An Olympic embrace? A critical evaluation of the IOC’s commitment to human rights

References

• Al Hussein, P.Z.R. and Davis, R. 2020. Recommendations for an IOC human rights strategy, https://stillmedab.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/News/2020/12/Independent_Expert_Report_IOC_HumanRights.pdf [Accessed 3 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Alston, P. and Quinn, G., 1987. The nature and scope of states parties’ obligations under the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. Human rights quarterly, 9 (2), 156–229. doi:10.2307/762295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai-Takahashi, Y., 2013. Proportionality. In: D. Shelton, ed. The oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford: OUP, 446–468.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., et al., BERA Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Special Interest Group, 2009. The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research papers in education, 24 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/02671520701809817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilchitz, D., 2021. Fundamental rights and the legal obligations of business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borelli, S., 2006. Positive obligations of states and the protection of human rights. Interights bulletin, 15 (3), 101–104.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J., 2011. The anti-olympics. New left review, 67 (1), 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J., 2013. Celebration capitalism and the olympic games. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J., 2019. The political history of the Olympics and the human rights thicket. Connecticut journal of international law, 35 (1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, J., 2020. NOlympians: inside the fight against capitalist mega-sports in Los Angeles. Tokyo and Beyond. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brannagan, P.M. and Rookwood, J., 2016. Sports mega-events, soft power and soft disempowerment: international supporters’ perspectives on Qatar’s acquisition of the 2022 FIFA World Cup finals. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8 (2),173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Brems, E. and Lavrysen, L., 2015. Don’t use a sledgehammer to crack a nut’: less restrictive means in the case law of the European court of human rights. Human rights law review, 15 (1), 139–168. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu040
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, M., 2020. Forbes IOC President Thomas Bach: olympics ‘Are not about politics,’ athletes should be politically neutral at games, 26 October. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michellebruton/2020/10/26/ioc-president-thomas-bach-olympics-are-not-about-politics-athletes-should-be-politically-neutral-at-games/
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, S. and Lee Ludvigsen, J.A., 2022. Olympic Planning, profit, and participation: towards a Children’s rights-based approach to sport mega-event research?. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 5 (4), 465–487.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, S. and Lee Ludvigsen, J.A., 2023. Sport mega-event governance and human rights: the ‘ruggie principles’, responsibility and directions. Leisure Studies, 42 (2), 156–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. and Lundy, L., 2019. Children’s rights-based childhood policy: a six-P framework. The international journal of human rights, 23 (3), 357–373. doi:10.1080/13642987.2018.1558977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanavat, N. and Desbordes, M., 2014. Towards the regulation and restriction of ambush marketing? the first truly social and digital mega sports event: olympic Games. London international journal of sports marketing and sponsorship, 15 (3), 2–11. doi:10.1108/IJSMS-15-03-2014-B002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.L., 2021. The Olympics’ evolving relationship with human rights: an ongoing affair. Sport in society, 25 (1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/17430437.2022.2005289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S.K., 2015. Making the poor free?: India’s unique identification number. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Beco, G., 2009. Human rights impact assessments. Netherlands quarterly of human rights, 27 (2), 139–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, N.G. 2020. Mega-events, city and power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O., 2016. Towards a new treaty on business and human rights. Business and human rights journal, 1 (1), 41–67. doi:10.1017/bhj.2015.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D., Eds., 2013. Human rights obligations of business: beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Digby, B., 2008. The London 2012 Olympics. Geography, 93 (1), 40–47. doi:10.1080/00167487.2008.12094218
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, P., 2008. “Sport and human rights. Sport in society, 11 (4), 381–394. doi:10.1080/17430430802019326
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, G., et al., 2021. Olympic charter evolution shaped by urban strategies and stakeholder’s governance: from Pierre de Coubertin to the Olympic Agenda 2020. The international journal of the history of sport, 38 (5), 545–568. doi:10.1080/09523367.2021.1947251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, A., 2018. The Olympic charter: a transnational constitution without a state? Journal of law and society, 45 (S1), S245–S269 . doi:10.1111/jols.12112
   Google Scholar
• Ekins, R., 2014. ‘Legislating Proportionately’ In. G. Huscroft, B. W. Miller and G. Webber, eds. Proportionality and the rule of law: rights, justification, reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, H., 1999. The right to protest, the Human Rights Act and the margin of appreciation. Modern law review, 62 (4), 491–514. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00220
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2007. Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Basingstoke: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S., 2008. Human rights transformed: positive rights and positive duties. Oxford: OU.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., 2007. Article 3: the best interests of the child. Vol. 3, Brill: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fussey, P., et al., 2012. The regeneration games: purity and security in the Olympic city. British Journal of Sociology, 63 (2), 260–284. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01409.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussey, P., 2015. Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the London 2012 Olympics. The geographical journal, 181 (3), 212–223. doi:10.1111/geoj.12058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, R. and Alford, G., 2019. Will human rights ever be Olympic values?: evaluating the responses to human rights violations at the Olympic games. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 35 (1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gerards, J., 2013. How to improve the necessity test of the European court of human rights. International journal of constitutional law, 11 (2), 466–490. doi:10.1093/icon/mot004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R., 2004. Human rights, globalization and sentimental education: the case of sport. Sport in society, 7 (3), 55–369. doi:10.1080/1743043042000291686
   Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R., 2011. Sport mega events, urban football carnivals and securitised commodification: the case of the English premier league. Urban studies, 48 (15), 3293–3310. doi:10.1177/0042098011422395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R., et al., 2015. Sport mega-events and public opposition: a sociological study of the London 2012 Olympics. Journal of sport and social issues, 39 (2), 99–119. doi:10.1177/0193723514530565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti, R. and McArdle, D., 2014. Sport, civil liberties and human rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glinski, C., 2017. The ruggie framework, business human rights self-regulation and tort law: increasing standards through mutual impact and learning. Nordic journal of human rights, 35 (1), 15–34. doi:10.1080/18918131.2017.1291171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, J., 2020. Legal aspects of the olympics and ambush marketing. In: D. Chatziefstathiou, B. García and S. Benoit, eds. Routledge handbook of the olympic and paralympic games. London: Routledge, 130–138.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, S., James, M., and Osborn, G., 2012. The Olympics, the law and the contradictions of Olympism. In: HJ. Lenskyj and S. Wagg eds. The Palgrave handbook of olympic studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 304–317.
   Google Scholar
• Grell, T., 2018. The International Olympic Committee and human rights reforms: game changer or mere window dressing? International sports law journal, 17 (3–4), 160–169. doi:10.1007/s40318-018-0127-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grix, J., 2013. The risks and rewards of hosting sports mega-events. International Centre for Sport Security Journal, 1 (1), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2008. Displaced by London's Olympics. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/jun/02/olympics2012#:~:text=We%20didn't%20have%20much,they%20made%20quite%20an%20impact.
   Google Scholar
• Herguner, B., 2012. The IOC as a transnational organization: paradigm shift and its rising role in global governance. International area studies review, 15 (2), 176–186. doi:10.1177/2233865912447088
   Google Scholar
• Horne, J., 2018. Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events. Leisure Studies, 37 (1), 11–21. doi:10.1080/02614367.2017.1324512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Human Rights and Business, 2017. 2024 olympic bid evaluation a human rights review. Briefing. July.
   Google Scholar
• International Olympic Committee. (2021). Olympic Charter. Available at https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/General/EN-Olympic-Charter.pdf?_ga=2.28010044.1621801407.1698528866-1302279309.1698528866
   Google Scholar
• International Olynpic Committee. (2020). Olympic Agenda 2020 + 5. Available at: https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/IOC/What-We-Do/Olympic-agenda/Olympic-Agenda-2020-5-15-recommendations.pdf?_ga=2.208357906.1621801407.1698528866-1302279309.1698528866
   Google Scholar
• IOC., 2017. Host City Contract Principles – Games of the XXXIII Olympiad in 2024. Available at: https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/Documents/Host-City-Elections/XXXIII-Olympiad-2024/Host-City-Contract-2024-Principles.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• IOC (International Olympic Committee), 2018. Host City Contract – operational Requirements.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. and Osborn, G., 2012a. London 2012 and the impact of the UK’s Olympic and Paralympic legislation: protecting commerce or preserving culture? The modern law review, 74 (3), 410–429. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00853.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M. and Osborn, G., 2012b. The Olympic laws and the contradictions of promoting and preserving the Olympic ideal. In: V. Girginov, ed. Handbook of the London 2012 olympic and paralympic games. London: Routledge, 88–100.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. and Osborn, G., 2016a. The Olympics, transnational law and legal transplants: the International Olympic Committee, ambush marketing and ticket touting. Legal Studies, 36 (1), 93–110. doi:10.1111/lest.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennelly, J., 2016. Olympic exclusions: youth, poverty and social legacies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, B. and Donnelly, P., 2000. Human rights in sports. International review for the sociology of sport, 35 (2), 131–148. doi:10.1177/101269000035002001
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H., 2013. The 2012 London Olympics: commercial partners, environmental sustainability, corporate social responsibility and outlining the implications. The international journal of the history of sport, 30 (18), 2197–2208. doi:10.1080/09523367.2013.845171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauser, F.R., 2010. Splintering spheres of security: Peter Sloterdijk and the contemporary fortress city. Environment and planning d: society and space, 28 (2), 326–340. doi:10.1068/d14608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenskyj, H., 2004. The Olympic industry and civil liberties: the threat to free speech and freedom of assembly. Sport in society, 7 (3), 370–384. doi:10.1080/1743043042000291695
   Google Scholar
• Lenskyj, H., 2014. Sexual diversity and the Sochi 2014 Olympics: no more rainbows. Basingstoke: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, I. and Chapman, T., 2017. Enhancing the contribution of sport to the sustainable development goals. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, A.M., 2012. Ambush marketing & the mega-event monopoly: how laws are abused to protect commercial rights to major sporting events. The Hague: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lundy, L., 2007. Voice’is not enough: conceptualising article 12 of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. British educational research journal, 33 (6), 927–942. doi:10.1080/01411920701657033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundy, L., Kilkelly, U., and Byrne, B., 2013. Incorporation of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child in law: a comparative review. The international journal of children’s rights, 21 (3), 442–463. doi:10.1163/15718182-55680028
   Google Scholar
• Macchi, C., 2018. A treaty on business and human rights: problems and prospects. In: L.Č. J and C.-S. N, eds. The future of business and human rights. Intersentia. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mach, L. and Ponting, J., 2018. Governmentality and surf tourism destination governance. Journal of sustainable tourism, 26 (11), 1845–1862. doi:10.1080/09669582.2018.1513008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, L., 2017. Assessing the feasibility of a business and human rights treaty. International & comparative law quarterly, 66 (1), 43–180. doi:10.1017/S0020589316000476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillivray, D., et al., 2019. A conceptual model and research agenda for bidding, planning and delivering major sport events that lever human rights. Leisure studies, 38 (2), 175–190. doi:10.1080/02614367.2018.1556724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillivray, D., et al., 2022. The role of advocacy organisations for ethical mega sport events. Sport management review, 25 (2), 234–253. doi:10.1080/14413523.2021.1955531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillivray, D., Duignan, M., and Mielke, E., 2020. Mega sport events and spatial management: zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city. Annals of leisure research, 23 (3), 280–303. doi:10.1080/11745398.2019.1607509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, D., 2010. The new law of peaceful protest: rights and regulation in the Human Rights Act era. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, P., 2017. World Cup 2022 and Qatar’s construction projects: relational power in networks and relational responsibilities to migrant workers. Current sociology, 65 (5), 756–776. doi:10.1177/0011392116645382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray, A., 2004. The development of positive obligations under the European convention on human rights by the European court of human rights. Oregon, Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, H.E., 2018. The neutrality myth: why international sporting associations and politics cannot be separated. Journal of the philosophy of sport, 45 (2), 144–160. doi:10.1080/00948705.2018.1479190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, H.E., 2020. Sociology and the ethnography of human rights at mega-sport events. Current sociology, 68 (7), 972–989. doi:10.1177/0011392119888562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, B., 2018. Is Olympic ambush marketing here to stay: examining the issues surrounding ambush marketing as they relate to Olympic sponsors, athletes, and other stakeholders. Arizona journal of international and comparative law, 35 (3), 499–530.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. and Cottrell, P., 2016. Sport without referees? The power of the International Olympic Committee and the social politics of accountability. European journal of international relations, 22 (2), 437–458. doi:10.1177/1354066115589386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoliello, M., 2021. The new agenda 2020+ 5 and the future challenges for the Olympic movement. Athens journal of sports, 8 (2), 21–140. doi:10.30958/ajspo.8-2-2
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, M. and A, Q., 2017. Questioning the no-touch discourse in physical education from a children’s rights perspective. Sport, education and society, 22 (3), 305–320. doi:10.1080/13573322.2015.1030384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, G. and Smith, A., 2015. Olympic brandscapes: london 2012 and the seeping commercialisation of public space. In: G. Poynter, V. Viehoff, and Y. Li, eds. The London Olympics and urban development: the mega-event city. London: Routledge, 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, M., 1998. Ambush marketing: the undeserved advantage. Psychology & marketing, 15 (4), 323–331. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199807)15:4<323::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. and Tunney, E., 2010. Visibilities and invisibilities in urban development: small business communities and the London Olympics 2012. Urban Studies, 47 (10), 2069–2091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. and Bauman, L., 2008. Winning the Olympic marketing game: recall of logos on clothing, equipment and venues at the 2006 Winter Olympics. International journal of sports marketing and sponsorship, 9 (4), 48–63. doi:10.1108/IJSMS-09-04-2008-B007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, M., 2000. Mega-events and modernity: olympics and expos in the growth of global culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., 1996. The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and society, 25 (3), 327–356. doi:10.1080/03085149600000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Séguin, B., et al., 2005. Internationalising ambush marketing: a comparative study. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 6 (4), 1–25. doi:10.1108/IJSMS-06-04-2005-B004
   Google Scholar
• Séguin, B. and O’Reilly, N., 2008. The Olympic brand, ambush marketing and clutter. International journal of sport management and marketing, 4 (1), 62–84. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2008.017659
   Google Scholar
• Shiner, R., 2004. Freedom of commercial expression. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Siltaoja, M., Malin, V., and Pyykkönen, M., 2015. ‘We are all responsible now’: governmentality and responsibilized subjects in corporate social responsibility. Management learning, 46 (4), 444–460. doi:10.1177/1350507614541199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, B., 2018. Consuming Olympism: consumer culture, sport star sponsorship and the commercialisation of the Olympics. Journal of consumer culture, 18 (2), 241–260. doi:10.1177/1469540517747146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoyanova, V., 2018. Causation between state omission and harm within the framework of positive obligations under the European convention on human rights. Human rights law review, 18 (2), 309–346. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngy004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, N., Ogawa, T., and Inaba, N., 2018. The right to adequate housing: evictions of the homeless and the elderly caused by the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo. Leisure studies, 37 (1), 89–96. doi:10.1080/02614367.2017.1355408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, A., 2023. Human rights at the Olympic Games: policy, protest, and progress. Event management, 27 (6), 915–930.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H. and B, W., 2019. The olympic games, agenda 2020 and action sports: the promise, politics and performance of organisational change. International journal of sport policy and politics, 11 (3), 465–483. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1569548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Committee on Economic, Social and cultural rights (CESCR), General comment No. 7: the right to adequate housing (Art.11.1): forced evictions, 20 May 1997, E/1998/22
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General comment No. 24 (2017) on State obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the context of business activities, 10 August 2017, E/C.12/GC/24.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). 2013. General comment No. 17 (2013) on the right of the child to rest, leisure, play, recreational activities, cultural life and the arts (art. 31), 17 April, CRC/C/GC/17.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 21 October 2015, A/RES/70/1
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2011. Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the united nations ‘protect, respect and remedy’ framework. United Nations: New York and Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations., 2014. The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities training guide professional training Series No. 19.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2016. Report of the special rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, A/HRC/32/33, (4 April).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2021. Legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises (3rd revised draft). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGTransCorp/Session6/LBI3rdDRAFT.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Veal, A.J., 2023. Sport and human rights: assessing the performance of nation states in assuring the right to sport participation. European journal for sport and society, 20 (2), 140–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedder, C., 1984. The international olympic committee: an advanced non-governmental organization and the international law. German yearbook of international law, 27, 233.
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F., 2015. Normativity, ethics, and the UN guiding principles on business and human rights: a critical assessment. Journal of human rights, 14 (2), 162–182. doi:10.1080/14754835.2015.1005733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Klauser, F., and Chan, G., 2009. Governing security at the 2008 Beijing olympics. The international journal of the history of sport, 26 (3), 390–405. doi:10.1080/09523360802602265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar