560
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

First-mover advantages and intentional knowledge spillover effects on cybersecurity start-ups’ financial and innovation performance: incentive for revealing innovations in high-tech emerging industry

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Audretsch, D. B. (2001). Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00136
  • Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
  • Alnuaimi, T., & George, G. (2016). Appropriability and the retrieval of knowledge after spillovers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2383
  • Argyres, N., Bigelow, L., & Nickerson, J. A. (2015). Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower's dilemma. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2207
  • Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.009
  • Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556419
  • Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Open, semi-open and closed innovators: Towards an explanation of degree of openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.530839
  • Barker, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.6.782.187
  • Carr, J. C., Haggard, K. S., Hmieleski, K. M., & Zahra, S. A. (2010). A study of the moderating effects of firm age at internationalization on firm survival and short-term growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.90
  • Chai, S., & Freeman, R. (2019). Temporary colocation and collaborative discovery: Who confers at conferences. Strategic Management Journal, 40(13), 2138–2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3062
  • Chen, Y. (2020). Integration decisions and technology innovation in Chinese technology-sourcing overseas M&As: An empirical analysis based on PLS path modeling. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1761260
  • Conti, A., Peukert, C., & Roche, M. (2021). Beefing it up for your investor? Open sourcing and startup funding: Evidence from Github. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3883936
  • Corsi, C., & Prencipe, A. (2019). High-tech entrepreneurial firms’ innovation in different institutional settings. Do venture capital and private equity have complementary or substitute effects? Industry and Innovation, 26(9), 1023–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1561358
  • Daswani, N., & Elbayadi, M. (2021). Big breaches: Cybersecurity lessons for everyone. Apress.
  • Deane, J. K., Goldberg, D. M., Rakes, T. R., & Rees, L. P. (2019). The effect of information security certification announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Technology and Management, 20(3), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-018-00297-3
  • Durand, R., & Coeurderoy, R. (2001). Age, order of entry, strategic orientation, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00061-0
  • Feng, C. X. (2021). A comparison of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling zero-inflated count data. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40488-021-00115-2
  • Fershtman, C., & Gandal, N. (2011). Direct and indirect knowledge spillovers: The “social network” of open-source projects. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00126.x
  • Folta, T. B., & O’Brien, J. P. (2004). Entry in the presence of dueling options. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.368
  • Ganco, M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: A complexity approach. Academy of Management Review, 34(2), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.36982618
  • Haans, R. F., Pieters, C., & He, Z. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U-and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
  • Hannah, D., Parent, M., Pitt, L., & Berthon, P. (2019). Secrets and knowledge management strategy: The role of secrecy appropriation mechanisms in realizing value from firm innovations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2017-0389
  • Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32(10), 1753–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00061-1
  • Hegde, D., Mowery, D., & Graham, C., & J, S. (2009). Pioneering inventors or thicket builders: Which U.S. firms use continuations in patenting? Management Science, 55(7), 1214–1226. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1016
  • Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069334
  • Hu, B., Hu, M., & Yang, Y. (2017). Open or closed? Technology sharing, supplier investment, and competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(1), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0598
  • Jiang, W., & Ke, X. (2020). Effect of new product alliances on building cross-functional capability: Cross-fertilisation or cannibalization? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 32(4), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1667970
  • Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.2.93
  • Kesidou, E., Caniels, M. C., & Romijn, H. A. (2009). Local knowledge spillovers and development: An exploration of the software cluster in Uruguay. Industry and Innovation, 16(2), 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710902764444
  • Lee, K., & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 46(2), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006
  • Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00174
  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
  • Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090706
  • Lim, C., Lee, J. H., Sonthikorn, P., & Vongbunyong, S. (2021). Frugal innovation and leapfrogging innovation approach to the Industry 4.0 challenge for a developing country. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 29(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1786707
  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications.
  • Makadok, R. (1998). Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management Journal, 19(7), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199807)19:7<683::AID-SMJ965>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Malik, T. (2012). First mover, strategic alliances and performance: Context of turmoil in China. Chinese Management Studies, 6(4), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506141211280308
  • Mohammadi, A., & Franzoni, C. (2014). Inventor's knowledge set as the antecedent of patent importance. Industry and Innovation, 21(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.879255
  • Morgan, L., Feller, J., & Finnegan, P. (2013). Exploring value networks: Theorising the creation and capture of value with open source software. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(5), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.44
  • Morgan, L., & Finnegan, P. (2014). Beyond free software: An exploration of the business value of strategic open source. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2014.07.001
  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171108
  • Munir, H., Runeson, P., & Wnuk, K. (2019). How companies use OSS tools ecosystems for open innovation. IT Professional, 21(6), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2019.2893134
  • Nagle, F. (2019). Open source software and firm productivity. Management Science, 65(3), 1191–1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2977
  • Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (1997). Emerging market conditions and their impact on first mover advantages: an integrative review. International Marketing Review, 14(6), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339710192993
  • Park, C., Kang, M., & Choi, Y. (2019). Strategy on building Korea’s industrial security ecosystem in the global technology competition era. Science & Technology Policy Institute.
  • Paruchuri, S., & Eisenman, M. (2012). Microfoundations of firm R&D capabilities: A study of inventor networks in a merger. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1509–1535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01066.x
  • Pereira, T., Barreto, L., & Amaral, A. (2017). Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1253–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.047
  • Popp, D., Juhl, T., & Johnson, D. (2004). Time in purgatory: Examining the grant lag for U.S. patent applications. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 4(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0653.1329
  • Schøtt, T., & Jensen, K. W. (2016). Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects. Research Policy, 45(6), 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.006
  • Shamsie, J., Phelps, C., & Kuperman, J. (2004). Better late than never: A study of late entrants in household electrical equipment. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.364
  • Suarez, F. F., & Lanzolla, G. (2007). The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24349587
  • Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
  • Tseng, C. Y., & Pi, D. C. (2014). Knowledge search, spillover and creation capability in India’s pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.850472
  • Tuppura, A., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Puumalainen, K., & Jantunen, A. (2010). The influence of appropriability conditions on the firm's entry timing orientation. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 21(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2010.05.004
  • Valentini, G. (2011). Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality. Strategic Management Journal, 33(3), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.946
  • VanderWerf, P. A., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first-mover advantage. Management Science, 43(11), 1510–1519. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.11.1510
  • Varadarajan, R., Yaday, M. S., & Shankar, V. (2008). First-mover advantage in an Internet-enabled market environment: Conceptual framework and propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0080-y
  • von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks–by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm005
  • Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0917
  • Woo, S., Jang, P., & Kim, Y. (2015). Effects of intellectual property rights and patented knowledge in innovation and industry value added: A multinational empirical analysis of different industries. Technovation, 43-44, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.003
  • Yan, J., & Williams, D. W. (2021). Timing is everything? Curvilinear effects of age at entry on new firm growth and survival and the moderating effect of IPO performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106020
  • Yang, H., Phelps, C., & Steensma, H. K. (2010). Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49389018
  • Yu, J., Lee, J. M., & Kim, Y. (2022). Effects of voluntary R&D disclosure on business performance: Empirical evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 30(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1844026
  • Zhang, J., Jiang, H., Wu, R., & Li, J. (2019). Reconciling the dilemma of knowledge sharing: A network pluralism framework of firms’ R&D alliance network and innovation performance. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2635–2665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318761575
  • Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.830
  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.642

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.