Psychological assumptions underlying credibility assessments in Finnish asylum determinations

References

• Baillot, H., Cowan, S., & Munro, V. E. (2014). Reason to disbelieve: Evaluating the rape claims of women seeking asylum in the UK. International Journal of Law in Context, 10(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552313000396
   Google Scholar
• Barry, T., Lenaert, B., Hermans, D., Raes, F., & Griffith, J. (2018). Meta-analysis of the association between autobiographical memory specificity and exposure to trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 31(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögner, D., Brewin, C., & Herlihy, J. (2010). Refugees’ experiences of home office interviews: A qualitative study on the disclosure of sensitive personal information. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903368329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & Depaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, A. S. (2006). Improving prosecutorial decision making: Some lessons of cognitive science. William and Mary Law Review, 47(5), 1587–1633. https://ssrn.com/abstract=707138
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, H. E. (2010). Refugee status determinations and the limits of memory. International Journal of Refugee Law, 22(4), 469–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeq041
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, J. (2010). Memory and its implications for asylum decisions. Journal of Health & Biomedical Law, 37(6), 37–63. https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, G. (2003). The credibility of credibility evidence at the refugee review tribunal. International Journal of Refugee Law, 15(3), 377–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/15.3.377
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2001). Errors of recall and credibility: Can omissions and discrepancies in successive statements reasonably be said to undermine credibility of testimony? The Medico-Legal Journal, 69(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1258/spmlj.69.1.25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conway, M. A., & Loveday, C. (2015). Remembering, imagining, false memories & personal meanings. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo, M., & Fernandez-Lansac, V. (2016). Memory and narrative of traumatic events: A literature review. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 8(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(17), 6889–6892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018033108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, R., Hunter, J., Liddell, B., McAdam, J., Nickerson, A., & Bryant, R. (2018). Filling gaps and verifying facts: Assumptions and credibility assessment in the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal. International Journal of Refugee Law, 30(1), 71–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eey017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E. (2020). Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: Six fallacies and the eight sources of bias. Analytical Chemistry, 92(12), 7998–8004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dror, I. E., & Charlton, D. (2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56(4), 600–616.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhard, I. M., McNally, R. J., & van Schie, K. (2019). Retrieving and modifying traumatic memories: Recent research relevant to three controversies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418807728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel, M., Wheeler, J., & Danesh, J. (2005). Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: A systematic review. Lancet (London, England), 365(9467), 1309–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61027-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., Chaiken, S., & Lutz, S. (2002). Validity beliefs and ideology can influence legal case judgments differently. Law and Human Behavior, 26(5), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020251921659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Landström, S., & Nordin, A. (2017). Värdering av muntliga utsagor. Göteborgs Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Granting asylum or not? Migration board personnel’s beliefs about deception. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183042000305672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutchess, A. H., & Indeck, A. (2009). Cultural influences on memory. Progress in brain research (178), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17809-3
   Google Scholar
• Gyulai, G. (Ed.). (2013). Credibility assessment in asylum procedures. A multidisciplinary training manual. Hungarian Helsinki Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Herlihy, J., Gleeson, K., & Turner, S. (2010). What assumptions about human behaviour underlie asylum judgments? International Journal of Refugee Law, 22(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeq027
   Google Scholar
• Herlihy, J., Jobson, L., & Turner, S. (2012). Just tell us what happened to you: Autobiographical memory and seeking asylum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlihy, J., & Turner, S. W. (2009). The psychology of seeking protection. International Journal of Refugee Law, 21(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eep004
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, E. R., & Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: A consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Anakwah, N., Antfolk, J., Brubacher, S. P., Flowe, H., Gabbert, F., Giebels, E., Kanja, W., Korkman, J., Kyo, A., Naka, M., Otgaar, H., Powell, M. B., Selim, H., Skrifvars, J., Sorkpah, I. K., Sowatey, E. A., Steele, L. C., Stevens, L., …, Anonymous. (2022). Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 27(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, I. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1998). Errors in autobiographical memory. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(8), 933–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association of Refugee Law Judges. (2015). A structured approach to the decision making process in refugee and other international protection claims.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, M. (2003). Is truth in the eye of the beholder? Objective credibility assessment in refugee status determination. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 17, 367–415.
   Google Scholar
• Kälin, W. (1986). Troubled communication: Cross-cultural misunderstandings in the asylum hearing. International Migration Review, 20(2), 230–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maegherman, E., Veldhuizen, T. V., Amsterdam, V. U., & Horselenberg, R. (2018). Dropping the anchor: The use of plausibility in credibility assessments. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, 7(2), 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. A., & Zoellner, L. A. (2007). Overgeneral autobiographical memory and traumatic events: An evaluative review. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (2003). Self and social functions: Individual autobiographical memory and collective narrative. Memory (Hove, England), 11(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, B. (2009). Prime suspect: An examination of factors that aggravate and counteract confirmation bias in criminal investigations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(4), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompedda, F., Antfolk, J., Zappalà, A., & Santtila, P. (2017). A combination of outcome and process feedback enhances performance in simulations of child sexual abuse interviews using avatars. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1474–1410. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & Peace, K. A. (2007). The scars of memory: A prospective, longitudinal investigation of the consistency of traumatic and positive emotional memories in adulthood. Psychological Science, 18(5), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01918.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B. (2008). Designing effective training programs for investigative interviewers of children. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 20(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2008.12035804
   Google Scholar
• Qualification Directive, The European Parliament. (2011). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782257615.0027
   Google Scholar
• Reifels, L., Pietrantoni, L., Prati, G., Kim, Y., Kilpatrick, D. G., Dyb, G., Halpern, J., Olff, M., Brewin, C. R., & O’Donnell, M. (2013). Lessons learned about psychosocial responses to disaster and mass trauma: An international perspective. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 22897. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.22897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmittat, S. M., Englich, B., Sautner, L., Velten, P., Schmittat, S. M., Englich, B., Sautner, L., & Velten, P. (2022). Alternative stories and the decision to prosecute: An applied approach against confirmation bias in criminal prosecution approach against confirmation bias in criminal prosecution. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(6), 608–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1941013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenholtz, A. I., Ramji-Nogales, J., & Schrag, P. G. (2007). Refugee roulette: Disparities in asylum adjudication. Stanford Law Review, 60, 295–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, G. S., Sazma, M. A., McCullough, A. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2017). The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 636–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibbald, M., de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2013). Checklists improve experts’ diagnostic decisions. Medical Education, 47(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwick, S. M., Morgan, A., Nicolaou, A. L., & Charney, D. S. (1997). Consistency of memory for combat-related traumatic events in veterans of Operation Desert Storm. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.2.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, D., & Takarangi, M. K. T. (2015). Memory distortion for traumatic events: The role of mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 27–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J. A. (2007). The lure of “facts” in asylum appeals: Critiquing the practice of judges. In Smith, S., Applying theory to policy and practice: Issues for critical reflection (pp. 19–35). Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. (2006). Assessing the credibility of asylum claims: EU and UK approaches examined. European Journal of Migration and Law, 8(1), 79–96. www.ait.gov.uk/ https://doi.org/10.1163/157181606776911969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, D., & Kahneman, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2013). Beyond proof, credibility assessment in EU asylum systems.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1951). The 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Vernham, Z., Dalton, G., Serok-Jeppa, O., Rozmann, N., Nahari, G., & Fisher, R. P. (2021). ‘Please tell me all you remember’: A comparison between British and Arab interviewees’ free narrative performance and its implications for lie detection. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(4), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1805812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. (2016). Remembering the self in cultural contexts: A cultural dynamic theory of autobiographical memory. Memory Studies, 9(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016645238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar