Magnetic adsorbent used in combination with ultrafiltration membrane for the removal of surfactants from water

References

• Adak, M. Bandyopadhyay, A. Pal, Removal of anionic surfactant from wastewater by alumina: A case study. Colloids Surf., A 254 (2005) 165–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Onder, A.S. Koparal, U.B. Ogutveren, An alternative method for the removal of surfactants from water: Electrochemical coagulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 52 (2007) 527–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.S. Rao, Environmental Pollution Control Engineering, Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, 1991, pp. 165–232.
   Google Scholar
• G. Lissens, J. Pieters, M. Verhaege, L. Pinoy, W. Verstraete, Electrochemical degradation of surfactants by intermediates of water discharge at carbon-based electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 48 (2003) 1655–1663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mozia, M. Tomaszewska, A.W. Morawski, Decomposition of nonionic surfactant in a labyrinth flow photoreactor with immobilized TiO2 bed. Appl. Catal. B 59 (2005) 155–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Shiau, J.H. Harwell, J.F. Scamehorn, Precipitation of mixtures of anionic and cationic surfactants: III. Effect of added nonionic surfactant. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 167 (1994) 332–345.
   Google Scholar
• F.I. Talens-Alesson, S.T. Hall, N.P. Hankins, B. Azzopardi, Flocculation of SDS micelles with Fe3+. J. Colloids Surf. 204 (2002) 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.N. Rao, S. Dube, Photocatalytic degradation of mixed surfactants and some commercial soap/detergent products using suspended TiO2. J. Mol. Catal. 104 (1996) 197–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ohtaki, H. Sato, H. Fujii, K. Eguchi, Intramolecularly selective decomposition of surfactant molecules on photocatalytic oxidative degradation over TiO2 photocatalyst. J. Mol. Catal. 155 (2000) 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• T. Zhang, T. Oyama, S. Horikoshi, J. Zhao, N. Serpone, H. Hidaka, Photocatalytic decomposition of the sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate surfactant in aqueous titania suspensions exposed to highly concentrated solar radiation and effects of additives. Appl. Environ. 42 (2003) 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ogita, Y. Nagai, M.A. Mehta, T. Fujinami, Application of the adsorption effect of optical fibres for the determination of critical micelle concentration. Sens. Actuat. 64 (2000) 147–151.
   Google Scholar
• A. Adak, M. Bandyopadhyay, A. Pal, Removal of anionic surfactant from wastewater by alumina: A case study. Colloids Surf. 254 (2005) 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Lin, T.W. Smith, P. Alexandridis, Adsorption of a polymeric siloxane surfactant on carbon black particles dispersed in mixtures of water with polar organic solvents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 255 (2002) 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Matthew, N.J. Malcolm, The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1508 (2000) 235–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• H.J. Chen, D.H. Tseng, S.L. Huang, Biodegradation of octylphenol polyethoxylate surfactant Triton X-100 by selected microorganisms. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005) 1483–1491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A. Dhouib, N. Hamad, I. Hassaïri, S. Sayadi, Degradation of anionic surfactants by Citrobacter braakii. Process Biochem. 38 (2003) 1245–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Sirieix-Plénet, M. Turmine, P. Letellier, Membrane electrodes sensitive to doubly charged surfactants. Application to a cationic gemini surfactant. Talanta 60 (2003) 1071–1078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. Fernández, J.M. Benito, C. Pazos, J. Coca, Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of anionic and nonionic surfactant solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 246 (2005) 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Kowalska, M. Kabsch-Korbutowicz, K. Majewska-Nowak, T. Winnicki, Separation of anionic surfactants on ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 162 (2004) 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Wiesner, M.M. Clark, J. Mallevialle, Membrane filtration of coagulated suspensions. J. Environ. Eng. 115 (1989) 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Lahoussine-Turcaud, M.R. Wiesner, J. Bottero, Mallevialle, Coagulation pretreatment for ultrafiltration of a surface water. Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 82 (1990) 76–81.
   Google Scholar
• T. Carroll, S. King, S.R. Gray, B.A. Bolto, N.A. Booker, The fouling of microfiltration by NOM after coagulation treatment. Water Res. 34 (2000) 2861–2868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Braghetta, J.G. Jacangelo, S. Chellem, M.L. Hotaling, B.A. Utne, DAF pretreatment: its effect on MF performance. Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 89 (1997) 90–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Adham, V.L. Snoeyink, M.M. Clark, J. Bersillon, Predicting and verifying organics removal by PAC in an ultrafiltration system. Am. Water Works Assoc. J. 83 (1991) 81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.G. Jacangelo, J. Laine, E.W. Cummings, S.S. Adham, UF with pretreatment for removing DPB precursors. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 87 (1995) 100–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Konieczny, G. Klomfas, Using activated carbon to improve natural water treatment by porous membranes. Desalination 147 (2002) 109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Laıne, D. Vial, P. Moulart, Status after 10 years of operation – overview of UF technology today. Desalination 131 (2000) 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Pianta, M. Boller, M.L. Janex, A. Chappaz, B. Birou, R. Ponce, Micro- and ultra-filtration of karstic spring water. Desalination 117 (1998) 61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Qilin, V.L. Snoeyink, B.J. Marinas, C. Campos, Pore blockage effect of NOM on atrazine adsorption kinetics of PAC: The roles of PAC pore size distribution and NOM molecular weight. Water Res. 37 (2003) 4863–4872.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S.J. Lee, K.H. Choo, C.H. Lee, Conjunctive use of ultrafiltration with powdered activated carbon adsorption for removal of synthetic and natural organic matter. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 6 (2000) 357–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.F. Lin, S.H. Liu, O.J. Hao, Effect of functional groups of humic substances on UF performance. Water Res. 35 (2001) 2395–2402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.F. Lin, Y.J. Huang, O.J. Hao, Ultrafiltration processes for removing humic substances: Effect of molecular weight fractions and PAC treatment. Water Res. 33 (1999) 1252–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zahoor, M. Mahramanlioglu, Removal of phenolic substances from water by adsorption and adsorption–ultrafiltration. Sep. Sci. Technol. 46 (2011) 1482–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.C.A. Oliveira, R.V.R.A. Rios, J.D. Fabris, V. Garg, K. Sapag, R.M. Lago, Activated carbon/iron oxide magnetic composites for the adsorption of contaminants in water. Carbon 40 (2002) 2177–2183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Langmuir, The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40 (1918) 1361–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Freundlich, Über die adsorption in lösungen [Adsorption in solution]. Z. Phys. Chem. 57 (1906) 384–470.
   Google Scholar
• S. Lagergren, Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption geloester stoffe [Kinetics equation for solute adsorption on various adsorbents]. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakad, Handlingar 24 (1898) 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Y.S. Ho, G. Mckay, Sorption of dye fromaqueous solution by peat. Chem. Eng. J. 70 (1998) 115–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.S. Jonsson, J. Lindau, J. Brink, B. Jonsson, Influence of the concentration of a low-molecular organic solute on the flux reduction of a polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 135 (1997) 117–128.
   Google Scholar