Rarity of microalgae in macro, meso, and microhabitats

References

• Abell R. 2002. Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis: a freshwater follow-up. Conserv Biol. 16(5):1435–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell R, Thieme M, Ricketts TH, Olwero N, Ng R, Petry P, Dinerstein E, Revenga C, Hoekstra J. 2011. Concordance of freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity. Conserv Lett. 4(2):127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ács E, Földi A, Wetzel CE, Vad CF, Kiss KT, Dobosy P, Trabert Z, Grigorszky I, Engloner A. 2017a. Nitzschia austriaca Hustedt: a characteristic diatom of Hungarian inland saline waters including a morphological comparison with the type material. Phytotaxa. 308(1):54–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ács É, Wetzel CE, Hlubiková D, Grigorszky I, Trábert Z. 2016. Morphology and distribution of Brevilinea kevei sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae), a new diatom from Europe. Phytotaxa. 284(1):24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ács É, Wetzel CE, Buczkó K, Kiss KT, Nagy K, Trábert Z, Földi A. 2017b. Biogeography and morphology of a poorly known Sellaphora species. Fottea. 17(1):57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariyadej C, Tansakul R, Tansakul P, Angsupa-nich S. 2004. Phytoplankton diversity and its relationships to the physico-chemical environment in the Banglang Reservoir, Yala Province. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 26(5):595–607.
   Google Scholar
• Arrhenius O. 1921. Species and area. J Ecol. 9:95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Balian EV, Segers H, Martens K, Lévéque C. 2008. The freshwater animal diversity assessment: an overview of the results. Hydrobiologia. 595/1:627–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B-Béres V, Stenger-Kovács C, Török P, T-Krasznai E. 2021. Are recent protection strategies sufficient for maintaining diverse freshwater benthic diatom assemblages? Ecol Ind. 127:107782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker B, Marin B. 2009. Streptophyte algae and the origin of embryophytes. Ann Bot. 103(7):999–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ. 1994. The distribution of body sizes of the world’s bird species. Oikos. 70:127–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ. 1996. Abundance–body size relationships: the area you census tells you more. Oikos. 75:303–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ. 1998. The distribution of mammal body masses. Div Distrib. 4(3):121–113.
   Google Scholar
• Bolgovics Á, Béres V, Várbíró G, Krasznai-K EÁ, Ács É, Kiss KT, Borics G. 2019. Groups of small lakes maintain larger microalgal diversity than large ones. Sci Total Env. 678:162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolgovics Á, Várbíró G, Ács É, Trábert Z, Kiss KT, Pozderka V, Görgényi J, Boda P, Lukács BA, Nagy-László Z, et al. 2017. Phytoplankton of rhithral rivers: its origin, diversity and possible use for quality-assessment. Ecol Ind. 81:587–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borics G, Abonyi A, Várbíró G, Padisák J, T-Krasznai E. 2015. Lake stratification in the Carpathian Basin and its interesting biological consequences. Inland Waters. 5(2):173–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borics G, Abonyi A, Salmaso N, Ptacnik R. 2021. Freshwater phytoplankton diversity: models, drivers and implications for ecosystem properties. Hydrobiologia. 848(1):53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borics G, Tóthmérész B, Várbíró G, Grigorszky I, Czébely A, Görgényi J. 2016. Functional phytoplankton distribution in hypertrophic systems across water body size. Hydrobiologia. 764(1):81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borics G, Várbíró G, Padisák J. 2013. Disturbance and stress: different meanings in ecological dynamics? Hydrobiologia. 711(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JH. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat. 124(2):255–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiafa AN, Martins FR. 2010. Forms of rarity of tree species in the southern Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Biol Conserv. 19(9):2597–2618.
   Google Scholar
• Cardillo M, Mace GM, Jones KE, Bielbi J, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Sechrest W, Orme CDL, Purvis A. 2005. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science. 309(5738):1239–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho L, Poikane S, Lyche Solheim A, Phillips G, Borics G, Catalan J, De Hoyos C, Drakare S, Dudley BJ, Järvinen M, Laplace-Treyture C. 2013. Strength and uncertainty of phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes. Hydrobiologia. 704(1):127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen B, Whitton F, Dyer EE, Baillie JE, Cumberlidge N, Darwall WR, Pollock C, Richman NI, Soulsby A-M, Böhm M. 2014. Global patterns of freshwater species diversity, threat and endemism. Glob Ecol Biol. 23(1):40–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SL, Glenn SM. 1997. Effects of organismal and distance scaling on analysis of species distribution and abundance. Ecol Appl. 7(2):543–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delwiche CF, Graham LE, Thomson N. 1989. Lignin-like compounds and sporopollen in Coleochaete, an algal model for land plant ancestry. Science: 245(4916):399–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt TJ, Wright AM, Cannatella DC, Hillis DM. 2019. Species delimitation in endangered groundwater salamanders: implications for aquifer management and biodiversity conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 116(7):2624–2633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EEA] European Environment Agency. 2004. Ecoregions for rivers and lakes [accessed 2017 March 21]. Copenhagen (Denmark): EEA. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/ecoregions-for-rivers-and-lakes
   Google Scholar
• Famiglietti JS. 2014. The global groundwater crisis. Nat Climate Change. 4(11):945–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felföldy L. 1972. A kékalgák (Cyanophyta) kishatározója. Budapest (Hungary): VIZDOK. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Felföldy L. 1981. A zöldalgák Desmidiales rendjének kishatározója. Budapest (Hungary): VGI. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Felföldy L. 1985. A zöldalgák Phytomonadina csoportjának kishatározója. Budapest (Hungary): VIZDOK. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ. 1994. Rarity: population and community biology. London (UK): Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason HA. 1922. On the relation between species and area. Ecology. 3(2):158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Görgényi J, Boros G, Vitál Z, Mozsár A, Várbíró G, Vasas G, Borics G. 2016. The role of filter-feeding Asian carps in algal dispersion. Hydrobiologia. 764(1):115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görgényi J, Tóthmérész B, Várbíró G, Abonyi A, T-Krasznai E, B-Béres V, Borics G. 2019. Contribution of phytoplankton functional groups to the diversity of a eutrophic oxbow lake. Hydrobiologia. 830(1):287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenyer R, Orme CDL, Jackson SF, Thomas GH, Davies RG, Davies TJ, Jones KE, Olson VA, Ridgely RS, Rasmussen PC, et al. 2006. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature. 444(7115):93–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorszky I, Borics G, Padisák J, Tótmérész B, Vasas G, Nagy S, Borbély G. 2003. Factors controlling the occurrence of Dinophyta species in Hungary. Hydrobiologia. 506–509(1):203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorszky I, Vasas F, Borics G. 1999. A páncélos-ostoros algák (Dinophyta) kishatározója. Budapest (Hungary): KGI. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Guiry MD, Guiry GM. 2008. AlgaeBase. https://www.algaebase.org/
   Google Scholar
• Hajdu L, Zrupkó G. 1982. Checklist of aquatic algae found in the Hortobágy National Park. In: Szujkó-Lacza, editor. Flora of the Hortobágy National Park. Budapest (Hungary): Akadémiai Kiadó; p. 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos. 38:210–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Virtanen R. 2006. Relationships between distribution and abundance vary with spatial scale and ecological group in stream bryophytes. Freshw Biol. 51(10):1879–1889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand H, Blasius B, Borer ET, Chase JM, Downing JA, Eriksson BK, Filstrup CT, Harpole WS, Hodapp D, Larsen S, et al. 2018. Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: consequences for conservation and monitoring. J Appl Ecol. 55(1):169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui C. 2012. Scale effect and bimodality in the frequency distribution of species occupancy. Community Ecol. 13(1):30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui C, McGeoch MA. 2007. Modeling species distributions by breaking the assumption of self-similarity. Oikos. 116(12):2097–2107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illies J. 1978. Limnofauna Europaea: Eine Zusammenstellung alle die europaischen Binnengewasser bewohnenden mehrzelligen Tierarten mit Angaben über ihre Verbreitung und Ökologie (Zweite, überarbeitete und erganzte Auflage) [Limnofauna Europaea: a compilation of all multicellular animal species inhabiting European inland waters with information on their distribution and ecology (Second, revised, and supplemented edition)]. Stuttgart (Germany): Gustav Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• [IPBES] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn (Germany). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins CN, Van Houtan KS, Pimm SL, Sexton JO. 2015. US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 112(16):5081–5086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattan GH. 1992. Rarity and vulnerability: the birds of the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Conserv Biol. 6(1):64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss KT, Schmidt A. 1998. Changes of the Chlorophyta species in the phytoplankton of the Hungarian section of the Danube River during the last decades (1961–1997). Biol Bratislava. 53(4):509–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenker R. 2017. Quantile regression: 40 years on. Ann Rev Econ. 9:155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komáromi PZS, Padisák J. 1999. The soil algal flora of the Kiskunság National Park and the surrounding regions. In: Lõkös L, Rajczy M, editors. The flora of the Kiskunság National Park II. Cryptogams. Natural History of the National Parks of Hungary, Hungarian National Museum, Budapest; p. 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lydeard C, Mayden RL. 1995. A diverse and endangered aquatic ecosystem of the southeast United States. Conserv Biol. 9(4):800–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maciel EA, Martins FR. 2021. Rarity patterns and the conservation status of tree species in South American savannas. Flora. 285:151942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmqvist B, Zhang Y, Adler P. 1999. Diversity, distribution, and larval habitats of North Swedish blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Freshw Biol. 42(2):301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammola S, Riccardi N, Prié V, Correia R, Cardoso P, Lopes-Lima M, Sousa R. 2020. Towards a taxonomically unbiased European Union biodiversity strategy for 2030. Proc Roy Soc B: Biol Sci. 287:20202166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka K, Fukuyo Y. 2003. Taxonomy of cysts. Manual on harmful marine microalgae. Paris (France): UNESCO; p. 563–592.
   Google Scholar
• Maulood BK, Hadi RAM, Saadalla HAA, Kassim TI, Al-Lami AA. 1993. Checklist of algae in Iraq. Marina Mesopotamica: Supplement. 1:1–128.
   Google Scholar
• McClain CR. 2021. The commonness of rarity in a deep-sea taxon. Oikos. 130(6):863–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney ML. 1997. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 28:495–516.
   Google Scholar
• Mezősi G. 2017. Physical geography of Hungary. London (UK), New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Minteer BA, Collins JP. 2010. Move it or lose it? The ecological ethics of relocating species under climate change. Ecol Appl. 20:1801–1804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe SJ, Dudley B, Ptacnik R. 2008. REBECCA databases: experiences from compilation and analyses of monitoring data from 5,000 lakes in 20 European countries. Aquatic Ecol. 42(2):183–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee S, Read AF, Greenwood JJD, Harvey PH. 1991. The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds. Nature. 351(6324):312–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh J. 1997. Az ostoros algák kishatározója 1 [Flagellar algae 1] (Euglenophyta). Budapest (Hungary): KGI. Hungarian
   Google Scholar
• Németh J. 2005. Red list of algae in Hungary. Acta Bot Hung. 47(3–4):379–417.
   Google Scholar
• Oindo BO, Skidmore AK, Prins HH. 2001. Body size and abundance relationship: an index of diversity for herbivores. Biodivers Conserv. 10(11):1923–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens IPF, Bennett PM. 2000. Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 97(22):12144–12148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padisák J. 1999. Checklist of aquatic algae found in the Kiskunság National Park and in the Danube-Tisza Interfluve. In: Lökös L, Rajczy M, editors. The flora of the Kiskunság National Park II. Cryptogams. Natural History of the National Parks of Hungary; Hungarian National Museum, Budapest; p. 9–146.
   Google Scholar
• Padisák J, Hajnal E, Krienitz L, Lakner J, Üveges V. 2010. Rarity, ecological memory, rate of floral change in phytoplankton—and the mystery of the red cock. Hydrobiologia. 653:45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padisák J, Hegewald E. 1992. In memoriam Dr. h. c. Dr. Tibor Hortobágyi. Botanikai Közlemények. 79:99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Padisák J, Péterfi LS, Momeu L. 2000. Silica-scaled chrysophytes from Hungary. Int Verein Theor Angew Limnol: Verhand. 27(1):131–134.
   Google Scholar
• Padisák J, Reynolds CS, Sommer U. 1993. Intermediate disturbance hypothesis in phytoplankton ecology. Proceedings of the 8th Workshop of the International Association of Phytoplankton Taxonomy and Ecology; 1991 July 5–15; Baja (Hungary): Springer Science & Business Media; Vol. 81.
   Google Scholar
• Padisák J, Vasas G, Borics G. 2016. Phycogeography of freshwater phytoplankton: traditional knowledge and new molecular tools. Hydrobiologia. 764(1):3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 401(6756):877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp L, Izsák J. 1997. Bimodality in occurrence classes: a direct consequence of lognormal or logarithmic series distribution of abundances: a numerical experimentation. Oikos. 79(1):191–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péterfi LS, Momeu L, Padisák J, Varga V. 1998a. Silica-scaled chrysophytes from permanent and temporary waters of Hortobágy, eastern Hungary. Hydrobiologia. 369/370:339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péterfi LS, Padisák J, Momeu L, Borics G. 1998b. Silica-scaled chrysophytes from the bog-lake Baláta-tó, SW Hungary. Nord J Bot. 18(6):727–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz D. 1981. Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H, editor. The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Chichester (UK): John Wiley and Sons; p. 205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz D, Cairns S, Dillon T. 1986. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Raunkiaer C. 1918. Recherches statistiques sur les formations vegetales [Statistical research on plant formations]. Biol Medd. 1:1–80. French.
   Google Scholar
• Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PTJ, Kidd KA, MacCormack TJ, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, et al. 2019. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev. 94(3):849–873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell LJ. 2012. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Meth Ecol Evol. 3(2):217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds CS. 2006. The ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JJ, Rahel FJ. 2008. Irrigation canals as sink habitat for trout and other fishes in a Wyoming drainage. Trans Am Fish Soc. 137(4):951–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelle ALC, Martins FR. 2009. Space and time in Brazilian savannas: 14 years of spatio-temporal dynamics. Ecologia de Campo IV; Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Rondinini C, Wilson KA, Boitani L, Grantham H, Possingham HP. 2006. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecol Lett. 9(10):1136–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 287(5459):1770–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap P, Schilde C. 2018. Encystation: the most prevalent and underinvestigated differentiation pathway of eukaryotes. Microbiology. 164(5):727–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Fehér G. 1998. A zöldalgák Chlorococcales rendjének kishatározója 1 [A suborder of the green algae order Chlorococcales 1]. Budapest (Hungary): KGI. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Fehér G. 1999. A zöldalgák Chlorococcales rendjének kishatározója 2 [A suborder of the green algae order Chlorococcales 2]. Budapest (Hungary): KGI. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Fehér G. 2001. A sárgászöld algák (Xanthophyceae) kishatározója [A small determinant of yellow-green algae (Xanthophyceae)]. Budapest (Hungary): KGI. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Smith VH, Foster BL, Grover JP, Holt RD, Leibold MA, deNoyelles F. 2005. Phytoplankton species richness scales consistently from laboratory microcosms to the world’s oceans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 102(12):4393–4396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soininen J, Heino J. 2005. Relationships between local population persistence, local abundance and regional occupancy of species: distribution patterns of diatoms in boreal streams. J Biogeogr. 32(11):1971–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer U. 1981. The role of r- and K-selection in the succession of phytoplankton in Lake Constance. Acta Oecol-Oecol Gen. 2:327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer U. 1984. The paradox of the plankton: fluctuations of phosphorus availability maintain diversity of phytoplankton in flow-through cultures. Limnol Oceanogr. 29(3):633–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stomp M, Huisman J, Mittelbach GG, Litchman E, Klausmeier CA. 2011. Large-scale biodiversity patterns in freshwater phytoplankton. Ecology. 92(11):2096–2107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Dudgeon D. 2010. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J North Am Benthol Soc. 29(1):344–358.
   Google Scholar
• Terborgh JW. 1974. Preservation of natural diversity: the problem of extinction prone species. Bioscience. 24(12):715–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T-Krasznai E, B-Béres V. 2021. Rarely mentioned species in Hungary: Can we step into the same lake? Biologia. 76(6):1661–1673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsarenko PM, Palamar-Mordvintseva GM, Wasser SP. 1999. Diversity of algae in Ukraine. Int J Algae. 1(2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Uherkovich G, Ács É, Schmidt A. 1995. A ‘Scenedesmus’ zöldalga nemzetség (‘Chlorococcales’, ‘Chlorophyceae’) különös tekintettel magyarországi elöfordulású taxonjaira [The green algae genus 'Scenedesmus' ('Chlorococcales', 'Chlorophyceae') with particular regard to the taxa occurring in Hungary]. Budapest (Hungary): Magyar Algológiai Társaság. Hungarian.
   Google Scholar
• Várbíró G, Görgényi J, Tóthmérész B, Padisák J, Hajnal É, Borics G. 2017. Functional redundancy modifies species–area relationship for freshwater phytoplankton. Ecol Evol. 7(23):9905–9913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vári A, Podschun SA, Erős T, Hein T, Pataki B, Iojă IC, Adamescu CM, Gerhardt A, Gruber T, Dedić A, et al. 2022. Freshwater systems and ecosystem services: challenges and chances for cross-fertilization of disciplines. Ambio. 51(1):135–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wake DB, Vredenburg VT. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 105:11466–11473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis EO. 1979. The composition of avian communities in remanescent woodlots in southern Brazil. Pap Avulsos Zool. 33:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yu J, Dobson FS. 2000. Seven forms of rarity in mammals. J Biogeogr. 27(1):131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar