Social Worker Assessments of Competency to Stand Trial

REFERENCES

• American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19. doi:10.1037/a0029889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291–316. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370100303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butters, R. P., & Vaughan-Eden, V. (2011a). Letter from the editors. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Butters, R. P., & Vaughan-Eden, V. (2011b). The ethics of practicing forensic social work. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 61–72. doi:10.1080/1936928x.2011.541202
   Google Scholar
• Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). Immaturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 741–760. doi:10.1002/bsl.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, M. L., & Zapf, P. A. (2004). An investigation of discrepancies between mental health professionals and the courts in decisions about competency. Law and Psychology Review, 28, 109–132.
   Google Scholar
• Drope v. Missouri. (1975) 420 U. S. 162.
   Google Scholar
• Dusky v. United States. (1960) 362 U.S. 402.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, B. C. (2000). Juveniles’ waiver of legal rights: Confessions, Miranda, and the right to counsel. In T. Grisso & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 105–138). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. F., Peszke, M. A., & Goodwin, R. C. (1978). Competency evaluations in Connecticut. Psychiatric Services, 29, 450–453. doi:10.1176/ps.29.7.450
   Google Scholar
• Frost, L. E., de Camara, R. L., & Earl, T. R. (2006). Training, certification and regulation of forensic evaluators. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 6, 77–91. doi:10.1300/j158v06n02_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godinez v. Moran. (1993) 113 S. Ct. 2680.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2010). Evaluating capacity to waive Miranda rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (2005). Evaluating juveniles’ adjudicative competence: A guide for clinical practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T., & Quinlan, J. (2005). Juvenile court clinical services: A national description. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 56, 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.2005.tb00175.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., Goldstein, A. M., & LaDuke, C. (2013). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. In R. Roesch & P. A. Zapf (Eds.), Forensic assessments in criminal and civil law: A handbook for lawyers (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• In re Gault. (1967) 387 U.S. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Indiana v. Edwards. (2008) 554 U.S. 164.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins v. United States. (1962) 113 U.S. App. D.C. 300, 307.2d 637.
   Google Scholar
• Kent v. United States. (1966) 383 U.S. 541.
   Google Scholar
• Kruh, I., & Grisso, T. (2009). Evaluations of juveniles’ competence to stand trial. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maschi, T., & Killian, M. L. (2011). The evolution of forensic social work in the United States: Implications for 21st century practice. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 8–36. doi:10.1080/1936928x.2011.541198
   Google Scholar
• McGaha, A., Otto, R. K., McClaren, M. D., & Petrila, J. (2001). Juveniles adjudicated incompetent to proceed: A descriptive study of Florida's competence restoration program. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 29, 427–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan, K., Roesch, R., & Douglas, K. S. (2011). Examining the role of interrogative suggestibility in Miranda rights comprehension in adolescents. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 165–177. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9198-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, G., Weithorn, L., & Slobogin, C. (1985). Community mental health centers and the courts: An evaluation of community-based forensic services. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miranda v. Arizona. (1966) 384 U.S. 436.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, C. (2011). Forensic social work practice standards: Definition and specification. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 37–60.
   Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Zapf, P. A., Warren, J. I., & Henderson, C. E. (2008). Clinician variation in findings of competence to stand trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 177–193. doi:10.1037/a0013578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, R., Poythress, N., Edens, N., Nicholson, R., Monahan, J., Bonnie, R. & Eisenberg, M. (1998). Psychometric properties of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 10, 435–443. doi:10.1037//1040-3590.10.4.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate v. Robinson. (1966) 383 U. S. 375.
   Google Scholar
• Petrella, R. C., & Poythress, N. G. (1983). The quality of forensic evaluations: An interdisciplinary study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 76–85. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.1.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poythress, N. G., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., Otto, R. K., & Hoge, S. K. (2002). Adjudicative competence: The MacArthur studies. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Poythress, N. G., Nicholson, R. A., Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., Bonnie, R. J., Monahan, J., & Hoge, S. K. (1999). The MacArthur competence assessment tool: Criminal adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, R. E., Goldstein, N. E. S., & Heilbrun, K. (2005). Juvenile delinquency: Past and present. In K. Heilbrun N. E. S. Goldstein & R. E. Redding (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency: Prevention, assessment, and intervention (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. R. (2008). Social workers’ desk reference. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R. (2011). Young offenders and legal competencies. In T. Bliesener A. Beelmann & M. Stemmler (Eds.), Antisocial behavior and crime: Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention, (pp. 275–290). Cambridge, UK: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1980). Competency to stand trial. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R., & Viljoen, J. L. (2016). Assessing adolescents’ adjudicative competence. In R. Jackson & R. Roesch (Eds.), Learning forensic assessment (pp. 271–293). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R., Zapf, P. A., & Eaves, D. (2006). Fitness Interview Test—Revised: A structured interview for assessing competency to stand trial. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial—revised professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, A. M., & Elwork, A. (1990). Treating incompetence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 57–65. doi:10.1007/bf01055789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. M. (2008). The growing admissibility of expert testimony by clinical social workers on competence to stand trial. Social Work, 53, 153–163. doi:10.1093/sw/53.2.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J., & Golding, S. L. (1998). Community examiners’ evaluations of competence to stand trial: Common problems and suggestions for improvement. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 357–367. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.29.4.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surface, D. (2007). State of mind: Evaluating competency to stand trial. Social Work Today, 7(4), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., & Roesch, R. (2005). Competency to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 723–742. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-7978-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., & Zapf, P. A. (2002). Interrater reliability of the fitness interview test across four professional groups. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 47, 945–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Roesch, R., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Zapf, P. A. (2003). The role of Canadian psychologists in conducting fitness and criminal responsibility evaluations. Canadian Psychology, 44, 369–381. doi:10.1037/h0086959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Vincent, G. M., & Roesch, R. (2006). Assessing adolescent defendants’ adjudicative competence: Interrater reliability and factor structure of the fitness interview test-revised. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 449–466. doi:10.1177/0093854806287317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J. I., DuVal, J., Komarovskaya, I., Chauhan, P., Buffington-Vollum, J., & Ryan, E. (2009). Developing a forensic service delivery system for juveniles adjudicated incompetent to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 245–262. doi:10.1080/14999011003635670
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2009). Best practices in forensic mental health assessments: Evaluation of competence to stand trial. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2011). Future directions in the restoration of competence to stand trial. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 43–47. doi:10.1177/0963721410396798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., Boccaccini, M. A., & Brodsky, S. L. (2003). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 103–120. doi:10.1002/bsl.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., Roesch, R., & Viljoen, J. L. (2001) Assessing fitness to stand trial: The utility of the fitness interview test (revised edition). Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 426–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., Skeem, J. L., & Golding, S. L. (2005). Factor structure and validity of the MacArthur competence assessment tool—Criminal adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 17, 433–445. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar