The change and continuity in China’s S&T policy: an institutional grammar (IG) approach

References

• Appelbaum, R. P., Cao, C., Han, X., Parker, R., & Simon, D. (2018). Innovation in China: Challenging the global science and technology system. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Băzăvan, A. (2019). Chinese government’s shifting role in the national innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, 119738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2019). Holistic innovation policy: Theoretical foundations, policy problems, and instrument choices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brødsgaard, Kjeld Erik. (2018). China’s Political Order under Xi Jinping: Concepts and Perspectives. China: An International Journal, 16(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2018.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, C., Li, N., Li, X., & Liu, L. (2018). Reform of China’s science and technology system in the Xi Jinping era. China: An International Journal, 16(3), 120–141. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/703443. https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2018.0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CCCCP and SCPRC (the State Council of the People’s Republic of China). (2015). Several opinions of the Chinese communist party central committee and the state council on deepening the reform of systems and mechanisms to accelerate the implementation of innovation-driven development strategies. Gazette of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 1513(10), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• CCCCP (The Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party). (1985). The Chinese Communist Party Central Committee’s decision about reforming the system of science and technology. Gazette of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, (9), 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Naughton, B. (2016). An institutionalized policy-making mechanism: China’s return to techno-industrial policy. Research Policy, 45(10), 2138–2152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R., & Wang, N. (2012). How China became capitalist. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, S. E., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslatte, A., Helmke-Long, L., Anderies, J. M., Garcia, M., Hornberger, G. M., & Ann Koebele, E. (2022). Assessing sustainability through the Institutional Grammar of urban water systems. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolla, V. S. (2015). Science and technology in contemporary China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J. C., & Radaelli, C. M. (2019). A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the institutional grammar tool (IGT) in policy research. Journal of Chinese Governance, 4(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1575502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2014). Striving towards a holistic innovation policy in European countries-but linearity still prevails!. STI Policy Review, 5(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22675/STIPR.2014.5.2.001
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2019). Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy, 48(4), 869–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, S. (2015). Unveiling the features of a regulatory system: The institutional grammar of tobacco legislation in Mexico. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.952822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, P., & Watanabe, C. (2006). Promoting industrial development through technology policy: Lessons from Japan and China. Technology in Society, 28(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X. (2010). Re-examining the reform of China’s science and technology system: A historical perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/17585521011032513
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2021). Institutional Grammar 2.0: A specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design. Public Administration, 99(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Institutional Grammar: Foundations and applications for institutional analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, X., Woo, W. T., & Hou, J. (2016). Technological innovation policy in China: The lessons, and the necessary changes ahead. Economic Change and Restructuring, 49(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-016-9186-x
   Google Scholar
• Gu, S. (2001). Science and technology policy for development: China’s experience in the second half of the twentieth century. Science, Technology and Society, 6(1), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180100600109
   Google Scholar
• Gu, S., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2016). China’s innovation system and the move towards harmonious growth and endogenous innovation. Innovation, 18(4), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1265050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, S., Serger, S. S., & Lundvall, B.-Å. (2016). China’s innovation system: Ten years on. Innovation, 18(4), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1256215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbig, H. (2018). China after reform: The ideological, constitutional, and organisational makings of a new era. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 47(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261804700307
   Google Scholar
• Horesh, N., & Lim, K. F. (2017). China: An East Asian alternative to neoliberalism? The Pacific Review, 30(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1264459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., & Li, J. (2015). A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1521–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1406-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2017). An institutional analysis of Xi Jinping’s centralization of power. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(105), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1245505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Simon, D. F., Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2011). China’s innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy, 40(7), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2009). Science and technology and innovation policy in China. In J. E. Cassiolato & V. Vitorino (Eds.), BRICS and development alternatives: Innovation systems and policies (pp. 133–162). Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Ye, X., Yang, F., Tan, L., & Liu, W. (2014). The concept, the classification, and the evolution characteristics of the internationalized policy in China’s national innovation system: A quantitative analysis based on the policy version. Management World, 255(12), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2014.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Losacker, Sebastian, & Liefner, Ingo. (2020). Implications of China's innovation policy shift: Does “indigenous” mean closed?. Growth and Change, 51(3), 1124–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.v51.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noesselt, N. (2017). Governance change and patterns of continuity: Assessing China’s ‘New Normal’. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(3), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-017-9487-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, R., & Ennew, C. T. (2005). Developing a market orientation in a transitional economy: The role of government regulation and ownership structure. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 24(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.24.1.82.63900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, E. W. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, G., & Alpermann, B. (2019). Studying the Chinese policy process in the era of ‘top-level design’: The contribution of ‘political steering’ theory. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-09594-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirk, S. L. (2018). The return to personalistic rule. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Basurto, X., & Weible, C. M. (2012). Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., Pacheco-Vega, R., Carter, D., Curley, C., Deslatte, A., & Bennett, A. (2022). Institutional analysis with the Institutional Grammar. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12361
   Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00397.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, D.. (2017). Xi Jinping thought vs. Deng Xiaoping theory. The Diplomat, October 25, 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/ xi-jinping-thought-vs-deng-xiaoping-theory/
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2018). The evolving relations between government agencies of innovation policymaking in emerging economies: A policy network approach and its application to the Chinese case. Research Policy, 47(3), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Cao, C. (2020). The dynamics of the studies of China’s science, technology and innovation (STI): A bibliometric analysis of an emerging field. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1335–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03500-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Carter, D. P. (2015). The composition of policy change: Comparing Colorado’s 1977 and 2006 smoking bans. Policy Sciences, 48(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9217-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, J. (2016). Science and technology innovation of China. Central Compilation & Translation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, J. (2017). Building China into World Leader in Science and Technology. In J. Xi (Ed.), The Governance of China II. Foreign Language Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, X., & Yang X. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China’s national innovation system. Technology in Society, 29(3), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Zolfagharian, M., Walrave, B., Raven, R., Georges, A., & Rommea, L. (2019). Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy, 48(9), 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar