Aesthetic Experience and Empathy in Vasily Sesemann’s Phenomenological Aesthetics

Bibliography

• Botz-Bornstein, T. Vasily Sesemann: Experience, Formalism, and the Question of Being. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Broder, C. Philosophie der Kunst. Hanau: Clauss und Feddersen, 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, M. “Moritz Geiger on the Consciousness of Feelings.” Studia Phaenomenologica XV (2015): 375–393. doi:10.5840/studphaen20151519.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, J. “Introduction: The Phenomenological Tradition and Moral Philosophy.” In Phenomenological Approaches to Moral Philosophy, edited by J. Drummond and L. Embree, 1–15. Dordrecht, Kluwer: Academic Publishers, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fotti, V.M. Tracing Expression in Merleau-Ponty: Aesthetics, Philosophy of Biology, and Ontology. Northwestern University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. “Zum Problem der Stimmungseinfühlung bei Landschaften.” Zeitschrift f ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 6 (1911): 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Geniusas, S. “Vasily Sesemann’s Phenomenological Aesthetics.” Dialogue and Universalism 26, no. 3 (2016): 125–138. doi:10.5840/du201626346.
   Google Scholar
• Gerigk, H.-J. “Wer ist Broder Christiansen. Differenzqualität, Dominante und Objektsynthese: drei Schlüsselbegriffe seiner Philosophie der Kunst (1909).” In Figuration der Moderne, Sammelband 1–26. Heidelberg: Verlag Winter, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, N. Aestetics. Translated by Eugene Kelly. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, R. “Phenomenological Aesthetics: An Attempt at Defining Its Range.” The Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism 33, no. 3 (1975): 257–269. doi:10.1111/1540_6245.jaac33.3.0257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkus, D. “La fenomenología de la razón y la experiencia estética. Edmund Husserl y Vasily Sesemann.” Investigaciones Fenomenológicas no. 11 (2014): 129–142. doi:10.5944/rif.11.2014.29568.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkus, D. “Aesthetic a Priori and Embodied Imagination.” Social Imaginaries 5, no. 1 (2019): 143–160. doi:10.5840/si2019518.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkus, D. “Vasily Sesemann’s Theory of Knowledge, and Its Phenomenological Relevance.” In Early Phenomenology in Central and Eastern Europe. Main Figures, Ideas, and Problems, edited by W. Płotka and P. Eldridge, 93–110. Springer, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkus, D. “Critical Ontology and Critical Realism. The Responses of Nicolai Hartmann and Vasily Sesemann to Husserl’s Idealism.” In The Idealism-Realism Debate Among Edmund Husserl’s Early Followers and Critics, edited by R. Parker, 99–116. Springer, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkus, D. “Formalism and Phenomenology in Vasily Sesemann’s Aesthetics.” In Roman Ingarden and Our Times edited by D. Czakon, N. A. Michna, and L. Sosnowski, 45–62. Krakow: Akademicka Publishing, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, D.A. Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, T. Ästhetik: Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst. Hamburg-Leipzig: Voss, 1903.
   Google Scholar
• Salice, A. “Moritz Geiger.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Phenomenology of Emotion, edited by T. Szanto and H. Landweer, 87–95. London: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Scheler, M. The Nature of Sympathy. Translated by Peter Heath. London, New York: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schloßberger, M. “Phänomenologie der Naturerfahrung. Einfühlung und Einsfühlung mit der Natur bei Geiger und Scheler.” In Natur und Kosmos. Entwürfe der frühen Phänomenologie, Hans Rainer Sepp (Hrsg.), 55–75. Nordhausen, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. “Esteticheskaia ocenka v istorii iskusstva” [Aesthetic Valuation in History of Art]. Mysl’(Petrograd) no. 1 (1922): 117–147. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. “O Prirode Poeticheskogo obraza” [Nature of Poetic Image]. Lietuvos universiteto Humanitarinių mokslų fakulteto raštai no. 1 (1925): 423–481. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. “Iskusstvo i kul’tura.” [Art and Culture]. Versty 2 (1927): 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. “Review: Zugange zur Aesthetik. Moritz Geiger. Der neue Geist Verlag. 1928.” Evrazia no. 6 (1928): 3–4. in Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. “On the Nature of the Poetic Image.” In Vasily Sesemann: Experience, Formalism, and the Question of Being, Translated by Thorsten Botz-Bornstein, T. Botz-Bornstein, 103–109. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. Aesthetics. Translated by Mykolas Drunga, edited by Leonidas Donskis. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sesemann, V. “Aesthetic Valuation in History of Art.” In Selected Papers, Translated by Mykolas Drunga, 1–27. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• [Sesemann] Sezemanas, V. “Estetinių teorijų apžvalga.” In Ties grožio vertybėmis, 9–27. Kaunas: Sakalas, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• [Sesemann] Sezemanas, V. “Dvasinio grožio problema.” In Estetika, kultūros filosofija, filosofijos istorija, 95–97. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Vendrell Ferran, Í. Die Emotionen. Gefühle in der realistischen Phänomenologie. Berlin: Akademie, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Vendrell Ferran, Í. “Geiger and Wollheim on Expressive Properties and Expressive Perception.” Studi di Estetica 14, no. 2 (2019): 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Vendrell Ferran, Í. “On Liking and Enjoyment: Reassessing Geiger’s Account of Aesthetic Pleasure.” Metodo 8, no. 2 (2020): 207–232. doi:10.19079/metodo.8.2.207.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesing, L. Die Sichtbarkeit des Bildes. Geschichte und Perspektiven der Formalen ästhetik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. “Expression and Empathy.” In Folk Psychology Reassessed, edited by D. Hutto and M. Ratcliffe, 25–40. Springer, 2007.
   Google Scholar