Social semiotics: communicative and socio-cultural practices. The Russian-speaking contribution to the development of social semiotics in 1970–2000s

References

• Akhiezer, A. S. (1998). Rossia: kritika istoricheskogo opyta (sotsiokulturnaja dinamika Rossii). Vol.1. Ot proshlogo k buduchshemu [Russia: criticism of historical experience (socio-cultural dynamics of Russia). T. 1. From the past to the future.] Sibirskij khronograf.
   Google Scholar
• Akimkin, E. M., Alekseeva, T. I., Dridze, T. M., & Manusevich Yu, P. (2005). Social'no bosnovannoe gradoustrojstvo v rezhime prognoznogo proektirovaniya: ot social'noj diagnostiki k profilaktike konfliktnyh situacij i konstruktivnomu dialogu za-interesovannyh storon. [Socially based urban planning in predictive design mode: from social diagnostics to prevention of conflict situations and constructive dialogue of stakeholders]. Institut municipalnogo upravlenija.
   Google Scholar
• Aron Brudnyj. (2021). https://web.archive.org/web/20131127164738/http://brudny.asia
   Google Scholar
• Blackledge, A., & Angela Creese, A. (2020). Interaction ritual and the body in a city meat market. Social Semiotics, 30(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1521355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogin, G. I. (2001). Obretenie sposobnosti ponimat': Vvedenie v filologicheskuyu ger-menevtiku. [Gaining the ability to understand: An introduction to philological hermeneutics]. Psihologiya i biznes onlajn.
   Google Scholar
• Bouvier, G., & Way, L. C. S. (2021). Revealing the politics in “soft”, everyday uses of social media: The challenge for critical discourse studies. Social Semiotics, 31(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1930855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudnyj, A. A. (1996). Nauka ponimat’. [Science to understand]. Ilim.
   Google Scholar
• Brudnyj, A. A. (1998). Psihologicheskaya germenevtika. [Psychological hermeneutics]. Labirint.
   Google Scholar
• Brudnyj, A. A. (1999). Prostranstvo vozmozhnostej: vvedenie v issledovanie real'nosti. [The Space of Opportunity: An Introduction to Reality Research]. Ilim.
   Google Scholar
• Brudnyj, A. A. (2003). Personetika = Personetics: Proekt «Glubokij rejd». [Personetics = Personetics: Project Deep Raid]. Labirint.
   Google Scholar
• Brudnyj, A. A., & Shukurov, E. D. (1977). Mir obshcheniya. [The world of communication]. Kyrgyzstan.
   Google Scholar
• Chebanov, S. V. (2021). Biosemantika: interpretatsionnye protsessy v zhivykh organizmakh [Biosemantics: Interpretive Processes in Living Organisms]. https://bioherm.ru/%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80%d1%8b/
   Google Scholar
• Chshedrovitskij, G. P. (1974). Smysl i znachenie [The meaning and significance]. Problemy semantiki [Problems of semantics]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Cobley, P., & Randviir, A. (2009). Introduction: What is sociosemiotics? Semiotica, 2009(173), 1–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.001
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Dridze, T. M. (Ed.) (1976). Smyslovoe vospriyatie rechevogo soobshcheniya (v usloviyah massovoj kommunikacii). [Semantic perception of a speech message (in terms of mass communication)]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Dridze, T. M. (1980). Yazyk i social'naya psihologiya. [Language and social psychology]. Vysshaya shkola.
   Google Scholar
• Dridze, T. M. (1984). Tekstovaya deyatel'nost’ v strukture social'noj kommunikacii. Problemy semiosociopsihologii. [Textual activity in the structure of social communication. Problems of semiosociopsychology]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Dridze, T. M. (Ed.) (1989). Prognoznoe social'noe proektirovanie: Metodologicheskie i metodicheskie problemy. [Predictive Social Design: Methodological and Methodical Problems]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Dridze, T. M. (Ed.) (1994). Prognoznoe social'noe proektirovanie: Teoretiko-metodologicheskie i metodicheskie problemy. [Predictive social design: Theoretical, methodological and methodological problems]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Fadeeva, I. E. (2003). Simvol v sisteme kultury. Teorija i kulturnoistoristoricheskaja fenomenologija [Symbol in the system of culture. Theory and Cultural-Historical Phenomenology]. RGPU.
   Google Scholar
• Fadeeva, I. E., & Sylimov, V. A. (2013). Semiozis: subjektivnaja antropologija simvolicheskoj realnosti [Semiosis: the subjective anthropology of symbolic reality]. Asterion.
   Google Scholar
• Fadeeva, I. E., & Sylimov, V. A. (2016). Chelovek v culture Severa: ot moderna k modernizatsii (Respublika Komi) [Man in the culture of the North: from modernity to modernization (Komi Republic). Asterion.
   Google Scholar
• Fomin, I. V., & Ilyin, M. V. (2019). Sotsialnaja semiotika: traektorii integratsii sotsiologicheskogo I semioticheskogo znanija [Social semiotics: trajectories of integration of sociological and semiotic knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal, 25(4), 123–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2019.25.4.6822
   Google Scholar
• Freiberger-Sheikholeslami, E. (1982). Forgotten pioneers of Soviet semiotics. In M. Herzfeld & M. D. Lenhart (Eds.), Semiotics 1980 (pp. 155–163). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Gavrilova, M. V. (2016). Social'naya semiotika: Teoreticheskie osnovaniya i principy analiza mul'timodal'nyh tekstov. [Social semiotics: Theoretical foundations and principles of analysis of multimodal texts]. Politֳicheskaya nauka. 2016(3), 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• G. I. Bogin i Tverskaya germenevticheskaya shkola. [G.I.Bogin and the Tver hermeneutic school]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1(7), 2005, 187-192.
   Google Scholar
• Glazychev, V. L. (2011). Gorod bez granic. [Город без границ]. Territoriya budushchego.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotics: The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskala, R. (2009). Modernity and the articulation of the gender system: Order, conflict, and chaos. Semiotica, 2009(173), 215–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.008
   Google Scholar
• Hess-Lüttich, E. W. B. (2009). The socio-symbolic function of language. Semiotica, 2009(173), 249–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.010
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyin, M. V. (2015). Semioticheskij, morfologicheskij, komparativnyj metody analiza diskursa v mezhdisciplinarnom prilozhenii. [Semiotic, morphological, comparative methods of discourse analysis in an interdisciplinary application]. Biznes. Obshchestvo. Vlast', 2015(22))(22), 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, V. V. (1976). Ocherki po istorii semiotiki v SSSR [Essays on the history of semiotics in the USSR]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R. H. (2005). A contemporary introduction to free will. Oxford University Press. – 208 p.
   Google Scholar
• Krejdlin, G. E. (2002). Neverbalnaja semiotika. Jazyk tela i estestvennyj jazyk. [Non-verbal semiotics. Body language and natural language]. NLO.
   Google Scholar
• Lanigan, R. (1991). Roman Jakobson's semiotic theory of communication. URL: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED355570
   Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, T. v. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (2009). Multimodal genres and transmedia traversals: Social semiotics and the political economy of the sign. Semiotica, 2009(173)), 283–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (1967). K probleme tipologii kultury [On the problem of the typology of culture]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam III, 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (1976). Bytovoe povedenie i tipologija kultury v Rossii XVIII v. [Everyday behavior and typology of culture in Russia in the eighteenth century]. Kulturnoe nasledie drevnej Rusi: Istoki. Stanovlenie, traditsii, Nauka, p. 292–297.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (1981). Semiotika kultury i ponjatie teksta [Semiotics of culture and the concept of text]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam, XII, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (1984). O semiosfere [About the semiosphere]. Trudy po znakovym sistemam, XVII, 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (1992). Kultura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Gnozis.
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, Y. M. (2010). Nepredskazuemye mekhanizmy kultury [Unpredictable mechanisms of culture]. TLU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckmann, T. (2009). Observations on the structure and function of communicative genres. Semiotica, 2009(173), 267–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.011
   Google Scholar
• Mazzali-Lurati, S. (2014). Boris Uspenskij and the semiotics of communication: An essay and an interview. Semiotica, 199(1/4), 109–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0121
   Google Scholar
• Merrell, F. (2008). Lotman’s semiosphere, peirce’s signs, and cultural processes. Russian Journal of Communication, 1(4), 372–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2008.10756726
   Google Scholar
• Nishanov, V. K. (1990). Fenomen ponimanija; kognitivnyj analiz [The phenomenon of understanding: cognitive analysis]. Ilim.
   Google Scholar
• Orlova, E. A., & Kuchmaeva, I. K. (Eds.) (1998). Kultura v sovetskom obchshestve: problemy i perspektivy razvitija [Culture in Soviet Society: Problems. and development prospects]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Petrilli, S. (2009). Semiotics as semioethics in the era of global communication. Semiotica, 2009(173), 343–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.015
   Google Scholar
• Ponzio, A. (2009). Sign, dialogue, and alterity. Semiotica, 2009(173), 129–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.005
   Google Scholar
• Portnov, A. N. (1992). Dialekticheskaja priroda soznanija i problema ego semioticheskikh sredstv [Dialectical nature of consciousness and the problem of its semiotic means]. Soznanie i teorija mirovozzrenija: istorija i sovremennost. IvGU, 70-90.
   Google Scholar
• Portnov, A. N. (Ed.) (1995). Filosofija jazyka i semiotika [Philosophy of language and semiotics]. IvGU.
   Google Scholar
• Portnov, A. N. (2008). Znakovaja fuktsija kak mezhdistsiplinarnoje ponjatie [Sign function as an interdisciplinary concept]. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo univers. Serija: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2008(2), 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Portnov, A. N., & Turchin, A. S. (2002). Semioticheskaja funktsija: filosofskie, sotsiologicheskiei psikhologicheskie aspekty [Semiotic function: Philosophical, sociological and psychological aspects]. Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo univers. Serija: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2002(2), 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Randviir, A. (2004). Mapping the world: Towards a sociosemiotic approach to culture. Tartu University.
   Google Scholar
• Sajko. (Ed.) (1999). Sotsiokulturnoe prostranstvo dialoga [Sociocultural space of dialogue]. Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Semiodinamika. (1994). Semiodinamika. Trudy seminara [Semiodynamics. Seminar proceedings]. Saint-Petersburg, 1994. – 192 p.
   Google Scholar
• Shirinkin, P. S. (2014). Turistskoe legendirovanie: regionalnye aspekty (Permskij kraj) [Tourist legend: regional aspects (Perm region). PGIKiI.
   Google Scholar
• Sotsialnaja semiotika. (2020). Sotsialnaja semiotika: tochki rosta [Social semiotics: points of growth] /ed.by G.Tulchinskii. Saint-Petersburg: Skifija-print.
   Google Scholar
• Sulimov, V. A. (2003). Tekstovaja dejatelnost, kultura, kommunikatsija [Text activity, culture, communication]. Isd. KGPI.
   Google Scholar
• Sulimov, V. A. (2005). Filosofija i logika russkogo jazykovogo kontinuuma [Philosophy and Logic of the Russian Linguistic Continuum]. Isd. KGPI.
   Google Scholar
• Sulimov, V. A. (2009). Semiotika literaturnogo yeksta [Semiotics of the literary text]. Komi pedinstitut.
   Google Scholar
• Sulimov, V. A. (Ed.) (2017). Chelovek sovremennogo Severa: sotsiokulturnyj kontekst [Man of the Modern North: Sociocultural Context]. Asterion.
   Google Scholar
• Sulimov, V. A., & Fadeeva, I. E. (2004). Kommunikativnoe prostranstvo sovremennoj kultury: znaki i simvoly [Communicative space of modern culture: signs and symbols]. Filosofskie nauki, 2004(4), 110–123.
   Google Scholar
• Tulchinskii, G. L. (2019). Rasshirenie vozmozhnostej semioticheskogo analiza: istochniki i soderzhanie kontseptsii “glubokoj semiotiki” [Expanding the possibilities of semiotic analysis: sources and content of the concept of “deep semiotics”]. Voprosy filosofii, 2019(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440007358-8
   Google Scholar
• Veshninskij, Y. G. (2012). Aksiologicheskaya geografiya (aksiologicheskaya topologiya) kul'turnogo prostranstva na rubezhe tysyacheletij. [Axiological geography (axiological topology) of cultural space at the turn of the millennium]. Institut Naslediya.
   Google Scholar
• Waldstein, M. (2008). The Soviet empire of signs: A history of the Tartu school of semiotics. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., & Wang, R. (2020). Bakhtin and shpet – inheritance and transcendence. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 16(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2020-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhivov, V., & Uspenskij, B. (2019). “Tsar and God” and other Essays in Russian cultural semiotics. Academic Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zinchenko, V. P. (2013). Predislovie k publikacii. [Foreword to the publication]. https://psyjournals.ru/files/61581/kip_2013_2_brudniy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zolyan, S. (2019). General sociolinguistics, social semiotics and semiotics of culture – ex pluri-bus unum? Forty years after language as social semiotic. Sign Systems Studies, 47(3/4), 400–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2019.47.3-4.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolyan, S. T. (2020). Yurij Lotman: O smysle, tekste, istorii. Temy i variacii. [Yuri Lotman: On the meaning, text, history. Themes and variations]. Izdatel'skij Dom YASK.
   Google Scholar