‘Athletes’ participation in the National Anti-Doping Organisations of Germany and Poland: democratic governance?’

References

• Athleten Deutschland, e.V. 2019. Satzung des Vereins „Athleten Deutschland e. V.’. Available from: https://athleten-deutschland.org/wp-content/uploads/Athleten-Deutschland-e.V.-Satzung.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Becker, C., 2020. Athleten fordern umfassende Reform der Wada. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 Jul.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. and Papadopoulos, Y., 2006. Governance and democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9 (2), 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, C. and Neale, P., 2006. Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Monitoring and Evaluation – 2. Watertown, MA, USA: Pathfinder International Tool Series.
   Google Scholar
• Casini, L., 2009. Global hybrid public–private bodies: the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). International organizations law review, 6 (2), 421–446. doi:10.1163/157237409X477644
   Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.-L. and Mrkonjic, M., 2019. Assessing sport governance principles and indicators. In: M. Winand and C. Anagnostopoulos, eds. Research handbook on sport governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 10–28.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, Thomas, 1996. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. Boulder: Colorado. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council Resolution 2020/C 419/01 of 4 December 2020 on the European Union Work Plan for Sport (1 January 2021-30 June 2024)
   Google Scholar
• Council Resolution 2021/C 501/01 of 13 December 2021 on the key features of a European Sport Model
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., et al. 2003. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 209–240.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., 1986. Democracy, liberty, and equality. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R., 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Hon, O., Kuipers, H., and van Bottenburg, M., 2015. Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods. Sports medicine, 45 (1), 57–69. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, M. and Harris, S., 2021. Comparing sporting nations: theory and methods. Maidenhead: Meyer & Meyer Sport (UK) Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit, 2020. Democracy Index 2020. In sickness and in health? Available from: https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/#mktoForm_anchor [Accessed 17 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Efverström, A., et al. 2016. Anti-doping and legitimacy: an international survey of elite athletes’ perceptions. International journal of sport policy and politics, 8 (3), 491–514. doi:10.1080/19406940.2016.1170716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Elite Athletes Association, 2022. Common position paper 2022. Available from: https://euathletes.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/EUA_COMMON-POSITION-PAPER_2022_BDef.pdf [Accessed 9 January 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A., 2015. Sports governance observer 2015. The legitimacy crisis in international sports governance. Copenhagen: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A., 2018. National sports governance observer. Final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A., 2021a. National anti-doping governance observer. Indicators and instructions for assessing good governance in national anti-doping organisations. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A., 2021b. National sports governance observer. Final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraert, A. and Van Eeckeren, F., 2022. Good governance in sport. Critical reflections. New York, NY: Routledge Research in Sport Business and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, O., 2016. IAAF bans four senior officials over alleged doping cover-ups. The Guardian, 7 Jan.
   Google Scholar
• Gleaves, J. and Christiansen, A.V., 2019. Athletes’ perspectives on WADA and the code: a review and analysis. International journal of sport policy and politics, 11 (2), 341–353. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1577901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Athlete, 2020. 2020 survey results: athlete rights, Athlete welfare, Athlete representation [dataset]. Available from: https://globalathlete.org/our-word/global-athlete-survey-results-athlete-rights-welfare-and-representation [Accessed 30 June 2021]
   Google Scholar
• Grigaliūnaitė, I. and Eimontas, E., 2018. Athletes’ involvement in decision making for good governance in sport. Baltic journal of sport and health sciences, 3 (110), 18–24. doi:10.33607/bjshs.v3i110.247
   Google Scholar
• Haas, L., 2021. NADO Reports: ‘Brazilian doping control authority’, ‘Anti-doping authority of Portugal. In: A. Geeraert, ed. National anti-doping governance observer. Final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies, 128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1992. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie: Zum Begriff deliberativer Demokratie. In: H. Münkler, ed. Die Chancen der Freiheit. Grundprobleme der Demokratie. München/Zürich: Piper, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hallmann, K. and Petry, K.M., 2013. Comparative sport development: Systems, participation and public policy. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, G., 2022. Finding a global response to corruption in Sports. An institutional approach to a persistent crisis. Available from: https://www.stopcorruptioninsports.eu/the-study [Accessed 10 December 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., (2023). In: short talk athlete representation on 9 February 2023 [online]. Sport&EU Association. Available from: https://www.sportandeu.com/events [Accessed 18 March 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.G., et al., 2006. Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayman, D., 2021. NADO report: sport Ireland anti-doping. In: A. Geeraert, ed. National anti-doping governance observer. Final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, A. and Dimeo, P., 2018. Perceptions of legitimacy, attitudes and buy-in among athlete groups: a cross-national qualitative investigation providing practical solutions. Montreal, CA: University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I.P., 2009. European models of sport: governance, organisational change and sports policy in the EU. Hitotsubashi Journal of Arts and Sciences, 50, 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I.P. and Lee, C.P., 2004. Governance and Ethics. In: S. Chadwick and J. Beech, eds. The business of sport management. Harlow: Pearson Education, 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. and Hanstad, D.V., 2018. The effectiveness of the world anti-doping agency: developing a framework for analysis. International journal of sport policy and politics, 11 (2), 203–217. doi:10.1080/19406940.2018.1534257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of National Anti-Doping Organisations, 2022. Declaration of Guiding Principles for the Future of Anti-Doping. Available from: https://www.inado.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Declaration_of_Guiding_Principles_for_the_Future_of_Anti-Doping.pdf [Accessed 8 October 2022].
   Google Scholar
• International Olympic Committee, 2017. Guide to developing an effective Athletes’ Commission. Available from: https://olympics.com/athlete365/app/uploads/2020/10/Guide-for-an-effective-AC-ENG.pdf [Accessed 9 September 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, C.F., 2021. NADO report: anti-doping Denmark. In: A. Geeraert, ed. National anti-doping governance observer. Final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies, 27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R., 2014. Qualitative Experteninterviews: konzeptionelle Grundlagen und praktische Durchführung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinski, M.I., 2017. ‘State‑sponsored’ doping: a transition from the former Soviet Union to present day Russia. BLDE university journal of health sciences, 2 (1), 1–3. doi:10.4103/bjhs.bjhs_54_16
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., and Kraay, A. (2022). Worldwide governance indicators. Available from: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports [Accessed 14 August 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Keating, S., 2018. Wada deny attempting to ‘bully’ athletes’ representative Beckie scott over Russia reinstatement. The Independent, 13 Oct.
   Google Scholar
• Kihl, L.A. and Schull, V., 2020. Understanding the meaning of representation in a deliberative democratic governance system. Journal of sport management, 34 (2), 173–184. doi:10.1123/jsm.2019-0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistner, T., 2018. Die WADA hat sich selbst abgeschafft. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 21 Sep.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, A. and Kuckartz, I., 2019. VERBI Software GmbH [software]. Available from: https://www.maxqda.com/de/produkte/maxqda-analytics-pro [Accessed 4 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Kutylowski, J., 2021. DeepL Pro [Software]. Available from: https://www.deepl.com/de/previous-pro-licenses/ [Accessed 10 April 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, et al., 2023. The good, the bad, and the ugly: a qualitative secondary analysis into the impact of doping and anti-doping on clean elite athletes in five European countries. International journal of sport policy and politics, 15 (1), 3–22. doi:10.1080/19406940.2022.2161596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P., 2014. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt, Austria: Social Science Open Access Repository.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, M., 2021. Strengthening athlete power in sport. A multidisciplinary review and framework. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., 2011. Good governance and anti-doping policy: an international federation view. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (2), 279–288. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.577082
   Google Scholar
• Mittag, J., 2021. Good governance. In: L. Thieme and T. Wojciechowski, eds. Sportverbände. Schorndorf: Hofmann Verlag, 351–367.
   Google Scholar
• Mittag, J., et al., 2022. Good governance in the employment relations of athletes in olympic sports. understanding – evaluating – improving. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
   Google Scholar
• Mittag, J. and Fiege, L., 2021. NADO report. National anti-doping agency of Germany. In: A. Geeraert, ed. National anti-doping governance observer. Final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports, 50–73.
   Google Scholar
• National Anti-Doping Agency of Germany, 2011. Foundation’s Constitution [online]. Available from: https://www.nada.de/fileadmin/nada/SERVICE/Downloads/2011_Verfassung_der_Stiftung_NADA.pdf [Accessed 7 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• National Anti-Doping Agency of Germany, 2018. Statement by international anti-doping leaders [online]. Available from: https://www.nada.de/nada/aktuelles/news/newsdetail/statement-by-international-anti-doping-leaders [Accessed 14 March 2021].
   Google Scholar
• National Anti-Doping Agency of Germany, 2020. Athletenschutzrechte (Informatorische Übersetzung der Nationalen Anti Doping Agentur Deutschland) [online]. Available from: https://www.nada.de/fileadmin/nada/SERVICE/Downloads/Regelwerke/20201222_UEbersetzung_athlete_act_de.pdf [Accessed 20 April 2021].
   Google Scholar
• National Anti-Doping Agency of Germany, 2021. Annual reports [online]. Available from: https://www.nada.de/en/nadagermany/annual-reports [Accessed 2 June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• National Anti-Doping Agency of Germany, 2022. Athletes Germany e.V. new member of together against doping network. Available from: https://www.nada.de/en/service/news/news-detail/athletes-germany-ev-new-member-of-together-against-doping-network [Accessed 6 March 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Petróczi, A., et al., 2021. Understanding and building clean(er) sport together: community-based participatory research with elite athletes and anti-doping organisations from five European countries. Psychology of sport and exercise, 55(4), 101932. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101932
   Google Scholar
• Polish Anti-Doping Agency, 2017. Polish Anti-Doping Agency organisational rules. Available from: https://www.antydoping.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Regulamin-organizacyjny-POLADA-z-dnia-1-lipca-2017-r.-1.pdf [Accessed 9 November 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Polish Anti-Doping Agency, 2020a. Annual Reports [online]. Available from: https://antydoping.pl/en/about-us/annual-reports/ [Accessed 10 June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Polish Anti-Doping Agency, 2020b. Anti-doping data collection policy governing investigations conducted by the Polish Anti-Doping Agency (Policy on whistle blowers protection) [online]. Available from: https://antydoping.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/POLADA-policy-about-protection-of-witness-and-whistleblowers.pdf [Accessed 25 August 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Polish Basketball Players’ Union (ZZK), 2021. O zwiazku. Available from: https://koszykarze.org/. [Accessed 2 December 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Polish Football Players’ Association (PZP), 2023. Goals. Available from: https://pzp.info.pl/pzp/cele/#. [Accessed 3 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Qvarfordt, A., et al. 2019. Limitations and duties: elite athletes’ perceptions of compliance with anti-doping rules. Sport in Society, 24 (4), 551–570. doi:10.1080/17430437.2019.1681404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzle, C. and Stollenwerk, E., 2018. Virtuous or vicious circle? Governance effectiveness and legitimacy in areas of limited statehood. Journal of intervention and statebuilding, 12 (4), 449–467. doi:10.1080/17502977.2018.1531649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, M., 2019. Eine Abrechnung mit dem Antidopingkampf. Stuttgarter Nachrichten, 7 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 1994. Institutions and organizations: toward a theoretical synthesis. In: W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, eds. Institutional environments and organizations: structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, 55–78 .
   Google Scholar
• Seltmann, M., 2021. The institutional position of athletes in the governance networks of the olympic movement in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom. The international journal of the history of sport, 38 (10–11), 1165–1188. doi:10.1080/09523367.2021.1978428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelley, J., Thrower, S.N., and Petróczi, A., 2021. Racing clean in a Tainted World: a qualitative exploration of the experiences and views of clean British elite distance runners on doping and anti-doping. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 (67), 673087. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673087
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shilbury, D. and Ferkins, L., 2011. Professionalisation, sport governance and strategic capability. Managing leisure, 16 (2), 108–127. doi:10.1080/13606719.2011.559090
   Google Scholar
• Singer, O., 2014. Nationale Anti-doping-organisationen im internationalen Vergleich. Available from: https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/411668/91aa546bf84b91c0ea070f1eeeae3f27/WD-10-015-12-pdf-data.pdf [Accessed 7 July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Stealing, C., et al. 2023. The meaning of democracy in an era of good governance: views of representation and their implications for board composition. International review for the sociology of sport, 58 (1), 108–125. doi:10.1177/10126902221088127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, L., Kihl, L., and Babiak, K., 2010. Democratization and governance in international sport: addressing issues with athlete involvement in organisational policy. International journal of sport policy, 2 (3), 275–302. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.507211
   Google Scholar
• Van Bottenburg, M., et al. 2021. The world anti-doping agency: guardian of elite sport’s credibility. In: A. Boin, ed. Guardians of Public Value. Cham, CH: Palgrave McMillan, 185–210.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherill, S., 2022. Saving football from itself: why and how to re-make EU sports law. Cambridge yearbook of european legal studies, 24, 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Winand, M. and Anagnostopoulos, C., 2019. Research handbook on sport governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Woolway, T., et al., 2020. “Doing what is right and doing it right”: a mapping review of athletes’ perception of anti-doping legitimacy. International journal of drug policy, 84, 102865. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Anti-Doping Agency, 2020a. Athletes’ anti-doping rights act [online]. Available from: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/anti-doping-community/athletes-anti-doping-rights-act. [Accessed 17 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• World Anti-Doping Agency, 2020b. Anti-doping testing figures report 2020 [online]. Available from: https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/2020_anti-doping_testing_figures_en.pdf [Accessed 9 October 2021].
   Google Scholar
• World Anti-Doping Agency, 2020c. WADA guide. operational independence of national anti-doping organizations under the 2021 world anti-doping code. Available from: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/guide-operational-independence-national-anti-doping-organizations-nados [Accessed 24 October 2022].
   Google Scholar
• World Anti-Doping Agency, 2021. World anti-doping code [online]. Available from: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/the-code/world-anti-doping-code [Accessed 19 April 2021].
   Google Scholar
• World Anti-Doping Agency, 2023. Athlete council [online]. Available from: https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/wada_athlete_council_tor_13apr2023.pdf [Accessed 20 April 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Zembura, P., 2021. NADO reports: ‘the polish anti-doping agency. In: A. Geeraert, ed. National anti-doping governance observer. final report. Aarhus: Play the Game/Danish Institute for Sports Studies, 90–106.
   Google Scholar
• Zubizarreta, E. and Demeslay, J., 2021. Power relationships between the WADA and NADOs and their effects on anti-doping. Performance Enhancement & Health, 8 (4), 100–181. doi:10.1016/j.peh.2020.100181
   Google Scholar