1,209
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Coppiced sweet chestnut in UK construction – challenges and opportunities for design development of hardwood building products

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 87-93 | Received 28 Nov 2022, Accepted 26 May 2023, Published online: 14 Jul 2023

References

  • Braden N, Russell K. 2001. Chestnut in the United Kingdom: forest area, management and utilisation as timber. For Snow Landsc Res. 76(3):505–510.
  • BSI. 2004. BS EN 1995-1-1:2004 Eurocode 5: design of timber structures. General – common rules and rules for buildings (+A2:2014) (incorporating corrigendum June 2006). BSI 2004.
  • Environmental Audit Committee. 2022. Sustainable timber and deforestation. Environmental Audit Committee; [cited 2022 Oct 28]. https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/3e7b41b0-d116-4409-9ec4-8a226ba49947.
  • EOTA. 2015. EAD 130012-00-0304, Strength graded structural timber - square edged logs with wane - chestnut. EAD 130012-00-0304 Jun, 2015.
  • Fereday G, Meech N. 2020. The XR beam – a trussed hardwood beam for value-added use of roundwood thinnings in the South-East of England. In: Speer M, editor. Timber 2020, Wood Technology Society, IOM3; p. 31–40.
  • Forest Research. 2014. 50-year forecast of hardwood timber availability.
  • Forest Research. 2022a. Forestry facts & figures 2022.
  • Forest Research. 2022b. Forest Statistics – Sawmills in England; [cited 2022 Nov 1]. https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/2022/09/uksawmills1994-2021final.ods.
  • Fuller RJ, Moreton BD. 1987. Breeding bird populations of Kentish sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) coppice in relation to Age and structure of the coppice. J Appl Ecol. 24(1):13–27. doi:10.2307/2403784.
  • Manetti MC, Conedera M, Pelleri F, Montini P, Maltoni A, Mariotti B, et al. 2022. Optimizing quality wood production in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) coppices. For Ecol Manage. 523:120490. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120490.
  • Marini F, Marini F, Portoghesi L, Manetti MC, Salvati L, Romagnoli M. 2021. Gaps and perspectives for the improvement of the sweet chestnut forest-wood chain in Italy. Ann Silvicult Res. 46(2):2021. doi:10.12899/asr-2203.
  • Mason CF, MacDonald SM. 2002. Responses of ground flora to coppice management in an English woodland – a study using permanent quadrats. Biodivers Conserv. 11(10):1773–1789. doi:10.1023/A:1020395014155.
  • Mattioli W, Mancini LD, Portoghesi L, Corona P. 2016. Biodiversity conservation and forest management: the case of the sweet chestnut coppice stands in Central Italy. Plant Biosyst. – Int Deal Asp Plant Biol 150(3):592–600. doi:10.1080/11263504.2015.1054448.
  • Ramage MH, Burridge H, Busse-Wicher M, Fereday G, Reynolds T, Shah DU, et al. 2017. The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 68:333–359. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107.
  • Romagnoli M, Spina S. 2012 Dec 13. Physical and mechanical wood properties of ring-shaken chestnut (Castanea sativa) trees. Can J For Res. 43(2):200–207. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0357.
  • Spear M, Hill C, Norton A, Price C. 2019. Wood in construction in the UK: an analysis of carbon abatement potential. Report for the CCC.
  • Structural Timber Association. 2021. STA white paper: increased use of timber. 2021 Sep.
  • Timber Trade Federation. 2021. Timber demand and supply in the UK - market statement. 2021 May.
  • UNI. 2016. UNI EN 338:2016 Structural timber – Strength classes.
  • Unrau A, Becker G, Spinelli R, Lazdina D, Magagnotti N, Nicolescu VN, et al. 2018. Coppice forests in Europe. University of Freiburg. http://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/22041/.
  • van Romunde A. 2020. Global Timber Outlook 2020.