Development and Validation of the Need for Privacy Scale (NFP-S)

References

• Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, A. A., Murata, K., & Orito, Y. (2009). The Japanese sense of information privacy. AI & Society, 24(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0228-z
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bartol, J., Vehovar, V., & Petrovčič, A. (2021). Should we be concerned about how information privacy concerns are measured in online contexts? A systematic review of survey scale development studies. Informatics, 8(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020031
   Google Scholar
• Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, G. (2017). Privacy as a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Media Critiques, 3(10), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.17349/Jmc117204
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., & Pangestu, M. (2017). Regional reproductive quests: Cross-border reproductive travel among infertile Indonesian couples. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 58(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernatchez, M.‑C., Poirier, C., Morales, E., & Maltais, D. (2017). Rethinking the bathroom for adolescents with cerebral palsy: An exploratory pilot study addressing privacy and independence. Journal of Accessibility & Design for All, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v7i2.119
   Google Scholar
• Błachnio, A., Przepiorka, A., Boruch, W., & Bałakier, E. (2016). Self-presentation styles, privacy, and loneliness as predictors of Facebook use in young people. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., Kruikemeier, S., & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J. (2018). Exploring motivations for online privacy protection behavior: Insights from panel data. Communication Research, 25(7), 953–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218800915
   Google Scholar
• Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2020). Beyond the online offline distinction: Entry points to digital discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 35, 100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, N., & Antheunis, M. L. (2022). Skype or skip? Causes and consequences of intimate self-disclosure in computer-mediated doctor-patient communication. Media Psychology, 25(5), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2035769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. D., & Goodboy, A. K. (2020). Evolving considerations and empirical approaches to construct validity in communication science. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1792791
   Google Scholar
• Brell, T., Biermann, H., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2019, May 3–5). Conditional privacy: Users’ perception of data privacy in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 352–359). Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007693803520359
   Google Scholar
• Büchi, M., Festic, N., Just, N., & Latzer, M. (2021). Digital inequalities in online privacy protection: Effects of age, education and gender. In E. Hargittai (Ed.), Handbook of Digital Inequality (pp. 296–310). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116572.00029
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Privacy and communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 6(1), 206–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1982.11678499
   Google Scholar
• Buss, A. H. (2001). Psychological dimensions of the self. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernichky-Karcher, S., Venetis, M. K., & Gettings, P. E. (2022). Revealing mental health information in friendships: The role of disclosure strategy and perceived recipient response on disclosure outcomes. Health Communication, 37(7), 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1876325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling management. Information Systems Quaterly, 22(1), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, V. (2017). A study of negative emotional disclosure behavior in social network media: Will an unexpected negative event and personality matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. (2022). Privacy literacy on social media: Its predictors and outcomes. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2101685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney Walton, S., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Mediated disclosure on Twitter: The roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock, A. E. (1997). The measurement of privacy preferences within marital relationships: The relationship privacy preference scale. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189708251054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0: Adolescents’ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1527–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobber, T. (2023). Microtargeting, privacy, and the need for regulating algorithms. In S. Trepte & P. Masur (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media (pp. 237–245). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dogruel, L. (2019). Privacy nudges as policy interventions: Comparing US and German media users’ evaluation of information privacy nudges. Information, Communication & Society, 22(8), 1080–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1403642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogruel, L., Masur, P. K., & Joeckel, S. (2021). Development and validation of an algorithm literacy scale for internet users. Communication Methods and Measures, 16(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1968361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doley, J. R., McLean, S. A., Griffiths, S., & Yager, Z. (2021). Designing body image and eating disorder prevention programs for boys and men: Theoretical, practical, and logistical considerations from boys, parents, teachers, and experts. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(1), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000263
   Google Scholar
• Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21500-3
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Epskamp, P., Stuber, S., Nak, J., Myrthe, V., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). R package “semPlot” (Version 1.1.2) [Computer Software]. https://github.com/SachaEpskamp/semPlot
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., & Quinn, K. (2020). Markers of online privacy marginalization: Empirical examination of socioeconomic disparities in social media privacy attitudes, literacy, and behavior. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120916853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frener, R. (2023). Privacy and gender. In S. Trepte & P. K. Masur (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media (pp. 152–161). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. S., Da Silva, D., & Braga Junior, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: Fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E. (2020). R package “Hmisc” (Version 4.4-1) [Computer Software]. https://hbiostat.org/R/Hmisc/
   Google Scholar
• Heise, D. R. (1969). Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review, 34(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, P. (2018). Treating sensitive topics online: A privacy dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9482-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, P., & Eichenhofer, C. (2019). Reflexionen zu einem social turn in den privacy studies [Reflections on a social turn in privacy studies]. In Digitalität und Privatheit [Digitality and Privacy]. Eds. C. Aldenhoff, L. Edeler, M. Hennig, J. Kelsch, L. Raabe, & F. Sobala. transcript pp. 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839446614-009
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M. (2007). Gender, security and development. Conflict, Security & Development, 7(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800601176535
   Google Scholar
• Hoendervanger, J. G., van Yperen, N. W., Mobach, M. P., & Albers, C. J. (2019). Perceived fit in activity-based work environments and its impact on satisfaction and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, F.‑J., & Chiu, S.‑L. (2016). Factors influencing Facebook usage and Facebook addictive tendency in university students: The role of online psychological privacy and Facebook usage motivation. Stress & Health, 32(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. A. (1991). The relationships among need for privacy, loneliness, conversational sensitivity, and interpersonal communication motives. Communication Reports, 4(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219109367527
   Google Scholar
• Hosman, L. A., & Siltanen, S. A. (1995). Relationship intimacy, need for privacy, and privacy restoration behaviors. Communication Quarterly, 43(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379509369956
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M., Grinnell, R. M., & Blanchard, R. (1978). A test of a shorter privacy preference scale. The Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1978.9915962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, G. L., & Taylor, S. A. The relationship between preference for privacy and social media usage. (2019). Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(1), 43–54. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2018-2927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, H., Park, S. T., & Ko, M. H. (2016). A study of factors that affect the right to be forgotten and self-disclosure intent in SNS. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(26). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i26/97398
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office. (1976). Employment, growth and basic needs: A one world problem: Report of the director-general of the international labour office and declaration of principles and program of action adopted by the Conference (2nd ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Kalfa, S., Koelmeyer, L., Taksa, L., Winch, C., Viveros, H., Gollan, P. J., Mackie, H., & Boyages, J. (2019). Work experiences of Australian cancer survivors with lymphoedema: A qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27(4), 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, J. H., & Bell, N. J. (1988). Need for privacy and its effect upon interpersonal attraction and interaction. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1988.6.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, P. S., Gutierrez, D., Dew, B. J., & Abrams, L. P. (2017). Gay and lesbian parents. The Family Journal, 25(4), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717731204
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2011). Privacy disposition, website reputation, and familiarity: Their impacts on privacy concerns. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6c7f/7ff743f512163006b100d505516b8afe46f3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2014). The impact of disposition to privacy, website reputation and website familiarity on information privacy concerns. Decision Support Systems, 57, 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H., Shen, F., & Fu, K. (2017). Privacy protection and self-disclosure across societies: A study of global Twitter users. New Media & Society, 19(9), 1476–1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816642210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T. (2021). Valuing intrinsic and instrumental preferences for privacy. Marketing Science, 41(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, S., & Armstrong, D. (2019). Beyond information: The role of territory in privacy management behavior on social networking sites. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(4), 434–475. https://doi.org/10.17705/1.jais.00540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Sarathy, R., & Xu, H. (2010). Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51(1), 62–71. https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/BLSE%3ARN281839790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., Bartel, A., Schwemmer, C., Powell, C., Djalovski, A., & Titz, J. (2020). R package “sjPlot” (Version 2.8.6) [Computer Software]. https://strengejacke.github.io/sjPlot/
   Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., Makowski, D., Waggoner, P., Patil, I., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). R package “performance” (Version 0.5.1) [Computer Software]. https://easystats.github.io/performance/
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., & Ranzini, G. (2017). Where dating meets data: Investigating social and institutional privacy concerns on Tinder. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117697735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, C., Schöttler, M., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2019). The privacy implications of social robots: Scoping review and expert interviews. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(3), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919843961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis, S. T. (2003). On the status and contribution of Westin’s and Altman’s theories of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, N. J. (1972). Privacy and environment. Human Ecology, 1(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, N. J. (1974). Dimensions of privacy preferences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 9(3), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0903_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masur, P. K. (2018). Mehr als Bewusstsein für Privatheitsrisiken: Eine Rekonzeptualisierung der Online- Privatheitskompetenz als Kombination aus Wissen, Fähig- und Fertigkeiten [More than awareness of privacy risks: A reconceptualization of online privacy literacy as a combination of knowledge, skills and abilities]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 66(4), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2018-4-446
   Google Scholar
• Masur, P. K. (2020). How online privacy literacy supports self-data protection and self-determination in the age of information. Media and Communication, 8(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masur, P. K., Hagendorff, T., & Trepte, S. (2023). Challenges in studying social media privacy literacy. In S. Trepte & P. Masur (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media (pp. 110–123). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Masur, P. K., Teutsch, D., & Trepte, S. Entwicklung und Validierung der Online-Privatheitskompetenzskala (OPLIS) [Development and validation of the Online Privacy Literacy Scale (OPLIS)]. (2017). Diagnostica, 63(4), 256–268. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000179
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McStay, A. (2020). Emotional AI, soft biometrics and the surveillance of emotional life: An unusual consensus on privacy. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 205395172090438. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720904386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Y., Schäwel, J., Kyewski, E., & Krämer, N. C. (2020). Applying protection motivation theory to predict Facebook users’ withdrawal and disclosure intentions. SMSociety’20: International Conference on Social Media and Society, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3400806.3400810
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. (2011). A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus, 140(4), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2011). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, S., & Kobsa, A. (2005). Uncovering privacy attitudes and practices in instant messaging. In M. Pendergast, K. Schmidt, G. Mark, & M. Ackerman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work - GROUP ’05 (p. 109). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1099203.1099220
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D. M. (1979). Dimensions of privacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48(3), 1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1979.48.3c.1291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D. M. (1987). Relationship of personality to privacy preferences. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 2(2), 267–274.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D. M. (1987). Sex differences in privacy preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64(3), 1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1987.64.3c.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D. M., & Frances, S. (1990). Regional differences in privacy preferences. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 731–736. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3.731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petro, G., & Metzger, M. J. (2023). Group privacy. In S. Trepte & P. Masur (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media (pp. 45–53). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pöge, K., Rommel, A., Starker, A., Prütz, F., Tolksdorf, K., Öztürk, I., Strasser, S., Born, S., & Saß, A.‑C. (2022). Survey of sex/gender diversity in the GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS study - objectives, procedure and experiences. Journal of Health Monitoring, 7(2), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.25646/9957
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prince, V. (2005). Sex vs. gender. The International Journal of Transgenderism, 8(4), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1300/J485v08n04_05
   Google Scholar
• Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v15i1.2775
   Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P. (2012). Invited Paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rensel, A., Abbas, J., & Rao, H. R. (2006). Private transactions in public places: An exploration of the impact of the computer environment on public transactional web site Use. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2021). R package “psych” (Version 2.0.9) [Computer Software]. https://personality-project.org/r/psych/
   Google Scholar
• Rosseell, Y., Jorgensen, T. D., & Rockwood, N. (2021). R package “lavaan” (Version 0.6-9) [Computer Software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Russel, D. W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D. W. (1982). Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. W., & Pang, Y. C. (2020). Loneliness. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 2674–2677). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1085
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M., & Bachl, M. (2019). Stable attitudes and behaviors as boundary conditions of reinforcing spirals models. In P. Müller, S. Geiß, C. Schemer, T. K. Naab, & C. Peter (Eds.), Methoden und Forschungslogik der Kommunikationswissenschaft: Vol. 15. Dynamische Prozesse der öffentlichen Kommunikation: Methodische Herausforderungen (pp. 286–300). Herbert von Halem Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schäwel, J. (2019). How to raise users’ awareness of online privacy. University of Duisburg-Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Schäwel, J., Frener, R., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2021). Learning by doing oder doing by learning? Die Wechselwirkung zwischen Online-Privatheitskompetenz und Datenschutzverhalten [The interdependency between online privacy literacy and data protection behavior]. Medien- & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 69(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2021-2-1
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B. (1999). An investigation of gender differences in online privacy concerns and resultant behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(4), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6653(199923)13:4<24:AID-DIR3>3.0.CO;2-O
   Google Scholar
• Škrinjarić, B., Budak, J., & Žokalj, M. (2018). The effect of personality traits on online privacy concern. Ekonomski Pregled, 69(2), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.32910/ep.69.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., Floridi, L., & van der Sloot, B. (2017). Introduction: A new perspective on privacy. In L. Taylor, L. Floridi, & B. van der Sloot (Eds.), Group privacy: New challenges of data technologies (pp. 83–100). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2018). Privacy in mediated and nonmediated interpersonal communication: How subjective concepts and situational perceptions influence behaviors. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118767134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. (2011). Privacy and gender in the social web. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online. Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web (pp. 251–266). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tifferet, S. (2019). Gender differences in privacy tendencies on social network sites: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S. (2021). The Social Media Privacy Model: Privacy and communication in the light of social media affordances. Communication Theory, 31(4), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S. (2023). Privacy theory - social, networked, relational, collective. In S. Trepte & P. Masur (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Privacy and Social Media (pp. 25–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., & Masur, P. K. (2016). Cultural differences in social media use, privacy, and self-disclosure: Research report of a multicultural survey study. University of Hohenheim.
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., & Masur, P. K. (2017). Need for privacy. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–4). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Masur, P. K., & Dienlin, T. (2021). The Privacy Longitudinal Study [Data and Measures]. https://doi.org/10.7802/2117
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Masur, P. K., Scharkow, M., & Dienlin, T. (2015). Privatheitsbedürfnisse verschiedener Kommunikationstypen on- und offline: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Studie zum Umgang mit persönlichen Inhalten [Privacy needs for different communication profiles online and offline]. Media Perspektiven, 5, 250–257.
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2011). The social web as shelter for privacy and authentic living. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy Online. Perspectives on Privacy and Self-disclosure in the Social Web (pp. 61–74). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., Ellison, N. B., Quiring, O., Yao, M. Z., & Ziegele, M. (2017). A cross-cultural perspective on the privacy calculus. Social Media + Society, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116688035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Teutsch, D., Masur, P. K., Eicher, C., Fischer, M., Hennhöfer, A., & Lind, F. (2015). Do people know about privacy and data protection strategies? Towards the “online privacy literacy scale” (OPLIS). In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, & P. D. Hert (Eds.), Law, governance and technology series: Vol. 20. Reforming European data protection law (pp. 333–365). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Turland, M., & Slade, P. (2020). Farmers’ willingness to participate in a big data platform. Agribusiness, 36(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being. Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaskooi-Eshkevari, K., Mirbazegh, F., Soltani-Kermanshahi, M., Sabzali-Poursarab-Saeedi, M., & Alipour, S. (2019). Customized patient clothing and patient satisfaction. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 32(3), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2018-0047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeij, T., Pouwels, J. L., Beyens, I., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2021). The accuracy and validity of self-reported social media use measures among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100090
   Google Scholar
• Vinsel, A., Brown, B. B., Altman, I., & Foss, C. (1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1104–1115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visinescu, L. L., Azogu, O., Ryan, S. D., Wu, Y. A., and Kim, D. J. (2016). Better safe than sorry: A study of investigating individuals’ protection of privacy in the use of storage as a cloud computing cervice. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(11), 885–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1204838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321160
   Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Westin, A. F. (1970). Privacy and freedom (2nd ed.). Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (2005). Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Kohske, T., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., & Dunnington, D. (2020). R package “ggPlot2” (Version 3.3.2) [Computer Software]. http://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/
   Google Scholar
• Windisch, M., & Kniel, A. (1988). Zur Messung von Einsamkeit und sozialer Abhängigkeit behinderter Menschen [Measuring loneliness and social dependence of disabled people]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 17(5), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1988-0506
   Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S. (2022). Privacy in collapsed contexts of displacement. Feminist Media Studies, 22(4), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1841814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, H. J., & Hart, P. (2008). Examining the formation of individual’s privacy concerns: Toward an integrative view. ICIS 2008 Proceedings. 6. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/6
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011). Information privacy concerns: Linking individual perceptions with institutional privacy assurances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(12), 798–824. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, M. Z., & Linz, D. G. (2008). Predicting self-protections of online privacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(5), 615–617. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao, M. Z., Rice, R. E., & Wallis, K. (2007). Predicting user concerns about online privacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S., & Hall, K. (2008). Gender and online privacy among teens: Risk perception, privacy concerns, and protection behaviors. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 763–765. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, N., Wang, C., & Xu, Y. (2011). Privacy in online social networks. International Conference on Interaction Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Zukowski, T., & Brown, I. (2007). Examining the influence of demographic factors on internet users’ information privacy concerns. In Proceedings of the 2007 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries (pp. 197–204). https://doi.org/10.1145/1292491.1292514
   Google Scholar