The decollegialization of higher education institutions in Sweden

References

• Agevall, O., & Olofsson, G. (2019). Universitetslärarna och den högre utbildningen. In T. Brante, K. Svensson, & L. G. Svensson (Eds.), Ett professionellt landskap i förvandling (pp. 91–126). Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbäck Öberg, S., & Bringselius, L. (2015). Professionalism and organizational performance in the wake of new managerialism. European Political Science Review, 7(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlbäck Öberg, S., & Sundberg, E. (2016). Avkollegialiseringen av den svenska högskolan. In S. A. Öberg, L. Bennich-Björkman, J. Hermansson, C. Karlsson, & S. Widmalm (Eds.), Det hotade universitetet (pp. 45–69). Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbäck Öberg, S., & Sundberg, E. (2017). Vad har hänt med det kollegiala styret? In L. Wedlin & J. Pallas (Eds.), Det ostyrda universitetet? Perspektiv på styrning, autonomi och reform av svenska lärosäten (pp. 91–119). Makadam.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbäck Öberg, S., & Widmalm, S. (2016). Att göra rätt – även när ingen ser på. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 118(1), 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlbäck Öberg, S., & Wockelberg, H. (2015). The Public Sector and the Courts. In J. Pierre (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook on Swedish Politics (pp. 130–146). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahola, S., Hedmo, T., Thomsen, J. -P., & Vabø, A. (2014). Organisational features of higher education; Denmark, Finland, Norway & Sweden, Working Paper 14/2014. Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance – Higher education dynamics (pp. 1–22). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. B. (1998). Collegial professionalism: The academy, individualism, and the common good. Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 127, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.152
   Google Scholar
• Björck, H. (2013). Om kollegialitet. Sveriges universitetslärarförbund.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., & Lepori, B. (Eds.). (2017). Managing Universities: Policy and Organizational Change from a Western European Comparative Perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53865-5
   Google Scholar
• Boberg, J. (2022). Lärosätenas interna organisation – kollegialitet, demokrati och linjestyrning. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift,124(1),19–67 .
   Google Scholar
• Chong, S., Geare, A., & Willett, R. J. (2018). Change in a New Zealand university 1985–2010: Views of collegiality and managerialism. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00632.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, H., & Stensaker, B. (2007). An internal representative system: The democratic vision. In P. Maassen & J. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration: Higher education dynamics (pp. 99–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5971-1_5
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. (1998). “New managerialism” and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020014
   Google Scholar
• Edlund, P., & Sahlin, K. (2022). Society on board? External board members and the embedding of Swedish higher education organizations in society, 1998–2016. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1551–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1925239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, M., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2018). Universities need leadership, academics need management: Discursive tensions and voids in the deregulation of Swedish higher education legislation. Higher Education, 75, 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0140-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, L. (2014). The recruitment of university top leaders: Politics, communities and markets in interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, L. (2017). Montesquieu på universitet: Styrelse, rektor och senat i samspel. In L. Wedlin & J. Pallas (Eds.), Det ostyrda universitetet?: perspektiv på styrning, autonomi och reform av svenska lärosäten (pp. 147–188). Makadam.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2006). Introduction: Trust and professionalism – Challenges and occupational changes. Current Sociology, 54(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106065083
   Google Scholar
• Gall, C. (2021). Prestigious Istanbul University Fights Erdogan’s Reach. The New York Times, February 1. https://www.nytimes.com (accessed February 10, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Gonch, W. (2013). Shared governance or paralysis? ACTA Blog. October 4. https://www.goacta.org/the_forum/shared_governance_or_paralysis (accessed March 6, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, A. (2009). Socrates in the boardroom: Why research universities should be led by top scholars. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. 2009/10:149. En akademi i tiden ökad frihet för universitet och högskolor.
   Google Scholar
• Holmén, J. (2022). The autonomy of higher education in Finland and Sweden: Global management trends meet national political culture and governance models. Comparative Education epub before print, 58, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2021.2018826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C. (1963). The uses of the university. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KI (2019). Organisationsplan för Karolinska institutet, set by the Board of Governors 2018-12-03. Reg. no. 1-93/2019. Karolinska institutet.
   Google Scholar
• Kok, S. K., Douglas, A., McClelland, B., & Bryde, D. (2010). The move towards managerialism: Perceptions of staff in “traditional” and “new” UK universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583881003756740
   Google Scholar
• Kwiek, M. (2015). The unfading power of collegiality? University governance in Poland in a European comparative and quantitative perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 43, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., & Ødegård, E. (1990). Universitetene foran 90-tallet. Endringer i styring og finansiering av forskning. Nordisk Ministerråd.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, K., Geschwind, L., & Broström, A. (2020). Organisational identities, boundaries, and change processes of technical universities. In L. Geschwind, A. Broström, & K. Larsen (Eds.), Technical Universities – Past, Present and Future (pp. 1–14). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lazega, E. (2001). The collegial phenomenon: The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, W., Cummings, W., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2011). Changing governance and management in higher education: The changing academy – the changing academic profession in international comparative perspective (Vol. 2). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). University dynamics and European integration (Vol. 4). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Musselin, C. (2013). Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university. Higher Education, 65(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9579-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedlin, L., & Pallas, J. (Eds.) (2017). Det ostyrda universitetet?: Perspektiv på styrning, autonomi och reform av svenska lärosäten. Makadam.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, C. L., Wood, B. G., & Wassenaar, C. L. (2018). The future of leadership in public universities: Is shared leadership the answer? Public Administration Review, 78(4), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., Foss Hansen, H., & Pulkkinen, K. (Eds.). (2019). Reforms, organizational change and performance in higher education: A comparative account from the Nordic countries. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – into the age of austerity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poutanen, M., Tomperi, T., Kuusela, H., Kaleva, V., & Tervasmäki, T. (2022). From democracy to managerialism: Foundation universities as the embodiment of Finnish university policies. Journal of Education Policy, 37(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1846080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. (2002). New managerialism, professional power and organizational governance in UK universities. In A. Amaral, G. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp.163–185). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Rider, S., Sundberg, E., & Ahlbäck Öberg, S. (2014). Kollegialitet i koncentrat, Rapport från Arbetsgruppen för utveckling av kollegiala styrformer. Vetenskapsområdet för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap. Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ruin, O. (1982). Sweden: External control and internal participation– Trends in Swedish higher education. In H. Daalder & E. Shils (Eds.) Universities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United StatesUniversities, Politicians and Bureaucrats: Europe and the United States (pp. 329–364). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., & Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2016). Collegiality in modern universities – the composition of governance ideals and practices. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016, 2–3. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.33640
   Google Scholar
• SFS 1974:152. Kungörelse om beslutad ny regeringsform [Instrument of Government].
   Google Scholar
• SFS 1992: 1434. Högskolelagen [ Higher Education Act].
   Google Scholar
• SFS 1993: 100. Högskoleförordningen [ Higher Education Ordinance].
   Google Scholar
• Shattock, M. (2010). Managing successful universities (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• SOU (2015). Government Inquiry of the Management of Universities. Utvecklad ledning av universitet och 1470 högskolor: betänkande. Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Tapper, T., & Palfreyman, D. (2010). The collegial tradition in the age of mass higher education. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• UKÄ (2022). Statistikdatabas: Högskolan i siffror. www.uka.se (accessed December 29, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO (1997). The UNESCO recommendation concerning the status of higher education teaching personnel. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
   Google Scholar
• Waring, M. (2017). Management and leadership in UK universities: Exploring the possibilities of change. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(5), 540–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1354754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S., Carney, S., Krejsler, J. B., Nielsen, G. B., & Williams Orberg, J. (2019). Enacting the university: Danish university reform in an ethnographic perspective. Springer.
   Google Scholar