Molecular recognition requires dimerization of a VHH antibody

References

• Hamers-Casterman C, Atarhouch T, Muyldermans S, Robinson G, Hamers C, Songa EB, Bendahman N, Hamers R. Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature. 1993;363(6428):446–14. PMID: 8502296. doi:10.1038/363446a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli S, Tegoni M, Frenken L, van Vliet C, Cambillau C. Lateral recognition of a dye hapten by a llama VHH domain. J Mol Biol. 2001;311(1):123–29. PMID: 11469862. doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyldermans S, Atarhouch T, Saldanha J, Barbosa JA, Hamers R. Sequence and structure of VH domain from naturally occurring camel heavy chain immunoglobulins lacking light chains. Protein Eng. 1994;7(9):1129–35. PMID: 7831284. doi:10.1093/protein/7.9.1129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu TT, Johnson G, Kabat EA. Length distribution of CDRH3 in antibodies. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet. 1993;16(1):1–7. PMID: 8497480. doi:10.1002/prot.340160102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decanniere K, Desmyter A, Lauwereys M, Ghahroudi MA, Muyldermans S, Wyns L. A single-domain antibody fragment in complex with RNase A: non-canonical loop structures and nanomolar affinity using two CDR loops. Structure. 1999;7(4):361–70. PMID: 10196124. doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80049-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmyter A, Spinelli S, Payan F, Lauwereys M, Wyns L, Muyldermans S, Cambillau C. Threecamelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic α-amylase. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(26):23645–50. PMID: 11960990. doi:10.1074/jbc.M202327200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmyter A, Transue TR, Ghahroudi MA, Thi MH, Poortmans F, Hamers R, Muyldermans S, Wyns L. Crystal structure of a camel single-domain VH antibody fragment in complex with lysozyme. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3(9):803–11. PMID: 8784355. doi:10.1038/nsb0996-803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoey RJ, Eom H, Horn JR. Structure and development of single domain antibodies as modules for therapeutics and diagnostics. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2019;244(17):1568–76. PMID: 31594404. doi:10.1177/1535370219881129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell LS, Colwell LJ. Comparative analysis of nanobody sequence and structure data. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2018;86(7):697–706. PMID: 29569425. doi:10.1002/prot.25497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen SG, Choi HJ, Fung JJ, Pardon E, Casarosa P, Chae PS, Devree BT, Rosenbaum DM, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, et al. Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β2 adrenoceptor. Nature. 2011;469(7329):175–80. PMID: 21228869. doi:10.1038/nature09648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GP, Goldman ER. TNT detection using llama antibodies and a two-step competitive fluid array immunoassay. J Immunol Methods. 2008;339(1):47–54. PMID: 18755196. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2008.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Rueda N, Behar G, Ferre V, Pugniere M, Roquet F, Gastinel L, Jacquot C, Aubry J, Baty D, Barbet J, et al. Generation of llama single-domain antibodies against methotrexate, a prototypical hapten. Mol Immunol. 2007;44(7):1680–90. PMID: 17011035. doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2006.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli S, Frenken LG, Hermans P, Verrips T, Brown K, Tegoni M, Cambillau C. Camelid heavy-chain variable domains provide efficient combining sites to haptens. Biochemistry. 2000;39(6):1217–22. PMID: 10684599. doi:10.1021/bi991830w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genst E, Silence K, Decanniere K, Conrath K, Loris R, Kinne J, Muyldermans S, Wyns L. Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(12):4586–91. PMID: 16537393. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505379103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning SW, Horn JR. An anti-hapten camelid antibody reveals a cryptic binding site with significant energetic contributions from a nonhypervariable loop. Protein Sci. 2011;20(7):1196–207. PMID: 21557375. doi:10.1002/pro.648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabares-da Rosa S, Wogulis LA, Wogulis MD, Gonzalez-Sapienza G, Wilson DK. Structure and specificity of several triclocarban-binding single domain camelid antibody fragments. J Mol Recognit. 2019;32(1):e2755. PMID: 30033524. doi:10.1002/jmr.2755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Wang Z, Zhong P, Jiang H, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Ren Z, Ding Y. Structural insights into the mechanism of single domain VHH antibody binding to cortisol. FEBS Lett. 2019;593:1248–56. PMID: 31049949. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladenson RC, Crimmins DL, Landt Y, Ladenson JH. Isolation and characterization of a thermally stable recombinant anti-caffeine heavy-chain antibody fragment. Anal Chem. 2006;78(13):4501–08. PMID: 16808459. doi:10.1021/ac058044j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmsen MM, Ruuls RC, Nijman IJ, Niewold TA, Frenken LG, de Geus B. Llama heavy-chain V regions consist of at least four distinct subfamilies revealing novel sequence features. Mol Immunol. 2000;37(10):579–90. PMID: 11163394. doi:10.1016/s0161-5890(00)00081-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonneson GJ, Horn JR. Hapten-induced dimerization of a single-domain VHH camelid antibody. Biochemistry. 2009;48(29):6693–95. PMID: 19572722. doi:10.1021/bi900862r.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang HJ, Mayonove P, Zavala A, De Visch A, Minard P, Cohen-Gonsaud M, Bonnet J. A modular receptor platform to expand the sensing repertoire of bacteria. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7(1):166–75. PMID: 28946740. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.7b00266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojar D, Scheller L, Hamri GC, Xie M, Fussenegger M. Caffeine-inducible gene switches controlling experimental diabetes. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2318. PMID: 29921872. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04744-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lesne J, Chang HJ, De Visch A, Paloni M, Barthe P, Guichou JF, Mayonove P, Barducci A, Labesse G, Bonnet J, et al. Structural basis for chemically-induced homodimerization of a single domain antibody. null. 2019;9(1):1840. PMID: 30755682. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38752-y.
   Google Scholar
• Yau KY, Groves MA, Li S, Sheedy C, Lee H, Tanha J, MacKenzie CR, Jermutus L, Hall JC. Selection of hapten-specific single-domain antibodies from a non-immunized llama ribosome display library. J Immunol Methods. 2003;281(1–2):161–75. PMID: 14580890. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2003.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhofer A, Helma J, Schmidthals K, Frauer C, Cui S, Karcher A, Pellis M, Muyldermans S, Casas-Delucchi CS, Cardoso MC, et al. Modulation of protein properties in living cells using nanobodies. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2010;17(1):133–38. PMID: 20010839. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozharski E, Moulin A, Hewagama A, Shanafelt AB, Petsko GA, Ringe D. Diversity in hapten recognition: structural study of an anti-cocaine antibody M82G2. J Mol Biol. 2005;349(3):570–82. PMID: 15885702. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Moriarty NW, Prisant MG, Videau LL, Deis LN, Verma V, Keedy DA, Hintze BJ, Chen VB, et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 2018;27(1):293–315. PMID: 29067766. doi:10.1002/pro.3330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrath K, Vincke C, Stijlemans B, Schymkowitz J, Decanniere K, Wyns L, Muyldermans S, Loris R. Antigen binding and solubility effects upon the veneering of a camel VHH in framework-2 to mimic a VH. J Mol Biol. 2005;350(1):112–25. PMID: 15913651. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koide A, Tereshko V, Uysal S, Margalef K, Kossiakoff AA, Koide S. Exploring the capacity of minimalist protein interfaces: interface energetics and affinity maturation to picomolar KD of a single-domain antibody with a flat paratope. J Mol Biol. 2007;373(4):941–53. PMID: 17888451. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JK, Pace CN, Scholtz JM. Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding. Protein Sci. 1995;4(10):2138–48. PMID: 8535251. doi:10.1002/pro.5560041020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothlisberger D, Honegger A, Pluckthun A. Domain interactions in the Fab fragment: a comparative evaluation of the single-chain Fv and Fab format engineered with variable domains of different stability. J Mol Biol. 2005;347(4):773–89. PMID: 15769469. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden R, de Geus B, Stok W, Bos W, van Wassenaar D, Verrips T, Frenken L. Induction of immune responses and molecular cloning of the heavy chain antibody repertoire of Lama glama. J Immunol Methods. 2000;240(1–2):185–95. PMID: 10854612. doi:10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00188-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–26. PMID: 27754618. doi:10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative Computational Project N. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Cryst. 1994;50(5):760–63. doi:10.1107/S0907444994003112.
   Google Scholar
• Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(2):213–21. PMID: 20124702. doi:10.1107/S0907444909052925.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(12):2126–32. PMID: 15572765. doi:10.1107/S0907444904019158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM. NACCESS, Computer Program. Ver Vol. V2 1.1: software, University College London, “NACCESS”, Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• DeLano WL The PyMOL molecular graphics system. [software] San Carlos, CA, USA: DeLano Scientific; 2002. http://www.pymol.org.
   Google Scholar
• Pace CN, Vajdos F, Fee L, Grimsley G, Gray T. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 1995;4(11):2411–23. doi:10.1002/pro.5560041120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull WB, Daranas AH. On the value of c: can low affinity systems be studied by isothermal titration calorimetry? J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(48):14859–66. PMID: 14640663. doi:10.1021/ja036166s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys J. 2000;78(3):1606–19. PMID: 10692345. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76713-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr AB, Conrady DG. Thermodynamic analysis of metal ion-induced protein assembly. Methods Enzymol. 2011;488:101–21. PMID: 21195226. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-381268-1.00005-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herr AB, Ornitz DM, Sasisekharan R, Venkataraman G, Waksman G. Heparin-induced self-association of fibroblast growth factor-2. Evidence for two oligomerization processes. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(26):16382–89. PMID: 9195945. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.26.16382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr AB, White CL, Milburn C, Wu C, Bjorkman PJ. Bivalent Binding of IgA1 to FcαRI suggests a mechanism for cytokine activation of IgA phagocytosis. J Mol Biol. 2003;327(3):645–57. PMID: 12634059. doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00149-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar