853
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

To intervene or not? Professionals' relation to early school leaving in Finnish general upper secondary education

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Axel, E. (2011). Conflictual cooperation. Nordic Psychology, 63(4), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000045
  • Axel, E., & Højholt, C. (2019). Subjectivity, conflictuality, and generaliztion in social praxis. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 23–40). Springer.
  • Bask, M., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Burned out to drop out: Exploring the relationship between school burnout and school dropout. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0126-5
  • Busch-Jensen, P., & Schraube, E. (2019). Zooming in zooming out: Analytical strategies of situated generalization in psychological research. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life (pp. 221–241). Springer.
  • De Witte, K., Cabus, S., Thyssen, G., Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2013). A critical review of the literature on school dropout. Educational Research Review, 10, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.002
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
  • Dreier, O. (1999). Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 1(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v1i1.3841
  • Dreier, O. (2011). Personality and the conduct of everyday life. Nordic Psychology, 63(2), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000030
  • Eichinger, U. (2019). What’s up? The possibilities of subject-scientific practice research in social work: A methodological ’explorative report. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 16, 671–684.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  • Hakkarainen, A. M., Holopainen, L. K., & Savolainen, H. K. (2015). A five-year follow-up on the role of educational support in preventing dropout from upper secondary education in Finland. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 408–421.
  • Haug, E. H., Plant, P., Valdimarsdóttir, S., Bergmo-Prvulovic, I., Vuorinen, R., Lovén, A., & Vilhjálmsdóttir, G. (2019). Nordic research on educational and vocational guidance: A systematic literature review of thematic features between 2003 and 2016. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9375-4
  • Højholt, C. (2016). Situated inequality and the conflictuality of children's conduct of everyday life. In C. Højholt & E. Schraube (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp. 145–163) Routledge.
  • Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2014). Practice research. In T. Teo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1485–1488). Springer.
  • Højholt, C., & Kousholt, D. (2020). Contradictions and conflicts: Researching school as conflictual social practice. Theory & Psychology, 30(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319884129
  • Højholt, C., & Schraube, E. (2016). Introduction: Toward a psychology of everyday living. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
  • Højholt, C., & Schraube, E. (Eds.). (2019). Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life. Springer.
  • Holte, B. H. (2017). Counting and meeting NEET young people: Methodology, perspective and meaning in research on marginalized youth. Young, 26(1), 1–16.
  • Holzkamp, K. (2013). What could a psychology from the standpoint of the subject be? In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 46–59). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kalalahti, M., Varjo, J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2017). Immigrant-origin youth and the indecisiveness of choice for upper secondary education in Finland. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(9), 1242–1262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2017.1321108
  • Kirjavainen, T., Pulkkinen, J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2016). Special education students in transition to further education: A four-year register-based follow-up study in Finland. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.001
  • Korhonen, V., & Nieminen, J. (2010). Nuorten ohjauksen kentät ja monialaisen yhteistyön mahdollisuudet [Fields of youth counselling and possibilities in multisectoral co-operation]. Nuorisotutkimus, 3, 3–17.
  • Kouluterveyskysely [The school health promotion study]. (2019). Retrieved December 14, 2020, from https://thl.fi/fi/web/lapset-nuoret-ja-perheet/tutkimustuloksia/palvelut-ja-avunsaanti
  • Kousholt, D. (2016). Collaborative research with children: Exploring contradictory conditions of the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & C. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and the conduct of everyday life ((pp. 241–258). Routledge.
  • Lastensuojelulaki (2007). [Child welfare act] 417/2007.
  • Latomaa, T. (2011). Mitä ohjaus on? Ohjaus pedagogisena toimintana. [What is guidance? Guidance as pedagogical activity.] Kasvatus, 42(1), 46–57.
  • Lukiolaki. (2018). [General upper secondary schools act] 714/2018.
  • Määttä, M. (2018). General information about One-Stop Guidance Center – The use of the services and user feedback. In M. Määttä (Ed.), One-Stop Guidance Center – Ready to Offer Multi-agency Services to the Young (pp. 12–18) Kohtaamo (ESF), ELY-Centre Central Finland.
  • Molin-Karakoc, L., & Ikola, M. (2019). Learning engagement as a target for interventions: A qualitative study of first-generation migrant adolescents in Finnish secondary education. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 47(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2018.1545995
  • Mozkau, J., & Schraube, E. (2015). Kritische Psychologie. Psychology from the standpoint of the subject. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of Critical Psychology (pp. 280–289) Routledge.
  • Niemi, A.-M., & Laaksonen, L. M. (2020). Discourses on educational support in the context of general upper secondary education. Disability & Society, 35(3), 460–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1634523
  • Nissen, M. (2000). Practice research. Critical psychology in and through practices. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2, 145–179.
  • Nissen, M. (2019). Remembering, rewriting, rearticulating, resituating motivation. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 16, 468–502.
  • Nissen, M., & Sørensen, K. S. (2017). The emergence of motives in liminal hotspots. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317698251
  • Nuorisolaki. (2016). [Youth act] 1285/2016.
  • Onnismaa, J. (2007). Ohjaus- ja neuvontatyö. Aikaa, huomiota ja kunnioitusta [The practice of guidance and counselling work. Time, attention and respect]. Gaudeamus.
  • Oomen, A., & Plant, P. (2014). Early school leaving and lifelong guidance. University of Jyväskylä, Finnish Institute for Educational Research.
  • Opetushallitus [Finnish national agency for education]. (2019). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2019 [National core curriculum for general upper secondary schools 2019]. Määräykset ja ohjeet 2019:2a. Opetushallitus.
  • Oppilas- ja opiskelijahuoltolaki. (2013). [Pupil and student welfare act] 1287/2013.
  • Oppivelvollisuuslaki. (2020). [Compulsory education act] 1214/2020.
  • Osterkamp, U., & Schraube, E. (2013). Introduction: Klaus Holzkamp and the development of psychology from the standpoint of the subject. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Parviainen, M., Aunola, K., Torppa, M., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Vasalampi, K. (2020). Symptoms of psychological ill-being and school dropout intentions among upper secondary education students: A person-centerd approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101853
  • Peltola, M., Suorsa, T., & Silvonen, J. (2021). ‘I try to remember that this is temporary’: Continuous balancing in remote students’ everyday life. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00247-6
  • Raetsaari, K., & Suorsa, T. (2020). Clearing the FOG — studying personal participation in solution-focused counselling. In S. Grajcár & T. Sprlák (Eds.), Career Guidance for Inclusive Society – Conference Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the International Association for Educational and Vocational Guidance (IAEVG) (pp. 393–397). Bratislava.
  • Raetsaari, K., Suorsa, T., & Muukkonen, H. (2020). Ohjaustyön haasteena lukion keskeyttäminen – Ammattilaisten tulkintoja olosuhteista ja työnsä perusteista [Quitting general upper secondary school as a challenge for counselling – Professionals' constructions on the conditions and reasons for action in their everyday work]. Kasvatus, 51(1), 38–50.
  • Raetsaari, K., Suorsa, T., & Muukkonen, H. (2021). ” Lopettasko lukion?” Toimintaperusteet, toimijuuden jännitteet ja ohjaus lukiolaisten arjen haasteissa [“Should I quit school?” Grounds for action, dialectics of agency and counselling in general upper secondary students' everyday school life]. Kasvatus, 52(3), 297–309.
  • Røn Larsen, M. (2018). Paradoxes of inclusion. Administrative procedures and children's everyday lives. In M. Hedegaard (Ed.), Children, childhood, and everyday life: Children's perspective (2nd ed., pp. 129–148).Information Age Publishing.
  • Silvonen, J. (2004). Who owns the intervention? Bringing the unemployed back into unemployed studies. In T. Kontinen (Ed.). Development intervention. Actor and activity perspectives (pp. 143–155). University of Helsinki, Centre for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research.
  • Silvonen, J., & Keso, P. (1999). Grounded theory aineistolähtöisen analyysin mallina [Grounded Theory as interactive qualitative analysis]. Psykologia, 34(2), 88–96.
  • Suorsa, T. (2015). Solution-focused therapy and subject-scientific research into personal conduct of everyday living. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 16(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v16i2.22998
  • Suorsa, T. (2019). Identifying and analysing personal participation in Finnish pupil welfare work. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 16, 1282–1298.
  • Thomsen, R. (2012). Career guidance in communities. Aarhus University Press.
  • Thomsen, R. (2014). Non-participation in guidance: An opportunity for development? International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-013-9260-0
  • Vasalampi, K., Kiuru, N., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2018). The role of a supportive interpersonal environment and education-related goal motivation during the transition beyond upper secondary education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.09.001
  • Vasalampi, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Sisäinen motivaatio ja kouluinnokkuus edistävät nuorten opintopolkuja [Intrinsic motivation and school engagement promote the study paths of young people]. In S. Pihlajaniemi, T. Villa, E. Lavikainen & L. Valkeasuo (Eds.), Oppia Ikä Kaikki. Kouluttautumisen Edellytykset Eri Elämänvaiheissa. Opiskelijatutkimuksen vuosikirja 2014 (pp. 13–23). Opiskelun ja koulutuksen tutkimussäätiö Otus.