Environmental impact of Italian pig herds as affected by farm management factors

References

• Anderson MJ. 2005. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Vol. 26. Auckland: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland. pp. 32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Battini F, Agostini A, Tabaglio V, Amaducci S. 2016. Environmental impacts of different dairy farming systems in the Po Valley. J Clean Prod. 112:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bava L, Zucali M, Sandrucci A, Tamburini A. 2017. Environmental impact of the typical heavy pig production in Italy. J Clean Prod. 140:685–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berton M, Gallo L, Carcò G, Schiavon S, Sturaro E. 2018. Effect of genetic type and low protein diets on the environmental footprint of intensive medium-heavy pig production system. j Cent Eur Agric. 19(4):852–857. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/19.4.2345.
   Google Scholar
• Berton M, Sturaro E, Schiavon S, Cecchinato A, Gallo L. 2023. Management factors affecting the environmental impact of cereal-based dairy farms. Ital J Anim Sci. 22(1):497–512. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2023.2213254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonk Consultants. 2020. Agri-Footprint – Part 2 – description of data – version D1.0. The Netherlands: Gouda.
   Google Scholar
• Bosi P, Russo V. 2004. The production of the heavy pig for high quality processed products. Ital J Anim Sci. 3(4):309–321. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2004.309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcò G, Schiavon S, Casiraghi E, Grassi S, Sturaro E, Dalla Bona M, Novelli E, Gallo L. 2019. Influence of dietary protein content on the chemico-physical profile of dry-cured hams produced by pigs of two breeds. Sci Rep. 9(1):19068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55760-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caro D, Davis SJ, Kebreab E, Mitloehner F. 2018. Land-use change emissions from soybean feed embodied in Brazilian pork and poultry meat. J Clean Prod. 172:2646–2654. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti C, Costantini M, Fusi A, Manzardo A, Guarino M, Bacenetti J. 2021. Environmental impact of pig production affected by wet acid scrubber as mitigation technology. Sustain Prod Consum. 28:580–590. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center of Environmental Science (CML). 2016. CML-IA database, characterisation and normalisation factors for midpoint impact category indicators, version 4.8. [accessed 2023 April 11]. http://www.cml.leiden.edu/software/data-cmlia.html
   Google Scholar
• Dorca-Preda T, Mogensen L, Kristensen T, Knudsen MT. 2021. Environmental impact of Danish pork at slaughterhouse gate–a life cycle assessment following biological and technological changes over a 10-year period. Livest Sci. 251:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Environmental Agency (EEA). 2019. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook – Technical Report 13/2019. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves LAC, Monteiro ANTR, Sitanaka NY, Oliveira PC, Castilha LD, Paula VRC, Pozza PC. 2021. The reduction of crude protein with the supplementation of amino acids in the diet reduces the environmental impact of growing pigs production evaluated through life cycle Assessment. Sustainability. 13(9):4815. doi: 10.3390/su13094815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) Handbook – general guide for life cycle assessment – detailed guidance. Luxembourg: European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Publications Office of The European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Special Eurobarometer 468. Wave EB88.1 – TNS opinion & social. Brussel, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. COM(2020) 381. Bruxelles, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2020. Livestock environmental assessment and performance (LEAP) partnership. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organisation. [accessed 2023 June 1]. http://www.fao.org/partnerships/leap/en/
   Google Scholar
• Gallo L, Dalla Montà G, Carraro L, Cecchinato A, Carnier P, Schiavon S. 2015. Carcass quality and uniformity of heavy pigs fed restrictive diets with progressive reductions in crude protein and indispensable amino acids. Livest. Sci. 172:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo L, Dalla Bona M, Cecchinato A, Schiavon S. 2017. Effect of growth rate on live performance, carcass and green thigh traits of finishing Italian heavy pigs. Ital J Anim Sci. 16(4):652–658. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1318037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo L, Dalla Montà G, Carraro L, Cecchinato A, Carnier P, Schiavon S. 2014. Growth performance of heavy pigs fed restrictively diets with decreasing crude protein and indispensable amino acids content. Livest Sci. 161:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-García S, Belo S, Dias AC, Rodrigues JV, Da Costa RR, Ferreira A, Pinto de Andrade L, Arroja L. 2015. Life cycle assessment of pigmeat production: portuguese case study and proposal of improvement options. J Clean Prod. 100:126–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INRA-CIRAD-AFZ. 2021. Composition and nutritive values of feeds for cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, poultry, rabbits, horses and salmonids. (accessed 2023 May 23).
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2019. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories - Volume. 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use – refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA). 2020. Listini prezzi CUN. (Accessed 2023 June 1). https://www.listinicun.it/pages/Home?cod=1
   Google Scholar
• Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA). 2023. Settore suinicolo – scheda di settore. Rome, Italy: ISMEA
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). 2006. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Istituto nazionale di statistica (ISTAT). 2023. Consistenza degli allevamenti. (Accessed 2023 June 1). http://dati.istat.it/
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaars JJMH, Van der Meer HG. 1999. Establishment of criteria for the assessment of the nitrogen content of animal manures. Report 14: Final report to ERM. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Plant Research International.
   Google Scholar
• Malgwi IH, Gallo L, Halas V, Bonfatti V, Carcò G, Sasso CP, Carnier P, Schiavon S. 2021. The implications of changing age and weight at slaughter of heavy pigs on carcass and green ham quality traits. Animals. 11(8):2447. doi: 10.3390/ani11082447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe GA, Chapman DV, Sage CL. 2016. A thematic review of life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pig production. Environ Impact Asses. 56:12–22. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordenti AL, Martelli G, Brogna N, Nannoni E, Vignola G, Zaghini G, Sardi L. 2012. Effects of a soybean-free diet supplied to Italian heavy pigs on fattening performance, and meat and dry-cured ham quality. Ital J Anim Sci. 11(4):e80. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2012.e80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhre G, Shindell D, Bréon FM, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J, Koch D, Lamarque JF, Lee D, Mendoza B, et al. 2013. Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemecek T, Kägi T. 2007. Life cycle inventories for Swiss and European agricultural production system. – Final report Ecoinvent no 15. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2021. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 8th ed. United States: National Academies Press
   Google Scholar
• Pirlo G, Carè S, Della Casa G, Marchetti R, Ponzoni G, Faeti V, Fantin V, Masoni P, Buttol P, Zerbinatti L, et al. 2016. Environmental impact of heavy pig production in a sample of Italian farms. A cradle to farm-gate analysis. Sci Total Environ. 565:576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen HD, Kristensen VF. 1998. Standard values for farm manure. A revaluation of the Danish standard values concerning the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of manure. Report n.7. Tjele, Denmark: Animal Husbandry, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Morlacchini M, Cerioli C, Masoero F. 2011. Pea (Pisum sativum) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds as protein sources in growing-finishing heavy pig diets: effect on growth performance, carcass characteristics and on fresh and seasoned Parma ham quality. Ital J Anim Sci. 10(4):e45. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2011.e45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruckli AK, Dippel S, Durec N, Gebska M, Guy J, Helmerichs J, Leeb C, Vermeer H, Hörtenhuber S. 2021. Environmental sustainability assessment of pig farms in selected european countries: combining lca and key performance indicators for biodiversity assessment. Sustainability. 13(20):11230. doi: 10.3390/su132011230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2013. SAS 9.4. Cary, New York, USA: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, cattle, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, fish. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavon S, Carraro L, Dalla Bona M, Cesaro G, Carnier P, Tagliapietra F, Sturaro E, Galassi G, Malagutti L, Trevisi E, et al. 2015. Growth performance, and carcass and raw ham quality of crossbred heavy pigs from four genetic groups fed low protein diets for dry-cured ham production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 208:170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavon S, Bona MD, Carcò G, Sturaro E, Gallo L. 2019. Responses of pigs of different genotypes to a variation in the dietary indispensable amino acid content in terms of their growth and carcass and meat quality traits. Animals, 9(8), 508. doi: 10.3390/ani9080508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavon S, Malgwi IH, Giannuzzi D, Galassi G, Rapetti L, Carnier P, Halas V, Gallo L. 2022. Impact of rearing strategies on the metabolizable energy and SID lysine partitioning in pigs growing from 90 to 200 kg in body weight. Animals. 12(6):689. doi: 10.3390/ani12060689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfeld H, Gerber PJ, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C. 2006. Livestock’s long shadow—Environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo K, Baert L, Bracquené E, De Tavernier J, Geeraerd A. 2021. The influence of farm characteristics and feed compositions on the environmental impact of pig production in flanders: productivity, energy use and protein choices are key. Sustainability. 13(21):11623. doi: 10.3390/su132111623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B, Reinhard J, Moreno-Ruiz E, Weidema B. 2016. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 21(9):1218–1230. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Sharma P, Shu S, Lin TS, Ciais P, Tubiello FN, Smith P, Campbell N, Jain AK. 2021. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat Food. 2(9):724–732. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zira S, Rydhmer L, Ivarsson E, Hoffmann R, Röös E. 2021. A life cycle sustainability assessment of organic and conventional pork supply chains in Sweden. Sustain Prod Consum. 28:21–38. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar