Participatory approaches and Social Network Analysis to analyse the emergence of collective action for rural development: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees

References

• Acocella I. 2012. The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages. Qual Quant. 46(4):1125–1136. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9600-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali T, Ali J. 2020. Factors affecting the consumers’ willingness to pay for health and wellness food products. J Agric Food Res. 2:100076. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100076.
   Google Scholar
• Baek EC, Hyon R, López K, Finn ES, Porter MA, Parkinson C. 2022. In-degree centrality in a social network is linked to coordinated neural activity. Nat Commun. 13(1):1118. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28432-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baland J, Platteau J. 1998. Division of the Commons: a Partial Assessment of the New Institutional Economics of Land Rights. American J Agri Economics. 80(3):644–650. doi:10.2307/1244574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnaud C, Corbera E, Muradian R, Salliou N, Sirami C, Vialatte A, Choisis J, Dendoncker N, Mathevet R, Moreau C, et al. 2018. Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework. E&S. 23(1):1–14. doi:10.5751/ES-09848-230115.
   Google Scholar
• Barron LJR, Andonegi A, Gamboa G, Garmendia E, García O, Aldai N, Aldezabal A. 2021. Sustainability assessment of pasture-based dairy sheep systems: a multidisciplinary and multiscale approach. Sustain. 13(7):3994. doi:10.3390/su13073994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentivoglio D, Bucci G, Finco A. 2019. Farmers’ general image and attitudes to traditional mountain food labelled: a SWOT analysis. Calitatea. 20(S2):48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bernués A, Riedel JL, Asensio MA, Blanco M, Sanz A, Revilla R, Casasús I. 2005. An integrated approach to studying the role of grazing livestock systems in the conservation of rangelands in a protected natural park (Sierra de Guara, Spain). Livest Prod Sci. 96(1)SPEC. ISS.)::75–85. doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.05.023.
   Google Scholar
• Bernués A, Ruiz R, Olaizola A, Villalba D, Casasús I. 2011. Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: synergies and trade-offs. Livest Sci. 139(1-2):44–57. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram D, Chilla T. 2023. Polycentricity and accessibility in mountain areas: the Alpine case. Eur Plan Stud. 31(12):2425–2445. doi:10.1080/09654313.2022.2145874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech. 2008(10):P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin Ö, Crona BI. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Chang. 19(3):366–374. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin Ö, Prell C. 2011. Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance. Cambridge: cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt RS. 2003. The social structure of competition. In: cross R, Parker A, Sasson L, editors. Networks in the knowledge economy. New York: oxford University Press. p. 13–56.
   Google Scholar
• Butts CT. 2008. Social network analysis: a methodological introduction. Asian J of Social Psycho. 11(1):13–41. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00241.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarero L, Oliva J. 2019. Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities. Palgrave Commun. 5(1):1–7. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0306-x.
   Google Scholar
• Choy LT. 2014. The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology: comparison and Complimentary between Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. IOSRJHSS. 19(4):99–104. doi:10.9790/0837-194399104.
   Google Scholar
• Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C. 2004. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phy Rev E. 70:066111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocca G, Sturaro E, Gallo L, Ramanzin M. 2012. Is the abandonment of traditional livestock farming systems the main driver of mountain landscape change in Alpine areas? Land Use Policy. 29(4):878–886. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connick S, Innes JE. 2003. Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: applying complexity thinking to evaluation. J Environ Plan Manag. 46(2):177–197. doi:10.1080/0964056032000070987.
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer S, Desmarais B. 2011. Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models. Polit Anal. 19(1):66–86. doi:10.1093/pan/mpq037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo J, Réquier-Desjardins D, Vicente J. 2014. Why can collective action fail in Local Agri-food Systems? A social network analysis of cheese producers in Aculco, Mexico. Food Policy. 46:165–177. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crona B, Ernstson H, Prell C, Reed M, Hubacek K. 2012. Combining social newtork with social theories to improve understanding of resource governance. In: Örjan B, Prell C (editors). Social Newtorks and Natural Resource Management: uncovering the Social Fabric in Environmental Governance. Cambridge, UK: cambridge University Press. pp p. 44–72.
   Google Scholar
• Csardi G. 2006. The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research. Int j Complex Syst. 1695(5):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich G, Winter PL. 2003. Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environ Behav. 35(2):286–307. doi:10.1177/0013916502250139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Vial I, Montoro-Sánchez Á. 2014. Social capital as a driver of local knowledge exchange: a social network analysis. Knowl Manag Res Pract. 12(3):276–288. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2014.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott J, Heesterbeek S, Lukensmeyer CJ, Slocum-Bradley N. 2006. Participatory Methods Toolkit. A practitioner’s manual. (Second edition). Brussels: king Baudouin Foundation, The Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment (viWTA).
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 62(1):107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D. 2012. qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J Stat Softw. 48(4):1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstson H, Sörlin S, Elmqvist T. 2008. Social movements and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc. 13(2):1–13. doi:10.5751/ES-02589-130239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2018. “Alps2050 – Common Spatial Perspectives for the Alpine Area. Towards a Common Vision.” Final report. https://www.espon.eu/Alps2050.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2008. Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas. Final study report. European Communities, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Farm to Fork Strategy: for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System; European Union: Brussels, Belgium. https://food.ec.europa.eu/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en.
   Google Scholar
• Everett MG, Valente TW. 2016. Bridging, brokerage and betweenness. Soc Networks. 44:202–208. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccioni G, Sturaro E, Ramanzin M, Bernués A. 2019. Socio-economic valuation of abandonment and intensification of Alpine agroecosystems and associated ecosystem services. Land Use Policy. 81:453–462. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippini R, Marescotti ME, Demartini E, Gaviglio A. 2020. Social networks as drivers for technology adoption: a study from a rural mountain area in Italy. Sustainability. 12(22):9392. doi:10.3390/su12229392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Martínez A, Olaizola A, Bernués A. 2009. Trajectories of evolution and drivers of change in European mountain cattle farming systems. Animal. 3(1):152–165. doi:10.1017/S1751731108003297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Nieto AP, Huland E, Quintas-Soriano C, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Martín-Lópezb B. 2019. Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services. Ecosyst People. 15(1):257–268. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez D, de Juana AJA, Estaqué FF, Borruel A. Situación poblacional y económica en tres valles pirenaicos con pasado milenario común y distintos modos de desarrollo reciente. Opiniones de la población y efectos ecológicos. In Valero Matas JA, Orejas Casas JA, Ortego Osa J, editors. 2020. Patrimonio cultural, sostenibilidad y desarrollo humano en lo rural. Valencia, España: tirant Humanidades. p. 229–264.
   Google Scholar
• Gretter A, Torre CD, Maino F, Omizzolo A. 2019. New Farming as an Example of Social Innovation Responding to Challenges of Inner Mountain Areas of Italian Alps. RGA . 107(2):0–16. doi:10.4000/rga.6106.
   Google Scholar
• Grootaert C, Van Bastelar T. 2002. Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: a Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Washington, DC: The World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/14098.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K. 2006. Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol. 34(4):573–592. doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handcock MS, Hunter DR, Butts CT, Goodreau SM, Morris M. 2008. statnet: software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. J Stat Softw. 24(1):1548–7660. doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i01.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen DL, Shneiderman B, Smith MA, Himelboim I, Hansen DL, Shneiderman B, Smith MA, Himelboim I. 2020. Social network analysis: measuring, mapping, and modeling collections of connections. In. editors. Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL. p. 31–51. Morgan Kaufmann Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817756-3.00003-0.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich N, Henrich J. 2007. Why Humans Cooperate: a Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation. New York: oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horrillo A, Gaspar P, Escribano M. 2020. Organic farming as a strategy to reduce carbon footprint in dehesa agroecosystems: a case study comparing different livestock products. Animals (Basel). 10(1):162. doi:10.3390/ani10010162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hua L, Yang Z, Shao J. 2022. Impact of network density on the efficiency of innovation networks: an agent-based simulation study. PLoS One. 17(6):e0270087. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang F, Zhang M, Li Y. 2018. A comparison study of tie non-response treatments in social networks analysis. Front Psychol. 9:2766. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Lv T, Zhang X, Yang Y, Zheng W, Wen C. 2014. Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. PLoS One. 9(8):e103733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman M. 2009. Imputation of missing network data: some simple procedures. J Soc Structure. 10(1):1–29. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_394.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D, Handcock M, Butts C, Goodreau S, Morris M. 2008. ergm: a Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. J Stat Softw. 24(3):nihpa54860. doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK. 2005. Social capital networks, and knowledge transfer. AMR. 30(1):146–165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159100. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281445.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers SC, Harring N, Löfgren Å, Sjöstedt M, Alpizar F, Brülde B, Langlet D, Nilsson A, Almroth BC, Dupont S, et al. 2020. On the preconditions for large-scale collective action. Ambio. 49(7):1282–1296. doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01284-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana R, Bandyopadhyay S, Choudhuri AK. 2013. Reciprocity among Farmers in Farming System Research: application of Social Network Analysis. J Hum Ecol. 41(1):45–51. doi:10.1080/09709274.2013.11906552.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen TD, Forney KJ, Hall JA, Giles SM. 2018. Using modern methods for missing data analysis with the social relations model: a bridge to social network analysis. Soc Networks. 54:26–40. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2017.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungsberg L, Copus A, Herslund LB, Nilsson K, Perjo L, Randall L, Berlina A. 2020. Key actors in community-driven social innovation in rural areas in the Nordic countries. J Rural Stud. 79:276–285. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossinets G. 2006. Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc Networks. 28(3):247–268. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsou S, Partalidou M, Ragkos A. 2014. Young farmers’ social capital in Greece: trust levels and collective actions. J Rural Stud. Pergamon. 34:204–211. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. 2000. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied researchers (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lazega E. 2006. Capital social, processus sociaux et capacité d‘action collective. In: bevort A, Lallement M, editors. Le capital social. Performance, équité et réciprocité. Paris: La Découverte. p. 211–225. doi:10.3917/dec.bevor.2006.01.0211.
   Google Scholar
• Lazega E. 1998. Réseaux sociaux et structures relationnelles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld P, Cranmer SJ, Desmarais BA. 2018. Temporal Exponential Random Graph Models with btergm: estimation and Bootstrap Confidence Intervals. J Stat Soft. 83(6):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v083.i06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy G, Hoffmann I, From T, Hiemstra SJ, Gandini G. 2018. Perception of livestock ecosystem services in grazing areas. Animal. 12(12):2627–2638. doi:10.1017/S1751731118001027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liechti K, Biber JP. 2016. Pastoralism in Europe: characteristics and challenges of highland-lowland transhumance. Rev Sci Tech. 35(2):561–575. doi:10.20506/rst.35.2.2541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little W. 2016. Introduction to Sociology: 2nd Canadian Edition. https://opentextbc.ca/introductiontosociology2ndedition/.
   Google Scholar
• Lusher D, Koskinen J, Robins G. 2013. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks. Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malliaros FD, Vazirgiannis M. 2013. Clustering and community detection in directed networks: a survey. Phy Rep. 533(4):95–142. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandarano LA, Meenar M. 2015. e-Participation: comparing Trends in Practice and the Classroom. Plan Pract Res. 30(4):457–475. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1017933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocchi C, Orsi L, Sali G. 2021. Consumers’ attitudes for sustainable mountain cheese. Sustain. 13(4):1743. doi:10.3390/su13041743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocchi C, Sali G. 2022. Supporting Mountain agriculture through “mountain product” label: a choice experiment approach. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(1):701–723. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01464-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMorran R, Santini F, Guri F, Gomez-y-Paloma S, Price M, Beucherie O, Monticelli C, Rouby A, Vitrolles D, Cloye G. 2015. A mountain food label for Europe? RGA. 103(4):0–22. doi:10.4000/rga.2654.
   Google Scholar
• Meemken EM, Qaim M. 2018. Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 10(1):39–63. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023252.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick R, DiGregorio M, McCarthy N. 2004. Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agric Syst. 82(3):197–214. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran D, Blair KJ. 2021. Review: sustainable livestock systems: anticipating demand-side challenges. Animal. 15 Suppl 1:100288. doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Ulecia E, Bernués A, Casasús I, Olaizola AM, Lobón S, Martín-Collado D. 2021. Drivers of change in mountain agriculture: a thirty-year analysis of trajectories of evolution of cattle farming systems in the Spanish Pyrenees. Agric Syst. 186:102983. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Ulecia E, Bernués A, Ondé D, Ramanzin M, Soliño M, Sturaro E, Martín-Collado D. 2022. People’s attitudes towards the agrifood system influence the value of ecosystem services of mountain agroecosystems. PLoS One. 17(5):e0267799. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Paruchuri S. 2005. Evolution of R&D capabilities: the role of knowledge networks within a firm. Manage Sci. 51(5):771–785. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyumba OT, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N. 2018. The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods Ecol Evol. 9(1):20–32. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österblom H, Paasche Ø. 2021. Earth altruism. One Earth. Cell Press. 4(10):1386–1397. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511807763.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2010. Analyzing collective action. Agric Econ. 41(s1):155–166. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2009. Understanding institutional diversity. New Jersey, USA: princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Otte E, Rousseau R. 2002. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J. Inf. Sci. 28(6):441–453. doi:10.1177/016555150202800601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachoud C, Da Re R, Ramanzin M, Bovolenta S, Gianelle D, Sturaro E. 2020. Tourists and Local Stakeholders’ Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Summer Farms in the Eastern Italian Alps. Sustain. 12(3):1095. doi:10.3390/su12031095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachoud C, Delay E, Da Re R, Ramanzin M, Sturaro E. 2020. A relational approach to studying collective action in dairy cooperatives producing mountain cheeses in the Alps: the case of the primiero cooperative in the Eastern Italians Alps. Sustain. 12(11):4596. doi:10.3390/su12114596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachoud C, Labeyrie V, Polge E. 2019. Collective action in Localized Agrifood Systems: an analysis by the social networks and the proximities. Study of a Serrano cheese producers’ association in the Campos de Cima da Serra/Brazil. J Rural Stud. 72:58–74. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliacci F, Cei L, Defrancesco E, Gatto P. 2022. The EU Mountain Product Voluntary Quality Term as a Valorization Tool for Livestock Farms: challenges and Opportunities in an Alpine Context. Sustain. 14(6):3292. doi:10.3390/su14063292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlik M, Membretti A. 2018. Migration by necessity and by force to mountain areas: an opportunity for social innovation. Mt Res Dev. 38(3):250–264. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00070.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Profeta A, Hamm U. 2019. Consumers’ expectations and willingness-to-pay for local animal products produced with local feed. Int J of Food Sci Tech. 54(3):651–659. doi:10.1111/ijfs.13933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rac I, Juvančič L, Erjavec E. 2020. Stimulating collective action to preserve High Nature Value farming in post-transitional settings. A comparative analysis of three Slovenian social-ecological systems. Nat. NC. 39:87–111. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.39.51216.
   Google Scholar
• Robins G, Pattison P, Woolcock J. 2004. Missing data in networks: exponential random graph (p*) models for networks with non-respondents. Soc Networks. 26(3):257–283. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ortega T, Bernués A, Alfnes F. 2016. Psychographic profile affects willingness to pay for ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean high nature value farmland. Ecol Econ. 128:232–245. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryschawy J, Dumont B, Therond O, Donnars C, Hendrickson J, Benoit M, Duru M. 2019. Review: An integrated graphical tool for analysing impacts and services provided by livestock farming. Animal. 13(8):1760–1772. doi:10.1017/S1751731119000351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini F, Guri F, Gomez y Paloma S. 2013. Labelling of agricultural and food products of mountain farming. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports Luxembourg: publications Office of the European Union. p. 126. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC77119?mode=full.
   Google Scholar
• Sarti S, Darnall N, Testa F. 2018. Market segmentation of consumers based on their actual sustainability and health-related purchases. J Clean Prod. 192(192):270–280. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.188.
   Google Scholar
• Schirpke U, Wang G, Padoa-Schioppa E. 2021. Editorial: mountain landscapes: protected areas, ecosystem services, and future challenges. Ecosyst Serv. 49:101302. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter B, Hauck J, Hackenberg I, Matzdorf B. 2018. Bringing transparency into the process: social network analysis as a tool to support the participatory design and implementation process of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Ecosyst Serv. 34:206–217. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J, Marshall G. 2009. A Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer P. 2013. Q-Squared: combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Poverty Analysis. Oxford, UK: oxford Academic. p. 3–12. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676903.003.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel DA. 2009. Social networks and collective action. American J Political Sci. 53(1):122–138. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25193871. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00361.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stampa E, Schipmann-Schwarze C, Hamm U. 2020. Consumer perceptions, preferences, and behavior regarding pasture-raised livestock products: A review. Food Qual Prefer. 82:103872. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern MJ, Coleman KJ. 2015. The Multidimensionality of Trust: Applications in Collaborative Natural Resource Management. Soc Nat Resour. 28(2):117–132. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.945062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. 2014. Focus groups: theory and practice (Vol. 20). California, USA: SAGE publications. p. 153.
   Google Scholar
• Stokman FN. 2001. Networks: social. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB, editors. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Oxford, UK: pergamon Press. p. 493–524.
   Google Scholar
• Tabacco E, Merlino VM, Coppa M, Massaglia S, Borreani G. 2021. Analyses of consumers’ preferences and of the correspondence between direct and indirect label claims and the fatty acid profile of milk in large retail chains in northern Italy. J Dairy Sci. 104(12):12216–12235. doi:10.3168/jds.2021-20191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabassum S, Pereira FS, Fernandes S, Gama J. 2018. Social network analysis: An overview. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Standard Journal Abbreviation (ISO4) Copied. 8(5):e1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö M, Brondizio ES, Elmqvist T, Malmer P, Spierenburg M. 2014. Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: the multiple evidence base approach. Ambio. 43(5):579–591. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teston M, Orsi M, Bittante G, Cecchinato A, Gallo L, Gatto P, Mota LFM, Ramanzin M, Raniolo S, Tormen A, et al. 2022. Added Value of Local Sheep Breeds in Alpine Agroecosystems. Sustain. 14(8):4698. doi:10.3390/su14084698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teston M, Villalba D, Berton M, Ramanzin M, Sturaro E. 2020. Relationships between organic beef production and agro-ecosystems in mountain areas: the case of catalan pyrenees. Sustain. 12(21):9274. doi:10.3390/su12219274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan L. 2005. Web Hyperlink Analysis. In: kempf-Leonard, K, editor. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. p. 949–954.
   Google Scholar
• Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Vialatte A, Barnaud C, Blanco J, Ouin A, Choisis JP, Andrieu E, Sheeren D, Ladet S, Deconchat M, Clément F, et al. 2019. A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 34(7):1653–1673. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00829-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Robins G, Pattison P, Lazega E. 2013. Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Soc Networks. 35(1):96–115. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wibeck V. 2011. Images of environmental management: competing metaphors in focus group discussions of swedish environmental quality objectives. Environ Manage. 49(4):776–787. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9816-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson S. 2004. Focus group research. In. Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research: theory, method, and practice. London, UK: SAGE Publications. p. 177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Young JC, Searle K, Butler A, Simmons P, Watt AD, Jordan A. 2016. The role of trust in the resolution of conservation conflicts. Biol Conserv. 195:196–202. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaga-Mendez A, Bissonnette JF, Kolinjivadi V, Cleaver F, Dupras J. 2021. Towards collective action in ecosystem services governance: the recognition of social interdependencies in three collective agri-environmental initiatives in Quebec. Ecosyst Serv. 51:101357. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Wang CH, Zheng D, Yu X, Chan HK. 2018. Process of innovation knowledge increase in supply chain network from the perspective of sustainable development. IMDS. 118(4):873–888. doi:10.1108/IMDS-06-2017-0243.
   Google Scholar
• Zoderer BM, Tasser E, Carver S, Tappeiner U. 2019. Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles. Ecosyst Serv. 37:100938. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar