Research and education form competing activity systems in externally funded doctoral education

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Postdoctoral researchers: Roles, functions and career prospects. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318550
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, B., Kirschner Marc, W., Tilghman, S., & Varmus, H. (2014). Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(16), 5773–5777. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404402111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., Bengtsen, S. S. E., Del Pilar Gallego Castaño, L., Crossouard, B., Keefer, J. M., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). Drivers and interpretations of doctoral education today: National comparisons. Frontline Learning Research, 3(3), 5–22 doi:10.14786/flr.v3i3.177.
   Google Scholar
• Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelse, J., & Huisman, J. (2008). The bologna process. In M. Nerad & M. Heggelund (Eds.), Toward a global PhD: Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 101–113). University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, C., Jazvac‐Martek, M., & McAlpine, L. (2009). Studying doctoral education: Using activity theory to shape methodological tools. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 46(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903068839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2001). Kontrovers och konsensus : vetenskap och politik i svenskt 1990-tal .Institutet för studier av utbildning och forskning,SISTER.240. 9157803781. Institutet för studier av utbildning och forskning (SISTER).
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M., & Sörlin, S. (2007). Shaping strategic research: Power, resources, and interests in Swedish research policy. Minerva, 45(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-006-9019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E., Lindén, J., Sonesson, A., & Lindberg-Sand, Å. (2019). Doctoral supervision in theory and practice. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Jørgensen, T., & Loukkola, T. (2013). Quality Assurance in doctoral education – results of the ARDE project. The European University Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural–historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornér, S., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). Supervisors’ perceptions of primary resources and challenges of the doctoral journey. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(3), 365–377. 1812–9129.
   Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472(7343), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/472276a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Feijter, J. M., de Grave, W. S., Dornan, T., Koopmans, R. P., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: An activity theory analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9266-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuchar, R. (2008). Facilitator, director or critical friend?: Contradiction and congruence in doctoral supervision styles. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(4), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802193905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmgren, M., Forsberg, E., Lindberg-Sand, Å., & Sonesson, A. (2016). The formation of doctoral education. Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik, 16(3), 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education & Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-73330200009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2021). Retrieved August 1, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
   Google Scholar
• Fochler, M. (2016). Variants of epistemic Capitalism: Knowledge production and the accumulation of worth in commercial biotechnology and the academic life sciences. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(5), 922–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916652224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fochler, M., Felt, U., & Müller, R. (2016). Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: Narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives. Minerva, 54(2), 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granata, S. N., & Dochy, F. (2016). Applied PhD research in a work-based environment: An activity theory-based analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 990–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, H. K. (2008). Nordic countries. In M. Nerad & M. Heggelund (Eds.), Toward a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. University of Washington Press 75–87 .
   Google Scholar
• Haraldsson, J. (2010).“Det ska ju vara lite äventyr” - styrning av svensk forskarutbildning utifrån reformen 1998 [”There has to be an element of adventure” – governing Swedish graduate studies according to the 1998 reform]. Doctoral thesis, Göteborgs universitet. Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Herschberg, C., Benschop, Y., & van den Brink, M. (2018). Precarious postdocs: A comparative study on recruitment and selection of early-career researchers. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(4), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., & Stocks, C. (2008). Teaching development for doctoral students: what can we learn from activity theory? International Journal for Academic Development, 13(3), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440802242358
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2013). Issues in doctoral studies - Forty years of journal discussion: Where have we been and where are we going? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 83–104. https://doi.org/10.28945/1871
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin V. (2005). The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18. 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America: A comparative analysis. In U. Teichler (Ed.), The formative years of scholars (pp. 67–78). Portland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. (2020). Reforms of doctoral education in Europe and diversification of types. In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education (pp. 85–104). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). “I don’t even have time to be their friend!” ethical dilemmas in Ph.D. supervision in the hard sciences. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2721–2739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1104424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L. (2016). Becoming a PI: From ‘doing’ to ‘managing’ research. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1110789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerad, M. (2014). Converging practices in phd education. In M. Nerad & B. Evans (Eds.), Globalization and its impacts on the quality of PhD education worldwide. forces and forms of doctoral education (pp. 1–4). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M. (2020). Governmental innovation policies, globalisation, and change in doctoral education worldwide: are doctoral programmes converging? Trends and tensions. In (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education (pp. 43–84). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_3
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., & Heggelund, M. (Eds.). (2008). Toward a Global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Öquist, G., & Benner, M. (2012). Fostering breakthrough research: A comparative study. Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, N., Tedder, M., Boyask, R., & Kelly, P. (2015). Pedagogic relations and professional change: A sociocultural analysis of students’ learning in a professional doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106551
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. ISRN Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J. (2012). Exploring the fit between doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of resources and challenges vis-à-vis the doctoral journey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.28945/1745
   Google Scholar
• Reid, H., Gormley, G. J., Dornan, T., & Johnston, J. L. (2021). Harnessing insights from an activity system – OSCEs past and present expanding future assessments. Medical Teacher, 43(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., Radford, L., & Lacroix, L. (2012). Working with cultural-historical activity theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.2.1814
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, K., & Comer, K. (2010). When the governmental tail wags the disciplinary dog: Some consequences of national funding policy on doctoral research in New Zealand. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903277372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiermeier, Q. (2005). Pity poor postdocs. Nature, 434(7032), 540–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7032-540a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigl, L. (2016). On the tacit governance of research by uncertainty: How early stage researchers contribute to the governance of life science research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(3), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915599069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Kiley, M., & Holley, K. A. (Eds.). (2021). The making of doctoral supervisors: international case studies of practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274831
   Google Scholar
• Triggle, D. J., & Miller, K. W. (2002). Doctoral education: Another tragedy of the commons? American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66(3), 287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKÄ. (2022). Retrieved February 22, 2022 from https://www.uka.se/statistik–analys/hogskolan-i-siffror.html
   Google Scholar
• Uller, T. (2016). External funding of doctoral education: Background and reflection. Högre utbildning, 6(1), 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Vekkaila, J., Pyhältö, K., Hakkarainen, K., Keskinen, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Doctoral students’ key learning experiences in the natural sciences. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 154–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316991
   Google Scholar
• Vitae. (2011). Researcher Development Framework. Retrieved 22 February2022 from https://www.vitae.ac.uk/researchers-professional-development/about-the-vitae-researcher-development-framework/developing-the-vitae-researcher-development-framework
   Google Scholar
• Wichmann-Hansen, G., & Herrmann, K. J. (2017). Does external funding push doctoral supervisors to be more directive? A large-scale Danish study. Higher Education, 74(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0052-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658609
   Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods. understanding complex learning environments. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5
   Google Scholar
• Ylijoki, O.-H. (2016). Projectification and conflicting temporalities in academic knowledge production. Theory of Science, 38(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.46938/tv.2016.331
   Google Scholar