Macrophyte growth forms shift along the trophic gradient of lakes

References

• Arthaud F, Toury J, Romestaing C, Bornette G. 2021. Photosynthetic and morphological traits control aquatic plant distribution according to light stress. Evol Ecol. 35(5–6):739–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baastrup-Spohr L, Iversen LL, Dahl-Nielsen J, Sand-Jensen K. 2013. Seventy years of changes in the abundance of Danish charophytes. Freshw Biol. 58(8):1682–1693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao L, Li X, Su J. 2020. Alteration in the potential of sediment phosphorus release along series of rubber dams in a typical urban landscape river. Sci Rep. 10(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barko JW, Gunnison D, Carpenter SR. 1991. Sediment interactions with submersed macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquat Bot. 41(1–3):41–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blindow I. 1992. Decline of charophytes during eutrophication: comparison with angiosperms. Freshw Biol. 28(1):9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blindow I, Hargeby A, Andersson G. 2002. Seasonal changes of mechanisms maintaining clear water in a shallow lake with abundant Chara vegetation. Aquat Bot. 72(3–4):315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bristow JM, Whitcombe M. 1971. The role of roots in the nutrition of aquatic vascular plants. Am J Bot. 58(1):8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner P-C. 2017. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw. 80:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher RW. 1933. Studies on the ecology of rivers: I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain. J Ecol. 21(1):58.
   Google Scholar
• Carignan R. 1982. An empirical model to estimate the relative importance of roots in phosphorus uptake by aquatic macrophytes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 39(2):243–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ. 2007. Random forest for classification in ecology. Ecology. 88(11):2783–2792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon PJ, Rigler FH. 1974. The phosphorus–chlorophyll relationship in lakes1,2: phosphorus–chlorophyll relationship. Limnol Oceanogr. 19(5):767–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsborough WJ, Kemp WM. 1988. Light responses of a submersed macrophyte: implications for survival in turbid tidal waters. Ecology. 69(6):1775–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwell M. 2017. pdp: an R package for constructing partial dependence plots. R J. 9(1):421–436.
   Google Scholar
• He L, Zhu T, Wu Y, Li W, Zhang H, Zhang X, Cao T, Ni L, Hilt S. 2019. Littoral slope, water depth and alternative response strategies to light attenuation shape the distribution of submerged macrophytes in a mesotrophic lake. Front Plant Sci. 10:169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilt S, Alirangues Nuñez MM, Bakker ES, Blindow I, Davidson TA, Gillefalk M, Hansson L-A, Janse JH., et al. 2018. Response of submerged macrophyte communities to external and internal restoration measures in north temperate shallow lakes. Front Plant Sci. 9:194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlahan JE, McKinney ST, Anderson TM, McGill BJ. 2017. The priority of prediction in ecological understanding. Oikos. 126(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen LL, Winkel A, Baastrup-Spohr L, Hinke AB, Alahuhta J, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Birk S, Brodersen P, Chambers PA, Ecke F, et al. 2019. Catchment properties and the photosynthetic trait composition of freshwater plant communities. Science. 366(6467):878–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James C, Fisher J, Russell V, Collings S, Moss B. 2005. Nitrate availability and hydrophyte species richness in shallow lakes. Freshw Biol. 50(6):1049–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 2013. Chapter 8: tree-based methods. In: James G, Witten D, Hatie T, Tibshirani R, editors. An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R (Vol. 2). New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen E, Peder Jensen J, Sondergaard M, Lauridsen T, Landkildehus F. 2000. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient: a detailed study of Danish lakes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshw Biol. 45(2):201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaijser W, Lorenz AW, Birk S, Hering D. 2021. The interplay of nutrients, dissolved inorganic carbon and algae in determining macrophyte occurrences in rivers. Sci Total Environ. 781(28):146728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolada A. 2021. Charophyte variation in sensitivity to eutrophication affects their potential for the trophic and ecological status indication. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst. 422:30.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke J. 2014. Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. 2nd ed. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw A, Wiener M. 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News. 2(3):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mathes J, Plambeck G, Schaumburg J. 2002. Das typisierungssystem für stehende Gewässer in Deutschland mit Wasserfllächen ab 0.5 km2 zur Umsetzung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie [The classification system for standing water in Germany with water areas of 0.5 km2 or more for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive]. BTU Cottbus. 5(02):15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer ML, Raat AJP, Doef RW. 1989. Restoration by biomanipulation of lake Bleiswijkse Zoom (The Netherlands): first results. Hydrobiol Bull. 23(1):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips G, Pietiläinen O-P, Carvalho L, Solimini A, Lyche Solheim A, Cardoso AC. 2008. Chlorophyll–nutrient relationships of different lake types using a large European dataset. Aquat Ecol 42(2):213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips GL, Eminson D, Moss B. 1978. A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated freshwaters. Aquat Bot. 4:103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikane S, Phillips G, Birk S, Free G, Kelly MG, Willby NJ. 2019. Deriving nutrient criteria to support ‘good' ecological status in European lakes: an empirically based approach to linking ecology and management. Sci Total Environ. 650:2074–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikane S, Portielje R, Berg M, Phillips G, Brucet S, Carvalho L, Mischke U, Ott I, Soszka H, Van Wichelen J, et al. 2014. Defining ecologically relevant water quality targets for lakes in Europe. J Appl Ecol. 51(3):592–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikane S, Portielje R, Denys L, Elferts D, Kelly M, Kolada A, Mäemets H, Phillips G, Sondergaard M, Willby N, van den Berg M. 2018. Macrophyte assessment in European lakes: diverse approaches but convergent views of ‘good’ ecological status. Ecol Indic. 94:185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rip WJ, Ouboter M, van Nes EH, Beltman B. 2005. Oscillation of a shallow lake ecosystem upon reduction in external phosphorus load. Arch Hydrobiol. 164(3):387–409.
   Google Scholar
• Robin J, Wezel A, Bornette G, Arthaud F, Angélibert S, Rosset V, Oertli B. 2014. Biodiversity in eutrophicated shallow lakes: determination of tipping points and tools for monitoring. Hydrobiologia. 723(1):63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer CD, Davidson TA, Jones JI. 2010. Seasonal dynamics of macrophytes and phytoplankton in shallow lakes: a eutrophication-driven pathway from plants to plankton? Freshw Biol. 55(3):500–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumburg DJ, Schranz C, Stelzer DD, Vogel DA. 2014. Verfahrensanleitung für die ökologische Bewertung von Seen zur Umsetzung der EG- Wasserrahmenrichtlinie: Makrophyten & Phytobenthos Phylib [Action instructions for the ecological assessment of lakes for the implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive: macrophytes and phytobenthos]. Munich (Germany): Bavarian Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer M, Hosper SH, Meijer M-L, Moss B, Jeppesen E. 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol Evol. 8(8):275–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer M, Van Nes EH. 2007. Shallow lakes theory revisited: various alternative regimes driven by climate, nutrients, depth and lake size. Hydrobiologia. 584(1):455–466.
   Google Scholar
• Sederias J, Colman B. 2009. Inhibition of Chara vulgaris oospore germination by sulfidic sediments. Aquat Bot. 91(4):273–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolders AJP, Lamers LPM, Lucassen ECHET, Van Der Velde G, Roelofs JGM. 2006. Internal eutrophication: How it works and what to do about it—a review. Chem Ecol. 22(2):93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard M, Jeppesen E, Peder Jensen J, Lildal Amsinck S. 2005. Water Framework Directive: ecological classification of Danish lakes. J Appl Ecol. 42(4):616–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard M, Johansson LS, Lauridsen TL, Jørgensen TB, Liboriussen L, Jeppesen E. 2010. Submerged macrophytes as indicators of the ecological quality of lakes. Freshw Biol. 55(4):893–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobiessen P, Snow PD. 1984. Temperature and light effects on the growth of Potamogeton crispus in Collins Lake, New York State. Can J Bot. 62(12):2822–2826.
   Google Scholar
• Verhofstad MJJM, Alirangues Núñez MM, Reichman EP, van Donk E, Lamers LPM, Bakker ES. 2017. Mass development of monospecific submerged macrophyte vegetation after the restoration of shallow lakes: roles of light, sediment nutrient levels, and propagule density. Aquat Bot. 141:29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhofstad MJJM, Bakker ES. 2019. Classifying nuisance submerged vegetation depending on ecosystem services. Limnology. 20(1):55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollenwieder RA, Kerekes J. 1982. Eutrophication of waters: monitoring, assessment and control. Paris (France): Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD); p. 156.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wiik E, Bennion H, Sayer CD, Davidson TA, McGowan S, Patmore IR, Clarke SJ. 2015. Ecological sensitivity of marl lakes to nutrient enrichment: evidence from Hawes Water, UK. Freshw Biol. 60(11):2226–2247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilke CO. 2019. cowplot: streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ‘ggplot2’. R Package Version 0.9.4.
   Google Scholar
• Willby NJ. 2011. From metrics to Monet: the need for an ecologically meaningful guiding image. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 21(7):601–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar