Size and shape attributes of packaging remnants commonly detected in former food products

References

• Almoraie NM, Saqaan R, Alharthi R, Alamoudi A, Badh L, Shatwan IM. 2021. Snacking patterns throughout the life span: potential implications on health. Nutr Res. 91:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2021.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato G, Desiato R, Giovannini T, Pinotti L, Tretola M, Gili M, Marchis D. 2017. Gravimetric quantitative determination of packaging residues in feed from former food. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 34(8):1446–1450. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1337277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessa F, Frias J, Kögel T, Lusher A, Andrade JM, Antunes J, Sobral P, Pagter E, Nash R, O’Connor I. 2019. Harmonized protocol for monitoring microplastics in biota. JPI-Oceans BASEMAN project. 30. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28588.72321/1.
   Google Scholar
• Calvini R, Luciano A, Ottoboni M, Ulrici A, Tretola M, Pinotti L. 2020. Multivariate image analysis for the rapid detection of residues from packaging remnants in former foodstuff products (FFPs)–a feasibility study. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 37(8):1399–1411. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2020.1769195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandramohan D, Marimuthu K. 2011. A review on natural fibers. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci. 8(2):194–206.
   Google Scholar
• Deshwal GK, Panjagari NR. 2020. Review on metal packaging: materials, forms, food applications, safety and recyclability. J Food Sci Technol. 57(7):2377–2392. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-04172-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshwal GK, Panjagari NR, Alam T. 2019. An overview of paper and paper based food packaging materials: health safety and environmental concerns. J Food Sci Technol. 56(10):4391–4403. doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03950-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Commission Regulation (EU) No. 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of the feed, amending European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 and repealing Council Directive 79/373/EEC, Commission Directive 80/511/EEC. Off J. L 229/(1):1–28.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. Off J Eur Union. L150:109–140.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organisation. 2015. Hazards associated with animal feed, FAO Animal production and Health, Report 14.
   Google Scholar
• Gajjar P, Johnson CG, Carr J, Chrispeels K, Gray J, Withers PJ. 2021. Size segregation of irregular granular materials captured by time-resolved 3D imaging. Sci Rep. 11(1):8352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87280-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shopova S, Sieg H, Braeuning A,. 2020. Risk assessment and toxicological research on micro‐and nanoplastics after oral exposure via food products. Efsa J. 18(Suppl 1):e181102. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.e181102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim ID, Hamam Y, Sadiku ER, Ndambuki JM, Kupolati WK, Jamiru T, Eze AA, Snyman J. 2022. Need for sustainable packaging: an overview. Polymers . 14(20):4430. doi: 10.3390/polym14204430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphues J. 2005. Expert report on Foreign Materials in Feedstuffs. Hannover, Germany: InstitutfürTierernährung. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Kerry J. 2012. Aluminium foil packaging. Packaging Technol. Sawston (UK): Woodhead Publishing. 163–177. doi: 10.1533/9780857095701.2.163
   Google Scholar
• Lapusneanu DM, Zaharia R, Pop IM. 2022. Research on some compound feed raw materials hazards in relation with food safety. Scientific Papers: series D, Animal Science-The International Session of Scientific Communications of the Faculty of Animal Science. 65(1): 158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Luciano A, Mazzoleni S, Ottoboni M, Tretola M, Calvini R, Ulrici A, Manoni M, Bernardi CEM, Pinotti L. 2022. Former foodstuff products (FFPs) as circular feed: types of packaging remnants and methods for their detection. Sustainability. 14(21):13911. doi: 10.3390/su142113911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni S, Magni S, Tretola M, Luciano A, Ferrari L, Bernardi CEM, Lin P, Ottoboni M, Binelli A, Pinotti L. 2023a. Packaging contaminants in former food products: using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to identify the remnants and the associated risks. J Hazard Mater. 448:130888. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni S, Tretola M, Luciano A, Lin P, Pinotti L, Bee G. 2023b. Sugary and salty former food products in pig diets affect energy and nutrient digestibility, feeding behaviour but not the growth performance and carcass composition. Animal. 17(12):101019. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.101019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal FB, Russ JC. 2012. Measuring shape. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otto S, Strenger M, Maier-Nöth A, Schmid M. 2021. Food packaging and sustainability–Consumer perception vs. correlated scientific facts: a review. J Clean Prod. 298:126733. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinotti L. 2009. Image analysis and microscopy: a useful combination. BASE. (SPEC. ISSUE). 13:21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Ferrari L, Fumagalli F, Luciano A, Manoni M, Mazzoleni S, Govoni C, Rulli MC, Lin P, Bee G, et al. 2023b. Review: pig-based bioconversion: the use of former food products to keep nutrients in the food chain. Animal. 17 Suppl 2:100918. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Luciano A, Ottoboni M, Manoni M, Ferrari L, Marchis D, Tretola M. 2021. Recycling food leftovers in feed as opportunity to increase the sustainability of livestock production. J Clean Prod. 294:126290. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Ottoboni M, Caprarulo V, Giromini C, Gottardo D, Cheli F, Fearn T, Baldi A. 2016. Microscopy in combination with image analysis for characterization of fishmeal material in aquafeed. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 215:156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinotti L, Mazzoleni S, Moradei A, Lin P, Luciano A. 2023a. Effects of alternative feed ingredients on red meat quality: a review of algae, insects, agro-industrial by-products and former food products. Ital J Anim Sci. 22(1):695–710. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2023.2238784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto G, Jiménez‐Martín A. 2001. Conducting aluminum‐filled nylon 6 composites. Polym Compos. 22(1):65–70. doi: 10.1002/pc.10517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prata JC, Dias-Pereira P. 2023. Microplastics in terrestrial domestic animals and human health: implications for food security and food safety and their role as sentinels. Animals. 13(4):661. doi: 10.3390/ani13040661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Raamsdonk LWD, Frick G, Ujčič Vrhovnik I, Zadravec M, Zegers J, Krull-Wöhrmann R, Weiss R, van der Borg G. 2023. Introduction to new guidelines for validation of methods to examine visually recognisable substances. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 40(1):12–25. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2022.2135768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Raamsdonk LWD, Pinckaers VGZ, Vliege JJM, van Egmond HJ. 2012. Examination of packaging materials in bakery products: a validated method for detection and quantification. Wageningen: RIKILT.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raamsdonk LWD, Rijk R, Schouten GPJ, Mennes W, Meijer GAL, Van der Poel AFB, De Jong J. 2011. A risk evaluation of traces of packaging materials in former food products intended as feed materials. Wageningen: RIKILT.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raamsdonk LWD, van der Zande M, Koelmans AA, Hoogenboom RLAP, Peters RJB, Groot MJ, Peijnenburg AACM, Weesepoel YJA. 2020. Current insights into monitoring, bioaccumulation, and potential health effects of microplastics present in the food chain. Foods. 9(1):72. doi: 10.3390/foods9010072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Aparna K. 2020. Food packaging and storage. Research Trends in Home Science and Extension AkiNik Pub. New Delhi: AkiNik Publications; 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Vermeer WM. 2010. Small, medium, large or supersize: trends in food portion sizes in The Netherlands. Public Health Nutr. 13(6):852–857. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009992011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Ottoboni M, Luciano A, Dell’Orto V, Cheli F, Pinotti L. 2019. Tracing food packaging contamination: an electronic nose applied to leftover food. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 36(11):1748–1756. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2019.1653498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretola M, Mazzoleni S, Silacci P, Dubois S, Proserpio C, Pagliarini E, Bernardi CEM, Pinotti L, Bee G. 2024. Sustainable pig diets: partial grain replacement with former food products and its impact on meat quality. J Anim Sci. 102:skae070. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy U. 2023. A review of particle shape effects on material properties for various engineering applications: from macro to nanoscale. Minerals. 13(1):91. doi: 10.3390/min13010091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy U, Atagun ON. 2023. Particle shape characterization of shaking table streams in a Turkish chromite concentration plant by using dynamic imaging and microscopical techniques. Part Sci Technol. 41(2):141–150. doi: 10.1080/02726351.2022.2046666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar