The lesser of two evils: Approaching trust with Bourdieu’s habitus

References

• Alpar, İ, & Yener, S. (1991). Gecekondu Araştırması. Sosyal Planlama Başkanlığı. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=DPa7AAAAIAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Arese, N. S. (2018). Urbanism as craft: Practicing informality and property in Cairo's gated suburbs, from theft to virtue. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(3), 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1386541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, I., & Gill, S. (2003). Ontology, method, and hypotheses. In I. Bakker, & S. Gill (Eds.), Power, production and social reproduction: Human In/security in the globally political economy (pp. 17–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, U. (2011). The enclosure of urban space and consolidation of the capitalist land regime in turkish cities. Urban Studies, 48(10), 2162–2179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010380958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnskov, C. (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130(1-2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9069-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, W. (2010). Intersubjectivity and bourdieusian approaches to ‘identity’. Cultural Sociology, 4(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975509356750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00174048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital (R. Nice, Trans.). In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education (pp. 46–58). Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology (M. Adamson, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2005). Habitus. In J. Hillier, & E. Rooksby (Eds.), Habitus: A sense of place (pp. 43–53). Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Chartier, R. (2015). The sociologist and the historian [Le sociologue et l’historien]. (D. Fernbach, Trans.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. L., Early, E. A., & Schulthies, B. (2014). Everyday Life in the Muslim Middle East (3rd ed.). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, J., & Laslett, B. (1986). Social reproduction and the family. In U. Himmelstrand (Ed.), Sociology: From crisis to science? Vol. 2 The social reproduction of organization and culture (pp. 116–131). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cabannes, Y. (1997). From community development to housing finance: From mutiroesto casa melhorin fortaleza, brazil. Environment and Urbanization, 9(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789700900106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, H.-K., Lam, K.-C. J., & Liu, P.-W. (2011). The structure of trust in China and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0700-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. S. (2007). Trade, social values, and the generalized trust. Southern Economic Journal, 73(3), 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2007.tb00799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coban, C. (2013). Different periods of internal migration in Turkey from the perspective of development. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(10), 58–65. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_10_October_2013/9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contractor, A., & Greenlee, A. J. (2018). Up-“Routing” communities: Subaltern voices challenge sustainable urban renewal in fortaleza, Brazil. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2017.1284155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, C., Burke, C., & Murphy, M. (2019). Capturing habitus: Theory, method and reflexivity. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1420771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A. (2012). “Mongrel city”: Cosmopolitan neighbourliness in a Delhi squatter settlement. Antipode, 44(3), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00928.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwardt, L., Wittek, R., & Wielers, R. (2012). Talking about the boss. Group & Organization Management, 37(4), 521–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112450607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erder, S. (1996). İstanbul'a Bir Kent Kondu: Ümraniye [A City Happened Upon Istanbul: Ümraniye]. İletişim Yayıncılık A. Ş.
   Google Scholar
• Erder, S. (1999). Where do you hail from?: Localism and networks in Istanbul (Ç. Keyder, Ed. & Trans.); Istanbul: Between the global and the local (pp. 161–171). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ergun, A., & Erdemir, A. (2010). Negotiating insider and outsider identities in the field: “Insider” in a foreign land; “outsider” in one’s own land. Field Methods, 22(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09349919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. (1996). Women and the housing environment. Environment and Behavior, 28(6), 764–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659602800603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. (1997). Squatter (gecekondu) housing versus apartment housing: Turkish rural-to-urban migrant residents’ perspectives. Habitat International, 21(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(96)00048-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T. (2011). Understanding The experiences Of The politics Of urbanization In Two gecekondu (squatter) neighborhoods under Two urban regimes: Ethnography in the urban periphery Of Ankara, Turkey. Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development, 40(1/2), 67–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41291338.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, T. (2019). From informal housing to apartment housing: Exploring the ‘new social’ in a gecekondu rehousing project, Turkey. Housing Studies, 34(3), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1458293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, T., & Hatiboglu, B. (2017). Rendering responsible, provoking desire: Women and home in squatter/slum renewal projects in the Turkish context. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(9), 1283–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1382448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, S. (2008). Canadian contributions to social reproduction feminism, race and embodied labor. Race, Gender & Class, 15(1/2), 42–57. www.jstor.org/stable/41675357.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2017). Crisis of care? On the social-reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In T. Bhattacharya (Ed.), Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression (pp. 21–36). Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, M. (2014). Relational trust: Outline of a Bourdieusian theory of interpersonal trust. Journal of Trust Research, 4(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2014.966829
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gago-Cortes, C., & Novo-Corti, I. (2015). Inclusive policies of housing through slum clearance municipal actuation: The relocation of the slum dwellers in culleredo (galicia, Spain). Gestion Y Politica Publica, 24(1), 131–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiani, S., Gertler, P. J., Undurraga, R., Cooper, R., Martínez, S., & Ross, A. (2017). Shelter from the storm: Upgrading housing infrastructure in Latin American slums. Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, B. (2019). Attending to the importance of context: Trust as a process in global microfinance. Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2019.1566073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmasi, M., & Prorok, C. V. (2002). Women's migration and quality of life in Turkey. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 33(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00020-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakayali, N. (2004). Reading bourdieu with adorno. Sociology, 38(2), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504040869
   Google Scholar
• Karpat, K. H. (2004). The genesis of the gecekondu: Rural migration and urbanization (1976). European Journal of Turkish Studies, 1. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.54
   Google Scholar
• Keyder, Ç. (2000). Liberalization from above and the future of the informal sector: Land, shelter, and informality in the periphery. In F. Tabak, & M. A. Crichlow (Eds.), Informalization: Process and structure (pp. 119–132). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khodyakov, D. (2007). Trust as a process. Sociology, 41(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072285
   Google Scholar
• Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.002121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. S. (2021). Trust in context: Problematizing trust(ing) in Turkey among rural-to-urban migrant women [PhD Dissertation]. Bilkent University. http://hdl.handle.net/11693/55126.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, J. S., & Hoard, P. R. (2020). A tale of two fears: Negotiating trust and neighborly relations in urbanizing Turkey. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 28(3), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1730161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancilla, A. (2017). Shanty towns as an expression of the right of necessity. Revista De Ciencia Politica, 37(3), 755–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McEvily, B. (2011). Reorganizing the boundaries of trust: From discrete alternatives to hybrid forms. Organization Science, 22(5), 1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. S., & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, V. M. (2004). Patriarchy in transition: Women and the changing family in the Middle East. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.35.2.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllering, G. (2013). Process views of trusting and crises. In R. Bachmann, & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of advances in trust research (pp. 285–305). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Nannestad, P. (2008). What have We learned about generalized trust, If anything? Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures, and figures. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, E. A. (1982). Duofocal family structure. In Ç Kağıtçıbaşı (Ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey (pp. 33–72). Indiana University Turkish Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pinarcioğlu, M., & Işik, O. (2008). Not only helpless but also hopeless: Changing dynamics of urban poverty in Turkey, the case of sultanbeyli, Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 16(10), 1353–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310802420060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (2004). ‘It's all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000236934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Introduction: Social capital in scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.t01-1-00077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So different after All: A cross-discipline view Of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D., Bernal, D., & Lees, M. (2020). An exploratory factor analysis model for slum severity index in Mexico City. Urban Studies, 57(4), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019869769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarıoğlu, E. (2013). Gendering the organization of home-based work in Turkey: Classical versus familial patriarchy. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(5), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siisiäinen, M. (2000, July 5–8, 2000). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam. ISTR fourth international conference - “The third sector: For what and for whom?”, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Six, F., Nooteboom, B., & Hoogendoorn, A. (2010). Actions that build interpersonal trust: A relational signalling perspective. Review of Social Economy, 68(3), 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760902756487
   Google Scholar
• Soytemel, E. (2013). The power of the powerless: Neighbourhood based self-help networks of the poor in Istanbul. Women's Studies International Forum, 41, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, P. (1999). Cause, knowledge and change turkish village revisited. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin, 23(1), 24–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43384715.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, P. (1964). Encounters with Istanbul: Urban peasants and village peasants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 208. doi:10.1177/002071526400500207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar