Does citizen engagement improve development outcomes? A realist-informed systematic review of participation and accountability mechanisms

References

• Alhassan, R. K., E. Nketiah-Amponsah, N. Spieker, D. K. Arhinful, A. Ogink, P. Van Ostenberg, T. F. R. De Wit, and A. M. Noor. 2015. “Effect of Community Engagement Interventions on Patient Safety and Risk Reduction Efforts in Primary Health Facilities: Evidence from Ghana.” PLoS One 10 (11): e0142389. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., S. Deb, M. Gambrill, E. Giannone, G. Joseph, P. Kannath, M. Kumar, P. Kuruvila Kurian, R. Many, and A. Muwonge. 2017. “Sustainability of Demand Responsive Approaches to Rural Water Supply: The Case of Kerala.” Journal of Water Sustainability 8 (3): 73–97.
   Google Scholar
• Aunger, R., and V. Curtis. 2016. “Behaviour Centred Design: Towards an Applied Science of Behaviour Change.” Health Psychology Review 10 (4): 425–446. doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1219673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., M. N. Humavindu, P. Shyamsundar, and L. Wang (2004). Do Households Gain from Community‐based Natural Resource Management? An Evaluation of Community Conservancies in Namibia. Environment Department. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., P. Shyamsundar, and M. Xie. 2010. “Transferring Irrigation Management to Farmer’s Associations: Evidence from the Philippines.” Water Policy 12 (3): 444–460. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., R. Chattopadhyay, E. Duflo, D. Keniston, and N. Singh. 2014. Improving Police Performance in Rajasthan, India: Experimental Evidence on Incentives, Managerial Autonomy and Training. Cambridge MA: Massacchussets Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., R. Chattopadhyay, E. Duflo, D. Keniston, and N. Singh. 2021. “Improving Police Performance in Rajasthan, India: Experimental Evidence on Incentives, Managerial Autonomy and Training.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13 (1): 36–66. doi:10.1257/pol.20190664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., R. Hanna, J. Kyle, B. A. Olken, and S. Sumarto. 2018. “Tangible Information and Citizen Empowerment: Identification Cards and Food Subsidy Programs in Indonesia.” The Journal of Political Economy 126 (2): 451–491. doi:10.1086/696226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barde, J. A. 2017. “What Determines Access to Piped Water in Rural Areas? Evidence from Small‐scale Supply Systems in Rural Brazil.” World Development 95: 88–110. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, M. A., and R. Glennerster. 2017. ”The Generalizability Puzzle.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 15 (3): 50–54. doi:10.48558/EYY5-3S89.
   Google Scholar
• Beath, A., F. Christia, and R. Enikolopov (2013). Randomized Impact Evaluation of Afghanistan’s National Solidarity Program: Final Report. World Bank Report No. 81107. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Beath, A., F. Christia, and R. Enikolopov. 2015. “The National Solidarity Programme: Assessing the Effects of Community-Driven Development in Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping 22 (4): 302–320. doi:10.1080/13533312.2015.1059287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedore, J. (2011). Revisiting Irrigation Management Transfer: A Case Study Of A Philippine Municipality’s Experience In Transferring Irrigation Management To Farmer Associations. Master’s thesis. University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., M. Callen, L. N. Condra, M. Downey, T. Ghanik, and M. Isaqzadeh. 2017. Community Monitors Vs. Leakage: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. UCSD, San Diego: Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Beuermann, D. W., and M. Amelina. 2014. Does Participatory Budgeting Improve Decentralized Public Service Delivery?. Washington, D.C: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Björkman Nyqvist, M., D. de Walque, and J. Svensson. 2017. “Experimental Evidence on the Long-Run Impact of Community-Based Monitoring.” American Economic Journal Applied Economics 9 (1): 33–69. doi:10.1257/app.20150027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkman, M., and J. Svensson. 2009. “Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 735–769. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, D. 2012. Development as a Collective Action Problem. Addressing the Real Challenges of African Governance. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J., and S. Igras. 2005. “Improving the Quality of Child Health Services: Participatory Action by Providers.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 17 (5): 391–399. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. W., and A. Wetterberg. 2015. “Gauging the Effects of Social Accountability on Services, Governance, and Citizen Empowerment.” Public Administration Review 76 (2): 274–286. doi:10.1111/puar.12399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell Collaboration. 2016. Campbell Systematic Reviews: Policies and Guidelines Campbell Policies and Guidelines Series No. 1. Oslo: The Campbell Collaboration. doi:10.4073/cpg.2016.1.
   Google Scholar
• Capuno, J. J., and M. M. Garcia. 2010. “Can Information About Local Government Performance Induce Civic Participation? Evidence from the Philippines.” The Journal of Development Studies 46 (4): 624–643. doi:10.1080/00220380903023521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr-Hill, R., C. Rolleston, R. Schendel, and H. Waddington. 2018. “The Effectiveness of School-Based Decision Making in Improving Educational Outcomes: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 10 (1): 61–94. doi:10.1080/19439342.2018.1440250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., A. Booth, J. Leaviss et al, 2013. ”“Best Fit” Framework Synthesis: Refining the Method.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 13 (37). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-37.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., L. Charlton, M. Juden, T. Munslow, and R. B. Williams (2020). Making Predictions of Programme Success More Reliable. CEDIL Methods Working Paper. Oxford: CEDIL. Available at: cedilprogramme.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/CEDIL-methods-WP-N.-Cartwright-Oct-2020.pdf (accessed 3 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Casey, K., R. Glennerster, and E. Miguel (2012). The GoBifo Project Evaluation Report: Assessing the Impacts of Community-Driven Development in Sierra Leone. Impact Evaluation Report 3. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3 ie).
   Google Scholar
• Consortium, E. (2016). Empowerment and Accountability Annual Technical Report 2016: What Works for Social Accountability, Macro Evaluation of Dfid’s Policy Frame for Empowerment and Accountability. Oxford: e‐PACT.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Bó, E., and F. Finan (2016). At the Intersection: A Review of Institutions in Economic Development. EDI Working Paper Series WP 16/11.01. Available at: https://edi.opml.co.uk/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/WhitePaper-Nov2016_sv.pdf (accessed 28 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Devarajan, S., S. Khemani, and M. Walton. 2014. “Can Civil Society Overcome Government Failure in Africa?” The World Bank Research Observer 29 (1): 20–47. doi:10.1093/wbro/lkt008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Cayeros, A., B. Magaloni, and A. Ruiz-Euler. 2014. “Traditional Governance, Citizen Engagement, and Local Public Goods: Evidence from Mexico.” World Development 53: 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, K., and A. Garcia Mosqueira. 2016. Power to the People? A Replication Study of a Community-Based Monitoring Program in Uganda. 3ie. New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, W. 2007. “Inequality Does Cause Underdevelopment: Insights from a New Instrument.” Journal of Development Economics 84 (2): 755–776. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala, N., and P. Premand (2018). Social Accountability and Service Delivery: Experimental Evidence from Uganda. Policy Research working paper No. WPS 8449, Impact Evaluation Series. Washington, D.C: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Finan, F., B. A. Olken, and R. Pande, Chapter 6 - The Personnel Economics of the Developing State. Editors: Abhijit Vinayak Banerjee, Esther Duflo, Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Vol. 2, 467–514. North-Holland: Amsterdam. doi:10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S. E. (2012). Voter Opinion and Involvement Through Civic Education VOICE. The VOICE Impact Evaluation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Final Report. Prepared by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems for USAID. Washington, D.C: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2014). Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say? GPSA Working Paper No. 1. Washington, D.C: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder, M., and V. Dixon (2018). Misdiagnosis and the Evidence Trap: A Tale of Inadequate Program Design. Evidence matters blogpost, 1 November 2018. Available at: https://www.3ieimpact.org/blogs/misdiagnosis-and-evidence-trap-tale-inadequate-program-design (accessed 23 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Giné, X., S. Khalid, and G. Mansuri. 2018. “The Impact of Social Mobilization on Health Service Delivery and Health Outcomes - Evidence from Rural Pakistan.” In World Bank Group, Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Team and Poverty and Equity Global Practice Group. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8313.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, S. 2013. “The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil.” World Development 53: 94–110. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, J. 2016. ”Why Might Information Exacerbate the Gender Gap in Civic Participation? Evidence from Mali.” World Development 86: 95–110. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandvoinnet, H., G. Aslam, and S. Raha. 2015. Opening the Black Box: The Contextual Drivers of Social Accountability. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0481-6.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., M. Humphreys, and G. Sacramone-Lutz. 2014. ““I Wld Like U Wmp to Extend Electricity 2 Our Village”: On Information Technology and Interest Articulation.” The American Political Science Review 108 (3): 688–705. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., and K. Michelitch. 2018. “Information Dissemination, Competitive Pressure, and Politician Performance Between Elections: A Field Experiment in Uganda.” American Political Science Association 112 (2): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., K. Michelitch, and M. Santamaria. 2017. “Texting Complaints to Politicians: Name Personalization and Politicians.” Encouragement in Citizen Mobilization. Comparative Political Studies 50 (10): 1325–1357. doi:10.1177/0010414016666862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G., J. Rodden, Z. Tausanovich, and A. Han (2017). Can Text Messages Improve Local Governance? An Impact Evaluation of the U-Bridge Program in Uganda. Endline Impact Evaluation Report. Washington, D.C: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Gullo, S., C. Galavotti, A. S. Kuhlmann, T. Msiska, P. Hastings, C. N. Marti, and M. Ciccozzi. 2017. “Effects of a Social Accountability Approach, Care’s Community Score Card, on Reproductive Health-Related Outcomes in Malawi: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Evaluation.” PLoS One 12 (2): e0171316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halloran, B. (2015). Strengthening Accountability Ecosystems: A Discussion Paper. Think Piece Series, Transparency and Accountability Initiative. Brighton: IDS.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, R., S. Bishop, S. Nadel, G. Scheffler, and K. Durlacher (2011). The Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Policy: What Has Worked, What Hasn’t and What We Don’t Know: A Systematic Review. Technical report. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Harbord, R. M., and J. Higgins. 2008. “Meta-Regression in Stata.” The Stata Journal 8 (4): 493–519. doi:10.1177/1536867X0800800403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. 1983. “A Random Effects Model for Effect Sizes.” Psychological Bulletin 93 (2): 388–395. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, T. C., P. P. Glasziou, I. Boutron, R. Milne, R. Perera, D. Moher, D. G. Altman, et al. 2014. ”Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide.” BMJ 348 (mar07 3): g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Q. Q. 2014. “Impact Evaluation of the Irrigation Management Reform in Northern China.” Water Resources Research 50 (5): 4323–4340. doi:10.1002/2013WR015192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M., R. S. de la Sierra, and P. van der Windt (2014). Social and Economic Impacts of Tuungane: Final Report on the Effects of a Community Driven Reconstruction Program in the Democratic Republic of Congo. New Delhi: 3ie.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M., and J. M. Weinstein (2012). Policing Politicians: Citizen Empowerment and Political Accountability in Uganda Preliminary Analysis. IGC Working Paper. London: The International Growth Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. 1999. “Policy Lessons from the Evolution of a Community-Based Approach to Wildlife Management, Kunene Region, Namibia.” Journal of International Development 11 (2): 295–304. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199903/04)11:2<295:AID-JID583>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A. 2014. “Reading the Local Context: A Causal Chain Approach to Social Accountability.” IDS bulletin 45 (5): 23–35. doi:10.1111/1759-5436.12101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasim, T. M. (2016). Essays on policy evaluation from an environmental and a regional perspective. Dissertation, Georgia State University. 10.57709/8739061.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P., and S. Khemani. 2014. “Mass Media and Public Education: The Effects of Access to Community Radio in Benin.” Journal of Development Economics 109 (July): 57–72. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., C. Nguyen, and A. Tran. 2013. ”The Impact of Recentralization on Public Services: A Difference-In-Differences Analysis of the Abolition of Elected Councils in Vietnam.” The American Political Science Review 108 (01): 144–168. Doi.org/. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000580.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, D. (2018). Statistical Power and the Funnel of Attribution. World Bank Development Impact Blog, 9 January 2018. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/statistical-power-and-funnel-attribution (accessed 11 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Mcloughlin, C., and R. Batley (2012). The Politics of What Works in Service Delivery: An Evidence-Based Review. Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-006-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Meyfroidt, P., R. Roy Chowdhury, A. de Bremond, E. C. Ellis, K. -H. Erb, T. Filatova, R. D. Garrett, et al. 2018. ”Middle-Range Theories of Land System Change.” Global Environmental Change 53: 52–67. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, E. 2014. Can Bottom-Up Institutional Reform Improve Service Delivery?. Washington, D.C: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, S., U. Das, Y. Liu, and C. Barrett. 2017. “The “Discouraged Worker Effect” in Public Works Programs: Evidence from the MGNREGA in India.” World Development 100: 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/DAC. 2005. Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. OECD/DAC Second High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Olken, B. 2007. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” The Journal of Political Economy 115 (2): 200–249. doi:10.1086/517935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, L., and R. Pande. 2018. “Ending Global Poverty: Aid and the State.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (4): 173–200. doi:10.1257/jep.32.4.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palladium (2015). Independent Evaluation of the Security Sector Accountability and Police Reform Program. Final Evaluation Report. London: DFID.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, P., S. R. Ashwini, M. Riboud, D. Levine, and M. Goyal. 2007. “Informing Resource-Poor Populations and the Delivery of Entitled Health and Social Services in Rural India: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.” Jama 298 (16): 1867–1875. doi:10.1001/jama.298.16.1867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2006. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. 2010. “Middle Range Theory and Program Theory Evaluation: From Provenance to Practice.” In Mind the Gap: Perspectives on Policy Evaluation and the Social Sciences, edited by J. Vaessen and F. L. Leeuw. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Persha, L., and C. Meshack. 2016. A Triple Win? The Impact of Tanzania’s Joint Forest Management Programme on Livelihoods, Governance and Forests. New Delhi: 3ie.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D., C. Coffey, E. Gallagher, P. Fenton Villar, J. Stevenson, S. Tsoli, S. Dhanasekar, and J. Eyers. 2017. “State-Society Relations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence Gap Map.” In 3ie Evidence Gap Map. Vol. 7. London: 3ie.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, H. Z., and M. Robinson 2006. ”Governance and State Effectiveness in Asia.” IDS bulletin 37: 130–149. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, V., K. Ananthpur, and K. Malik. 2017. “The Anatomy of Failure: An Ethnography of a Randomized Trial to Deepen Democracy in Rural India.” World Development 99: 481–497. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasolofoson, R. A., P. J. Ferraro, C. N. Jenkins, and J. P. G. Jones. 2015. “Effectiveness of Community Forest Management at Reducing Deforestation in Madagascar.” Biological conservation 184: 271–277. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravallion, M., D. van de Walle, P. Dutta, and R. Murgai. 2015. ”Empowering Poor People Through Public Information? Lessons from a Movie in Rural India.” Journal of Public Economics 132 (December): 13–22. 2015. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento Barletti, J. P., A. M. Larson, C. Hewlett, and D. Delgado. 2020. “Designing for Engagement: A Realist Synthesis Review of How Context Affects the Outcomes of Multi-Stakeholder Forums on Land Use And/Or Land-Use Change.” World Development 127 (March): 1047533. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savović, J., H. Jones, D. Altman, R. Harris, P. Jűni, J. Pildal, B. Als-Nielsen, et al. 2012. “Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates from Randomised Controlled Trials: Combined Analysis of Meta-Epidemiological Studies.” Health Technology Assessment 16 (35): 1–82. doi:10.3310/hta16350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, R. 2022. “The Unintended Effects of Bottom-Up Accountability: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Peru.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 17 (2): 223–257. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00020079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheely, R. 2015. “Mobilization, Participatory Planning Institutions, and Elite Capture: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya.” World Development 67 (March): 251–266. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.10.024.
   Google Scholar
• Tachibana, T., and S. Adhikari. 2009. “Does Community‐based Management Improve Natural Resource Condition? Evidence from the Forests in Nepal.” Land Economics 85 (1): 107–131. doi:10.3368/le.85.1.107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachibana, T., and S. Adhikari. 2009. “Does Community-Based Management Improve Natural Resource Condition? Evidence from the Forests in Nepal.” Land Economics 85: 107–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmons, J. F., and F. Garfias. 2015. “Revealed Corruption, Taxation, and Fiscal Accountability: Evidence from Brazil.” World Development 70: 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touchton, M., and B. Wampler. 2014. “Improving Social Well-Being Through New Democratic Institutions.” Comparative political studies 47 (10): 1442–1469. doi:10.1177/0010414013512601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency and Accountability Initiative (TAI) (2017). How Do We Define Key Terms? Transparency and Accountability Glossary. Accessed 4 September 2018. Available at: https://www.transparency-initiative.org/uncategorized/1179/tai-definitions/.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, L. 2007. “Accountability Without Democracy. Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China.” In Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. 2016. UNDP Support to the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16: Promote Peaceful and Inclusive Societies, Provide Access to Justice and Build Effective, Accountable and Inclusive Institutions. New York: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• United States Agency for International Development (2014). Analysis of USAID Anticorruption Programming Worldwide (2007-2013): Final Report. Washington, D.C: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Knaap, L. M., F. L. Leeuw, S. Bogaerts, and L. T. J. Nijssen. 2008. “Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach: The Best of Two Worlds?” American Journal of Evaluation 29 (1): 48–57. doi:10.1177/1098214007313024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, H., E. Masset, and E. Jimenez. 2018. “What Have We Learned After ten Years of Systematic Reviews in International Development?” Journal of Development Effectiveness 10 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/19439342.2018.1441166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, H., A. Sonnenfeld, J. Finetti, M. Gaarder, D. John, and J. Stevenson. 2019. “Citizen Engagement in Public Services in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries: A Mixed‐methods Systematic Review of Participation, Inclusion, Transparency and Accountability (PITA) Initiatives.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 15 (1–2): e1025. doi:10.1002/cl2.1025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waddington, H., J. Stevenson, A. Sonnenfeld, and M. Gaarder. 2018. “PROTOCOL: Participation, Inclusion, Transparency and Accountability (PITA) to Improve Public Services in Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 14 (1): 1–69. doi:10.1002/CL2.205.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, H., H. White, B. Snilstveit, J. G. Hombrados, M. Vojtkova, P. Davies, A. Bhavsar, et al. 2012. “How to Do a Good Systematic Review of Effects in International Development: A Tool Kit.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 4 (3): 359–387. doi:10.1080/19439342.2012.711765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 2014. “Current Challenges in Impact Evaluation.” European Journal of Development Research 26 (1): 18–30. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2013.45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 2018. “Theory-Based Systematic Reviews.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 10 (1): 17–38. doi:10.1080/19439342.2018.1439078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H., R. Menon, and H. Waddington (2018). Community-Driven Development: Does It Build Social Cohesion or Infrastructure? A Mixed-Method Evidence Synthesis Report. 3ie Working Paper 26. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Wibbels, E. 2019. “The Social Underpinnings of Decentralized Governance: Networks, Technology and the Future of Social Accountability.” In Prepared for the USAID/DRG Centre. Washington, D.C: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, G., T. Greenhalgh, G. Westhorp, J. Buckingham, and R. Pawson. 2013. “RAMESES Publication Standards: Realist Syntheses.” BMC medicine 11 (1): 21. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2004). World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington, D.C: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, D.C: The World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Yanez-Pagans, M., and G. Machicado-Salas. 2014. “Bureaucratic Delay, Local-Level Monitoring, and Delivery of Small Infrastructure Projects: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Bolivia.” World Development 59 (C): 394–407. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.02.004.
   Google Scholar