Preliminary Evaluation of Structured Professional Judgment to Assess Removal in Child Protection Practice

REFERENCES

• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). 4102.0: Australian Social Trends, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/3101.0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). 3101.0: Australian Demographic Statistics, September 2012. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/3101.0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2013). Child protection Australia 2011–12 (Child Welfare series). Canberra, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, C., & Wagner, D. (2000). The relative validity of actuarial- and consensus-based risk assessment systems. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 839–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, C., Wagner, D., Healy, T., & Johnson, K. (1999). Risk assessment in child protective services: consensus and actuarial model reliability. Child Welfare, 78, 723–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, J., Trocme, N., Goodman, D., Shlonsky, A., Black, T., & Leslie, B. (2007). The reliability and predictive validity of consensus-based risk assessment. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Centres of Excellence for Children's Well-Being.
   Google Scholar
• Bath, H. (2007). Northern Territory Community Services High Risk Audit. Darwin, Australia: The Thomas Wright Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, A., Friendship, C., Erikson, M., & Hanson, R. (2002). The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and conviction in a sample of UK child abusers. Sexual abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 155–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatti-Sinclair, K., & Sutcliffe, C. (2012). What determines the out-of-home placement of children in the USA? Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1749–1755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Lodewijks, H., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2010). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk In Youth (SAVRY). In R. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assesment (pp. 63–79). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, M., Belderson, P., Warren, C., Howe, D., Gardner, R., Dodsworth, J., & Black, J. (2008). Analysing child deaths and serious injury through abuse and neglect: what can we learn? A bienniel analysis of serious case reviews 2003–2005. Nottingham, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, M., Sidebotham, P., Ellis, C., Baily, S., & Belderson, P. (2011). Child and family practitioners’ understanding of child development: lessons learnt from a small sample of serious care reviews. London, UK: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Children's Court of Victoria. (2011). Annual report 2010–2011. Melbourne, Australia: Children's Court of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Children's Court of Victoria. (2012). Family division—child protection. In P. Power (Ed.), Research materials. Retrieved from http://www.childrenscourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Research_Materials_5_FD_Child_Protection_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H., Unell, I., & Aldgate, J. (2011). Children's needs–parenting capacity. Child abuse: Parental mental illness, learning disability, substance misuse, and domestic violence. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Coid, J. W., Yang, M., Ulrich, S., Zhang, T., Sizmur, S., Farrington, D., & Rogers, R. (2011). Most items in structured risk assessment instruments do not predict violence. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, P., Scott, D., & Scales, B. (2012). Protecting Victoria's vulnerable children inquiry. Victoria, Australia: Department of Premier and Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson-Arad, B. (2001). Predicted changes in children's quality of life in decisions regarding the removal of children at risk from their homes. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 127–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, L. (2014). Child removal in child protection practice: comparing structured professional judgement and actuarial risk assessment instruments (PhD thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) Retrieved from http://arrow.monash.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/monash:128561.
   Google Scholar
• De Bortoli, L., & Dolan, M. (2015). Decision making in social work with families and children: developing decision-aids compatible with cognition. British Journal of Social Work, 45, 2142–2160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfabbro, P., Fernandez, E., McCormick, J., & Kettler, L. (2013). Reunification in a complete entry cohort: A longitudinal study of children entering out-of-home care in Tasmania, Australia. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1592–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. (2011a). Protecting children, changing lives. Supporting the child protection workforce. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government Department of Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. (2011b). Child protection workforce. The case for change. Melbourne, Australia: State of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. (2012). Best interests case practice model: Summary Guide. Melbourne, Australia: State Government of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• DeRoma, V. M., Kessler, M. L., McDaniel, R., & Soto, C. M. (2006). Important risk factors in home-removal decisions: Social caseworker perceptions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, D., Berkowitz, L., Kadushin, A., & McGlogin, J. (1990). Some factors influencing abusers’ justification of their child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 337–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, M., & Doyle, M. (2000). Violence risk prediction: Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, T., & Jureidini, J. (2004). Parenting capacity. Child Abuse Review, 13, 5–17. doi:10.1002/car.827
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Hart, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1372–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K., & Reeves, K. (2010). Historical-Clinical-Risk-Management-20 (HCR-20) violence risk assessment scheme. Rational, application and emprical overview. In R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K., & Skeem, J. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 11, 347–383. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, D., & Harwin, J. (2006). Parental substance misuse and child care social work: findings from the first stage of a study of 100 families. Child & Family Social Work, 11, 325–335.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2005). Critical thinking in clinical practice: improving the quality of judgments and decisions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2009). Practitioner perspectives on the Family Risk Evaluation Tool: An aide to decision making or “just another form to fill in”? Developing Practice, 23, 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2011). Decision-making tools and the development of expertise in child protection practitioners: are we ‘just breeding workers who are good at ticking boxes'? Child & Family Social Work, 16, 412–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P., & Humphreys, C. (2010). Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools: Observations and reflections from the front line. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2598–2616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W., & Meehl, P. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 292–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S., & Boer, D. (2010). Structured professional judgement guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The Sexual Violence Risk-20 (SVR-20) and Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). In R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 269–294). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Yasuhara, K., & Shah, S. (2010). Violence risk assessment tools: Overview and critical analysis. In R. Otto & K. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, T. (1999). Child protection: A new approach in South Australia. Child Abuse Review, 8, 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., & Scharenbroch, C. (2012). Family risk evaluation validation: A prospective study. Prepared for Queensland Department of Communities, Child Safety Services. Madison, WI: Children's Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., Wagner, D., & Wiebush, R. (2000). South Australia Department of Family and Community Services: Risk assessment revalidation Study. Madison, WI: Children's Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, J. (1995). The clinical prediction of violent behavior. Northvale, NJ: John Aronsin Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection. (2nd ed.): London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E., & Manful, E. (2010). Safeguarding children: a comparison of England's data with that of Australia, Norway and the United States. Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre. London, UK: Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• NSPCC. (2012). NSPCC policy on child neglect. Retrieved from https://www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/resourcesforprofessionals/neglect/policy_wda92078.html
   Google Scholar
• Random.Org. (1998–2012). Random.Org. Retrieved from http://www.random.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M., & Harris, G. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannapieco, M., & Connell-Carrick, K. (2005). Understanding child maltreatment. An ecological and developmental perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, R. (2001). Magistrates’ decision-making in child protection cases. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sidebotham, P. (2001). An ecological approach to child abuse: a creative use of scientific models in research and practice. Child Abuse Review, 10, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Child Death Review Committee. (2011). Annual report of inquiries into the deaths of children known to Child Protection 2011. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. (1997). South Australia Department of Family and Community Services: Risk Assessment Validation Study. Madison, WI: Children's Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S., Olver, M., & Stockdale, K. (2009). The utility of dynamic and static factors in risk assessment, prediction, and treatment. In J. Andrade (Ed.), Handbook of violence risk assessment and treatment: New approaches for mental health professionals (pp. 83–120). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2008). Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry Into Child Protection Services in New South Wales. Sydney, Australia: State of NSW through the Special Commission of Inquiry Into Child Protection Services in NSW.
   Google Scholar