1,426
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

It’s about inspiring the greater community to continue supporting this sector: Elite sport success as a main policy objective for disability sport promotion in ASEAN member states

, , &
Pages 655-670 | Received 08 Nov 2022, Accepted 07 Jul 2023, Published online: 27 Aug 2023

References

  • Abd Samad, N.A., Said, I., and Rahim, A.A., 2018. A review of universal design and accessibility legislation in implementation strategies among Asian countries. In Proceedings, The 12thSymposium of Engineering Education and Research for Sustainable Development, 12-13 March 2018 Yogjakarta. 1–8.
  • Abdullah, N.M., et al., 2021. Paralympic movement in Malaysia: the achievement of high-performance para sports. Journal sport area, 6 (1), 67–75. doi:10.25299/sportarea.2021.vol6(1).5504.
  • Bailey, S. and Nguon, S.K., 2014. Situation analysis for disability-inclusive governance and community development in Cambodia [ online]. UNICEF cambodia: local governance and child rights. Available from: https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/cambodia-disability-inclusive-governance-community-development-sit-analysis.pdf [Accessed 26 February 2023].
  • Berghs, M., et al., 2019. Do disabled people need a stronger social model: a social model of human rights? Disability & Society, 34 (7–8), 1034–1039. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1619239.
  • Bourgeois, A.M. 2013. Contested perspectives of ‘marvel’ and ‘mockery’ in disability and sport: accra, Ghana. In: J.M.L.C. In, Eds. Disability in the global sport arena: a sporting chance. London, UK: Routledge, 179–192. doi:10.4324/9780203718001-21.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2021. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Brittain, I., 2006. Paralympic success as a measure of national social and economic development. International journal of eastern sport and physical education, 4 (1), 38–47.
  • Brooke, M. and Khoo, S., 2021. Insider perspectives on the sustainability of the Malaysian and Singaporean paralympic movements. Sustainability, 13 (10), 5557. Available from 10.3390/su13105557 Accessed 28 October 2022.
  • Bruce, T., 2014. Us and them: the influence of discourses of nationalism on media coverage of the Paralympics. Disability and society, 29 (9), 1443–1459. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.816624.
  • Bualar, T., 2014. Barriers to employment: Voices of physically disabled rural women in Thailand. Community, work & family, 17 (2), 181–199. doi:10.1080/13668803.2013.806125.
  • Carty, C., et al., 2021. The first global physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines for people living with disability. Journal of physical activity and health, 18 (1), 86–93. doi:10.1123/jpah.2020-0629.
  • Christiansen, N.V., Kahlmeier, S., and Racioppi, F., 2014. Sport promotion policies in the European Union: results of a contents analysis. Scandinavian journal of medicine and science in sports, 24 (2), 428–438. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01500.x.
  • Coates, J. and Vickerman, P.B., 2016. Paralympic legacy: exploring the impact of the games on the perceptions of young people with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 33 (4), 338–357. doi:10.1123/APAQ.2014-0237.
  • Cogburn, D.L. and Reuter, T.K., eds., 2017. Making disability rights real in Southeast Asia: implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in ASEAN. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Creak, S., 2013. Representing true Laos in post-colonial Southeast Asia: regional dynamics in the globalization of sport. In: K. Bromber, B. Krawietz, and J. Maguire, eds. Sport across Asia. London, UK: Routledge, 109–134.
  • Curato, N. and Fossati, D., 2020. Authoritarian innovations: crafting support for a less democratic Southeast Asia. Democratization, 27 (6), 1006–1020. doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1777985.
  • Dao, M.S. and Darnell, S.C., 2021. Exploring Vietnamese sport for development through the capabilities approach: a descriptive analysis. Sport in Society, 25 (10), 1987–2008. doi:10.1080/17430437.2021.1900828.
  • DePauw, K.P. and Gavron, S.J., 2005. Disability sport. 2nd. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. doi: 10.5040/9781492596226.
  • de Souza, D.L. and Brittain, I., 2022. The Rio 2016 Paralympic Games: the visibility of people with disabilities in Brazil as a possible legacy. Communication & Sport, 10 (2), 334–353. doi:10.1177/2167479520942739.
  • Grue, J., 2016. The social meaning of disability: a reflection on categorisation, stigma and identity. Sociology of health and illness, 38 (6), 957–964. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12417.
  • Hairiel, B. and Diah, N.M., 2019. Understanding the needs of disabled athletes in school: the case of impared vision athletes. Malaysian Journal of Youth Studies, 1, 80–92.
  • Hammond, A. and Jeanes, R., 2018. Federal government involvement in Australian disability sport, 1981–2015. The international journal of the history of sport, 35 (5), 431–447. doi:10.1080/09523367.2017.1337000.
  • Hanass-Hancock, J. and Mitra, S. 2016. Livelihoods and disability: the complexities of work in the global south. In: S. Grech and K. Soldatic, Eds. Disability in the Global South. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 133–149. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0_9.
  • Hoffmann, R., Ging, L.C., and Ramasamy, B., 2004. Olympic success and ASEAN countries: economic analysis and policy implications. Journal of Sports Economics, 5 (3), 262–276. doi:10.1177/1527002503261826.
  • Kardiyanto, D.W., Setijono, H., and Mintarto, E., 2017. The evaluation of Indonesia Paralympic coaching. European Journal of Special Education Research, 2 (4), 102–122.
  • Kidd, B., 2013. A new social movement: sport for development and peace. In: S.J. Jackson and S. Haigh, eds. Sport and foreign policy in a globalizing world. London, UK: Routledge, 22–32.
  • Link, B.G. and Phelan, J.C., 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual review of sociology, 27 (1), 363–385. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.
  • Low, H.M., et al., 2019. Perceptions towards disabilities among primary-school teachers in the Lao’s People Democratic Republic: Insights into a cultural view of ASD. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Special Education, 13-15 July 2019 Surabaya, 71–74.
  • Madill, A., Jordan, A., and Shirley, C., 2000. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91 (1), 1–20. doi:10.1348/000712600161646.
  • Marks, D., 1997. Models of disability. Disability and rehabilitation, 19 (3), 85–91. doi:10.3109/09638289709166831.
  • Marshall, J., Doone, E., and Price, M., 2019. Cultural models of child disability: perspectives of parents in Malaysia. Disability & Rehabilitation, 41 (22), 2653–2662. doi:10.1080/09638288.2018.1474497.
  • McBean, C., Townsend, R.C., and Petrie, K., 2022. An historical analysis of disability sport policy in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 14 (3), 419–434.
  • Merriam, S.B., 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ngo, H., et al., 2012. Stigma and restriction on the social life of families of children with intellectual disabilities in Vietnam. Singapore medical journal, 53 (7), 451–457.
  • Oliver, M. 2009. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. 2nd ed. Tavistock, UK: Palgrave.
  • Patatas, J.M., De Bosscher, V., and Legg, D., 2018. Understanding parasport: an analysis of the differences between able-bodied and parasport from a sport policy perspective. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 10 (2), 235–254. doi:10.1080/19406940.2017.1359649.
  • Perkin, S.J. and Howe, P.D., 2017. A foucauldian interpretation of paralympic sport in the united arab emirates: an exploration through a virtual lens. The international journal of the history of sport, 34 (13), 1418–1435. doi:10.1080/09523367.2018.1464441.
  • Petrola, J.P.J., 2017. Paralympics: spheres of recognition for people with disabilities in the Philippines. International journal of science and research, 9 (11), 2025–2032.
  • Powell, K., Thurston, M., and Bloyce, D., 2017. Theorising lifestyle drift in health promotion: explaining community and voluntary sector engagement practices in disadvantaged areas. Critical public health, 27 (5), 554–565. doi:10.1080/09581596.2017.1356909.
  • Pullen, E., Jackson, D., and Silk, M., 2020. Watching disability: UK audience perceptions of the Paralympics, equality and social change. European journal of communication, 35 (5), 469–483. doi:10.1177/0267323120909290.
  • Sano, R., 2021. A review of current disability policies being implemented in the ASEAN member states in relation to ESCAP’s report on strategic approaches to achieving disability-inclusive sustainable development. Journal of social policy and administration, 21, 83–94. doi:10.15002/00024034 [Accessed 28 October 2022].
  • Seidman, I. 1998. Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Silva, C.F. and Howe, P.D., 2012. The (in) validity of supercrip representation of Paralympian athletes. Journal of sport and social issues, 36 (2), 174–194. doi:10.1177/0193723511433865.
  • Singapore Disability Sports Council, 2020. SDSC annual report FY 2019/20. Singapore Disability Sports Council.
  • Srisuppaphon, D., et al., 2017. Effective implementation of the UNCRPD by Thailand State Party: challenges and potential remedies. BMC international health and human rights, 17 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1186/s12914-017-0123-5.
  • Stiker, H.J., 1999. A history of disability. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
  • Svensson, P.G. and Woods, H., 2017. A systematic overview of sport for development and peace organisations. Journal of sport for development, 5 (9), 36–48.
  • Takasaki, Y., 2020. Impacts of disability on poverty: quasi-experimental evidence from landmine amputees in Cambodia. Journal of economic behavior and organization, 180, 85–107. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.09.027
  • Thomas, N. and Guett, M., 2014. Fragmented, complex and cumbersome: a study of disability sport policy and provision in Europe. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 6 (3), 389–406. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.832698.
  • The United Nations, 2006. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Treaty Series, 2515, 3.
  • Wee, E.H., et al., 2021. Physical activity and sport participation among persons with disabilities in Malaysia: motivation and constraint. In: G. Balint, B. Antala, C. Carty, J.A. Mabieme, I.B. Amar, and A. Kaplanova, eds. Physical education and sport for children and youth with special needs researches – best practices - situation. Bratislava, Slovakia: Slovak Scientific Society for Physical Education and Sport and FIEP, 125–136.
  • Wilson, N.C. and Khoo, S., 2013. Benefits and barriers to sports participation for athletes with disabilities: the case of Malaysia. Disability and society, 28 (8), 1132–1145. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.758034.
  • Yeam, C.T. and Brooke, M., 2016. Changing perceptions of disability through sport: the case of Singaporean wheelchair basketball. Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science, 5 (3), 157–164. doi:10.1080/21640599.2016.1222659.