Eating time of dairy cows: a study focusing on commercial farms

References

• Aikman PC, Reynolds CK, Beever DE. 2008. Diet digestibility, rate of passage, and eating and rumination behavior of Jersey and Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 91(3):1103–1114. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MS. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 83(7):1598–1624. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75030-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2016. Official Methods of Analysis; AOAC International: Arlington, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Azizi O, Kaufmann O, Hasselmann L. 2009. Relationship between feeding behaviour and feed intake of dairy cows depending on their parity and milk yield. Livest Sci. 122(2-3):156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA. 2018. Invited review: current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 101(6):4762–4784. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley N, Buckley F, Pierce KM, Fahey AG, Mallard BA. 2009. Differences in udder health and immune response traits of Holstein-Friesians, Norwegian Reds, and their crosses in second lactation. J Dairy Sci. 92(2):749–757. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Meir YA, Nikbachat M, Jacoby S, Portnik Y, Levit H, Kleinjan Elazary A, Gershon E, Adin G, Cohen Zinder M, Shabtay A, et al. 2019. Effect of lactation trimester and parity on eating behavior, milk production and efficiency traits of dairy cows. Animal. 13(8):1736–1743. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaissa S, Tuyttens FAM, Plets D, de Pessemier T, Trogh J, Tanghe E, Martens L, Vandaele L, Van Nuffel A, Joseph W, et al. 2019. On the use of on-cow accelerometers for the classification of behaviours in dairy barns. Res Vet Sci. 125:425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchaar C, Hassanat F. 2020. Frequency of diet delivery to dairy cows: effect on nutrient digestion, rumen fermentation, methane production, nitrogen utilization, and milk production. J Dairy Sci. 103(8):7094–7109. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchers MR, Gavigan S, Harbers A, Bewley J. 2021. An evaluation of a novel device for measuring eating, rumination, and inactive behaviors in lactating Holstein dairy cattle. Animal. 15(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavent M, Kuentz-Simonet V, Labenne A, Saracco J. 2012. Orthogonal rotation in PCAMIX. Adv Data Anal Classif. 6(2):131–146. doi: 10.1007/s11634-012-0105-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavent M, Kuentz-Simonet V, Labenne A, Saracco J. 2014. Multivariate analysis of mixed data: the PCAmixdata R package. Accessed February 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4911.
   Google Scholar
• Corazzin M, Romanzin A, Foletto V, Fabro C, Da Borso F, Baldini M, Bovolenta S, Piasentier E. 2021. Heat stress and feeding behaviour of dairy cows in late lactation. Ital J Anim Sci. 20(1):600–610. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2021.1903818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotanch KW, Grant RJ. 2006. Measuring physically effective fiber on-farm to predict cow response. Pages 151–160 in Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Dado RG, Allen MS. 1994. Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 77(1):132–144. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76936-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG, Beauchemin KA. 2005. Frequency of feed delivery affects the behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 88(10):3553–3562. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73040-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 72(1):68–78. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez I, Michalet-Doreau B. 2002. Effect of maturity stage and chopping length of maize silage on particle size reduction in dairy cows. Anim Res. 51(6):445–454. doi: 10.1051/animres:2002040.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris CP, Patterson DC, Gordon FJ, Watson S, Kilpatrick DJ. 2014. Calving traits, milk production, body condition, fertility, and survival of Holstein-Friesian and Norwegian Red dairy cattle on commercial dairy farms over 5 lactations. J Dairy Sci. 97(8):5206–5218. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogsgaard KK, Røntved CM, Sørensen P, Herskin MS. 2012. Sickness behavior in dairy cows during Escherichia coli mastitis. J Dairy Sci. 95(2):630–638. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González LA, Tolkamp BJ, Coffey MP, Ferret A, Kyriazakis I. 2008. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 91(3):1017–1028. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant RJ, Albright JL. 2000. Feeding behaviour. In: Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition. Mello JPF, editor. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK; p. 365–382.
   Google Scholar
• Grant RJ, Ferraretto LF. 2018. Silage review: silage feeding management: silage characteristics and dairy cow feeding behavior. J Dairy Sci. 101(5):4111–4121. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gündel S, Munksgaard L, Looft C, Foldager L. 2022. Comparison of the feeding behaviour of primiparous and multiparous Jersey and Holstein cows kept under equal conditions throughout lactation. J Dairy Res. 89(1):1–7. doi: 10.1017/S0022029922000061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart KD, McBride BW, Duffield TF, DeVries TJ. 2014. Effect of frequency of feed delivery on the behavior and productivity of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 97(3):1713–1724. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmann A, Zehetgruber K, Fuerst-Waltl B, Zollitsch W, Knaus W, Zebeli Q. 2019. Feeding forages with reduced particle size in a total mixed ration improves feed intake, total-tract digestibility, and performance of organic dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 102(10):8839–8849. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger M, Brügemann K, Brandt H, König S. 2019. Associations between precision sensor data with productivity, health and welfare indicator traits in native black and white dual-purpose cattle under grazing conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 212:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang FG, Lin XY, Yan ZG, Hu ZY, Liu GM, Sun YD, Liu XW, Wang ZH. 2017. Effect of dietary roughage level on chewing activity, ruminal pH, and saliva secretion in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 100(4):2660–2671. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston C, DeVries TJ. 2018. Short communication: associations of feeding behavior and milk production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 101(4):3367–3373. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok A, van Middelaar CE, Engel B, van Knegsel ATM, Hogeveen H, Kemp B, de Boer IJM. 2016. Effective lactation yield: a measure to compare milk yield between cows with different dry period lengths. J Dairy Sci. 99(4):2956–2966. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononoff PJ, Heinrichs AJ, Buckmaster DR. 2003. Modification of the Penn State forage and total mixed ration particle separator and the effects of moisture content on its measurements. J Dairy Sci. 86(5):1858–1863. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73773-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leso L, Becciolini V, Rossi G, Camiciottoli S, Barbari M. 2021. Validation of a commercial collar-based sensor for monitoring eating and ruminating behaviour of dairy cows. Animals. 11(10):2852. doi: 10.3390/ani11102852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovarelli D, Bacenetti J, Guarino M. 2020. A review on dairy cattle farming: is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic and social sustainable production? J Clean Prod. 262:121409. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magrin L, Cozzi G, Lora I, Prevedello P, Gottardo F. 2022. Brief research report: how do claw disorders affect activity, body weight, and milk yield of multiparous Holstein dairy cows? Front Vet Sci. 9:824371. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.824371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammi LME, Cavallini D, Fustini M, Fusaro I, Giammarco M, Formigoni A, Palmonari A. 2021. Calving difficulty influences rumination time and inflammatory profile in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 104(1):750–761. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merenda VR, Marques O, Miller-Cushon EK, Dilorenzo N, Laporta J, Chebel RC. 2019. Technical note: validation of a system for monitoring individual behavior in beef heifers. J Anim Sci. 97(12):4732–4736. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens DR. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 80(7):1463–1481. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76075-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munksgaard L, Weisbjerg MR, Henriksen JCS, Løvendahl P. 2020. Changes to steps, lying, and eating behavior during lactation in Jersey and Holstein cows and the relationship to feed intake, yield, and weight. J Dairy Sci. 103(5):4643–4653. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasrollahi SM, Imani M, Zebeli Q. 2016. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of the impact of particle size, level, source and preservation method of forages on chewing behavior and ruminal fermentation in dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 219:144–158. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. edn. Washington, DC: Natl Acad. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oba M, Allen MS. 1999. Evaluation of the importance of digestibility of neutral detergent fiber from forage: effects on dry matter intake and milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 82(3):589–596. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75271-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson CA, Carstens GE, Herring AD, Hale DS, Kayser WC, Miller RK. 2019. Effects of temperament at feedlot arrival and breed type on growth efficiency, feeding behavior, and carcass value in finishing heifers. J Anim Sci. 97(4):1828–1839. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences. 2022. Particle Size Spreadsheet. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. Accessed February 2023. https://extension.psu.edu/penn-state-particle-separator.
   Google Scholar
• Reith S, Hoy S. 2012. Relationship between daily rumination time and estrus of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95(11):6416–6420. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson PH, Campbell Mathews M, Fadel JG. 1999. Influence of storage time and temperature on in vitro digestion of neutral detergent fibre at 48h, and comparison to 48h in sacco neutral detergent fibre digestion. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 80(3-4):257–266. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00062-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson PH, Meyer D. 2010. Total Mixed Ration (TMR) sampling protocol. University of California. Agriculture and Natural Resources-Publication 8413. ANR Communication Services, Davis, Ca.
   Google Scholar
• Romanzin A, Degano L, Vicario D, Spanghero M. 2021. Feeding efficiency and behaviors of Simmental bulls selected for high growth capacity: comparison of bulls with high vs. low residual feed intake. Livest Sci. 249:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanzin A, Florit E, Degano L, Spanghero M. 2022. Feeding efficiency and behaviour of growing bulls from the main Italian dual-purpose breeds. Ital J Anim Sci. 21(1):1611–1621. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2146006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stergiadis S, Allen M, Chen XJ, Wills D, Yan T. 2015. Prediction of nutrient digestibility and energy concentrations in fresh grass using nutrient composition. J Dairy Sci. 98(5):3257–3273. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. 4th Edition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh S, Buckley F, Pierce K, Byrne N, Patton J, Dillon P. 2008. Effects of breed and feeding system on milk production, body weight, body condition score, reproductive performance, and postpartum ovarian function. J Dairy Sci. 91(11):4401–4413. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar