Developing a tool to optimize research on antioxidants for rooster semen cryopreservation

References

• Alvarez M, Tamayo-Canul J, Anel E, Boixo J, Mata-Campuzano M, Martinez-Pastor F, Anel L, de Paz P. 2012. Sperm concentration at freezing affects post-thaw quality and fertility of ram semen. Theriogenology. 77(6):1111–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini MR, Kohram H, Zare-Shahaneh A, Zhandi M, Sharideh H, Nabi MM. 2015. The effects of different levels of catalase and superoxide dismutase in modified Beltsville extender on rooster post-thawed sperm quality. Cryobiology. 70(3):226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anuthama K, Shankar S, Ilayaraja V, Kumar GS, Rajmohan M, Vignesh. 2011. Determining dental sex dimorphism in South Indians using discriminant function analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 212(1-3):86–89. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arando A, Delgado JV, Bermúdez‐Oria A, León JM, Fernández‐Prior Á, Nogales S, Pérez‐Marín CC. 2020. Effect of olive‐derived antioxidants (3, 4‐dihydroxyphenylethanol and 3, 4 dihydroxyphenylglycol) on sperm motility and fertility in liquid ram sperm stored at 15° C or 5° C. Reprod Domest Anim. 55(3):325–332. doi: 10.1111/rda.13631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asano A, Tajima A. 2017. Development and preservation of avian sperm. In: Sasanami T, editor. Avian reproduction: from behavior to molecules. Singapore: Springer; p. 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz D, Ahlswede L, Enbergs H. 2005. Application of MTT reduction assay to evaluate equine sperm viability. Theriogenology. 64(6):1350–1356. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz N, Saleh RA, Sharma RK, Lewis-Jones I, Esfandiari N, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. 2004. Novel association between sperm reactive oxygen species production, sperm morphological defects, and the sperm deformity index. Fertil Steril. 81(2):349–354. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bréque C, Surai P, Brillard JP. 2003. Roles of antioxidants on prolonged storage of avian spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev. 66(3):314–323. doi: 10.1002/mrd.10347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillard J. 2003. Practical aspects of fertility in poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J. 59(4):441–446. doi: 10.1079/WPS20030027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucak MN, Sarıözkan S, Tuncer PB, Ulutaş PA, Akçadağ Hİ. 2009. Effect of antioxidants on microscopic semen parameters, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant activities in Angora goat semen following cryopreservation. Small Rumin Res. 81(2-3):90–95. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary D, Vadlamudi V, Singh U. 2017. Research output of veterinary and animal sciences as seen from the Indian Veterinary Journal. Library Waves. 3(2):129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Dai C, Zhang Z, Shan G, Chu L-T, Huang Z, Moskovtsev S, Librach C, Jarvi K, Sun Y. 2021. Advances in sperm analysis: techniques, discoveries and applications. Nat Rev Urol. 18(8):447–467. doi: 10.1038/s41585-021-00472-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David I, Kohnke P, Lagriffoul G, Praud O, Plouarboué F, Degond P, Druart X. 2015. Mass sperm motility is associated with fertility in sheep. Anim Reprod Sci. 161:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. 2006. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 295(1):90–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee GF, Bertschinger H, Donoghue AM, Blanco J, Soley J. 2004. Reproduction in nondomestic birds: physiology, semen collection, artificial insemination and cryopreservation. Avian & Poul Biolog Rev. 15(2):47–101. doi: 10.3184/147020604783637435.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan L, Kroetsch T, Maxwell WC, Evans G. 2008. Assessment of in vitro sperm characteristics in relation to fertility in dairy bulls. Anim Reprod Sci. 103(3-4):201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Arando A, Acosta A, Alcalá CJ, Arrebola FA, Pérez-Marín CC. 2019. Frozen dog spermatozoa are negatively affected during storage at-80, -21 and -8 °C. Anim Reprod Sci. 210:106197. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, León Jurado JM, Navas González FJ, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2021. Discriminant canonical tool for differential biometric characterization of multivariety endangered hen breeds. Animals. 11(8):2211. doi: 10.3390/ani11082211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, Navas González FJ, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2021. Discriminant canonical analysis as a validation tool for multivariety native breed egg commercial quality classification. Foods. 10(3):632. doi: 10.3390/foods10030632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, Navas González FJ, León Jurado JM, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2022. Data mining-based discriminant analysis as a tool for the study of egg quality in native hen breeds. Sci Rep. 12(1):15873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20111-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, Navas González FJ, Nogales Baena S, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2021. The study of growth and performance in local chicken breeds and varieties: a review of methods and scientific transference. Animals. 11(9):2492. doi: 10.3390/ani11092492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Navas González FJ, Arando Arbulu A, León Jurado JM, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2022. Variability of meat and carcass quality from worldwide native chicken breeds. Foods. 11(12):1700. doi: 10.3390/foods11121700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Navas González FJ, Arando Arbulu A, León Jurado JM, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2022. Discriminant canonical analysis as a tool to determine traces of endangered native hen breed introgression through egg hatchability phenomics. Anim Biosci. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González Ariza A, Navas González FJ, León Jurado JM, Arando Arbulu A, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2022. Data mining as a tool to infer chicken carcass and meat cut quality from autochthonous genotypes. Animals. 12(19):2702. doi: 10.3390/ani12192702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias Pastrana C, Navas González FJ, Ciani E, Barba Capote CJ, Delgado Bermejo JV. 2020. Effect of research impact on emerging camel husbandry, welfare and social-related awareness. Animals. 10(5):780. doi: 10.3390/ani10050780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimowicz M, Nizanski W, Batkowski F, Savic M. 2008. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS). Theriogenology. 70(1):77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauskopf E, Garcia F, Funk R. 2017. Bibliometric analysis of multi-language veterinary journals. Transinformação. 29(3):343–353. doi: 10.1590/2318-08892017000300011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruit SA, de Bruijn DS, Broekhuijse ML, Olthuis W, Segerink LI. 2022. Label-free microfluidic impedance cytometry for acrosome integrity assessment of boar spermatozoa. Biosensors. 12(9):679. doi: 10.3390/bios12090679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin H, Liaw R, Chen Y, Kang T, Lin D, Chen L, Wu M. 2019. Evaluation of cockerel spermatozoa viability and motility by a novel enzyme based cell viability assay. Br Poult Sci. 60(4):467–471. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2018.1426832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Hu G, Gu M. 2016. The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. Scientometrics. 106(3):1273–1276. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1821-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J. 2006. Avian semen cryopreservation: what are the biological challenges? Poult Sci. 85(2):232–236. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longobardi V, Zullo G, Salzano A, De Canditiis C, Cammarano A, De Luise L, Puzio MV, Neglia G, Gasparrini B. 2017. Resveratrol prevents capacitation-like changes and improves in vitro fertilizing capability of buffalo frozen-thawed sperm. Theriogenology. 88:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.09.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G, Sabido O, Durand P, Levy R. 2004. Cryopreservation induces an apoptosis-like mechanism in bull sperm. Biol Reprod. 71(1):28–37. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.024281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell W, Evans G, Mortimer S, Gillan L, Gellatly E, McPhie C. 1999. Normal fertility in ewes after cervical insemination with frozen–thawed spermatozoa supplemented with seminal plasma. Reprod Fertil Dev. 11(2):123–126. doi: 10.1071/rd99046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean AK, Gonzalez FJN. 2018. Can scientists influence donkey welfare? Historical perspective and a contemporary view. J Equine Vet Sci. 65:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2018.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdipour M, Kia HD, Martínez-Pastor F. 2020. Poloxamer 188 exerts a cryoprotective effect on rooster sperm and allows decreasing glycerol concentration in the freezing extender. Poult Sci. 99(11):6212–6220. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdipour M, Kia HD, Najafi A, Mohammadi H, Álvarez-Rodriguez M. 2020. Effect of crocin and naringenin supplementation in cryopreservation medium on post-thaw rooster sperm quality and expression of apoptosis associated genes. PLOS One. 15(10):e0241105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda R, Garcia-Carpintero E. 2019. Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas. Scientometrics. 121(1):479–501. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03210-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocé E, Lavara R, Vicente JS. 2010. Effect of cooling rate to 5 C, straw size and farm on fertilizing ability of cryopreserved rabbit sperm. Reprod Domest Anim. 45(5):e1–e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghbeli M, Kohram H, Zare-Shahaneh A, Zhandi M, Sharafi M, Nabi MM, Zahedi V, Sharideh H. 2016. Are the optimum levels of the catalase and vitamin E in rooster semen extender after freezing-thawing influenced by sperm concentration? Cryobiology. 72(3):264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi A, Mehdipour M, Mohammadi H, Mehdipour Z, Khorrami B, Nazari M. 2022. Effect of tempol and straw size on rooster sperm quality and fertility after post-thawing. Sci Rep. 12(1):12192. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16507-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura Y. 2017. Avian biotechnology. In: Sasanami T, editor. Avian reproduction: from behaviour to molecules. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; p. 187–214.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda MA, Seminar KB, Nandika D, Maddu A. 2018. Discriminant analysis as a tool for detecting the acoustic signals of termites Coptotermes curvignathus (Isoptera: rhinotermitidae). IJTech. 9(4):840–851. doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v9i4.455.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento J, Raphael CF, Andrade A, Alonso M, Celeghini ECC, Arruda R. 2008. Effects of sperm concentration and straw volume on motion characteristics and plasma, acrosomal, and mitochondrial membranes of equine cryopreserved spermatozoa. J Equine Vet Sci. 28(6):351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2008.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas CM, Delgado Bermejo JV, McLean AK, León Jurado JM, Rodriguez de la Borbolla y Ruiberriz de Torres A, Navas González FJ. 2021. Discriminant canonical analysis of the contribution of Spanish and Arabian purebred horses to the genetic diversity and population structure of Hispano-Arabian horses. Animals. 11(2):269. doi: 10.3390/ani11020269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nöthling JO, Shuttleworth R. 2005. The effect of straw size, freezing rate and thawing rate upon post-thaw quality of dog semen. Theriogenology. 63(5):1469–1480. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partyka A, Łukaszewicz E, Niżański W. 2012. Effect of cryopreservation on sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity in fowl semen. Theriogenology. 77(8):1497–1504. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partyka A, Niżański W. 2021. Supplementation of avian semen extenders with antioxidants to improve semen quality—Is it an effective strategy? Antioxidants. 10(12):1927. doi: 10.3390/antiox10121927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña A, Linde-Forsberg C. 2000. Effects of spermatozoal concentration and post-thaw dilution rate on survival after thawing of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 54(5):703–718. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00384-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen J, French A. 2008. Discriminant function analysis. San Francisco (CA): San Francisco State University.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn J, Burrows W. 1936. Artificial insemination in fowls. J Heredity. 27(1):31–38. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a104138.
   Google Scholar
• Rengaraj D, Hong YH. 2015. Effects of dietary vitamin E on fertility functions in poultry species. Int J Mol Sci. 16(5):9910–9921. doi: 10.3390/ijms16059910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengaraj D, Kwon W-S, Pang M-G. 2015. Effects of motor vehicle exhaust on male reproductive function and associated proteins. J Proteome Res. 14(1):22–37. doi: 10.1021/pr500939c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell S, Mrode R. 1994. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 36(1-2):77–86. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(94)90055-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Maes D, de Kruif A. 2003. Effect of technical settings on canine semen motility parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyzer. Theriogenology. 60(8):1553–1568. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00171-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogerson PA. 2001. Data reduction: factor analysis and cluster analysis. Statistical methods for geography. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.; p. 192–197.
   Google Scholar
• Saint Jalme M, Lecoq R, Seigneurin F, Blesbois E, Plouzeau E. 2003. Cryopreservation of semen from endangered pheasants: the first step towards a cryobank for endangered avian species. Theriogenology. 59(3-4):875–888. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01153-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado Pardo JI, González Ariza A, Arando Arbulu A, Navas González FJ, León Jurado JM, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2022. Preliminary results of reproductive traits of the Andalusian turkey. In Proceedings of 7th Mediterranean Poultry Summit, Córdoba, 8-10 June; p. 129.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago-Moreno J, Blesbois E. 2022. Animal board invited review: germplasm technologies for use with poultry. Animal. 16(3):100475. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago-Moreno J, Castaño C, Coloma M, Gómez-Brunet A, Toledano-Díaz A, López-Sebastián A, Campo J. 2009. Use of the hypo-osmotic swelling test and aniline blue staining to improve the evaluation of seasonal sperm variation in native Spanish free-range poultry. Poult Sci. 88(12):2661–2669. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago‐Moreno J, Castaño C, Toledano‐Díaz A, Coloma M, López‐Sebastián A, Prieto M, Campo J. 2012. Influence of season on the freezability of free‐range poultry semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 47(4):578–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01921.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siudzińska A, Łukaszewicz E. 2008. Effect of semen extenders and storage time on sperm morphology of four chicken breeds. J Appl Poult Res. 17(1):101–108. doi: 10.3382/japr.2007-00048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart C, Vaughan J, Kershaw C, De Graaf S, Bathgate R. 2019. Effect of diluent type, cryoprotectant concentration, storage method and freeze/thaw rates on the post-thaw quality and fertility of cryopreserved alpaca spermatozoa. Sci Rep. 9(1):12826. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49203-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun L, He M, Wu C, Zhang S, Dai J, Zhang D. 2021. Beneficial influence of soybean lecithin nanoparticles on rooster frozen–thawed semen quality and fertility. Animals. 11(6):1769. doi: 10.3390/ani11061769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, He M, Xu J, Wu C, Zhang S, Zhang D, Dai J, Gao J. 2022. Does antioxidant mitoquinone (MitoQ) ameliorate oxidative stress in frozen–thawed rooster sperm? Animals. 12(22):3181. doi: 10.3390/ani12223181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surai P, Fujihara N, Speake B, Brillard J, Wishart G, Sparks N. 2001. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in avian semen-Review. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 14(7):1024–1050. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2001.1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surai PF. 2016. Antioxidant systems in poultry biology: superoxide dismutase. J Anim Res Nutr. 1(1):8.
   Google Scholar
• Tai F, Pan W. 2007. Incorporating prior knowledge of gene functional groups into regularized discriminant analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 23(23):3170–3177. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thananurak P, Chuaychu-Noo N, Thélie A, Phasuk Y, Vongpralub T, Blesbois E. 2020. Different concentrations of cysteamine, ergothioneine, and serine modulate quality and fertilizing ability of cryopreserved chicken sperm. Poult Sci. 99(2):1185–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toalombo Vargas PA, Navas González FJ, Landi V, León Jurado JM, Delgado Bermejo JV. 2019. Sexual dimorphism and breed characterization of Creole hens through biometric canonical discriminant analysis across Ecuadorian agroecological areas. Animals. 10(1):32. doi: 10.3390/ani10010032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderrama Á, Jiménez-Contreras E, Valderrama P, Escabias M, Baca P. 2019. Is the trend to publish reviews and clinical trials related to the journal impact factor? Analysis in dentistry field. Account Res. 26(7):427–438. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1672541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderrama P, Escabias M, Valderrama MJ, Jiménez-Contreras E, Baca P. 2020. Influential variables in the journal impact factor of dentistry journals. Heliyon. 6(3):e03575. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Hoek M, Rickard JP, de Graaf SP. 2022. Motility assessment of ram spermatozoa. Biology. 11(12):1715. doi: 10.3390/biology11121715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent P, Underwood SL, Dolbec C, Bouchard N, Kroetsch T, Blondin P. 2014. Bovine semen quality control in artificial insemination centers. Anim Reprod. 9:153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyt P, Maes D, Rijsselaere T, Dejonckheere E, Castryck F, Van Soom A. 2004. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods. Reprod Domestic Animals. 39(6):447–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00538.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelders H. 2021. Cryopreservation of avian semen. In: Wolkers WF, editor. Cryopreservation and freeze-drying protocols. Totowa: Humana Press; p. 379–399.
   Google Scholar
• Wolniak K, Goolsby C, Choi S, Ali A, Serdy N, Stetler‐Stevenson M. 2017. Report of the results of the International Clinical Cytometry Society and American Society for Clinical Pathology workload survey of clinical flow cytometry laboratories. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 92(6):525–533. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung C-H, Cooper TG, Nieschlag E. 1997. A technique for standardization and quality control of subjective sperm motility assessments in semen analysis. Fertil Steril. 67(6):1156–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81455-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Hu J, Bai Z. 2020. Modified Pillai’s trace statistics for two high-dimensional sample covariance matrices. J Stat Plan Inference. 207:255–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2020.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong Y, Li Y, Sun Y, Mehaisen GM, Ma T, Chen J. 2023. Chicken sperm cryopreservation: review of techniques, freezing damage, and freezability mechanisms. Agriculture. 13(2):445. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020445.
   Google Scholar