Physical and mechanical properties of thermally modified short-rotation wood in a closed system

References

• Araújo SO, Vital BR, Mendoza ZMSH, Vieira TA, Carneiro ACO. 2012. Properties of thermorectificated wood of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus. Scientia Forestalis. 40(95):327–336. https://www.ipef.br/publicacoes/scientia/nr95/cap03.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D143. 2014. Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber.
   Google Scholar
• Batista DC. 2012. Thermal modification of Eucalyptus grandis wood in industrial scale with the Brazilian processVap HolzSysteme® Doctor thesis, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Batista DC, Oliveira JTS, Paes JB, Nisgoski S, Muñiz GIB. 2018. Effect of the Brazilian process of thermal modification on the physical properties of Eucalyptus grandis juvenile wood. Maderas: Ciencia y Tecnología. 20(4):715–724. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2018005041701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista DC, Tomaselli I, Klitzke RJ. 2011. Effect of time and temperature of thermal modification on the reduction of maximum swelling of Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden wood. Ciência Florestal. 21(3):533–540. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050983810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon KRR. 2013. Thermal modification of wood with the process VAP HolzSysteme® of three planted species, Masters dissertation, Federal University of Paraná, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Bellon KRR, Loiola PL, Juízo CGF, Marchesan R, Sakowicz E, Klitzke RJ, Rocha MP. 2014. The effect of the thermal modification temperature in the resistance to the parallel compression of fiber for Eucalyptus grandis, Pinus taeda and Tectona grandis wood. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 8(18):512–520. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2014/December/512-520.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Floréz J, Trugilho PF, Lima JT, Hein PRG, Silva JRM. 2014. Characterization of young wood Tectona grandis L. f. planted in Brazil. Madera y Bosques. 20(1):11–20. http://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2014.201172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonduelle GM, Iwakiri S, Trianoski R, Prata JG, Rocha VY. 2015. Analysis of wood density and shrinkage of Tectona grandis wood in axial and radial direction of the tree trunk. Floresta. 45(4):671–680. http://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v45i4.31991.
   Google Scholar
• Bossu J, Beauchêne J, Estevez Y, Duplais C, Clair B. 2016. New insights on wood dimensional stability influenced by secondary metabolites: the case of fast-growing tropical species Bagassa guianensis Aubl. PLoS ONE. 11(3):e0150777. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazilian Tree Industry. 2020. Annual Report 2020. Brasília: Brazilian Tree Industry. 122 pp, https://iba.org/datafiles/publicacoes/relatorios/relatorio-iba-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brito TM, Ferreira G, Silva JGMd, Mendonça ARd, Fantuzzi Neto H, Paes JB, Batista DC. 2022. Resistance to biodeterioration of thermally modified Eucalyptus grandis and Tectona grandis short-rotation wood. Wood Mat Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2022.2150985
   Google Scholar
• Cademartori PHG, Missio AL, Mattos BD, Gatto DA. 2015. Effect of thermal treatments on technological properties of wood from two Eucalyptus species. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 87(1):471–481. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520130121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calonego FW, Severo ETD, Ballarin AW. 2012. Physical and mechanical properties of thermally modified wood from E. grandis. Eur J Wood and Wood Products. 70:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-011-0568-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccui I, Negro F, Zanuttini R, Espinoza M, Allegretti O. 2017. Thermo-vacuum modification of teak wood from fast-growth plantation. BioResources. 121(1):1903–1915. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.1903-1915.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves BM, Pereira HM. 2009. Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. BioResources. 4(1):370–404. http://doi.org/10.15376/biores.4.1.370-404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang S, Yang W, Fu X. 2004. Variation of microfibril angle and its correlation to wood properties in poplars. J Wood Forestry. 15(4):261–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844949.
   Google Scholar
• Glass SV, Zelinka SL. 2010. Moisture relations and physical properties of wood. In: Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. Madison: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; p. 80–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hein P, Lima JT. 2012. Relationships between microfibril angle, modulus of elasticity and compressive strength in Eucalyptus wood. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología. 14(3):267–274. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2012005000002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CAS. 2006. Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 239 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas do Estado de São Paulo – IPT. 2023a. Information on wood. Tectona grandis. (In Portuguese), https://www.ipt.br/informacoes_madeiras3.php?madeira = 78.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas do Estado de São Paulo – IPT. 2023b. Information on wood. Eucalyptus grandis. (In Portuguese), https://www.ipt.br/informacoes_madeiras3.php?madeira = 13.
   Google Scholar
• Kocaefe D, Huang X, Kocaefe Y. 2015. Dimensional stabilization of wood. Current Forestry Reports. 1:151–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0017-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaefe D, Poncsak S, Boluk Y. 2008. Effect of thermal treatment on the chemical composition and mechanical properties of birch and aspen. Bioresources. 3(2):571–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengowski EC, Bonfatti EA, Nisgoski S, Bolzon de Muñiz GI, Klock U. 2021. Properties of thermally modified teakwood. Maderas: Ciencia y tecnología. 23(10):1–16. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2021000100410.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Wu HX, Southerton S. 2011. Transcriptome profiling of Pinus radiata juvenile wood with contrasting stiffness identifies putative candidate genes involved in microfibril orientation and cell wall mechanics. Genomics. 12:480. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes JO, Garcia RA, Nascimento AM, Latorraca JVF. 2014a. Color uniformization of the young teak wood by heat treatment. Revista Árvore. 38(3):561–568. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-67622014000300019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes JO, Garcia RA, Nascimento AM, Latorraca JVF. 2014b.Physical properties of heat-treated teak wood. Floresta e Ambiente. 21(4):521–534. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.040213.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez-Mejías LD, Moya R. 2018. Effect of thermo-treatment on the physical and mechanical, color, fungal durability of wood of Tectona grandis and Gmelina arborea from forest plantations. Materials Science (Medžiagotyra). 24(1):59–68. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.24.1.17545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes WM. 2017. Effect of thermal modification in industrial scale on the quality of Tectona grandis Linn. wood. Doctor thesis, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil
   Google Scholar
• Miranda I, Souza V, Pereira H. 2011. Wood properties of teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor. J Wood Sci. 57:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-010-1164-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modes KS, Santini EJ, Vivian MA, Haselein CR. 2017. Effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties of Pinus taeda and Eucalyptus grandis woods. Ciência Florestal. 27(1):291–302. http://doi.org/10.5902/1980509826467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moura LF, Brito JO, Bortoletto Júnior G. 2012. Effects of thermal rectification on mass loss and mechanical properties of Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis woods. Floresta. 42(2):305–314. http://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v42i2.17635.
   Google Scholar
• Niemz P, Sonderegger W, Keplinger T, Jiang J, Lu J. 2023. Physical properties of wood and wood-based materials. In: Niemz P., Teischinger A., Sandberg D., editors. Springer handbook of wood science and technology. Cham, Chapter 6: Springer; p. 281–353.
   Google Scholar
• Paes JB, Santos LL, Silva LF, Motta JP, Braz RL, Lombardi LR. 2015. Technological characterization of juvenile wood teak (Tectona grandis) to production of furnitures. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias. 10(3):437–442. http://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v10i3a3906.
   Google Scholar
• Priadi T, Suharjo AAC, Karlinasari L. 2019. Dimensional stability and colour change of heat-treated young teak wood. Int Wood Prod J. 10(3):119–125. doi:10.1080/20426445.2019.1679430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treacy M, Evertsen J, Dhubháin ÁN. 2000. A comparison of mechanical and physical wood properties of a range of Sitka spruce provenances. Project Reports. National Council for Forest Research and Development. Wexford, Ireland. 40 pp. http://coford.ie/media/coford/content/publications/projectreports/comparison.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoumis G. 1991. Science and technology of wood: structure, properties, utilization. New York: Chapman & Hall, 494 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Winck RA, Fassola HE, Tomazello Filho M, Area MC. 2013. Case study: microfibril angle and its relationship with basic density in Pinus taeda L. wood from silvopastoral systems. O Papel. 71(5):55–61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262917148_Case_study_Microfibril_angle_and_its_relationship_with_basic_density_in_Pinus_taeda_L_wood_from_silvopastoral_systems.
   Google Scholar
• Yamammoto H, Sassus F, Ninomiya M, Gril J. 2001. A model of anisotropic swelling and shrinking process of wood. Wood Sci Technol. 35:167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002260000074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar