazione del benesere animale e della biosicurezza nell’allevamento bovino da latte: manuale di autocontrollo. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna; Centro di Referenza Nazionale per il Benessere Animale; Ministero della Salute. [accessed 2023 Mar 14]. https://www.classyfarm.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2021/01/Manuale- Benessere-e-Biosicurezza-Autocontrollo-BOVINA-DA- LATTE_Classyfarm_REV019-22_01_2021_compressed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blokhuis. 2009. Welfare Quality - Assessment protocol for cattle. Hg. v. Welfare Quality Network. [accessed 2023 Mar 20]. http://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net/media/1088/cattle_protocol_without_veal_calv es.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bock BB, van Leeuwen F. 2005. Socio-political and market developments. In: roex J, Miele M, Hrsg. Farm Animal Welfare Concerns: consumers, Retailers and Producers. Wales: cardiff University Press. Welfare Quality® Reports No. 1; S. p. 115–149. [accessed 2023 Feb 28]. http://www.welfarequality.net/media/1093/wqr1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brenninkmeyer C, Dippel S, Brinkmann J, March S, Winckler C, Knierim U. 2013. Hock lesion epidemiology in cubicle housed dairy cows across two breeds, farming systems and countries. Prev Vet Med. 109(3–4)S. :236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classyfarm. 2019a. Classyfarm checklist dairy cattle tie stall. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna; Universitá di Parma; Ministero della Salute [accessed 2023 Mar 6]. https://www.classyfarm.it/wpcontent/uploads/sites/4/2021/01/Check-Autocontrollo-. ClassyFarm-BOVINA-LATTE-FISSA_99item_17112020-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Classyfarm. 2019b. Classyfarm checklist dairy cattle free stall. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna; Universitá di Parma; Ministero della Salute [accessed 2023 June 19]. https://www.classyfarm.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/04/Check-Autocontrollo-ClassyFarm-BOVINA-LATTE-LIBERA_105-item_05-04-2023griglie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Classyfarm. 2023a. Classyfarm. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna; Universitá di Parma; Ministero della Salute. [accessed 2023 Mar 6] https://www.classyfarm.it/.
   Google Scholar
• Classyfarm. 2023. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna; Universitá di Parma; Ministero della Salute. Valutazione del benessere animale e della biosicurezza dell’allevamento BOVINO DA LATTE: MANUALE DI AUTOCONTROLLO (April 2023). [accessed 2023 June 19]. https://www.classyfarm.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/04/Man-ClassyFarm-Ben- Bio-Autocontrollo-Bov.Latte_apr2023_def.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cook NB, Bennett TB, Nordlund KV. 2005. Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 88(11):3876–3885. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73073-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Monte E, Zanon T, Vevey M, Gauly M. 2020. Evaluation of the systematic recording of diagnostic data in the Valdostana cattle. Italian J Anim Sci. 19(1):1253–1263. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1833767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA European Food Safety Authority. 2009. Scientific Opinion on the overall effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. Efsa J. 7(7):1143. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1143.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA European Food Safety Authority. 2012. Statement on the use of animal‐based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFS2. 10(6):2767. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2767.
   Google Scholar
• Egger-Danner C, Fuerst-Waltl B, Obritzhauser W, Fuerst C, Schwarzenbacher H, Grassauer B, Mayerhofer M, Koeck A. 2012. Recording of direct health traits in Austria–experience report with emphasis on aspects of availability for breeding purposes. J Dairy Sci. 95(5):2765–2777. S doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis KA, Billington K, McNeil B, McKeegan DE. 2009. Public opinion on UK milk marketing and dairy cow welfare. Anim Welf. 18(3):267–282. S doi: 10.1017/S096272860000052X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Council Directive. 2008/119/EC of 18 December 2008. Laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves, Art. 3, 2008/119/EC [accessed 2023 Mar 30]. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32008L0119&fro m=DE.
   Google Scholar
• FAWC Farm Animal Welfare Council. 2009. Farm Animal Welfare Council web archive. [accessed 2023 Apr 26]: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20121010012427/. http://www.fawc. org.uk/freedoms.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Firth CL, Laubichler C, Schleicher C, Fuchs K, Käsbohrer A, Egger-Danner C, Köfer J, Obritzhauser W. 2019. Relationship between the probability of veterinary-diagnosed bovine mastitis occurring and farm management risk factors on small dairy farms in Austria. J Dairy Sci. 102(5):4452–4463. S doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulwider WK, Grandin T, Garrick DJ, Engle TE, Lamm WD, Dalsted NL, Rollin BE. 2007. Influence of free-stall base on tarsal joint lesions and hygiene in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 90(7):3559–3566. S doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez A, Cook NB. 2010. Time budgets of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall herds. J Dairy Sci. 93(12):5772–5781. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling RJ. 2018. A review of cleaning and disinfection studies in farming environments. Livestock. 23(5):232–237. doi: 10.12968/live.2018.23.5.232.
   Google Scholar
• Governo Italiano. [17 luglio 2020. ]; Ministero dell’agricoltura, della sovranità alimentare e delle foreste [accessed 2023 June 19] https://www.politicheagricole.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/18448.
   Google Scholar
• Grant R, Miner WH. 2015. Economic benefits of improved cow comfort. [accessed 2023 Mar 28]. http://www.dairychallenge.org/pdfs/2015_National/resources/Novus_Economic_B enefits_of_Improved_Cow_Comfort_April_2015. pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn GJ, Heffernan C, Hall M, McLeod A, Hovi M. 2008. Measuring and comparing constraints to improved biosecurity amongst GB farmers, veterinarians and the auxiliary industries. Prev Vet Med. 84(3-4):310–323. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson GM. 1993. Effects of daily exercise on the health of tied dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 17(3-4):209–223. doi: 10.1016/0167-5877(93)90030-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell MJ, Rennie LJ, Bowell VA, Bell MJ, Lawrence AB. 2006. Housing system, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89(11):4259–4266. S doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72472-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Beveridge L, Matthews LR. 1995. The welfare of extensively managed dairy cattle: a review. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 42(3):161–182. S doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00538-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Mendo O, Keyserlingk MAGv, Veira DM, Weary DM. 2007. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 90(3):1209–1214. S doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71608-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husfeldt AW, Endres MI. 2012. Association between stall surface and some animal welfare measurements in freestall dairy herds using recycled manure solids for bedding. J Dairy Sci. 95(10):5626–5634. S doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFC. 2015. Good practice note: improving animal welfare in livestock operations. [accessed 2023 Mar 2] https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/958081468320947271/good-practice-note-improving- animal-welfare-in-livestock-operations.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen MB, Larsen LE. 2014. Effects of level of social contact on dairy calf behavior and health. J Dairy Sci. 97(8):5035–5044. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenberger K, Rauch E, Erhard M, Reese S, Gauly M. 2020. Evaluating the need for an animal welfare assurance programme in South Tyrolean dairy farming. Ital J Anim Sci. 19(1):1146–1156. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1823897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil NM, Wiederkehr TU, Friedli K, Wechsler B. 2006. Effects of frequency and duration of outdoor exercise on the prevalence of hock lesions in tied Swiss dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 74(2-3):142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koknaroglu H, Akunal T. 2013. Animal welfare: an animal science approach. Meat Sci. 95(4):821–827. S doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn CC, Munksgaard L. 1993. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments II. Lying and lying-down behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 37(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90066-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krohn CC. 1994. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments. III. Grooming, exploration and abnormal behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 42(2):73–86. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)90148-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl S, Flach L, Gauly M. 2020. Economic assessment of small-scale mountain dairy farms in South Tyrol depending on feed intake and breed. Italian J Anim Sci. 19(1):41–50. S doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2019.1691064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton DS, Choudhary A, Bean AG. 2017. Breaking the chain of zoonoses through biosecurity in livestock. Vaccine. 35(44):5967–5973. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiello S, Klotz C, Baroli D, Minero M, Ferrante V, Canali E. 2009. Welfare problems in alpine dairy cattle farms in Alto Adige (Eastern Italian Alps). Italian. J Anim Sci. 8(sup2):628–630. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.628.
   Google Scholar
• Mariottini F, Giuliotti L, Gracci M, Benvenuti MN, Salari F, Arzilli L, Martini M, Roncoroni C, Brajon G. 2022. The ClassyFarm System in Tuscan Beef Cattle Farms and the Association between Animal Welfare Level and Productiv Performance. Animals. 12(15):1924. doi: 10.3390/ani12151924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington DC, USA. [accessed 2023 May 02] http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miele M, Veissier I, Evans A, Botreau R. 2011. Animal welfare: establishing a dialogue between science and society. Anim Welf. 20(1):103–117. doi: 10.1017/S0962728600002475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munksgaard L, Jensen MB, Pedersen LJ, Hansen SW, Matthews L. 2005. Quantifying behavioural priorities—Effects of time constraints on behaviour of dairy cows, Bos taurus. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 92(1-2):3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nöremark M, Frössling J, Lewerin SS. 2013. A survey of visitors on Swedish livestock farms with reference to the spread of animal diseases. BMC Vet Res. 9(1):184. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Connell PS, Giller, W, Meaney. 1989. A comparison of dairy cattle behavioural patterns at pasture and during confinement. [accessed 2023 Mar 24] https://www.jstor.org/stable/25556231?casa_token=bowrjf2staiaaaaa:muob9gb4eigpeexoxq3xhgr4ktamggcavwqz7wmpa6qwi8pw4sbrhxbz49ymbjullkul6e9aafwbparahfkgs zjcxgcmrqiunnilolvqkdpgl25n8te.
   Google Scholar
• Ofner-Schröck Schröck. 2018. Handbuch Rinder: selbstevaluierung Tierschutz [Handbook Cattle: Self-evaluation animal welfare] Fachstelle für tiergerechte Haltung und Tierschutz. Bundesministerium für Arbeit, Soziales, Gesundheit und Konsumentenschutz. [accessed 2023 Mar 21] https://www.ttgd.at/images/SelbstevaluierungTierschutz/Checkliste2018/tierschutzkonform.at-handbuch-rinder-handbuch-rinder-2auflage2018-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos G, Boyle L, Hanlon A, Patton J, Murphy JJ, Mee JF. 2009. Hoof disorders, locomotion ability and lying times of cubicle-housed compared to pasture-based dairy cows. Livest Sci. 125(2-3):199–207. S doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollmann Tschanz. 2006. Leiden-ein Begriff aus dem Tierschutzrecht.[Suffering- a term from animal welfare]. Amtstierärztlicher Dienst Und Lebensmittelkontrolle. 13:234–239. Jg4/2006[accessed 2023 Mar 23] https://www.uabw.de/uploaddoc/cvuafr/leiden_begriff_tierschutz.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu S, Borda C, Diugan EA, Spinu M, Groza IS, Sandru CD. 2013. Dairy cows welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise. Acta Vet Scand. 55(1):43. S. 43. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regula G, Stephan R, Danuser J, Bissig B, Ledergerber U, Lo Fo Wong D, Stärk, KDC. 2003. Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animal-friendly’ pig fattening farms in Switzerland. Vet Rec. 152(3):80–81. S doi: 10.1136/vr.152.3.80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regula G, Danuser J, Spycher B, Wechsler B. 2004. Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med. 66(1-4):247–264. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca-Fernández AI, Ferris CP, González-Rodríguez A. 2013. Short communication. Behavioural activities of two dairy cow genotypes (Holstein-Friesian vs. Jersey x Holstein-Friesian) in two milk production systems (grazing vs. confinement). Span J Agric Res. 11(1):120. S doi: 10.5424/sjar/2013111-2682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford KMD, Langford FM, Jack MC, Sherwood L, Lawrence AB, Haskell MJ. 2008. Hock injury prevalence and associated risk factors on organic and nonorganic dairy farms in the United Kingdom. J Dairy Sci. 91(6):2265–2274. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennereiverband T. 2021. [Annual Report of the South Tyrolean dairy association] [accessed on 03.04.2023] https://www.suedtirolermilch.com/CustomerData/655/Files/Documents/2021_taetigkei tsbericht.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TS, ISO. 2016. 34700: Animal Welfare Management—General Requirements and Guidance for Organizations in the Food Supply Chain. Geneva: international Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe E. 2008. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 113(4):279–297. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke J, Piepers S, Supré K, De Vliegher S. 2014. Pathogen-specific incidence rate of clinical mastitis in Flemish dairy herds, severity, and association with herd hygiene. J Dairy Sci. 97(11):6926–6934. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White SL, Benson GA, Washburn SP, Green JT. 2002. Milk production and economic measures in confinement or pasture systems using seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows. J Dairy Sci. 85(1):95–104. S doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74057-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanon T, De Monte E, Gauly M. 2021. Effects of cattle breed and production system on veterinary diagnoses and administrated veterinary medicine in alpine dairy farms. Italian J Anim Sci. 20(1):1126–1134. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1953410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuliani A, Mair M, Kraševec M, Lora I, Brscic M, Cozzi G, Leeb C, Zupan M, Winckler C, Bovolenta S. 2018. A survey of selected animal-based measures of dairy cattle welfare in the Eastern Alps: toward context-based thresholds. J Dairy Sci. 101(2):1428–1436. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar