Ecogeographic patterns of macrophyte metacommunities in the Hengduan Mountain region

References

• Alahuhta J, Heino J. 2013. Spatial extent, regional specificity and metacommunity structuring in lake macrophytes. J Biogeogr. 40:1572–1582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoń K. 2018. Package ‘MuMIn’. Model selection model averaging based on information criteria. R package version 1.15. 6. 2016. 3(3).
   Google Scholar
• Baselga A, Orme CDL. 2012. betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol. 3:808–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard-Verdier M, Navas M-L, Vellend M, Violle C, Fayolle A, Garnier E. 2012. Community assembly along a soil depth gradient: contrasting patterns of plant trait convergence and divergence in a Mediterranean rangeland. J Ecol. 100:1422–1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonthoux S, Balent G. 2015. Bird metacommunity processes remain constant after 25 years of landscape changes. Ecol Complex. 21:39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botta-Dukát Z. 2018. Cautionary note on calculating standardized effect size (SES) in randomization test. Community Ecol. 19:77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements FE. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol. 24:252–284.
   Google Scholar
• Core RD. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing team RDC. Vienna (Austria). 2006. http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Dallas T, Drake JM. 2014. Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities. Ecosphere. 5:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond JM. 1975. Assembly of species communities. Ecol Evol Comm. 1:342–444.
   Google Scholar
• Diniz LP, Petsch DK, Bonecker CC. 2021. Zooplankton β diversity dynamics and metacommunity structure depend on spatial and temporal scales in a Neotropical floodplain. Freshw Biol. 66:1328–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erős T, Takács P, Specziár A, Schmera D, Sály P. 2017. Effect of landscape context on fish metacommunity structuring in stream networks. Freshw Biol. 62:215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Yuan GX, Jeppesen E, Ge DB, Li W, Zou DS, Huang ZR, Wu AP, Liu QL. 2019. Local and regional drivers of turnover and nestedness components of species and functional beta diversity in lake macrophyte communities in China. Sci Total Environ. 687:206–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Yuan GX, Jeppesen E. 2020. Trait-based community assembly of submersed macrophytes subjected to nutrient enrichment in freshwater lakes: Do traits at the individual level matter? Ecol Indic. 110:105895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Zhong J, Yuan G, Xie P, Guo L, Zhang X, Xu J, Li Z, Li W, Zhang M, et al. 2014. Trait-based community assembly of aquatic macrophytes along a water depth gradient in a freshwater lake. Freshw Biol. 59:2462–2471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Zhong J, Fang S, Hu JM, Guo CJ, Lou Q, Yuan GX, Dai TT, Li ZQ, Zhang M, et al. 2017. Scale-dependent changes in the functional diversity of macrophytes in subtropical freshwater lakes in south China. Sci Rep. 7:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan PQ. 2007. Geographic discretion about the Hengduan Mountains. Western China Z. 2:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• García-Girón J, Heino J, Baastrup-Spohr L, Clayton J, de Winton M, Feldmann T, Fernández-Aláez C, Ecke F, Hoyer MV, Kolada AJL. 2020. Elements of lake macrophyte metacommunity structure: global variation and community–environment relationships. Limnol Oceanogr. 65:2883–2895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianuca AT, Declerck SA, Lemmens P, De Meester L. 2017. Effects of dispersal and environmental heterogeneity on the replacement and nestedness components of β-diversity. Ecology. 98:525–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason HA. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. J Torrey Bot. 53(1):7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Göthe E, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Wiberg-Larsen P, Graeber D, Kristensen EA, Friberg N. 2016. Environmental and spatial controls of taxonomic versus trait composition of stream biota. Freshw Biol. 62:397–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos M, Heino J, Siqueira T, Landeiro VL, Kotanen J, Bini LM. 2013. Metacommunity structuring in stream networks: roles of dispersal mode, distance type, and regional environmental context. Ecol Evol. 3:4473–4487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Chen K, Soininen J, Heino J, Ding N, Wang B. 2020. Elements of metacommunity structure of diatoms and macroinvertebrates within stream networks differing in environmental heterogeneity. J Biogeogr. 47:1755–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Alahuhta J, Alahulkko MT, Antikainen H, Bini LM, Bonada N, Datry T, Eros T, Hjort J, Kotavaara O. 2017a. Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research. Environ Rev. 25:334–349.
   Google Scholar
• Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Soininen J, Valanko S, Bini LM. 2015a. Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol. 60:845–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Nokela T, Soininen J, Tolkkinen M, Virtanen L, Virtanen RJFB. 2015b. Elements of metacommunity structure and community–environment relationships in stream organisms. Freshw Biol. 60:973–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R. 2015c. A comparative analysis of metacommunity types in the freshwater realm. Ecol Evol. 5:1525–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R. 2017b. Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms. Oecologia. 183:121–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques-Silva R, Lindo Z, Peres-Neto PR. 2013. A community of metacommunities: exploring patterns in species distributions across large geographical areas. Ecology. 94:627–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett. 7:601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold MA, Mikkelson GM. 2002. Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure. Oikos. 97:237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márquez JC, Kolasa J. 2013. Local and regional processes in community assembly. PLoS One. 8:e54580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morisita M. 1971. Composition of the Iδ-index. Popul Ecol. 13:1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy K, Efremov A, Davidson TA, Molina-Navarro E, Fidanza K, Betiol TCC, Urrutia-Estrada J. 2019. World distribution, diversity and endemism of aquatic macrophytes. Aquat Bot. 158:103127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers JA, Chase JM, Jiménez I, Jørgensen PM, Araujo-Murakami A, Paniagua-Zambrana N, Seidel R. 2013. Beta-diversity in temperate and tropical forests reflects dissimilar mechanisms of community assembly. Ecol Lett. 16:151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson BD, Atmar W. 1986. Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biol J Linn Soc. 28:65–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presley SJ, Higgins CL, Willig MR. 2010. A comprehensive framework for the evaluation of metacommunity structure. Oikos. 119:908–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presley SJ, Willig MR. 2010. Bat metacommunity structure on Caribbean islands and the role of endemics. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 19:185–199.
   Google Scholar
• Püttker T, de Arruda Bueno A, Prado PI, Pardini R. 2015. Ecological filtering or random extinction? Beta-diversity patterns and the importance of niche-based and neutral processes following habitat loss. Oikos. 124:206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley B, Venables B, Bates DM, Hornik K, Gebhardt A, Firth D, Ripley MB. 2013. Package ‘MASS’. 538:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Simberloff D. 1983. Competition theory, hypothesis-testing, and other community ecological buzzwords. Am Nat. 122:626–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence DHN. 1982. The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes. In: Macfadyen A, Ford ED, editors. Advances in ecological research. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; p. 37–125.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkin JD, Heino J, Sundermann A, Haase P, Jähnig SC. 2016. Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of central German stream metacommunities. Freshw Biol. 61:607–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira TB, Brasil LS, da Silva LCN, Tejerina-Garro FL, de Aquino P, Pompeu PS, de Marco, Jr P. 2020. Elements of fish metacommunity structure in Neotropical freshwater streams. Ecol Evol. 10:12024–12035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weihs C, Ligges U, Luebke K, Raabe N. 2005. klaR analyzing German business cycles, data analysis and decision support. In: Baier, D, Decker, R, editors. Data analysis and decision support. Berlin (Germany): Springer; p. 335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wojciechowski J, Heino J, Bini LM, Padial AA. 2017. Temporal variation in phytoplankton beta diversity patterns and metacommunity structures across subtropical reservoirs. Freshw Biol. 62:751–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar