The Death Penalty Attitudes of Social Work Students: Current and Future Opportunities

REFERENCES

• Andrews, A. B. (1991). Social work expert testimony regarding mitigation in capital sentencing proceedings. Social Work, 36, 440–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F., Fisher, B., & Vander Ven, T. (2000). Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology, 38, 719–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyrous, G. (2011). Statistics for research: With a guide for SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, M. P., & Umbreit, M. S. (2012). Assessing the impact of the ultimate penal sanction on homicide survivors: A two state comparison. Marquette Law Review, 96(1), Article 3. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol96/iss1/3
   Google Scholar
• Austin, W., Goble, E., & Kelecevic, J. (2009). The ethics of forensic psychiatry: Moving beyond principles to a relational ethics approach. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 835–850. doi:10.1080/14789940903174147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. N., Lambert, E. G., & Jenkins, M. (2005). Racial differences in death penalty support and opposition: A preliminary study of white and black college students. Journal of Black Studies, 35, 201–224. doi:10.1177/0021934704263126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2008). The decline of the death penalty and the discovery of innocence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. (1767). An essay on crimes and punishments. London, UK: Printed for J. Almon.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, E., & Britto, S. (2006). Using feminist methods and restorative justice to interview capital offenders’ family members. Affilia, 21(1), 59–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0886109905283139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns, N. (2009). Contesting the victim card: Closure discourse and emotion in death penalty rhetoric. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 383–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betancourt, B., Dolmage, K., Johnson, C., Leach, T., Menchaca, J., Montero, D., & Wood, T. (2006). Social workers’ roles in the criminal justice system: Adapting to the USA's changing attitudes towards the death penalty, 1953–2001. International Social Work, 49, 615–627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872806066762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bias, T. K., Goldberg, A., & Hannum, T. (2011). Catholics and the death penalty: Religion as a filter for political beliefs. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 7, Article 10. Retrieved from http://www.religjournal.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. M. (1989). The effects of classroom instruction and discussion on death penalty opinions: A teaching note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 123–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. M. (1992). Retribution and capital punishment: Toward a better understanding of death penalty opinion. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. (2011). DeathQuest: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. M., & Vogel, R. E. (1991). Educational experiences and death penalty opinions: Stimuli that produce changes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 2, 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. M., & Vogel, B. L. (2004). More than ten years after: The long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, R. M., Vogel, R. E., & Maisto, A. A. (1993). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: A panel study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(1), 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, M. J. (1997). The Southern subculture of punitiveness: Regional variation in support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britto, S., & Noga-Styron, K. E. (2015). The belief that guns deter crime and support for capital punishment. Criminal Justice Studies, 28, 314. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2015.1048546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, B. M., & Moran, G. (2002). The role of death qualification in venirepersons’ evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgason, K. A., & Pazzani, L. (2014). The death penalty: A multi-level analysis of public opinion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 818–838. doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9261-7
   Google Scholar
• Chalfin, A., Haviland, A. M., & Raphael, S. (2013). What do panel studies tell us about a deterrent effect of capital punishment? A critique of the literature. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(1), 5–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9168-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J., Boots, D., & Heide, K. (2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20, 65–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J., & Chamlin, M. (2005). Can information change public opinion? Another test of the Marshall hypotheses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 573–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J., Denise, P., & Chamlin, M. (2006). Political identity and support for capital punishment: A test of attribution theory. Journal of Crime & Justice, 29(1), 45–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. K. (2013). Student death penalty attitudes: Does new information matter? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24, 443–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2013.787638
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (2010). Poll shows growing support for alternatives to the death penalty: Capital punishment ranked lowest among budget priorities. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/pollresults#Press_Release
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (2015a). Executions by year. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions-year
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (2015b). Death penalty on hold in most of the country. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/5829
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (2015c). Number of executions by state and region since 1976. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/number-executions-state-and-region-1976
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (2015d). Race of death row inmates executed since 1976. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death-row-inmates-executed-1976#defend
   Google Scholar
• Death Penalty Information Center. (n.d.). States with and without the death penalty. Retrieved from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Ross, L. (1983). Public opinion and capital punishment: a close of examination of the views of abolitionist and retentionist. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 116–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epperson, M. W., Roberts, L., Ivanoff, A., Tripodi, S. J., & Gilmer, C. (2013). To what extent is criminal justice content specifically addressed in MSW program? Journal of Social Work Education, 49, 96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergun, D. (2014, June 5). New low in preference for the death penalty. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/06/new-low-in-preference-for-the-death-penalty/
   Google Scholar
• Farnworth, M., Longmire, D., & West, V. (1998). College students’ views on criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 9, 39–57. doi:10.1080/10511259800084171
   Google Scholar
• Firment, K. A., & Geiselman, E. (1997). University students’ attitudes and perceptions of the death penalty. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 15, 65–89.
   Google Scholar
• Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238. (1972).
   Google Scholar
• Gould, K. K., & Perlin, M. L. (2000). “Johnny's in the basement/mixing up his medicine": Therapeutic jurisprudence and clinical teaching. Seattle University Law Review, 24, 339.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153. (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Guin, C. C., Noble, D. N., & Merrill, T. S. (2003). From misery to mission: Forensic social workers on multidisciplinary mitigation teams. Social Work, 48, 362–371. doi:10.1093/sw/48.3.362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. W. (1986). Over-simplification and error in public opinion surveys on capital punishment. Justice Quarterly, 3, 429–455.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2001). Capital punishment: A global perspective. Punishment and Society, 3, 331–354.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2005). Capital punishment: The USA in world perspective (Working paper No. 3, Extrajudicial executions series). Retrieved from http://chrgj.org/publications/docs/wp/Hood.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Innocence Project. (n.d.). Our work. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/free-innocent
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. (2014). Americans’ support for death penalty stable. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/178790/americans-support-death-penalty-stable.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262. (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• LaChappelle, L. (2014). Capital punishment in the era of globalization: A partial test of the marshall hypothesis among college students. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 839–854. doi:10.1007/s12103-014-9263-5
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., Camp, S. D., Clarke, A., & Jiang, S. (2011). The impact of information on death penalty support, revisited. Crime and Delinquency, 57, 572–599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011128707312147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, E., & Clarke, A. (2001). The impact of information on an individual's support of the death penalty: A partial test of the marshall hypothesis among college students. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12, 215–234.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., Clarke, A., & Lambert, J. (2004). Reasons for supporting or opposing capital punishment in the USA. Internet Journal of Criminology. Retrieved from http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/ijcprimaryresearch.html
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., Clarke, A., Tucker-Gail, K., & Hogan, N. L. (2009). Multivariate analysis of reasons for death penalty support between male and female college students: Empirical support for gilligan's ‘ethic of care’. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law & Society, 22, 239–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786010903166957
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., Moore, B., Jenkins, M., Jiang, S., & Clarke, A. (2008). The death penalty attitudes of criminal justice students: Are they different from other students? Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law & Society, 21, 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, E. G., Pasupuleti, S., & Allen, R. I. (2005). Punishment and rehabilitation views of social work majors and non-social work students: An exploratory study. Journal of the South Carolina Academy of Science, 3(1), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. M., Bohm, R. M., & Pazzani, L. M. (2014). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: The marshall hypotheses revisited. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 642–659. doi:10.1007/s12103-013-9229-z
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2002). Capital punishment as moral imperative: Pro-death penalty discourse on the internet. Punishment and Society, 4, 213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Lubove, R. (1965). The professional altruist: the emergence of social work as a career, 1880–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquart, J. W., & Sorensen, J. R. (1989). A national study of the Furman commuted inmates: assessing the threat to society from capital offenders. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review, 23, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Meskell, M. W. (1999). An American resolution: The history of prisons in the United States from 1777 to 1877. Stanford Law Review, 51, 839–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallicoat, S., & Brown, G. (2008). The impact of race and ethnicity on student opinions of capital punishment. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 6, 255–280. doi:10.1080/15377930802530296
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C., & Cochran, J. K. (2011). The effects of information on change in death penalty support: race- and gender-specific extensions of the Marshall hypotheses. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 9, 291–313.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2015). Social work speaks (10th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasupuleti, S., Lambert, E. G., & Cluse-Tolar, T. (2005). Undergraduate views of capital punishment: Are social work students different from other students? Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 2(2). Retrieved from http://jswve.org/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Less support for death penalty, especially among Democrats. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2015/04/16/less-support-for-death-penalty-especially-among-democrats/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. (2009). Status disparities in the capital of capital punishment. Law & Society Review, 43, 807–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, E. K. (2004). Research to inform mental health practice: Social work's contribution. Social Work Research, 28, 195–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242. (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Radelet, M., & Lacock, T. (2009). Do executions lower homicide rates? The views of leading Criminologists. Journal of Criminal Law &Criminology, 99, 489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randa, L. E. (1997). Society's final solution: A history and discussion of the death penalty. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. (2009). Death nation: The experts explain American capital punishment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sarat, A., & Vidmar, N. (1976). Public opinion, the death penalty, and the eighth amendment: Testing the marshall hypothesis. Wisconsin Law Review, 17, 171–207.
   Google Scholar
• Schabas, W. (1993). The abolition of the death penalty in international law. Cambridge, UK: Grotius Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J., Guin, C. C., Pogue, R., & Bordelon, D. (2006). Mitigating circumstances in death penalty decisions: Using evidence-based research to inform social work practice in capital trials. Social Work, 51, 355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, T. J. (2011). Capital punishment, 2010—statistical tables (NCJ 236510). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Stack, S. (2000). Support for the death penalty: A gender-specific model. Sex Roles, 43, 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiker, C. S. (2009). The Marshall hypothesis revisited. Howard Law Review Journal, 52, 525.
   Google Scholar
• Steiker, J. M., & Steiker, C. S. (2015). The American death penalty and the (in)visibility of race. The University of Chicago Law Review, 82(1), 243–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrell, J., & Staller, K. M. (2003). Buckshot's case: Social work and death penalty mitigation in alabama. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), 7–23. doi:10.1177/1473325003002001276
   Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. (2005). Executing the innocent and support for capital punishment: Implications for public policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 3–38.
   Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. (2006). Christian fundamentalism and support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 169–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2012). White perceptions of whether African Americans and Hispanics are prone to violence and support for the death penalty. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49, 519–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Armour, M. P. (2006). Victims of severe violence in mediated dialogue with offender: The impact of the first multi-site study in the U.S. International Review of Victimology, 13(1), 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, M., Giacopassi, D., & Gathje, P. (2002). ‘I hope someone murders your mother!': An exploration of extreme support for the death penalty. Deviant Behavior, 23, 385–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidmar, N. (1974). Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty. The Canadian Psychologist, 15, 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidmar, N., & Dittenhoffer, T. (1981). Informed public opinion and death penalty attitudes. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 23, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Vollum, S., Longmire, D. R., Buffington-Vollum, J. (2004). Confidence in the death penalty and support for its use: Exploring the value-expressive dimension of death penalty attitudes. Justice Quarterly, 21, 521–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. T., & Blankenship, M. B. (2000). The gender gap in capital punishment attitudes: An analysis of support and opposition. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, L., Clarke, A., & Lambert, E. (2002). Innocence matters: How innocence recasts the death penalty debate. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38, 670–735.
   Google Scholar
• Worthen, M. G. F., Rodgers, F. R., & Sharp, S. F. (2014). Expanding the spectrum of attitudes toward the death penalty: How nondichotomous response options affect our understandings of death penalty attitudes. Criminal Justice Review, 39, 160–181.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, H. O., Bohm, R. M., & Jamieson, K. M. (1995). A comparison of uninformed and informed death penalty opinions: A replication and expansion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 57–87.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. L. (1992). Religious orientation, race and support for the death penalty. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. (2003). The contradictions of American capital punishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar