Literacy as Epistemology and Educational Policy: An Exploration of a Large Swedish Professional Development Programme for Teachers

References

• Addey, C. (2017). Golden relics & historical standards: How the OECD is expanding global education governance through PISA for development. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1352006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almqvist, R. (2006). New public management. Om konkurrensutsättning, kontrakt och kontroll [New public management. On competition, contracts and control]. Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson Varga, P. (2017). Elever skriver [Students write]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift. Tolka Och Skriva Text [Interpret and Write Texts], Compulsory School F−9, 4, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh Nestlog, E., Danielsson, K., & Krogh, E. (2018). Skrivande och skrivundervisning i alla ämnen [Writing and writing instruction in all subjects]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Att skriva i alla ämnen [Writing in all subjects]. Compulsory School, 4−9(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635866
   Google Scholar
• Borsgård, G. (2021). Litteraturens mått: Politiska implikationer av litteraturundervisning som demokrati-och värdegrundsarbete [The measurement of literature. Political implications of teaching literature as a means of democratic fostering]. (Doctoral dissertation, Umeå universitet). https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Borsgård, G., & Jönsson, M. (2019). Från litteraturförståelse till literacy: Om utbredningen av ett begrepp och konsekvenserna för litteraturdidaktiken [From literary comprehension to literacy: The expansion of a concept and its consequences for the teaching of literature]. Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap [Journal of comparative literature], 2019(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v49i4.6550
   Google Scholar
• Boughton, B. (2016). Popular education and mass literacy campaigns: Beyond ‘new literacy studies. In K. Yasukawa & S. Black (Eds.), Beyond economic interests (pp. 149–164). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brozo, W. (2019). Att lyfta oengagerade och lågpresterande pojkars läsning [To lift disengaged and low-achieving boys’ reading]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Stimulera läsintresse [Stimulate reading engagement].compulsory school, 4−9(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Carlbaum, S., Hanberger, A., Andersson, E., Roe, A., Tengberg, M., & Kärnebro, K. (2019). Utvärdering av Läslyftet: Slutrapport från den nationella utvärderingen av Läslyftets genomförande och effekter i olika skolformer [Evaluation of the Reading Lift: Final report from the national evaluation of implementation and effects of the Reading Lift in different school forms].
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowska, I. (2019). Diverse nature of literacy: The sociocultural perspective. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 43(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2019.43.3.33-43
   Google Scholar
• d’Agnese, V. (2017). Reclaiming education in the age of PISA: Challenging OECD’s educational order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269436
   Google Scholar
• Dahler Larsen, P. (2012). The Evaluation Society. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804778121
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson, K., Bergh Nestlog, E., & Krogh, E. (2019). Lärares rörlighet i text och praktik: En studie av kollegialt lärande [Teacher mobility in text and practice: A study of collegial learning]. HumaNetten, (43), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.15626/hn.20194308
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon, P. O. (2010). School subject paradigms and teaching practice in lower secondary Swedish schools influenced by ICT and media. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1212–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon, P.-O., & Löfgren, M. (2018). Ett demokratilyft för Sverige. Om relationen mellan literacy, skönlitteratur och demokrati i Läslyftet [A democracy lift for Sweden. About the relationship between literacy, fiction and democracy in the reading lift]. Utbildning och Demokrati, 27(3), 7–33. https://doi.org/10.48059/uod.v27i3.1106
   Google Scholar
• Erixon, P.-O., & Löfgren, M. (2020). The marginalisation of literature in Swedish L1: A victim of socio-political forces and paradigmatic changes. In B. Green & P.-O. Erixon (Eds.), Rethinking L1 education in a global era (pp. pp. 133–155). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55997-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Fast, C. (2008). Sexåriga Saras vägar in i skriftspråket [Six-year-old Sara’s route into the written language]. Barn – forskning om barn og barndom i Norden [Children – Research on children and childhood in Scandinavia], 26(4), CHILDREN-Research on children and childhood in the Nordics, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.5324/barn.v26i4.4301
   Google Scholar
• Franker, Q. (2018). Resurser och literacitetspraktiker [Resources and literacy practices]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]:Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Grundläggande literacitet för nyanlända [Basic literacy for newly arrived. 8, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. (2013). Truth and method. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2018). Affinity spaces: How young people live and learn on line and out of school. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718762416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay, L., Hamilton, M., & Lea, M. R. (2014). Textual practices in the new media digital landscape: Messing with digital literacies. Research in Learning Technology, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21438
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, B. (2000). Kunskapsfilosofi: Tre kunskapsformer i historisk belysning [Philosophy of knowledge: Three forms of knowledge in historical light]. Wahlström & Widstrand.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2018). Introduktion till ett språkutvecklande arbetssätt i NO-ämnen [Introduction to a language development approach in the sciences]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Främja elevers lärande i NO I [Promote students’ learning in the natural sciences I], compulsory school 4−9, part 1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hultgren, F., & Johansson, M. (2020). Stimulera läsintresse [Stimulate an interest in reading]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Stimulera läsintresse – en introduktion [Stimulate reading engagement – an introduction], compulsory school F−9, part 1, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hvit Lindstrand, S. (2018). De Yngsta barnens teckenskapande [The youngest children’s sign creation]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Utforska skriftspråket [Explore written language], preschool, part 4. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2009). Literacy and power. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869956
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M., & Magnusson, P. Läslyftet i praktiken. Analys av ett textmaterial och ett lärarlags samtal [The Reading Lift in practice. Analysis of a Text Material and a Teaching Team Conversation]. (2019). Acta Didactica Norge, 13(1), 6. 13(1. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.5632
   Google Scholar
• Kirsten, N. (2020). A systematic research review of teachers’ professional development as a policy instrument. Educational Research Review, 31, 100366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, F. M. (2012). Wilhelm von Humboldt’s contribution to a theory of Bildung. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth. Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism (pp. 107–124). SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krogh, E. Writing in the literacy era: Scandinavian teachers’ notions of writing in mother tongue education. (2012). L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 12, SI InescLang(Inescapability of language), 1–28. Running Issue. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2012.03.01
   Google Scholar
• Krogh, E. (2020). Bildung and literacy in subject Danish: Changing L1 education. In B. Green & P.-O. Erixon (Eds.), Rethinking L1 education in a global era (pp. 157–176). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55997-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Kulturdepartementet. (2011). Kommittédirektiv litteraturens ställning [Committee directive: The position of literature]. Dir, 24. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/kommittedirektiv/2011/03/dir.-201124/
   Google Scholar
• Kulturdepartementet. (2012). Läsandets kultur – Slutbetänkande av Litteraturutredningen [The Culture of Reading - the final report of the literature survey]. SOU 65. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2012/09/sou-201265/. Retrieved from https://www.regeringen.se/49bb95/contentassets/8475aba8d50a4ad6881b13474004351a/lasandets-kultur-hela-dokumentet-sou-201265
   Google Scholar
• Kulturdepartementet. (2013). Läsa för livet [Reading for life – Government Bill]. Prop, 2013 (14), 3. Retrieved from https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/proposition/2013/09/prop.-2013143/
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liberg, C., Wiksten Folkeryd, J., & Af Geijerstam, Å. (2012). Swedish–An updated school subject? Education Inquiry, 3(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i4.22049
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, H. (2016). A noisy silence about care: Swedish preschool teachers’ talk about documentation. Early Years, 36(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2015.1062744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren, M. (2023). Literature and multimodality for all. Teachers Professional Development in the Age of Global Assessments [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Culture and Media Studies, Umea university.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, M., & Erixon, P. O. (2022). Literature—a high risk implementation route to literacy? L1-Educational Studies in Language & Literature, 22, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.21248/l1esll.2022.22.1.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström, S., Mannerstedt, L., & Palo, A. (2011). Den mätbara litteraturläsaren. En tendens i Lgr11 och en konsekvens för svensklärarutbildningen [The measurable literature reader. A tendency in Lgr11 and a consequence for Swedish teacher education]. Utbildning & Demokrati, 20(2), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.48059/uod.v20i2.948
   Google Scholar
• MacCabe, C. (1998). A response to brian street. English in Education, 32(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1998.tb00139.x
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. (2016). The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society, 27(3), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthewman, S., Blight, A., & Davies, C. (2004). What does multimodality mean for English? Creative tensions in teaching new texts and new literacies. Education, Communication & Information, 4(1), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463631042000210944
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Culture. (2013), Läsa för livet [Reading for life – Government Bill]. Swedish Government, Ministry of Culture. Prop 2013/14:3. https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/proposition/2013/09/prop.-2013143/
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, G. (2018). Makt och demokrati – kritiskt textarbete med bild [Power and democracy - critical text work with images]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift. Kritiskt Textarbete [Critical Textwork], Compulsory School 7−9, 6, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2015). PIRLS 2016 assessment framework (2nd Eds.). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. (2018). Skrift och text i lek och utforskande [Writing and text in play and exploration]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Utforska skriftspråket [Explore written language], preschool, part 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nygård Larsson, P. (2015). NO-ämnenas texter och texttyper [Science subject text and text types]: [Writing and text in play and exploration]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Främja elevers lärande i NO I [Promote students’ learning in the natural sciences I. Compulsory School, 4−9(4), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Literacy and education. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pelger, S. (2015). Skriva och förklara – en väg till ökad förståelse [Writing and explaining – a way to enhance understanding]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Främja elevers lärande i NO II [Promote students’ learning in the natural sciences II], compulsory school 4−9, part. 7, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, D. (2003). Politics of assessments: International organisations and globalisation of educational steering. Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, 2003(3), 26811. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522729.2003.11803874
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, D., Prøitz, T. S., & Forsberg, E. (2017). From role models to nations in need of advice: Norway and Sweden under the OECD’s magnifying glass. Journal of Education Policy, 32(6), 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1301557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper, I. (2020). L1 Education and the place of literature. In B. Green & P.-O. Erixon (Eds.), Rethinking L1 education in a global era (pp. 115–132). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55997-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Pluim, G., Nazir, J., & Wallace, J. (2020). Curriculum integration and the semicentennial of Basil Bernstein’s classification and framing of educational knowledge. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00135-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Randahl, A. C., & Varga, P. A. (2020). Kollegiala samtal som kontext för utveckling av lärares literacyförståelse [Collegial conversations as a context for the development of teachers’ understanding of literacy]. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 6(4), 18. https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v6.2031
   Google Scholar
• Ringarp, J. (2013). From bildung to entrepreneurship: Trends in education policy in Sweden. Policy Futures in Education, 11(4), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.4.456
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (1st ed., pp. 729–780). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rømer, T. A. (2021). Gert Biesta–Education between Bildung and post-structuralism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1738216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 128–144). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C. (2018). Berättande texter [Narrative texts]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Läsa och skriva i alla ämnen [Reading and writing in all subjects, Part 6, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., & Jönsson, K. (2018). Läsförståelse [Reading comprehension]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Läsa och skriva i alla ämnen [Reading and writing in all subjects, Part 4, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). PISA and the expanding role of the OECD in global educational governance. In H. D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 185–206). Symposium Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should inquiry-based science education be sacrificed to climb on the rankings? Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.6185
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström, J. (2013). Towards bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education, 22(7), 1873–1890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2020). Redovisning av Uppdrag om fortbildning i läs- och skrivutveckling – Läslyftet [Report on Assignment on professional development in reading and writing – The Reading Lift]. The Swedish National Agency for Education Dnr, 2020, 351. Retrieved from. https://www.skolverket.se/getFile?file=8942
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, K. (2000). A critical discussion of the ‘new literacy studies’. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1994). The new literacy studies: Implications for education and pedagogy. Changing English, 1(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684940010109
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1997). The implications of the ‘new literacy studies’ for literacy education. English in Education, 31(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1997.tb00133.x
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2006). Autonomous and ideological models of literacy: Approaches from new literacy studies. Media Anthropology Network, 17, 1–15. https://www.easaonline.org/downloads/networks/media/09p.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. V., & Street, B. B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice (Vol. 9). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundström Sjödin, E. (2019). Where is the critical in literacy?: Tracing performances of literature reading, readers and non-readers in educational practice (Doctoral dissertation, Örebro University).
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, J. E. (2010). Professional learning communities at the crossroads: How systems hinder or engender change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (Vol. 23, pp. 555–571). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_32
   Google Scholar
• Thavenius, J. (1991). Modersmål och fadersarv: Svenskämnets traditioner i historien och nuet [Native language and father’s heritage: Traditions in Swedish traditions in history and the present]. Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Thavenius, J. (1991). Klassbildning och folkuppfostran: Om litteraturundervisningens traditioner [Class formation and public education: On the traditions of literature teaching]. Symposion.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet. (2013). Uppdrag om fortbildning i läs- och skrivutveckling – Läslyftet [Commission on in-service training in reading and writing development – the reading enhancement]. Dnr U2013/7215/S. Retrieved from http://www.regeringen.se/regeringsuppdrag/2013/12/u20137215s/
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, V. (2010). Getting beyond”I like the book”. Creating space for critical literacy in K–6 classrooms. International Reading Association,www.reading.org.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (Vol. 49). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
   Google Scholar
• Wedin, Å. (2018). Skrift och flerspråkighet [Writing and multilingualism]. Skolverket [the Swedish National Agency for Education]: Part of Language-, reading and writing development (the Reading Lift), Grundläggande literacitet för nyanlända [Basic literacy for newly arrived, Part 2, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. R. (2007). Developing language and literacy with young children (Vol. 3). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446214534
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar