Milk characteristics and milking efficiency in Italian Mediterranean buffalo

References

• Ali AKA, Shook GE. 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. J Dairy Sci. 63(3):487–490. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82959-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambord S, Stoffel MH, Bruckmaier RM. 2010. Teat anatomy affects requirements for udder preparation in Mediterranean buffaloes. J Dairy Res. 77(4):468–473. doi: 10.1017/S0022029910000518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach A, Cabrera V. 2017. Robotic milking: feeding strategies and economic returns. J Dairy Sci. 100(9):7720–7728. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besier J, Lind O, Bruckmaier RM. 2016. Dynamics of teat-end vacuum during machine milking: types, causes and impacts on teat condition and udder health – a literature review. J Appl Anim Res. 44(1):263–272. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2015.1031780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boselli C, De Marchi M, Costa A, Borghese A. 2020. Study of milkability and its relation with milk yield and somatic cell in Mediterranean Italian Waterh Buffalo. Front Vet Sci. 7:432. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil LH, Britten AM. 2001. Vacuum Airflow Measurements from Milking Clusters with 5/8, 3/4, and 7/8 Inch ID outlet to simulate loads produced from unit attachment or unit fall off. 40th National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting; February 11–14, 2001; Reno (NV) incorporated National Mastitis Council, Vol. 40, p. 195–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bueso-Ródenas J, Tangorra FM, Romero G, Guidobono-Cavalchini A, Díaz JR. 2016. Effects of pulsation type (alternate and simultaneous) on mechanical milking of dairy goats (I): a study in Alpine goats varying the system vacuum level. Small Rumin Res. 144:300–304. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caria M, Murgia L, Pazzona A. 2011. Effects of the working vacuum level on mechanical milking of buffalo. J Dairy Sci. 94(4):1755–1761. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogato A, Brščić M, Guo H, Marinello F, Pezzuolo A. 2021. Challenges and tendencies of Automatic Milking Systems (AMS): a 20-years systematic review of literature and patents. Animals (Basel). 11(2):356. doi: 10.3390/ani11020356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conte G, Dimauro C, Serra A, Macciotta NPP, Mele M. 2018. A canonical discriminant analysis to study the association between milk fatty acids of ruminal origin and milk fat depression in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 101(7):6497–6510. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Bovenhuis H, Penasa M. 2020. Changes in milk lactose content as indicators for longevity and udder health in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 103(12):11574–11584. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, De Marchi M, Visentin G, Campagna MC, Borghese A, Boselli C. 2020. The effect of pre-milking stimulation on teat morphological parameters and milk traits in the Italian Water Buffalo. Front Vet Sci. 7:572422. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.572422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz JR, Peris C, Rodríguez M, Molina MP, Fernández N. 2004. Effect of milking pipeline height on machine milking efficiency and milk quality in sheep. J Dairy Sci. 87(6):1675–1683. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73320-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Occhio MJ, Ghuman SS, Neglia G, Della Valle G, Baruselli PS, Zicarelli L, Visintin JA, Sarkar M, Campanile G. 2020. Exogenous and endogenous factors in seasonality of reproduction in buffalo: a review. Theriogenology. 150:186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzidic A, Rovai M, Poulet JL, Leclerc M, Marnet PG. 2019. Review: milking routines and cluster detachment levels in small ruminants. Animal. 13(S1):s86–s93. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernández N, Martí JV, Rodríguez M, Peris C, Balasch S. 2020. Machine milking parameters for Murciano-Granadina breed goats. J Dairy Sci. 103(1):507–513. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferneborg S, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. 2015. The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking. J Dairy Res. 82(4):453–459. doi: 10.1017/S0022029915000515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox LK. 2009. Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of heifer mastitis. Vet Microbiol. 134(1–2):82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson DE, O’Callaghan EJ, Rath MV. 2004. Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography. Ir Vet J. 57(5):289–296. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-57-5-289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAR. 2022. Section 2 - guidelines for dairy cattle milk recording. In the ICAR Recording Guidelines approved on May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• International Dairy Federation. 2005. Evaluating milking performances. IDF bulletin 396/2005. Brussels, Belgium: IDF; p. 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kunc P, Knížková I, Koubková M, Flusser J, Doležal O. 2000. Thermographic observation of the mammary gland responses to machine milking in dairy cows. Physiol Res. 4:21.
   Google Scholar
• Lollivier V, Guinard-Flament J, Ollivier-Bousquet M, Marnet PG. 2002. Oxytocin and milk removal: two important sources of variation in milk production and milk quality during and between milkings. Reprod Nutr Dev. 42(2):173–186. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2002016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahle DE, Galton DM, Adkinson RW. 1982. Effects of vacuum and pulsation ratio on udder health. J Dairy Sci. 65(7):1252–1257. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82338-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzur A, Díaz JR, Mehdid A, Fernández N, Peris C. 2012. Effect of mid-line or low-line milking systems on milking characteristics in goats. J Dairy Res. 79(3):375–382. doi: 10.1017/S0022029912000362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matera R, Conte G, Cotticelli A, Pascarella L, Tondo A, De Luise L, Campanile G. 2023. Milking parameters related to mammary gland health and milk characteristics in Italian Mediterranean buffalo. Ital J Anim Sci. 22:163.
   Google Scholar
• Meffe N. 1994. Lipolysis in cows’ milk: better prevention by a fuller understanding the mechanisms and the causes. Recueil de medecine veterinaire (France).
   Google Scholar
• Mein GA. 2012. The role of the milking machine in mastitis control. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 28(2):307–320. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørstebø H, Rachah A, Dalen G, Østerås O, Whist AC, Nødtvedt A, Reksen O. 2019. Large-scale cross-sectional study of relationships between somatic cell count and milking-time test results in different milking systems. Prev Vet Med. 165:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan EJ. 1998. Effects of pulsation characteristics on machine yield, milking time and cluster stability. Irish J Agric Food Res. 37:201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odorčić M, Rasmussen MD, Paulrud CO, Bruckmaier RM. 2019. Review: milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows. Animal. 13(S1):s94–s99. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ontsouka CE, Bruckmaier RM, Blum JW. 2003. Fractionized milk composition during removal of colostrum and mature milk. J Dairy Sci. 86(6):2005–2011. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73789-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyörälä S. 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet Res. 34(5):565–578. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2003026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen MD. 1993. Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health. J Dairy Res. 60(3):287–297. doi: 10.1017/s0022029900027631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinemann DJ, Van Den Borne BHP, Hogeveen H, Wiedemann M, Paulrud CO. 2021. Effects of flow-controlled vacuum on milking performance and teat condition in a rotary milking parlor. J Dairy Sci. 104(6):6820–6831. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero G, Peris C, Fthenakis GC, Diaz JR. 2020. Effects of machine milking on udder health in dairy ewes. Small Rumin Res. 188:106096. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønningen O. 2002. Milkline vacuum stability in milking machine installations. J Dairy Res. 69(4):501–509. doi: 10.1017/s0022029902005812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer C, Feierabend M, Bruckmaier RM. 2020. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 103(10):9250–9260. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangorra FM, Zaninelli M, Costa A, Agazzi A, Savoini G. 2010. Milk electrical conductivity and mastitis status in dairy goats: results from a pilot study. Small Rum Res. 90(1–3):109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CS, Bruckmaier RM, Östensson K, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. 2005. Effect of different milking routines on milking-related release of the hormones oxytocin, prolactin and cortisol, and on milk yield and milking performance in Murrah buffaloes. J Dairy Res. 72(1):10–18. doi: 10.1017/s0022029904000457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CS, Svennersten-Sjaunja KR, Bhosrekar M, Bruckmaier RM. 2004. Mammary cisternal size, cisternal milk and milk ejection in Murrah buffaloes. J Dairy Res. 71(2):162–168. doi: 10.1017/s0022029904000081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermaak P, Petzer IM, Karzis J. 2023. Effects of milking machine settings and teat liners on bovine udder health. SA J an Sci. 52(4):421–432. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v52i4.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar