The influence of firm size on ESG score controlling for ratings agency and industrial sector

References

• Avetisyan, E., and K. Hockerts. 2017. “The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression.” Business Strategy and the Environment 26 (3): 316–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, M., L. Dal Maso, G. Liberatore, F. Mazzi, and S. Terzani. 2016. “Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in S. Drempetic et al.1 3environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure.” Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., and I. Clelland. 2004. “Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (1): 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg. 2014. “Look Beyond: Bloomberg for Environmental, Social and Governance Analysis.” Downloaded January 11, 2022. https://www.cfaboston.org/docs/ESG/BloombergLookBeyond2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Boatright, J. R. 2014. Ethics in finance. 3rd edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Capelle-Blancard, G., and A. Petit. 2017. “Every Little Helps?: ESG news and Stock Market Reaction.” Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11): 129. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A. K., R. Durand, D. I. Levine, and S. Touboul. 2016. “Do Ratings of Firms Converge? Implications for Managers, Investors and Strategy Researchers.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (8): 1597–1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döpfner, C. 2016. “Wie nützlich sind Nachhaltigkeitsratings für Einenachhaltige Entwicklung von Unternehmen?: Umsetzung – Möglichkeiten – Grenzen.” In CSR und Finanzratings: Nachhaltige Finanzwirtschaft: Rating statt Raten! [Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility], edited by H. E. Kopp, 55–63. Berlin: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., and J. Pfeffer. 1975. “Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior.” Pacific Sociological Review 18 (1): 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Drempetic, S., C. Klein, and B. Zwergel. 2019. “The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review.” Journal of Business Ethics. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., and S. Klimenko. 2019. “The Investor Revolution.” Harvard Business Reviews 3: 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., and J. Stroehle. 2018. “Exploring Social Origins in the Construction of ESG Measures,” July 12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3212685. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3212685.
   Google Scholar
• Escrig-Olmedo, E., MÁ Fernández-Izquierdo, I. Ferrero-Ferrero, J. M. Rivera-Lirio, and M. J. Muñoz-Torres. 2019. “Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles.” Sustainability 11 (3): 915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament & Council of the European Union. 2014. “Amending Directive 2013/34/EU as Regards Disclosure of Nonfinancial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Undertakings and Groups: Directive 2014/95/EU”.
   Google Scholar
• Friede, G., T. Busch, and A. Bassen. 2015. “ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More Than 2000 Empirical Studies.” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 5 (4): 210–233. doi:10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B. S., J. Hahn, A. Poirier, and J. L. Powell. 2015. “Quantile Regression with Panel Data.” NBER Working Paper Number 21034. Accessed July 4, 2021. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21034/w21034.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, R., and M. Kühnen. 2013. “Determinants of Sustainability Reporting: A Review of Results, Trends, Theory, and Opportunities in an Expanding Field of Research.” Journal of Cleaner Production 59: 5–21. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasse, R., and G. Krücken. 2009. “Neo-institutionalistische Theorie.” In Handbuch Soziologische Theorien (1st ed., pp. 237–251), edited by G. Kneer and M. Schroer. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• ISS. 2021. “Methodology & Research Process ISS ESG Corporate Rating.” Downloaded January 11, 2022. https://www.issgovernance.com/file/publications/methodology/Corporate-Rating-Methodology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., and W. Bartels. 2015. “Currents of Change: The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015.” Accessed June 30, 2021. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2015/11/kpmg-international-survey-of-corporateresponsibility-reporting-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, H. E. 2016. “Nachhaltigkeitsratings: Zur ‘Vermessung’ von Nachhaltigkeit im Finanzbereich.” In CSR und Finanzratings: Nachhaltige Finanzwirtschaft: Ratingstatt Raten!, Management-Reihe Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by H. E. Kopp, 1–28. Berlin: Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363. http://doi.org/10.1086/22655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSCI. 2020. “MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology Executive Summary MSCI ESG Research November 2020.” Downloaded January 11, 2022. https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/21901542/MSCI+ESG+Ratings+Methodology+-+Exec+Summary+Nov+2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Principles for Responsible Investment. 2019. “About PRI.” https://www.unpri.org/pri/about-the-pri.
   Google Scholar
• Refinitiv. 2021. “Environmental, Social and Governance Scores from Refinitiv.” Downloaded January 11, 2022. https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/refinitiv-esg-scores-methodology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sanches-Garcia, A., W. Mendes-Da-Silva, and R. J. Orsatoc. 2017. “Sensitive Industries Produce Better ESG Performance: Evidence from Emerging Markets.” Journal of Cleaner Production 150: 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, H. 2005. “International Corporate Social Responsibility Rating Systems.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 2005 (20): 107–120. doi:10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.wi.00012.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, H. 2011. “Transparenz von Unternehmensverantwortung mittels Ratings und Regulierungen sowie die Rolle des globalen Finanzsystems.” In Finanzmarktakteure und Corporate Social Responsibility: Ordnungspolitik, Transparenz, Anlagestrategien (1st ed., pp.177–192), edited by G. Ulshöfer and B. Feuchte. Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss.
   Google Scholar
• Schaltegger, S., and J. Hörisch. 2017. “In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking?” Journal of Business Ethics 145 (2): 259–276. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaiger, M., J. Eberhardt, and S. Mahr. 2016. “Corporate Reputationals optimale Steuerungsgröße für die Unternehmenskommunikation.” In Handbuch Controlling der Kommunikation: Grundlagen – Innovative Ansätze – Praktische Umsetzungen, edited by F.-R. Esch, T. Langner, & M. Bruhn (2nd ed., pp. 53–77, Springer Reference Wirtschaft). Wiesbaden: Springer FachmedienWiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Soppe, A. 2004. “Sustainable Corporate Finance.” Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1): 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparkes, R., and C. J. Cowton. 2004. “The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1): 45–57. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S&PGlobal. 2021. “ESG Scores.” Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.spglobal.com/esg/solutions/data-intelligence-esg-scores.
   Google Scholar
• Sroufe, R., and V. Gopalakrishna-Remani. 2019. “Management, Social Sustainability, Reputation, and Financial Performance Relationships: An Empirical Examination of US Firms.” Organization & Environment 32 (3): 331–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar