(Still) Educating design thinking

References

• Addison, Nicholas, and Lesley Burgess. Learning to Teach Art and Design in the Secondary School. London: Routledge Falmer, 2000.10.4324/978020344795610.1162/DESI_a_0016510.5040/978147429388410.1162/07479360175035719610.1162/0747936015210379610.2307/377443510.1162/desi.2010.26.1.1510.1353/hcy.2017.003410.2307/988449
   Google Scholar
• Addison, Nicholas, and Lesley Burgess. Issues in Art and Design Teaching. London: Routledge Falmer, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Aicher, Otl. The World as Design: Writings of Design. Berlin: Wiley, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, Felicity. Education. London; Cambridge, Mass: Whitechapel Gallery; MIT Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, Herbert, Walter Gropius, and I. Gropius. Bauhaus: Weimar 1919–25 Dessau 1925–28. Boston, MA: Branford, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28, no. 3 (2012): 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Tim. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review. Boston, MA, 2008. Accessed June 10, 2017. http://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking/
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Richard. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8, no. 2 (1992): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. West. “Guest Editorial: Wicked Problems.” Management Science 14, no. 4 (1967): B141-B142.
   Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. West, Jean-Pierre Protzen, Melvin M. Webber, and David Krogh. “In Memoriam: Horst W.J. Rittel.” Design Issues 23, no. 1 (2007): 89–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science.” Design Issues 17, no. 3 (2001): 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. Design Thinking. English. London: Berg, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel, and Ernest Edmonds. Expertise in Design: Design Thinking Research Symposium 6. Design Thinking Research. Sydney, UTS: Creativity and Cognition Studios, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Findeli, Alain. “Rethinking Design Education for the 21st Century: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Discussion.” Design Issues 17, no. 1 (2001): 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illich 1926–2002, and Ivan. Tools for Conviviality. London: Calder and Boyars (1973).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Edgar. “The Arts and Crafts: Reactionary or Progressive?” Record / Princeton University, Art Museum / Art Museum Princeton, NJ. 34, no. 2 (1975): 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. “Beyond Design Thinking: Design-as-Practice and Designs-in-Practice.” In CRESC (p. 15). Manchester, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Klee, P. Pedagogical Sketchbook. Faber Paper Covered ed. London: Faber & Faber, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, Jon. “Sensemaking and Framing: A Theoretical Reflection on Perspective in Design Synthesis.” 2010 Design Research Society Conference (2010): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, Jon. “Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis.” Design Issues 26, no. 1 (2010): 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolko, Jon. “Unveiling the Magic of Design: The Role of Synthesis.” Rotman Magazine Winter (2011): 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, Jon. “Design Thinking Comes of Age.” Harvard Business Review 93, no. 9 (2015): 66–71. doi:10.1023/A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, Herbert, Egon Chemaitis, Michael Erlhoff, Sibille Riemann, Helmut Staubach, and David Britt. “Ulm Design.” In The Morality of Objects, edited by Herbert Linder. Cambridge, Massachesetts: MIT Press, 1991, 287 p.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, E., and J. A. Miller. The ABCs of [Triangle, Square, Circle]: The Bauhaus and Design Theory. London: Thames and Hudson, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Roger L. The Design of Business. Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Bruce. “Design Thinking Is a Failed Experiment. So What’s Next?” Fastcodesign (2011). Accessed May 21, 2017. https://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-a-failed-experiment-so-whats-next
   Google Scholar
• Ogata, Amy F. “Architecture in Play: Intimations of Modernism in Architectural Toys by Tamar Zinguer (review).” The Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth 10, no. 2 (2017): 283–285.
   Google Scholar
• Plattner, Hasso, Christoph Meinel, and Larry Leifer. Design Thinking: Understand Improve Apply. Edited by Hasso Plattner, Christoph Meinel, and Larry Leifer. Berlin: Springer, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• RCA. Design in General Education Department of Design Research. London: Royal College of Art, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, Horst W. J., and M. M. Webber. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4, no. 2 (1973): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N. Convivial Design Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. Edited by Pieter Jan author Stappers. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. The Sciences of the Artificial. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Tekinbas, Katie Salen. The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Stuart. “The ‘Gifts’ of Friedrich Froebel.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 26, no. 4 (1967): 238–241.
   Google Scholar