Assess the website content of the healthcare organizations for heart patients through CRRAV model

References

• WHO. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56–e528. DOI:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman S, Rehman E, Ikram M, et al. Cardiovascular disease (CVD): assessment, prediction and policy implications. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1299. DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-11334-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC. Heart disease in the United States. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sreeniwas Kumar A, Sinha N. Cardiovascular disease in India: a 360 degree overview. Med J Armed Forces India. 2020;76(1):1–3. DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.12.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagchi KK, Udo GJ, Kirs PJ, et al. Internet use and human values: analyses of developing and developed countries. Comput Human Behav. 2015;50:76–90. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm K, Handley T, McHugh C, et al. The quality of internet websites for people experiencing psychosis: pilot expert assessment. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(4):e28135. DOI:10.2196/28135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng JY, Saini JB, Dzisiak DA. Evaluating the quality of websites providing complementary and alternative medicine patient information for neck pain. Adv Integr Med. 2021;8:3. DOI:10.1016/j.aimed.2021.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danhoundo G, Whistance-Smith D, Lemoine D, et al. Provision of consumer health information in Alberta’s rural public libraries. Health Inform Libr J. 2019;36(1):41–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulthard P. Dentistry and coronavirus (COVID-19)-moral decision-making. Br Dent J. 2020;228(7):503–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SN, Smallwood E, Sereda M, et al. The content and quality of information about hyperacusis presented online. Am J Audiol. 2020;29(3):623–630. DOI:10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbaffi L, Hargreaves S. The information trust formation process for informal caregivers of people with dementia: a qualitative study. J Doc. 2022;78(2):302–319. DOI:10.1108/JD-01-2021-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Wahab N, Rai D, Siddhanamatha H, et al. A comprehensive scoping review to identify standards for the development of health information resources on the internet. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen W, Petrovsky N, et al. The expectancy-disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction with public services: a meta-analysis and an agenda for best practice. Public Adm Rev. 2022;82(1):147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RL. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation. J Appl Psychol. 1977;62(4):480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Market Res. 1980;17(4):460–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver RL. Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. Routledge; 2010. DOI:10.4324/9781315700892
   Google Scholar
• Casaló LV, Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S. Understanding consumer interaction on instagram: the role of satisfaction, hedonism, and content characteristics. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(6):369–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oghuma AP, Libaque-Saenz CF, Wong SF, et al. An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging. Telemat Inform. 2016;33(1):34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam C, Santos D, Oliveira T. Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile apps: extending the expectation confirmation model. Inf Syst Front. 2020;22(1):243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-P, Hung M-J, Chen D-Y. Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences. Asian J Polit Sci. 2022: 1–26. DOI:10.1080/02185377.2022.2047081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh S, Ji H, Kim J, et al. Deep learning model based on expectation-confirmation theory to predict customer satisfaction in hospitality service. Inform Technol Tourism. 2022;24(1):109–126. DOI:10.1007/s40558-022-00222-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciampa A. Development of methodologies for fish freshness assessment using metabonomics applications. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Triacca L. Web usability: enhancing effectiveness of methodologies and improving their communication features [doctoral dissertation]. Lugano: Università della Svizzera italiana; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Signore O. A comprehensive model for web sites quality. Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Web Site Evolution, 2005. p. 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jeddi FR, Gilasi H, Khademi S. Evaluation models and criteria of the quality of hospital websites: a systematic review study. Electron Physician. 2017;9(2):3786–3793. DOI:10.19082/3786.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loiacono ET, Watson RT, Goodhue DL. Webqual: an instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. Int J Electron Commer. 2007;11(3):51–87. DOI:10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlHazme RH, Haque SS, Wiggin H, et al. The impact of health information technologies on quality improvement methodologies’ efficiency, throughput and financial outcomes: a retrospective observational study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Büyüközkan G, Feyzioğlu O, Gocer F. Evaluation of hospital web services using intuitionistic fuzzy AHP and intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2016. p. 607–611.
   Google Scholar
• Hanaway MJ, MacLennan PA, Locke JE. Exacerbating racial disparities in kidney transplant: the consequences of geographic redistribution. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):679–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao L, Wang Y. Factors influencing the information service quality of the online website of hospitals in China. Sci Program. 2021;2021:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marconato F. Produção lacrimal induzida pela ciclosporina aeo tacrolimus em cães hígidos e com ceratoconjuntivite seca [doctoral dissertation]. Santa Maria: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Salarvand S, Samadbeik M, Tarrahi MJ, et al. Quality of public hospitals websites: a cross-sectional analytical study in Iran. Acta Inform Med. 2016;24(2):130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson J. Worldwide desktop market share of leading search engines from January 2015 to January 2023. Statista. 2021. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/216573/worldwide-market-share-of-search-engines/.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtz BW. Selected digital case studies. In: Wirtz BW, editor. Digital business and electronic commerce: strategy, business models and technology. Springer; 2021. p. 681–715.
   Google Scholar
• Greene DL, Appel AJ, Reinert SE, et al. Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet. Spine. 2005;30(7):826–829. DOI:10.1097/01.brs.0000157754.98023.cd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhan A-M, Săucan D, Popa C, et al. Searching internet: a report on accessibility, nature, and quality of suicide-related information. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;33:373–377. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.146.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez LR. Web page classification based on unsupervised learning using MIME type analysis. 2021 International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS), 2021. p. 375–377.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw S-T, Guo JGN, Ansari S, et al. Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28(7):1591–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanagavarapu LM, Reddy YR, Agrawal S. SIREN: a fine grained approach to develop information security search engine. In: Advances in cybersecurity management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 337–367.
   Google Scholar
• Ng JY, Gilotra K. Web-information surrounding complementary and alternative medicine for low back pain: A cross-sectional survey and quality assessment. Integr Med Res. 2021;10(3):100692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JZH, Kong T, Killow V, et al. Quality assessment of online resources for the most common cancers. J Cancer Educ. 2023;38:34–41. Doi:10.1007/s13187-021-02075-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cajita MI, Rodney T, Xu J, et al. Quality and health literacy demand of online heart failure information. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;32(2):156–164. DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson T, Bergman G, Karlsson A-M, et al. Content and quality of information websites about congenital heart defects following a prenatal diagnosis. Interact J Med Res. 2015;4(1):e4. DOI:10.2196/ijmr.3819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huynh MNQ, Hicks KE, Malic C. Assessment of the readability, adequacy, and suitability of online patient education resources for benign vascular tumours using the DISCERN instrument. Plastic Surg. 2019;27(4):325–333. DOI:10.1177/2292550319880911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhou X, Zhou Y, et al. Evaluation of the quality and readability of online information about breast cancer in China. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(4):858–864. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, et al. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105–111. DOI:10.1136/jech.53.2.105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acklin MW. Beyond the boundaries: ethical issues in the practice of indirect personality assessment in non-health-service psychology. J Pers Assess. 2018;102(2):269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton DM, Kelly EG, Molony DC. Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014: 1–6. DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullard AC, Johnston SM, Hehir DJ. Quality and reliability evaluation of current internet information regarding mesh use in inguinal hernia surgery using HONcode and the DISCERN instrument. Hernia. 2021;25(5):1325–1330. DOI:10.1007/s10029-021-02406-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer C, Baujard V, Geissbuhler A. Evolution of health web certification through the HONcode experience. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:53–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portillo IA, Johnson CV, Johnson SY. Quality evaluation of consumer health information websites found on google using DISCERN, CRAAP, and HONcode. Med Ref Serv Q. 2021;40(4):396–407. DOI:10.1080/02763869.2021.1987799.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weitzel L, Oliveira JPM, Quaresma P. Measuring the reputation in user-generated-content systems based on health information. Proc Comput Sci. 2014;29:364–378. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.033.
   Google Scholar
• Cuan-Baltazar JY, Muñoz-Perez MJ, Robledo-Vega C, et al. Misinformation of COVID-19 on the internet: infodemiology study. JMIR Public Health Surv. 2020;6(2):1–9. DOI:10.2196/18444.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton DM, Bao MBM, Kelly EG, et al. Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014: 1–6. DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudinat A, Joubert M, Aymard S, et al. WRAPIN: new generation health search engine using UMLS knowledge sources for MeSH term extraction from health documentation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):356–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaudinat A, Ruch P, Joubert M, et al. Health search engine with e-document analysis for reliable search results. Int J Med Inf. 2006;75(1):73–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert M, Gaudinat A, Boyer C, et al. WRAPIN: a tool for patient empowerment within EHR. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):147–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sajid MS, Iftikhar M, Monteiro RS, et al. Internet information on colorectal cancer: commercialization and lack of quality control. Colorect Dis. 2008;10(4):352–356. DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01316.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegethoff D. Readability of information material in obstetrics. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2019;224(4):208–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raymaker DM, Kapp SK, McDonald KE, et al. Development of the AASPIRE web accessibility guidelines for autistic web users. Autism Adult. 2019;1(2):146–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basch CH, Mohlman J, Hillyer GC, et al. Public health communication in time of crisis: readability of on-line COVID-19 information. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;14(5):635–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills AJ, Pitt L, Sattari S. Reading between the vines: analyzing the readability of consumer brand wine web sites. Int J Wine Bus Res. 2012;24(3):169–182. DOI:10.1108/17511061211259170.
   Google Scholar
• Read-able.com. The readability test tool. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tejedor S, Pérez-Escoda A, Ventín A, et al. Tracking websites’ digital communication strategies in Latin American hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:23. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17239145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ease FR. Flesch–Kincaid readability test. Reading. 2009;70:8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32(3):221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khwaja A, Du PZ, DeSilva GL. Website evaluation for shoulder and elbow fellowships in the United States: an evaluation of accessibility and content. JSES Int. 2020;4(3):449–452. DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumenfeld WS, Justice BM. Six replicated investigations of the relationship between flesch and gunning readability indices. Percept Mot Skills. 1975;40(1):40–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirasawa R, Saito K, Yachi Y, et al. Quality of internet information related to the Mediterranean diet. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(5):885–893. DOI:10.1017/S1368980011002345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz MB, Osborne P. A preliminary examination of the readability of consumer pharmaceutical web pages. Burns. 2010;5(2009):33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Martin L, Gottron T. Readability and the web. Future Internet. 2012;4:238–252. DOI:10.3390/fi4010238.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RI, Sumeeth M, Miller J. A user-centric evaluation of the readability of privacy policies in popular web sites. Inf Syst Front. 2011;13:501–514. DOI:10.1007/s10796-010-9228-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas G, Hartley RD, Kincaid JP. Test-retest and inter-analyst reliability of the automated readability index, flesch reading ease score, and the fog count. J Lit Res. n.d.;7(2):149–154. DOI:10.1080/10862967509547131.
   Google Scholar
• Perez OD, Swindell HW, Herndon CL, et al. Assessing the readability of online information about achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Spec. 2020;13(6):470–477. DOI:10.1177/1938640019888058.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stvilia B. Measuring information quality. 2006. p. 304.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, von Brömssen M, Scanlon BR, et al. Hydrogeochemical comparison and effects of overlapping redox zones on groundwater arsenic near the Western (Bhagirathi sub-basin, India) and Eastern (Meghna sub-basin, Bangladesh) margins of the Bengal Basin. J Contam Hydrol. 2008;99(1–4):31–48. DOI:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nason GJ, Tareen F, Quinn F. Hydrocele on the web: an evaluation of internet-based information. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012: 1–6. DOI:10.3109/00365599.2012.719540.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Bahrani A, Plusa S. The quality of patient-orientated internet information on colorectal cancer. Colorect Dis. 2004;6(5):323–326. DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00604.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudolph JE, Fox MP, Naimi AI. Simulation as a tool for teaching and learning epidemiologic methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(5):900–907. DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaa232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidema WP, Graumans MJ, Oosterhuis JWA, et al. The quality of web sites’ health information on minimal invasive repair of pectus excavatum using the DISCERN instrument. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2021;31(2):157–163. DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1710026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almagharbeh WT, Al-Motlaq MA. Diacritics: an important strategy for proper validation of the arabic version of the critical care family needs inventory. J Nurs Meas. 2021;29(2):365–373. DOI:10.1891/JNM-D-20-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissman TL, Boehnlein JK. A critical review of internet information about depression. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:1046–1050. DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.52.8.1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Karmakar G, Kamruzzaman J. How much I can rely on you: measuring trustworthiness of a twitter user. IEEE Trans Depend Secure Comput. 2021;18(2):949–966. DOI:10.1109/TDSC.2019.2929782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu NM, Deng A, Ying H, et al. Dynamic frailty before kidney transplantation: time of measurement matters. Transplantation. 2019;103(8):1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul E, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for public health communications. Lancet Reg Health Europe. 2021;1:100012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akinwande MO, Dikko HG, Samson A. Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable (s) in regression analysis. Open J Stat. 2015;5(07):754.
   Google Scholar
• Opacic J, Maldonado A, Ramseier CA, et al. Influence of periodontitis on pregnancy and childbirth. Swiss Dent J. 2019;129(7–8):581–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao X, Li Z, Arthur D, et al. ScienceDirect The feasibility of an internet-based intervention for Chinese people with mental illness: a survey of willingness and attitude. 2014. 1, 0–5.
   Google Scholar
• Koivunen M, Välimäki M, Pitkänen A, et al. A preliminary usability evaluation of web-based portal application for patients with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007;14(5):462–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy J, Vaughn J, Gelber K, et al. Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;39:82–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi D, Stanley AJ, Hayes PC, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in the management of portal hypertension. Gut. 2020;69(7):1173–1192. DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou TG, Aberer K, Abramczuk K, et al. Game-theoretic models of web credibility. Proceedings of the 2nd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality – WebQuality ‘12, 27. 2012. DOI:10.1145/2184305.2184312.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi M, Fink E, Carbonell JG. Detection of Internet scam using logistic regression. Conference Proceedings – IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2011. p. 2168–2172.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari G, Dobrina R, Buchini S, et al. The impact of personal protective equipment and social distancing on communication and relation between nurses, caregivers and children: a descriptive qualitative study in a maternal and child health hospital. J Clin Nurs. 2021. DOI:10.1111/jocn.15857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot-Seymour V, Wiseheart M. Judging the credibility of websites: an effectiveness trial of the spacing effect in the elementary classroom. Cogn Res Prin Impl. 2022;7(1):5. DOI:10.1186/s41235-022-00358-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majali T, Alsoud M, Yaseen H, et al. The effect of digital review credibility on Jordanian online purchase intention. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2022;6(3):973–982. DOI:10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.1.014.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel D, Rozman V, Liška A. Storage of cereals in warehouses with or without pesticides. Insects. 2020;11:12. DOI:10.3390/insects11120846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayport JF, Sviokla JJ. Exploiting the virtual value chain. Harv Bus Rev. 1995;73(6):75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre B, Pitt L, Berthon J-P, et al. Mapping the marketspace: evaluating industry web sites using correspondence analysis. J Strat Mark. 1997;5:233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Reyneke M. Luxury as the opposite of vulgarity: a trio of perspectives on luxury brands. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sist L, Palese A. Decision making process and missed nursing care: findings from a scoping review. Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca. 2020;39(4):188–200. DOI:10.1702/3508.34952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banasiak NC, Meadows-Oliver M. Evaluating asthma websites using the brief DISCERN instrument. J Asthma Allergy. 2017;10:191–196. DOI:10.2147/JAA.S133536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths KM, Christensen H. The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web. Med J Aust. 2002;176:S97–S104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Website quality indicators for consumers. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(5):e55. DOI:10.2196/jmir.7.5.e55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd S, Charnock D, Cook A. A 5-star system for rating the quality of information based on DISCERN. Health Info Libr J. 2002;19(4):201–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Provost M, Koompalum D, Dong D, et al. The initial development of the WebMedQual scale: domain assessment of the construct of quality of health web sites. Int J Med Inf. 2006;75(1):42–57. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Bar-Joseph Z. GCNG: graph convolutional networks for inferring gene interaction from spatial transcriptomics data. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):300. DOI:10.1186/s13059-020-02214-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt N, Carrera P. Systematic review of web sites for prospective medical tourists. Tourism Rev. 2011;66(1):57–67. DOI:10.1108/16605371111127224.
   Google Scholar
• Varghese JA, Patel AA, Joshi C, et al. Which resources are better: sales or scholarly? An assessment on the readability, quality, and technical features of online chemical peel websites. Aesthet Surg J. 2021;3(1):ojab008. DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojab008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce-Brand RA, Baker JF, Byrne DP, et al. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(6):1095–1100. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill SC, Baker JF, Fitzgerald C, et al. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the internet. Spine. 2014;39(10):E645–E649. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truumees D, Duncan A, Mayer EK, et al. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation. Spine Deform. 2020;8(6):1159–1167. DOI:10.1007/s43390-020-00156-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the internet. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:151–155. DOI:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00124-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy S, Rao PB. Epidural morphine in COVID ARDS patients with high respiratory drive: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):632. DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05570-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar