Genetic diversity and population structure of Canarian chicken using microsatellite DNA markers

References

• Abebe AS, Mikko S, Johansson AM. 2015. Genetic diversity of five local Swedish chicken breeds detected by microsatellite markers. PLoS One. 10(4):e0120580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antos P, Andres K, Kapkowska E. 2013. Preliminary studies on genetic diversity of selected Polish local chicken varieties. J Cent Eur Agric. 14(1):11–22. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/14.1.1147.
   Google Scholar
• Bao W, Shu J, Musa H, Chen G. 2007. Analysis of pairwise genetic distance and its relation with geographical distance of 15 Chinese chicken breeds. Int J Trop Med. 2:107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Belkhir K. 1999. GENETIX, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. http://www univmontp2 fr/∼ genetix.
   Google Scholar
• Belkhir K. 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. http://www genetix univ-montp2 fr/genetix/genetix htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Ceccobelli S, Landi V, Di Lorenzo P, Lasagna E, Ciocchetti M, Şahin E, Mugnai C, Panella F, Sarti FM. 2011. A microsatellites-based survey on the genetic structure of two Italian local chicken breeds. Ital J Anim Sci. 10(3):e39. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2011.e39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capote MP. 2012. Germán González González (1940-2011). Cartas Diferentes: revista Canaria de Patrimonio Documental. 8(8):431–437.
   Google Scholar
• Castro GD, Naranjo JJ, Tosco RB, González DT, Rodríguez F. 2002. Datos sobre la distribución de aves esteparias en Tenerife y Gran Canaria, islas Canarias. Vieraea: folia Scientarum Biologicarum Canariensium.(30):177–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccobelli S, Di Lorenzo P, Lancioni H, Monteagudo Ibáñez LV, Tejedor MT, Castellini C, Landi V, Martínez Martínez A, Delgado Bermejo JV, Vega Pla JL, et al. 2015. Genetic diversity and phylogeographic structure of sixteen Mediterranean chicken breeds assessed with microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Livestock Science. 175:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccobelli S, Lorenzo PD, Lancioni H, Castellini C, Ibáñez LVM, Sabbioni A, Sarti FM, Weigend S, Lasagna E. 2013. Phylogeny, genetic relationships and population structure of five Italian local chicken breeds. Ital J Anim Sci. 12(3):e66. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalvit C, Zanetti E, Cassandro M. 2009. Estimation of genetic diversity over time in an in-situ marker assisted conservation scheme of local chicken breeds. Ital J Anim Sci. 8(sup2):63–65. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s2.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dávila S, Gil M, Resino-Talaván P, Campo J. 2009. Evaluation of diversity between different Spanish chicken breeds, a tester line, and a White Leghorn population based on microsatellite markers. Poult Sci. 88(12):2518–2525. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declaration I. 2007. Global plan of action for animal genetic resources and the Interlaken Declaration. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO: rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Del Giudice M. 2009. Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behav Brain Sci. 32(1):1–21. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eding H, Bennewitz J. 2007. Measuring genetic diversity in farm animals. Utilization and conservation of farm animal genetic resources (ed K Oldenbroek). Oldenbroek (NL): Genetic Resources; p. 103–130.
   Google Scholar
• Einum S, Fleming I. 1997. Genetic divergence and interactions in the wild among native, farmed and hybrid Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol. 50(3):634–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01955.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2006. ARLEQUIN Version 3.01. An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Lab, Institute of Zoology, Switzerland: University of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2011. Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources. Rome, Italy: FAO Animal Production and Health Guidlines.
   Google Scholar
• Fonteque GV, Battilana J, Paludo E, Lima-Rosa C. 2014. Genetic polymorphism of fifteen microsatellite loci in Brazilian (blue-egg Caipira) chickens. Pesq Vet Bras. 34(1):98–102. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2014000100016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Future trends for poultry genetic resources. Proceedings of the International Conference of Poultry in the 21st Century: Avian Influenza and beyond; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Gama L, Martinez A, Ginja C, Cañon J, Martin-Burriel I, Revidatti M, Ribeiro M, Jordana J, Cortes O, Sevane N. 2020. Genetic diversity and structure of iberoamerican livestock breeds. Advances in Animal Health, Medicine and Production. Switzerland: Springer; p. 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• González Ariza A, Navas González FJ, León Jurado JM, Arando Arbulu A, Delgado Bermejo JV, Camacho Vallejo ME. 2022. Data Mining as a Tool to Infer Chicken Carcass and Meat Cut Quality from Autochthonous Genotypes. Animals. 12(19):2702. doi: 10.3390/ani12192702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• mGoudet J. 2001. FSTAT 2.9. 3.2, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices.
   Google Scholar
• Granevitze Z, Hillel J, Chen G, Cuc NTK, Feldman M, Eding H, Weigend S. 2007. Genetic diversity within chicken populations from different continents and management histories. Anim Genet. 38(6):576–583. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01650.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Elston R. 1999. Linkage information content of polymorphic genetic markers. Hum Hered. 49(2):112–118. doi: 10.1159/000022855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halima H, Neser F, Marle-Koster V, De Kock A. 2007. Village-based indigenous chicken production system in north-west Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 39(3):189–197. doi: 10.1007/s11250-007-9004-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 23(2):254–267. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal A, Ali A, Javed K, Akram M, Usman M, Mehmood S, Hussain J, Hussnain F. 2015. Phenotypic characterization of two indigenous chicken ecotypes of Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 25(2):346–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol. 16(5):1099–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladle RJ, Whittaker RJ. 2011. Conservation biogeography. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Langella O. 1999. Populations 1.2. 28: a population genetic software. http://www pge cnrs-gif fr/bioinfo/populations/index php.
   Google Scholar
• Lenstra JA, Groeneveld LF, Eding H, Kantanen J, Williams JL, Taberlet P, Nicolazzi EL, Sölkner J, Simianer H, Ciani E, et al. 2012. Molecular tools and analytical approaches for the characterization of farm animal genetic diversity. Anim Genet. 43(5):483–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02309.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyimo C, Weigend A, Msoffe P, Eding H, Simianer H, Weigend S. 2014. Global diversity and genetic contributions of chicken populations from a frican, a sian and e uropean regions. Anim Genet. 45(6):836–848. doi: 10.1111/age.12230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macri M, Martínez A, Landi V, Canales A, Arando A, Delgado J, Camacho M. 2019. Genetic diversity of Utrerana chicken breed. Actas Iberoamericanas de Conservación Animal. 13:52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol. 19(2):153–170. doi: 10.1007/BF02300753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen Van D, Moula N, Moyse E, Do Duc L, Vu Dinh T, Farnir F. 2020. Productive performance and egg and meat quality of two indigenous poultry breeds in Vietnam, Ho and Dong Tao, fed on commercial feed. Animals. 10(3):408. doi: 10.3390/ani10030408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nxumalo N, Ceccobelli S, Cardinali I, Lancioni H, Lasagna E, Kunene NW. 2020. Genetic diversity, population structure and ancestral origin of KwaZulu-Natal native chicken ecotypes using microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. Ital J Anim Sci. 19(1):1275–1288. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1838350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okumu ON, Ngeranwa J, Binepal Y, Kahi A, Bramwel W, Ateya L, Wekesa F. 2017. Genetic diversity of indigenous chickens from selected areas in Kenya using microsatellite markers. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 15(2):489–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.04.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Özdemir D, Özdemir ED, Marchi MD, Cassandro M. 2013. Conservation of local Turkish and Italian chicken breeds: a case study. Ital J Anim Sci. 12(2):e49. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page RD. 1996. Tree View: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 12(4):357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park S. 2001. The Excel microsatellite toolkit. Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard J, Wen W, Falush D. 2004. Documentation for the STRUCTURE software Version 2. Chicago: Department of Human Genetics University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Wen X, Falush D. 2010. Documentation for structure software: version 2.3. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.p. 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan S, Kayang BB, Inoue E, Nirasawa K, Hayakawa H, Si I, Inoue-Murayama M. 2012. Evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation priorities for Egyptian chickens.
   Google Scholar
• Rege JEO, Gibson JP. 2003. Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation. Ecol Econ. 45(3):319–330. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00087-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds J, Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1983. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics. 105(3):767–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodero Serrano E, Rodero Franganillo A, Delgado-Bermejo J. 1992. Primitive andalusian livestock and their implications in the discovery of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Díaz. 2010. El mito de la gallina jabada. AGROPALCA. 11:88.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg NA. 2004. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes. 4(1):137–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudresh B, Murthy H, Jayashankar M, Nagaraj C, Kotresh A, Byregowda S. 2015. Microsatellite based genetic diversity study in indigenous chicken ecotypes of Karnataka. Vet World. 8(8):970–976. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.970-976.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherf BD, Pilling D. 2015. The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Silva P, Lui JF, Band G, Regitano L, Grossi S, Sollero BP, Nunes C. 2011. Genetic variability among the wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa), crossbred animals and pigs using microsatellite markers (STRs). Braz Arch Biol Technol. 54(2):301–306. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132011000200011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simianer H. 2005. Using expected allele number as objective function to design between and within breed conservation of farm animal biodiversity. J Anim Breed Genet. 122(3):177–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2005.00523.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres AMA, Capote J. 2018a. La Gallina Campera Canaria/Traditional Breed of Canarian Hen. Tenerife: instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias. Capítulo 2. Patrón racial de la población de gallinas Canarias/Chapter 2. Breed standard of the Canarian chicken population. p. 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Torres AMA, Capote J. 2018b. La Gallina Campera Canaria/Traditional Breed of Canarian Hen. Tenerife: instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias. Capítulo 1. Antecedentes históricos de las gallinas en Canarias/Chapter 1.The historical backgrounds of chickens in Canary Islands. p. 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Torres A, Muth PC, Capote J, Rodríguez C, Fresno M, Zárate AV. 2019. Suitability of dual-purpose cockerels of 3 different genetic origins for fattening under free-range conditions. Poult Sci. 98(12):6564–6571. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh PS, Varlaro J, Reynolds R. 1992. A rapid chemiluminescent method for quanititation of human DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 20(19):5061–5065. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.19.5061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigend S, Romanov MN. 2002. The World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity in the context of conservation and utilisation of poultry biodiversity. World’s Poult Sci J. 58(4):411–430. doi: 10.1079/WPS20020031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S, Wiener P, Teverson D, Haley C, Hocking P. 2012. Characterization of the genetic diversity, structure and admixture of British chicken breeds. Anim Genet. 43(5):552–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02296.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. 1951. The genetical structure of species. Ann Eugen. 15(323-354):747.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh FC, Yang R, Boyle T, Ye Z, Mao JX. 1999. POPGENE, version 1.32: the user friendly software for population genetic analysis. Molecular biology and biotechnology centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Zanetti E, De Marchi M, Dalvit C, Cassandro M. 2010. Genetic characterization of local Italian breeds of chickens undergoing in situ conservation. Poult Sci. 89(3):420–427. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar