Clovis Lifeways Set in Stone: The Contribution of Fluted-Point Morphological Variation

References

• Anderson, David G. 1990. “A North American Paleoindian Projectile Point Database.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 7: 67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, David G. 1990. “The Paleoindian Colonization of Eastern North America: A View from the Southeastern United States.” Early Paleoindian Economies of Eastern North America 5: 163–216.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. G. 1996. “Models of Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement in the Lower Southeast.” In The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, edited by D. G. Anderson and K. E. Sassaman, 29–57. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, David G., David Echeverry, D. Shane Miller, Stephen J. Yerka, Eric Kansa, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, Kelsey Noack Myers, et al. 2019. “Paleoindian Settlement in the Southeastern United States: The Role of Large Databases.” In Early Floridians: New Directions in the Search for and Interpretation of Florida’s Earliest Inhabitants, edited by David Thulman and Irv Garrison. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, David G., and Michael K. Faught. 1998. “The Distribution of Fluted Paleoindian Projectile Points: Update 1998.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 26: 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, David G., and Michael K. Faught. 2000. “Paleoindian Artifact Distributions: Evidence and Implications.” Antiquity 74 (285): 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00059846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, David G., D. Shane Miller, Stephen J. Yerka, J. Christopher Gillam, Erik N. Johanson, Derek T. Anderson, Albert C. Goodyear, and Ashley M. Smallwood. 2010. “PIDBA (Paleoindian Database of the Americas) 2010: Current Status and Findings.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 38: 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Charlotte, and George T. Jones. 2007. “Early Paleoarchaic Point Morphology and Chronology.” In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic? Great Basin Human Ecology at the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition, edited by Kelly E. Graf and Dave N. Schmitt, 23–41. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Charlotte, George T. Jones, and A. K. Taylor. 2019. “What’s Not Clovis? An Examination of Fluted Points in the Far West.” PaleoAmerica 5 (2): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1613145
   Google Scholar
• Bookstein, Fred L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., and P. J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A. 1982. “Flaked Stone Technology and Typology.” In The Agate Basin Site, edited by G. C. Frison and D. J. Standford, 181–208. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, B. A., M. B. Collins, and A. Hemmings. 2010. Clovis Technology. Archaeological Series 17. Ann Arbor, MI: International Monographs in Prehistory.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. W., A.E. kilby Spiess, R. A. Boisvert, and J. Boudreau. 2008. “What’s the Point? Modal Forms and Attributes of Paleoindian Bifaces in the New England-Maritimes Region.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 36: 119–172.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. 2005. “Cultural Transmission and Stone Tools: A Study of Early Paleoindian Technology in North America.” PhD diss. The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., B. Andrews, M. J. O'Brien, and M. I. Eren. 2018. “An Assessment of Stone Weapon Tip Standardization During the Clovis–Folsom Transition in the Western United States.” American Antiquity 83 (4): 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2018.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., B. Andrews, J. D. Kilby, and M. I. Eren. 2019. “Settling into the Country: Comparison of Clovis and Folsom Lithic Networks in Western North America Shows Increasing Redundancy of Toolstone Use.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 53:32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Briggs, and Mark Collard. 2007. “Investigating the Peopling of North America Through Cladistic Analyses of Early Paleoindian Projectile Points.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26 (3): 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., and M. Collard. 2010. “A geometric Morphometrics-Based Assessment of Blade Shape Differences Among Paleoindian Projectile Point Types from Western North America.” Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (2): 350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., M. Collard, M. J. Hamilton, and M. J. O’Brien. 2011. “Points and Prey: A Quantitative Test of the Hypothesis That Prey Size Influences Early Paleoindian Projectile Point Form.” Journal of Archaeological Science 38 (4): 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., M. I. Eren, M. T. Boulanger, and M. J. O'Brien. 2015. “Size, Shape, Scars, and Spatial Patterning: A Quantitative Assessment of Late Pleistocene (Clovis) Point Resharpening.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 3: 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.05.011
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Briggs, and M. J. Hamilton. 2009. “A Formal Test of the Origin of Variation in North American Early Paleoindian Projectile Points.” American Antiquity 74 (2): 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600048605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., and M. J. Hamilton. 2021. “Scaling Laws of Paleoindian Projectile Point Design.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 28: 580–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09481-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., J. D. Kilby, B. B. Huckell, M. J. O'Brien, and M. Collard. 2012. “A Morphometric Assessment of the Intended Function of Cached Clovis Points.” PLoS One 7 (2): e30530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., J. D. Kilby, J. M. LaBelle, T. A. Surovell, J. Holland-Lulewicz, and M. J. Hamilton. 2022. “Bayesian Modeling of the Clovis and Folsom Radiocarbon Records Indicates a 200-Year Multigenerational Transition.” American Antiquity 87 (3): 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2021.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., M. J. O'Brien, and M. Collard. 2014. “Continent-Wide or Region-Specific? A Geometric Morphometrics-Based Assessment of Variation in Clovis Point Shape.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6: 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., M. J. O'Brien, J. D. Kilby, B. B. Huckell, and M. Collard. 2012. “An Assessment of the Impact of Hafting on Paleoindian Point Variability.” PLoS One 7 (5): e36364. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, E. H. 1979. “The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition. A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts.” Archaeology of Eastern North America 7 (1): 1–180. In The Second International Work Seminar in Lithic Technology. Flintknappers’ Exchange (Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 21-22).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. B. 2007. “Discerning Clovis Subsistence from Stone Artifacts and Site Distributions on the Southern Plains Periphery.” In Foragers of the Terminal Pleistocene in North America, edited by R. B. Walker and B. N. Driskell, 59–87. Lincoln: University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dibble, H. L., and P. G. Chase. 1981. “A New Method for Describing and Analyzing Artifact Shape.” American Antiquity 46 (1): 178–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/279998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2004. “Understanding ‘Clovis’ Fluted Point Variability in the Northeast: A Perspective from the Debert Site, Nova Scotia.” Canadian Journal of Archaeology 28`: 205–253.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. J. 2019. “On the Reality of Gainey Points.” PaleoAmerica 5 (3): 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1591141
   Google Scholar
• Eren, Metin, and Adrienne Desjardine. 2015. “Flaked Stone Tools of Pleistocene Colonizers: Overshot Flaking at the Red Wing Site, Ontario.” In Clovis, On the Edge of a New Understanding, edited by Ashley M. Smallwood and Thomas A. Jennings, 109–120. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eren, Metin, David J. Meltzer, and Brian Andrews. 2018. “Is Clovis Technology Unique to Clovis?” PaleoAmerica 4: 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2018.1531277.
   Google Scholar
• Fiedel, S. J. 2022. “Initial Human Colonization of the Americas, Redux.” Radiocarbon 64 (4): 845–897. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2021.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flenniken, J. J., and A. W. Raymond. 1986. “Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis.” American Antiquity 51 (3): 603–614. https://doi.org/10.2307/281755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruciano, C. 2016. “Measurement Error in Geometric Morphometrics.” Development Genes and Evolution 226 (3): 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-016-0537-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-José, R., and J. Charlin. 2012. “Relative Importance of Modularity and Other Morphological Attributes on Different Types of Lithic Point Weapons: Assessing Functional Variations.” PLoS One 7 (10): e48009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. J. 2008. “Quantifying Clovis Dynamics: Confronting Theory with Models and Data Across Scales.” PhD diss. The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. J., and B. Buchanan. 2009. “The Accumulation of Stochastic Copying Errors Causes Drift in Culturally Transmitted Technologies: Quantifying Clovis Evolutionary Dynamics.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28 (1): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. J., B. Buchanan, B. B. Huckell, V. T. Holliday, M. S. Shackley, and M. E. Hill. 2013. “Clovis Paleoecology and Lithic Technology in the Central Rio Grande Rift Region, New Mexico.” American Antiquity 78 (2): 248–265. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.78.2.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, Jr C. V. 1964. “Fluted Projectile Points: Their Age and Dispersion: Stratigraphically Controlled Radiocarbon Dating Provides New Evidence on Peopling of the New World.” Science 145 (3639): 1408–1413. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3639.1408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. 2001. “Cultural Transmission and the Diffusion of Innovations: Adoption Dynamics Indicate That Biased Cultural Transmission is the Predominant Force in Behavioral Change.” American Anthropologist 103 (4): 992–1013. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.4.992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D. 1990. “The Clovis Point: Characteristics and Type Description.” Plains Anthropologist 35 (129): 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/2052546.1990.11909542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckell, B. B. 2007. “Clovis Lithic Technology: A View from the Upper San Pedro Valley.” In Murray Springs A Clovis Site with Multiple Activity Areas in the San Pedro Valley, Arizona, edited by C. V. Haynes and B. B. Huckell, 170–213. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huckell, B. B., and J. D. Kilby, eds. 2014. Clovis Caches: Recent Discoveries and new Research. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, T. A. 2013. “The Hogeye Clovis Cache, Texas: Quantifying Lithic Reduction Signatures.” Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (1): 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Robert L., and Lawrence C. Todd. 1988. “Coming Into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility.” American Antiquity 53 (2): 231–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/281017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilby, J. D. 2008. “An Investigation of Clovis Caches: Content, Function, and Technological Organization.” PhD diss. The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. A., K. Royal, and B. Buchanan. 2020. “Evaluating the Effects of Parallax in Archaeological Geometric Morphometric Analyses.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 12 (7): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01111-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. J. 1962. “The Paleo-Indian Tradition in Eastern North America.” Current Anthropology 3 (3): 227–278. https://doi.org/10.1086/200289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Oakes, W. J. 1959. “Relationship Between Plains Early Hunter and Eastern Archaic.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 49 (5): 146–156.
   Google Scholar
• McCuistion, A. 2013. “Promoting the Past: The Educational Applications of 3d Scanning Technology in Archaeology.” Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 29: 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. J. 1984. “Late Pleistocene Human Adaptations in Eastern North America.” PhD diss. University of Washington, Pullman.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. J. 2021. First Peoples in a New World: Populating Ice Age America. Cambridge: ambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. E. 1995. “Clovis Projectile Point Manufacture: A Perspective from the Ready/Lincoln Hills Site, 11JY46, Jersey County, Illinois.” Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 20 (2): 167–191.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. E. 2015. “Clovis-era Point Production in the Midcontinent.” In Clovis: On the Edge of a New Understanding, edited by Ashley M. Smallwood and Thomas Jennings, 83–107. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. E., and T. A. Morrow. 1999. “Geographic Variation in Fluted Projectile Points: A Hemispheric Perspective.” American Antiquity 64 (2): 215–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, J. E., and T. A. Morrow. 2002. “Exploring the Clovis-Gainey-Folsom Continuum: Technological and Morphological Variation in Midwestern Fluted Points.” In Folsom Technology and Lifeways, edited by J. E. Clarke and M. B. Collins, 141-157.New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, M. J., M. T. Boulanger, B. Buchanan, M. Collard, R. L. Lyman, and J. Darwent. 2014. “Innovation and Cultural Transmission in the American Paleolithic: Phylogenetic Analysis of Eastern Paleoindian Projectile-Point Classes.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 34: 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. J., and B. Buchanan. 2017. “Cultural Learning and the Clovis Colonization of North America.” Evolutionary Anthropology 26 (6): 270–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. J., J. Darwent, and R. L. Lyman. 2001. “Cladistics is Useful for Reconstructing Archaeological Phylogenies: Palaeoindian Points from the Southeastern United States.” Journal of Archaeological Science 28 (10): 1115–1136. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2001.0681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. J., and R. L. Lyman. 2002. “The Epistemological Nature of Archaeological Units.” Anthropological Theory 2 (1): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499602002001287
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, M. J., and R. L. Lyman. 2003. Cladistics and Archaeology. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prentiss, A. M., M. J. Walsh, R. R. Skelton, and M. Mattes. 2016. “Mosaic Evolution in Cultural Frameworks: Skateboard Decks and Projectile Points.” In Cultural Phylogenetics: Concepts and Applications in Archaeology, edited by L. M. Straffon, 113–130. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan, M., P. Skoglund, K. E. Graf, M. Metspalu, A. Albrechtsen, I. Moltke, S. Rasmussen. 2014. “Upper Palaeolithic Siberian Genome Reveals Dual Ancestry of Native Americans.” Nature 505 (7481): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F. James, and Leslie F. Marcus. 1993. “A Revolution in Morphometrics.” TREE 8 (4): 129–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondeau, Michael. 2015. “Fluted Point Studies in the Far West.” In Clovis: On the Edge of a New Understanding, edited by Ashley M. Smallwood and Thomas Jennings, 39–51. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruehl, Clifton B., and Thomas J. DeWitt. 2007. “Trophic Plasticity and Foraging Performances in Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus (Linnaeus).” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 349 (2): 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellet, F. 2018. “My Flute Is Bigger Than Yours: Nature and Causes of Technological Changes on the American Great Plains at the End of the Pleistocene.” In Lithic Technological Organization and Paleoenvironmental Change, edited by E. Robinson and F. Sellet. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shott, M. J. 2020. “Allometry and Resharpening in Experimental Folsom-Point Replicas: Analysis Using Inter-Landmark Distances.” Journal of Archaeological Method Theory 27 (2): 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-019-09437-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shott, M. J., J. P. Williams, and A. M. Slade. 2021. “Measuring Allometry in Dimensions of Western North American Clovis Points.” Journal of Archaeological Science 131: 105359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, Alan. 2010. “Clovis: What’s the Point? A Study in Thick-Bodied and Thin-Bodied Fluted Point Variatbility.” MA thesis. University of Southampton, Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Slade, Alan. 2020. The Influence of Lithic Raw Material Selection on Regional Morphological Variability of Clovis Fluted Points. BAR International Series S2962, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M. 2010. “Clovis Biface Technology at the Topper Site, South Carolina: Evidence for Variation and Technological Flexibility.” Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (10): 2413–2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M. 2012. “Clovis Technology and Settlement in the American Southeast: Using Biface Analysis to Evaluate Dispersal Models.” American Antiquity 77 (4): 689–713. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.77.4.689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M., T. A. Jennings, C. D. Pevny, and D. G. Anderson. 2019. “Paleoindian Projectile-Point Diversity in the American Southeast: Evidence for the Mosaic Evolution of Point Design.” PaleoAmerica 5 (3): 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1600343
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood, A. M., T. Jennings, H. L. Smith, C. D. Pevny, M. R. Waters, T. J. Loebel, J. Lambert, J. Ray, and D. Stephens. 2022. “Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton.” American Antiquity 87 (3): 544–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L. 2010. “A Behavioral Analysis of Clovis Point Morphology Using Geometric Morphometrics.” MA thesis. Texas A&M University, College Station.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L. 2012. “Geometric Morphometrics and the Effects of Raw Material Quality on Clovis Point Shape.” Current Research in the Pleistocene 28: 83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., and T. Goebel. 2018. “Origins and Spread of Fluted-Point Technology in the Canadian Ice-Free Corridor and Eastern Beringia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (16): 4116–4121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800312115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., T. A. Jennings, and A. M. Smallwood. 2021. “Do Early Paleoindian Point Blades Carry Culturally Significant Shape Information? Modules Versus Complete Points Using Geometric Morphometrics.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 40: 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103245
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., T. A. Jennings, and A. M. Smallwood. 2022. "The Third Dimension of Stone Points: 2D vs. 3D Geometric Morphometric Shape Analysis." Paper presented at the 78th Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference. Little Rock, AR.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., S. Kuzminsky, and A. Linderholm. 2020. “Discerning Dispersals Along the Pacific and Interior Corridors: Contributions of Geometric Morphometrics to the Peopling of the Americas.” PaleoAmerica 6 (1): 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1696149
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L., A. M. Smallwood, and T. J. DeWitt. 2015. “A Geometric Morphometric Exploration of Clovis Fluted-Point Shape Variability.” In Clovis: On the Edge of a New Understanding, edited by Ashley M. Smallwood and Thomas Jennings, 161–180. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tankersley, K. B. 1989. “Late Pleistocene Lithic Exploitation and Human Settlement in the Midwestern United States.” PhD diss. Indiana University, Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Tankersley, K. B. 1994. “The Effects of Stone and Technology on Fluted-Point Morphometry.” American Antiquity 59 (3): 498–510. https://doi.org/10.2307/282462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulman, D. K., M. J. Shott, A. M. Slade, and J. P. Williams. 2023. “Clovis Point Allometry, Modularity, and Integration: Exploring Shape Variation Due to Tool use with Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics.” PLoS One 18 (8): e0289489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, M. R., and T. A. Jennings. 2015. The Hogeye Clovis Cache. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M. R., C. D. Pevny, D. L. Carlson, and T. A. Jennings. 2011. Clovis Lithic Technology: Investigation of a Stratified Workshop at the Gault Site, Texas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M. R., T. W. Stafford Jr, and D. L. Carlson. 2020. “The Age of Clovis – 13,050 to 12,750 cal yr B.P..” Science Advances 6 (43): eaaz0455. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz0455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wernick, C. D. 2015. “Clovis Points on Flakes: A Technological Variation Seen in Long Distance Lithic Transport.” Plains Anthropologist 60 (235): 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1179/2052546X15Y.0000000004
   Google Scholar
• Willey, G. R., and P. Phillips. 1955. “Method and Theory in American Archeology II: Historical-Developmental Interpretation.” American Anthropologist 57 (4): 723–819. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1955.57.4.02a00060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P. 2018. “Fluted Hafted Bifaces in the Northeast and Clovis: A North America Wide Perspective Using Image Analysis.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 18: 386–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.01.033
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., and R. M. Niquette. 2019. “Changes in Hafted Biface Resharpening During the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene in the Central and Southeastern United States.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 25: 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.014
   Google Scholar
• Witthoft, J. 1954. “A Note on Fluted Point Relationships.” American Antiquity 19 (3): 271–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/277132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormington, H. M. 1953. “Origins: Indigenous Period.” Program of the History of America 1, No. 1. Mexico D. F., Instituto Panamericano de Geografia e His.
   Google Scholar
• Wormington, H. M. 1957. “Ancient Man in North America. Denver Museum of Natural History.” Popular Series 4: 322.
   Google Scholar