Using inferences to evaluate the value added of mixed methods research: a content analysis

References

• American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 33–40. doi:10.3102/0013189X03500603
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Harlen, W. (2006). Issues in synthesizing research in education. Educational Research, 48(3), 287–299. doi:10.1080/00131880600992330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2010). Computer-assisted integration of mixed methods: Data sources and analysis. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 431–467). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, K. D., Becker, B. J., & Kennedy, J. M. (2007). Constructing conclusions. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 493–510). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877
   Google Scholar
• Bui, N. H., & Alfaro, M. A. (2011). Statistics anxiety and science attitudes: Age, gender, and ethnicity factors. College Student Journal, 45(3), 566–572.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121. doi: 10.1111/1467-8527.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercikan, K., & Roth, W. M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14–23. doi: 10.3102/0013189X035005014
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, S. K. (2007). “Can I get your email.” Gender, networking, and social capital in an undergraduate bioengineering classroom. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 13(2), 175–189. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v13.i2.50
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixing methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. doi: 10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., & Hall, J. N. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huermerinta-Peltomaki, L., & Nummela, N. (2006). Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. MIR: Management International Review, 46, 439–459.
   Google Scholar
• Kanny, M. A., Sax, L. J., & Riggers-Piehl, T. A. (2014). Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 127–148. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007246
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9–25. doi:10.1177/1468794106058866
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A., & Mittapalli, K. (2010). Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 145–193). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2003). Impact of mixed methods and design on inference quality. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (1st ed., pp. 423–456). Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 7–24. doi: 10.1177/1558689810384490
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & Hitchcock, J. H. (2011). Underlying agreements between quantitative and qualitative research: The short and tall of it. Human Resource Development Review, 10(4), 381–398. doi:10.1177/1534484311413867
   Google Scholar
• NVivo10 for Windows Help. Retrieved April 18, 2014, from http://help-nv10.qsrinternational.com/desktop/concepts/about_cluster_analysis
   Google Scholar
• O'Cathian, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 531–555). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Reichertz, J. (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 214–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C., & Barroso, J. (2007). Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies. Social Science of Medicine, 64, 236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J. L. (2012). Mapping the mixed methods-mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 317–331. doi:10.1177/1558689811427913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 101–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 1–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41–47.
   Google Scholar