Running the gauntlet: challenges to genome integrity in spermiogenesis

References

• Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reproduction Update. 2010;16(3):231–12. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manier MK, Belote JM, Berben KS, et al. Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2010;328(5976):354–357. doi: 10.1126/science.1187096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto-Heras S, Sakkas D, Miller DJ. Sperm selection by the oviduct: perspectives for male fertility and assisted reproductive technologies. Biol Reprod. 2023;108(4):538–552. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioac224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavioon G, Hotzy C, Nakhro K, et al. Haploid selection within a single ejaculate increases offspring fitness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(30):8053–8058. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705601114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller MT. Spermatogenesis. In: Bate M, and Martinez-Arias A, editors The development of Drosophila. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. pp. 71–147.
   Google Scholar
• Griswold MD. Spermatogenesis: the commitment to meiosis. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(1):1–17. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian L, Brill JA. Drosophila spermiogenesis. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2(3):197–212. doi: 10.4161/spmg.21798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsley DL, Tokuyasu KT. Spermatogenesis. In: Ashburner M, and Wright TRF, editors Genetics and biology of Drosophila. New York: Academic; 1980. pp. 225–294.
   Google Scholar
• Amann RP. The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in humans: a need to revisit? J Androl. 2008;29(5):469–487. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.107.004655
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandley AC, Bateman AJ. Timing of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster using Tritiated Thymidine. Nature. 1962;193(4812):299–300. doi: 10.1038/193299b0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber JE. Partners and pathways. Trends Genet. 2000;16(6):259–264. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02022-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S, et al. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta – Genet Regul Mech. 2014;1839(3):155–168. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White-Cooper H. Molecular mechanisms of gene regulation during Drosophila spermatogenesis. Reproduction. 2010;139(1):11–21. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcon L, Boissonneault G. Transient DNA strand breaks during mouse and human spermiogenesis: new insights in stage specificity and link to chromatin remodeling. Biol Reprod. 2004;70(4):910–918. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.022541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller CG, Clermont Y. Spermatogenesis in man: an estimate of its duration. Science. 1963;140(3563):184–186. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3563.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meistrich ML. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis in humans. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1180–1186. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards RG, Sirlin JL. The effect of 200r of X-rays on the rate of spermatogenesis and spermiogenesis in the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1958;15(3):522–528. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90100-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakberg EF. Sensitivity and time of degeneration of spermatogenic cells irradiated in various stages of maturation in the mouse. Radiat Res. 1955;2(4):369–391. doi: 10.2307/3570245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costabile RA. The effects of cancer and cancer therapy on male reproductive function. J Urol. 1993;149(5 Part 2):1327–1330. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36384-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu KL, Yamashita YM. Germ cell connectivity enhances cell death in response to DNA damage in the Drosophila testis. Elife. 2017;6:1–16. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Daal A, Elgin SCR. A histone variant, H2AvD, is essential in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3(6):593–602. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.6.593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan JP, Chotkowski HL, Glaser RL. DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(17):3698–3705. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, et al. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(10):5858–5868. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed EA, Sfeir A, Takai H, et al. Ku70 and non-homologous end joining protect testicular cells from DNA damage. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(14):3095–3104. doi: 10.1242/jcs.122788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rübe CE, Zhang S, Miebach N, et al. Protecting the heritable genome: DNA damage response mechanisms in spermatogonial stem cells. DNA Repair. 2011;10(2):159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talibova G, Bilmez Y, Ozturk S. DNA double-strand break repair in male germ cells during spermatogenesis and its association with male infertility development. DNA Repair. 2022;118:103386. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber MR. The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(1):1–5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R700039200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz AA, Vida GS, Stern SR, et al. Emergent dynamics of adult stem cell lineages from single nucleus and single cell RNA-Seq of Drosophila testes. Elife. 2023;12:e82201. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Luo C, Wang Z, et al. Uncoupling transcription and translation through miRNA-dependent poly(A) length control in haploid male germ cells. Dev. 2022;149(12). doi: 10.1242/dev.199573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleene KC. Poly(A) shortening accompanies the activation of translation of five mRnas during spermiogenesis in the mouse. Development. 1989;106(2):367–373. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.2.367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreau C, Benson E, Gudmannsdottir E, et al. Post-meiotic transcription in Drosophila testes. Development. 2008;135(11):1897–1902. doi: 10.1242/dev.021949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaramaiah Raja S, Renkawitz-Pohl R. Replacement by Drosophila melanogaster protamines and Mst77F of histones during chromatin condensation in late spermatids and role of sesame in the removal of these proteins from the male pronucleus. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:3682–3682. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.9.3682.2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz LA, K Ü-K, et al. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73(1):39–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokuyasu KT. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Nuclear Transformation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1974;48(2):284–303. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5320(75)90013-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu S-F, Zhang H, Cairns BR. Genes for embryo development are packaged in blocks of multivalent chromatin in zebrafish sperm. Genome Res. 2011;21(4):578–589. doi: 10.1101/gr.113167.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Török A, Schiffer PH, Schnitzler CE, et al. The cnidarian Hydractinia echinata employs canonical and highly adapted histones to pack its DNA. Epigenet Chromatin. 2016;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13072-016-0085-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Török A, Browne MJG, Vilar JC, et al. Hydrozoan sperm-specific SPKK motif-containing histone H2B variants stabilise chromatin with limited compaction. Development. 2023;150(1). doi: 10.1242/dev.201058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hud NV, Allen MJ, Downing KH, et al. Identification of the elemental packing unit of DNA in Mammalian Sperm Cells by atomic force microscopy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;193(3):1347–1354. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer LR, Corzett M, Balhorn R. Protamine-induced condensation and decondensation of the same DNA molecule. Science. 1999;286(5437):120–123. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5437.120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathke C, Baarends WM, Jayaramaiah-Raja S, et al. Transition from a nucleosome-based to a protamine-based chromatin configuration during spermiogenesis in Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(9):1689–1700. doi: 10.1242/jcs.004663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz L, Hammoud SS. The Art of Packaging the Sperm Genome: Molecular and Structural Basis of the Histone-To-Protamine Exchange. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.895502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward WS. Function of sperm chromatin structural elements in fertilization and development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16(1):30–36. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balhorn R. The protamine family of sperm nuclear proteins. Genome Biol. 2007;8(9):227. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 1997;389(6648):251–260. doi: 10.1038/38444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, et al. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature. 2009;460(7254):473–478. doi: 10.1038/nature08162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raychaudhuri N, Dubruille R, Orsi GA, et al. Transgenerational propagation and quantitative maintenance of paternal centromeres depends on Cid/Cenp-A presence in Drosophila sperm. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(12):e1001434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-H, Natividad IM, Malik HS. Genetic conflicts between sex chromosomes drive expansion and loss of sperm nuclear basic protein genes in Drosophila. Elife. 2023;12:e85249. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirmarche S, Kimura S, Sapey-Triomphe L, et al. Drosophila protamine-like Mst35ba and Mst35bb are required for proper sperm nuclear morphology but are dispensable for male fertility. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2014;4(11):2241–2245. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.012724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura S, Loppin B. The Drosophila chromosomal protein Mst77F is processed to generate an essential component of mature sperm chromatin. Open Biol. 2016;6(11):160207. doi: 10.1098/rsob.160207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho C, Willis WD, Goulding EH, et al. Haploinsufficiency of protamine-1 or -2 causes infertility in mice. Nat Genet. 2001;28(1):82–86. doi: 10.1038/ng0501-82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki VW, Liu L, Jones KP, et al. Sperm protamine 1/protamine 2 ratios are related to in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and predictive of fertilization ability. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1408–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho C, Jung-Ha H, Willis WD, et al. Protamine 2 deficiency leads to sperm DNA damage and embryo death in mice. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(1):211–217. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.015115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelick PC, Balhorn R, Johnson PA, et al. Mouse Protamine 2 Is Synthesized as a Precursor whereas Mouse Protamine 1 Is Not. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7(6):2173–2179. doi: 10.1128/MCB.7.6.2173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arévalo L, Merges GE, Schneider S, et al. Loss of the cleaved-protamine 2 domain leads to incomplete histone-to-protamine exchange and infertility in mice. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(6):e1010272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz L, Schon SB, Rabbani M, et al. Sperm chromatin structure and reproductive fitness are altered by substitution of a single amino acid in mouse protamine 1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2023;30(8):1077–1091. doi: 10.1038/s41594-023-01033-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akematsu T, Fukuda Y, Garg J, et al. Post-meiotic DNA double-strand breaks occur in Tetrahymena, and require Topoisomerase II and Spo11. Elife. 2017;6:1–26. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leduc F, Maquennehan V, Nkoma GB, et al. DNA damage response during chromatin remodeling in elongating spermatids of mice. Biol Reprod. 2008;78(2):324–332. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.064162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grégoire MC, Leduc F, Morin MH, et al. The DNA double-strand “breakome” of mouse spermatids. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(15):2859–2872. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2769-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laberge R-M, Boissonneault G. On the nature and origin of DNA strand breaks in elongating Spermatids1. Biol Reprod. 2005;73(2):289–296. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.036939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champoux JJ. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70(1):369–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommier Y, Sun Y, Huang SN, et al. Roles of eukaryotic topoisomerases in transcription, replication and genomic stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(11):703–721. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron N, Veilleux S, Boissonneault G. Stimulation of DNA repair by the spermatidal TP1 protein. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;58(4):437–443. doi: 10.1002/1098-2795(20010401)58:4<437:AID-MRD12>3.0.CO;2-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissonneault G. Chromatin remodeling during spermiogenesis: a possible role for the transition proteins in DNA strand break repair. FEBS Lett. 2002;514(2–3):111–114. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02380-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Meyer DH, Schumacher B. Inheritance of paternal DNA damage by histone-mediated repair restriction. Nature. 2023;613(7943):365–374. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05544-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu DS, Liu H, Nix P, et al. Sperm chromatin proteomics identifies evolutionarily conserved fertility factors. Nature. 2006;443(7107):101–105. doi: 10.1038/nature05050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samson M, Jow MM, Wong CCL, et al. The Specification and Global Reprogramming of Histone Epigenetic Marks during Gamete Formation and Early Embryo Development in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(10):17–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titen SWA, Lin HC, Bhandari J, et al. Chk2 and P53 Regulate the Transmission of Healed Chromosomes in the Drosophila male germline. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(2):e1004130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki VW, Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, et al. DNA integrity is compromised in Protamine‐Deficient human sperm. J Androl. 2005;26(6):741–748. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.05063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burden F, Ellis PJI, Farre M. A shared ‘vulnerability code’ underpins varying sources of DNA damage throughout paternal germline transmission in mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(5):2319–2332. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palazzo AF, Gregory TR, Akey JM. The case for junk DNA. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinai MIT, Salamon A, Stanleigh N, et al. AT-dinucleotide rich sequences drive fragile site formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(18):9685–9695. doi: 10.1093/NAR/GKZ689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer L, Corzett M, Lau EY, et al. Dynamics of Protamine 1 binding to single DNA molecules. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(43):42403–42408. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303610200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balhorn R. A model for the structure of chromatin in mammalian sperm. J Cell Bio. 1982;93(2):298–305. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature. 1994;371(6494):215–220. doi: 10.1038/371215a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik HS. The Centromere Paradox: Stable Inheritance with Rapidly Evolving DNA. Science. 2001;293(5532):1098–1102. doi: 10.1126/science.1062939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand CL, Levine MT. Functional diversification of chromatin on rapid evolutionary timescales. Ann Rev Genet. 2021;55(1):401–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-020301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandler L, Novitski E. Meiotic drive as an evolutionary force. Am Nat. 1957;91(857):105–110. doi: 10.1086/281969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Masly JP, Araripe L, et al. A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. I: an autosomal suppressor. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(11):2560–2575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Araripe L, Kingan SB, et al. A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. II: an X-linked distorter. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(11):2576–2588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedanayagam J, Herbette M, Mudgett H, et al. Essential and recurrent roles for hairpin RNAs in silencing de novo sex chromosome conflict in Drosophila simulans. PLoS Biol. 2023;21(6):1–23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedanayagam J, Lin CJ, Lai EC. Rapid evolutionary dynamics of an expanding family of meiotic drive factors and their hpRNA suppressors. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5(12):1613–1623. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01592-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muirhead CA, Presgraves DC. Satellite DNA-mediated diversification of a sex-ratio meiotic drive gene family in Drosophila. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5(12):1604–1612. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01543-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyen CM, Chalkley GE, Voets O, et al. A Testis-Specific Chaperone and the Chromatin Remodeler ISWI Mediate Repackaging of the paternal genome. Cell Rep. 2015;13(7):1310–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krsticevic FJ, Santos HL, Januário S, et al. Functional copies of the Mst77F gene on the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2010;184(1):295–307. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.107516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krsticevic FJ, Schrago CG, Carvalho AB. Long-read single molecule sequencing to resolve tandem gene copies: the Mst77Y region on the Drosophila melanogaster Y chromosome. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2015;5(6):1145–1150. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.017277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JI, Bell GW, Yamashita YM. Derepression of Y-linked multicopy protamine-like genes interferes with sperm nuclear compaction in D. melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2023;120(16):2017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220576120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CI, Lyttle TW, Wu ML, et al. Association between a satellite DNA sequence and the responder of segregation distorter in D. melanogaster. Cell. 1988;54(2):179–189. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90550-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larracuente AM, Presgraves DC. The selfish Segregation Distorter gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2012;192(1):33–53. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.141390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbette M, Wei X, Chang CH, et al. Distinct spermiogenic phenotypes underlie sperm elimination in the segregation distorter meiotic drive system. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(7):1–26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler L, Hiraizumi Y, Sandler I. meiotic drive in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. i.the cytogenetic basis of segregation-distortion. Genetics. 1959;44(2):233–250. doi: 10.1093/genetics/44.2.233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokuyasu KT, Peacock WJ, Hardy RW. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Effects of segregation distorter (SD) chromosome. J Ultrastruct Res. 1977;58(1):96–107. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5320(77)80011-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peacock WJ, Miklos GLG. Meiotic Drive in Drosophila: New Interpretations of the Segregation Distorter and Sex Chromosome Systems. Adv Genet. 1973;17:361–409. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60174-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettaneh NP, Hartl DL. Histone transition during spermiogenesis is absent in segregation distorter males of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 1976;193(4257):1020–1021. doi: 10.1126/science.821147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingell LF, Mclean JR. A protamine knockdown mimics the function of sd in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2020;10(6):2111–2115. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer J. Separating from the pack: Molecular mechanisms of Drosophila spermatid individualization. Spermatogenesis. 2015;5(2):1–11. doi: 10.1080/21565562.2015.1041345
   Google Scholar
• Courret C, Wei X, Larracuente AM. New perspectives on the causes and consequences of male meiotic drive. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2023;83:102111. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2023.102111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger K, Balhorn R. Sperm nuclear protamines: A checkpoint to control sperm chromatin quality. J Vet Med Ser C Anat Histol Embryol. 2018;47(4):273–279. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar