‘We’re supposed to be at the forefront’: a multiple case study exploring how institutional context shapes engineering diversity and inclusion initiatives

References

• Altheide, D., M. Coyle, K. DeVriese, and C. Schneider. “Emergent Qualitative Document Analysis.” In Handbook of Emergent Methods, edited by S. N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy, 127–151. New York: The Guilford Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. “Initiating Change that Perseveres.” The American Behavioral Scientist 40, no. 3 (1997): 299–309. doi:10.1177/0002764297040003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, Rachel, George Boyne, and Rick Delbridge. “Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19, no. 1 (January 1, 2009): 165–187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, Jens. “Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change.” Sociological Theory 28, no. 2 (2010): 150–166. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01369.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. “The Contradictions of Change in Academic Systems.” Higher Education 12, no. 1 (1983): 101–116. doi:10.1007/BF00140275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., and J. March. “Leadership in an Organized Anarchy.” In Organizational and Governance of Higher Education, edited by M.C. Brown, 5th ed., 16–35. Boston, MA: Pearson Publishing, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., and K. E. Weick. “Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems.” The Academy of Management Journal 9, no. 2 (1984): 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., J. Bundy, L. Plunkett Tost, and M. C. Suchman. “Organizational Legitimacy: Six Key Questions.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. E. Meyer, 2nd ed., 27–54. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (April 1983): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Engineering. “National Science Foundation,” n.d. https://www.nsf.gov/eng/diversity.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, Christen, and Petra Brysiewicz. “A Hands-on Guide to Doing Content Analysis.” African Journal of Emergency Medicine 7, no. 3 (September 1, 2017): 93–99. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, Amitai. “Authority Structure and Organizational Effectiveness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 4, no. 1 (June 1959): 43–67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2390648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan, Dorothy E., and Zelda F. Gamson. “Disciplinary Adaptations to Research Culture in Comprehensive Institutions.” The Review of Higher Education 19, no. 2 (1996): 141–177. doi:10.1353/rhe.1996.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. “Judging the Quality of Fourth Generation Evaluation.” In Fourth Generation Evaluation, 228–251. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. “Why Do Universities Have Endowments?” Journal of Legal Studies XIX (1990): 3–42. doi:10.1086/467841
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, A. “Human Ecology.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by D.L. Sills, 328–337. New York: MacMillan, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 9 (November 1, 2005): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keup, J. R., A. A. Walker, H. S. Astin, and J. A. Lindholm. 2001. “Organizational Culture and Institutional Transformation.” ERIC. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERIC-ED464521/pdf/ERIC-ED464521.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, John P. “Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail.” Harvard Business Review 85, no. 1 (January 2007): 96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydens, Jon A., and Juan C. Lucena. Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lezotte, S. “Making Sense of Diversity and Inclusion in Engineering.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (2021). Advanced Online Publication. doi:10.1037/dhe0000371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G. “Footnotes to Organizational Change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26, no. 4 (1981): 563–577. doi:10.2307/2392340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and W. Richard Scott. “Centralization and the Legitimacy Problems of Local Governments.” In Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, edited by John W. Meyer, and W. Richard Scott, 199–215. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Heinz-Dieter, and Brian Rowan. “Institutional Analysis and the Study of Education.” In New Institutionalism in Education, edited by Heinz-Dieter Meyer, and Brian Rowan, 1–14. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 2 (September 1977): 340–363. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., W. R. Scott, and T. Deal. “Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations.” In Fourth Generational Evaluation. Report No. IFG-PR-79-A9, edited by E. G. Guba, and Y. S. Lincoln, 45–67. Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance, 1983. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED202142.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, Henry. “Structure in 5’s: A Synthesis of the Research on Organizational Design.” Management Science 26, no. 3 (March 1980): 322–341. doi:10.1287/mnsc.26.3.322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. The External Control of Organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Shadle, S., A. Marker, and B. Earl. “Faculty Drivers and Barriers: Laying the Groundwork for Undergraduate STEM Education Reform in Academic Departments.” International Journal of STEM Education 4, no. 8 (2017): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. Multiple Case Study Analysis. 1st ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Mark C. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” The Academy of Management Journal 20, no. 3 (1995): 571–610. doi:10.2307/258788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. Mixed Methodology. Vol. 46. Applied Social Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. “Organizational Culture in Higher Education: Defining the Essentials.” The Journal of Higher Education 59, no. 1 (1988): 2–21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1981868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. “Academic Work and Institutional Culture: Constructing Knowledge.” The Review of Higher Education 14, no. 2 (1991): 199–216. doi:10.1353/rhe.1991.0024.
   Google Scholar