Masculinity as buzzword?

References

• Allan, J. A. (2022). Against typologies. Affect and masculinity studies. In T. W. Reeser (Ed.), The Routledge companion to gender and affect (pp. 43–54). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2005). Orthodox and inclusive masculinity: Competing masculinities among heterosexual men in a feminized terrain. Sociological Perspectives, 48(3), 337–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, C. (2012). Problematizing contemporary men/masculinities theorizing: The contribution of Raewyn Connell and conceptual-terminological tensions today. The British Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 747–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, K. (2014). Sticky masculinity: Post-structuralism, phenomenology and subjectivity in critical studies on men. Men and Masculinities, 17(3), 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, T., Connell, R., & Lee, J. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604. https://www.jstor.org/stable/657315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, A.-D., & Qvotrup Jensen, S. (2014). Combining hegemonic masculinity and intersectionality. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 9(1), 60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee river collective statement. http://circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2000). The men and the boys. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins. Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword. A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. S. (1986). 'That’s classic!’ The phenomenology and rhetoric of successful social theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 16, 285–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D. Z. (2001). Connell's Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique. Theory and Society, 30(3), 337–361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/657965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dier, A., & Baldwin, G. (2022). Masculinities and violent extremism. International Peace Institute and UN Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate. https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Masculinities-and-VE-Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. (1993). What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society, 22(5), 643–657. http://www.jstor.org/stable/657988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. (2016). Caring masculinities: Theorizing an emerging concept. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 240–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, S. (2014). Bending the codes of masculinity: David Beckham and flexible masculinity in the new millennium. Sport in Society, 17(7), 917–936.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarén, N., & Johansson, T. (2014). Homosociality: In between power and intimacy. SAGE Open, 4(1).
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2004). From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. Feminist Theory, 5(1), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2012). A multi-faceted power analysis of men’s violence to known women: From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. The Sociological Review, 60(4), 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2020). 'A life of violence’. Some theoretical/political/personal accountings on ‘masculinities’ and ‘intimate partner violence. In L. Gottzén, M. Bjørnholt, & F. Boonzaier (Eds.), Men, masculinities and intimate partner violence (pp. 16–33). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howson, R. (2006). Challenging hegemonic masculinity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, M., & Pulé, P. (2021). Ecological masculinities. A response to the manthropocene question? In L. Gottzén, U. Mellström, & T. Shefer (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies (pp. 477–487). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. A. (2004). On patriarchs and losers: Rethinking men’s interests. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 48, 74–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035593.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. (2003). Research on men and masculinities. Some implications of recent theory for future work. Men and Masculinities, 6(1), 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Reeser, T. (2017). Theorizing the masculinity of affect. In J. M. Armengol, M. Bosch Vilarrubias, À Carabí, & T. Requena (Eds.), Masculinities and literary studies: Intersections and new directions (pp. 109–119). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27800079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Intersectionality: A Theoretical Adjustment. In R. Buikema, G. Griffin, & N. Lykke (Eds.), Theories and Methodologies in Postgraduate Feminist Research: Researching Differently (pp. 45–59). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waling, A. (2019). Rethinking masculinity studies: Feminism, masculinity, and poststructural accounts of agency and emotional reflexivity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 27(1), 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, S. (2002). Men and masculinities: Key themes and new directions. Malden, Mass.: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, R. (2002). Unmaking: Men and masculinities in feminist theory. In J. K. Gardiner (Ed.), Masculinity studies and feminist theory. New directions (pp. 31–59). New York: Columbia university press.
   Google Scholar