Using Delta-Generalized Additive Models to Predict Spatial Distributions and Population Abundance of Juvenile Pink Shrimp in Tampa Bay, Florida

References

• Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267–281 in B. Petrov and F. Csaki, editors. Proceedings of the second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, C. W., A. Nielson, and K. Kristensen. 2014. Evaluation of alternative age-based methods for estimating relative abundance from survey data in relation to assessment models. Fisheries Research 151:91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A. J. 1998. Spatial analysis of fish distribution and abundance patterns: a GIS approach. Pages 719–740 in F. Funk, T. J. Quinn II, J. Heifetz, J. N. Ianelli, J. E. Powers, J. F. Schweigert, P. J. Sullivan, and C.-I. Zhang, editors. Fishery stock assessment models. University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Publication AF-SG-98-01, Fairbanks.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, A. J. 2000. Incorporating the spatial component of fisheries data into stock assessment models. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:858–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, J. A., and M. B. Robblee. 2009. Pink shrimp as an indicator for restoration of Everglades ecosystems. Ecological Indicators 9(Supplement):S17–S28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, J. A., Z. Zein-Eldin, M. M. Criales, M. B. Robblee, and T. I. Jackson. 2002. Dynamics of pink shrimp recruitment in relation to Florida Bay salinity and temperature. Estuaries 25:1335–1371.
   Google Scholar
• Carocci, F., G. Bianchi, P. Eastwood, and G. Meaden. 2009. Geographic information systems to support the ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Technical Report 532.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, T. J., and D. M. Allen. 1970. Synopsis of biological data on the pink shrimp Penaeus duorarum Burkenroad, 1939. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Fisheries Report 57:1499–1538.
   Google Scholar
• Drexler, M., and C. H. Ainsworth. 2013. Generalized additive models used to predict species abundance in the Gulf of Mexico: an ecosystem modeling tool. PLoS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 8(5):e64458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, P. K., and G. K. Smyth. 1996. Randomized quantile residuals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5:236–244.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, P. H. C., and B. D. Marx. 1996. Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Statistical Science 11:89–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith, J., and J. R. Leathwick. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40:677–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPAP (Ecosystem Principles Advisory Panel). 1999. Ecosystem-based fishery management. Report to Congress. Ecosystem Principles Advisory Panel, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, D. 1988. Multiplicative errors: log-normal or gamma? Journal Research Statistical Society Series B Methodological 50:266–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D., D. MacKenzie, and E. Villouta. 2005. Modelling skewed data with many zeros: a simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 12:45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French-McCay, D. 2009. State-of-the-art and research needs for oil spill impact assessment modeling. Pages 601–653 in Proceedings of the 32nd AMOP technical seminar on environmental contamination and response. Environment Canada, Emergencies Science Division, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• FWRI (Fish and Wildlife Research Institute). 2013. Fisheries-independent monitoring program 2013 annual data summary report. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, In-House Report IHR2014-003, St. Petersburg.
   Google Scholar
• GMFMC (Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council). 2005. Final generic amendment number 3 for addressing essential fish habitat requirements, habitat areas of particular concern, and adverse effects of fishing in the following fishery management plans of the Gulf of Mexico (GOM): shrimp fishery of the GOM, United States waters, Red Drum fishery of the GOM, reef fish fishery of the GOM, coastal migratory pelagic resources (mackerels) in the GOM and South Atlantic, stone crab fishery of the GOM, spiny lobster fishery of the GOM, spiny lobster in the GOM and South Atlantic, coral and coral reefs of the GOM. GMFMC, Tampa, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Grüss, A., M. Drexler, and C. H. Ainsworth. 2014. Using delta generalized additive models to produce distribution maps for spatially explicit ecosystem models. Fisheries Research 159:11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling 135:147–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, H. H. 1955. A study of the fauna of the pink shrimp grounds in the Gulf of Campeche. Publications of the Institute of Marine Science University of Texas 4:169–232.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. P., R. Seppelt, T. J. Miller, and L. J. Bauer. 2005. Winter distribution of blue crab Callinectes sapidus in Chesapeake Bay: application and cross validation of a two-stage generalized additive model. Marine Ecology Progress Series 299:239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pape, O., F. Chauvet, S. Mahévas, P. Lazure, D. Guérault, and Y. Désaunay. 2003. Quantitative description of habitat suitability for the juvenile Common Sole (Solea solea, L.) in the Bay of Biscay (France) and the contribution of different habitats to the adult population. Journal of Sea Research 50:139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pape, O., J. Delavenne, and S. Vaz. 2014. Quantitative mapping of fish habitat: a useful tool to design specialized management measures and marine protected areas with fishery objectives. Ocean and Coastal Management 87:8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. R. III, and E. D. Estevez. 1988. The ecology of Tampa Bay, Florida: an estuarine profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 85(7.18).
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Jiao, and Q. Hi. 2011a. Decreasing uncertainty in catch rate analyses using Delta-AdaBoost: an alternative approach in catch and bycatch analyses with high percentage of zeros. Fisheries Research 107:261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Jiao, and K. Reid. 2011b. Gill-net saturation in Lake Erie: effects of soak time and fish accumulation on catch per unit effort of Walleye and Yellow Perch. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 31:280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. G., B. A. Wintle, J. R. Rhodes, P. M. Kuhnert, S. A. Field, S. J. Low-Choy, A. J. Tyre, and H. P. Possingham. 2005. Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modeling of zero observations. Ecology Letters 8:1235–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, R. Jr., R. McMichael Jr., D. Leffler, and T. MacDonald. 2005. Populations of juvenile and small-adult fishes in Tampa Bay: a decadal perspective. Pages 3–18 in S. F. Treat, editor. Proceedings, Tampa Bay area scientific information symposium, BASIS4. Tampa Bay National Estuary Program, St. Petersburg, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Maunder, M. N., and A. E. Punt. 2004. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fisheries Research 70:141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, R. G., A. A. Trotter, and P. W. Stevens. 2015. The 2015 stock assessment update of Common Snook, Centropomus undecimalis. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, IHR 2015-004, St. Petersburg.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. A., and P. Pepin. 1990. The robustness of lognormal-based estimators of abundance. Biometrics 46:1185–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, T., and A. J. Booth. 2001. Recent approaches using GIS in the spatial analysis of fish populations. Pages 19–36 in G. H. Kruse, N. Bez, A. Booth, M. W. Dorn, S. Hills, R. N. Lipcius, D. Pelletier, C. Roy, S. J. Smith, and D. Witherell, editors. Spatial processes and management of marine populations. University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Publication AK-SG-01-03, Fairbanks.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, R., and S. L. P. Ferrari. 2010. Inflated beta distributions. Statistical Papers 51:111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A. B. 1995. Nonparametric confidence bands for a distribution function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:516–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, M.1983. Efficient estimators of abundance for fish and plankton surveys. Biometrics 39:281–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planque, B., C. Loots, P. Petitgas, U. Lindstrǿme, and V. Sandrine. 2011. Understanding what controls the spatial distribution of fish populations using a multimodel approach. Fisheries Oceanography 20:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available: http://www.R-project.org/. ( March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, R. A., and D. M. Stasinopoulos. 2005. Generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Applied Statistics 54:507–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, B., M. Stasinopoulos, and V. Voudouris. 2013. GAMLSS flexible regression in R. [online book]. London Metropolitan University, London. Available: http://www.gamlss.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/FlexibleRegression.pdf. ( March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A., T. E. Bigford, S. Leathery, R. L. Hill, and K. Bickers. 2000. Ecosystem approaches to fishery management through essential fish habitat. Bulletin of Marine Science 66:535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubec, P. J., J. C. W. Bexley, H. Norris, M. S. Coyne, M. E. Monaco, S. G. Smith, and J. S. Ault. 1999. Suitability modeling to delineate habitat essential to sustainable fisheries. Pages 108–133 in L. R. Benaka, editor. Fish habitat: essential fish habitat and restoration. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 22, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Rubec, P. J., M. S. Coyne, R. H. McMichael Jr., and M. E. Monaco. 1998. Spatial methods being developed in Florida to determine essential fish habitat. Fisheries 23(7):21–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. M., D. D. Goble, and F. W. Davis. 2006. The Endangered Species Act at thirty, volume 2. Conserving biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Stasinopoulos, D. M., and R. A. Rigby. 2007. Generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) in R. Journal of Statistical Software 23:1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasinopoulos, M., B. Rigby, and C. Akantziliotou. 2008. Instructions on how to use the gamlss package in R, 2nd edition [online book]. London Metropolitan University, London. Available: http://www.gamlss.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gamlss-manual.pdf. ( March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Stasinopoulos, M., M. Rigby, C. Akantziliotou, G. Heller, R. Ospina, N. Motpan, F. McElduff, V. Voudouris, M. Djennad, M. Enea, and A. Ghalanos. 2014. gamlss.dist: distributions to be used for GAMLSS modeling in R package version 4.3-0. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gamlss.dist. ( March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Stefánsson, G. 1996. Analysis of groundfish survey abundance data: combining the GLM and delta approaches. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 53:577–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrjala, S. 2000. Critique of the use of the delta distribution for the analysis of trawl survey data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57:831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TBNEP (Tampa Bay National Estuary Program). 1996. Charting the course for Tampa Bay: comprehensive conservation and management plan for Tampa Bay. TBNEP, St. Petersburg, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Trimoreau, E., B. Archambault, A. Brind’Amour, M. Lepage, J. Guitton, and O. Le Pape. 2013. A quantitative estimate of the function of soft-bottom sheltered coastal areas as essential flatfish nursery habitat. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 133:193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. B. 1955. A survey of North Carolina shrimp distribution. Journal of Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 71:200–207.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S. H., and R. D. Drew, editors. 1990. An ecological characterization of the Tampa Bay watershed. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(20).
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Y., M. Al-Husaini, and A. Al-Baz. 2001. Use of generalized linear models to analyze catch rates having zero values: the Kuwait drift net fishery. Fisheries Research 53:151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar