A review of experimental research on organizational trust

References

• Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114547952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., Brown, T. C., & Carvajal, F. (2004). Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1108–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alós-Ferrer, C., & Farolfi, F. (2019). Trust games and beyond. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., Ellsworth, P. C., Carlsmith, J. M., & Gonzales, M. H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology (2 ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, B., Morse, L., & Iorio, A. (2019). The valley of trust: The effect of relational strength on monitoring quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Aviram, H. (2012). What would you do? Conducting web-based factorial vignette surveys. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp. 463–473). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, M. D., van der Werff, L., Colquitt, J. A., Rodell, J. B., Zipay, K. P., & Buckley, F. (2018). Trusting the “look and feel”: Situational normality, situational aesthetics, and the perceived trustworthiness of organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1718–1740. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D. (2015). Cooperative networks: Altruism, group solidarity, reciprocity, and sanctioning in Ugandan producer organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 355–395. https://doi.org/10.1086/682418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(8), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrera, D. (2008). The social mechanisms of trust. Sociologica, 2(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.2383/27728
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048016
   Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A., Lucas, J., Schilke, O., & Aeon, B. (2022). Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.284
   Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A., Lucas, J. W., & Schilke, O. (2018). Institutions under a microscope: Experimental methods in institutional theory (pp. 147-167).
   Google Scholar
• Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y.-R. (2011). What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organization Science, 22(4), 1040–1060. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnet, I., Greig, F., Herrmann, B., & Zeckhauser, R. (2008). Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. American Economic Review, 98(1), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolinger, M. T., Josefy, M. A., Stevenson, R., & Hitt, M. A. (2022). Experiments in strategy research: A critical review and future research opportunities. Journal of Management, 48(1), 77–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211044416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2004). How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Science, 50(11), 1587–1602. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottom, W., Gibson, K., Daniels, S., & Murnighan, J. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.497.7816
   Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2009). How different types of participant payments alter task performance. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. (1985). Experimental research and social policy: Must it be rigor versus relevance? Journal of Social Issues, 41(4), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brülhart, M., & Usunier, J.-C. (2012). Does the trust game measure trust? Economics Letters, 115(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, S., Nutefall, J., & Bridges, L. (2012). “We thought it might encourage participation.” Using lottery incentives to improve LibQUAL+™ response rates among students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2020). The diversity-uncertainty-valence (DUV) model of generalized trust development. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, G. F., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1985). Using vignettes in business ethics research. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 7, 279–293.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A. K., Findley, M., Jensen, N. M., Meier, S., & Nielson, D. (2016). Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshin, A., Amit, A., & van Kleef, G. A. (2018). The interpersonal effects of emotion intensity in customer service: Perceived appropriateness and authenticity of attendants’ emotional displays shape customer trust and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, R. Y. J., Morris, M. W., & Mor, S. (2012). Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cojuharenco, I., & Karelaia, N. (2020). When leaders ask questions: Can humility premiums buffer the effects of competence penalties? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Miller, T., & Devers, C. E. (2012). Under a cloud of suspicion: Trust, distrust, and their interactive effect in interorganizational contracting. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., & Cooper, R. M. (2003). Experimental studies of cooperation, trust and social exchange. In E. Ostrom & J. Walker (Eds.), Trust, reciprocity and gains from association: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research (pp. 277–333). Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610444347.7
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., & Yamagishi, T. (2008). A defense of deception on scientific grounds. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250807100303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. C. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00119-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 49–72). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., Schminke, M., De Schutter, L., & Stouten, J. (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1335–1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, B. A., Gillespie, N., Williamson, I., & Gill, C. (2021). Trust consensus within culturally diverse teams: A multistudy investigation. Journal of Management, 47(8), 2135–2168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320943658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, B. A., Kroon, D. P., & Schilke, O. (2017). The future of organizational trust research: A content-analytic synthesis of scholarly recommendations and review of recent developments. In P. A. M. Van Lange, B. Rockenbach, & T. Yamagishi (Eds.), Trust in social dilemmas (pp. 173–194). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2011). In money we trust? The use of financial compensations to repair trust in the aftermath of distributive harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano, G., & Gutierrez, C. (2019). Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 17(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018803840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stefano, G., & Gutierrez, C. (2019). Under a magnifying glass: On the use of experiments in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 17(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018803840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, E. S. (2011). Economics versus psychology experiments. In A. Lupia, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & J. N. Druckman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 58–70). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review, 35(5), 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480610682299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., & Cooper, C. D. (2011). Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. R., Ruedy, N. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2012). It hurts both ways: How social comparisons harm affective and cognitive trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90046-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, D. (2017). Field experiments in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062400
   Google Scholar
• Falk, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science, 326(5952), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.18.12809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001008
   Google Scholar
• Fréchette, G. (2015). Laboratory experiments: Professionals versus students. In G. R. Frechette, & A. Schotter (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economic methodology (pp. 360–390). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, C. A., & Ostroff, C. (2021). Trust conceptualizations across levels of analysis. In N. Gillespie, C. A. Fulmer, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Understanding trust in organizations: A multilevel perspective (pp. 14–41). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to Fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2008). Blinded by anger or feeling the love: How emotions influence advice taking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Wall, T. D. (2009). The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 653–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108320737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, S., Gillespie, N., Searle, R., Hope Hailey, V., & Dietz, G. (2021). Preserving organizational trust during disruption. Organization Studies, 42(9), 1409–1433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620912705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack, P., Schilke, O., & Zucker, L. G. (2021). Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. Journal of Management Studies., 58(3), 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanel, P. H. P., & Vione, K. C. (2016). Do student samples provide an accurate estimate of the general public? PloS One, 11(12), e0168354–e0168354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, D. J., Kim, P. H., & Mayer, K. J. (2015). Breaking the letter vs. spirit of the law: How the interpretation of contract violations affects trust and the management of relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2020). Getting to less: When negotiating harms post-agreement performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. S., Bartol, K. M., Tesluk, P. E., & Langa, G. A. (2009). Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: Influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtz, B. C. (2015). From first impression to fairness perception: Investigating the impact of initial trustworthiness beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 499–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Gino, F., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. S., & Budesheim, T. L. (2004). How jurors use and misuse character evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. E., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Implicit effects of justice on self-identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. A., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2018). Building trust by tearing others down: When accusing others of unethical behavior engenders trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keren, G. (2007). Framing, intentions, and trust–choice incompatibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2013). Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. External attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, J. J., & Mercer, M. (2009). Selection neglect in mutual fund advertisements. Management Science, 55(7), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, M. A., Roberson, L., & Rymph, R. D. (1998). What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on managers’ interactional fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/256728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugler, T., Bornstein, G., Kocher, M. G., & Sutter, M. (2007). Trust between individuals and groups: Groups are less trusting than individuals but just as trustworthy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfred, C. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, S. G., Miller, G. J., & Zenger, T. R. (2008). Dealing with the paradox of embeddedness: The role of contracts and trust in facilitating movement out of committed relationships. Organization Science, 19(5), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBel, E. P., Berger, D., Campbell, L., & Loving, T. J. (2017). Falsifiability is not optional. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P. (1987). Associative effects of information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25(2), 85–86. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330291
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1086/209174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2015). Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, E. E., & Wald, K. A. (2020). Fibbing about your feelings: How feigning happiness in the face of personal hardship affects trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156, 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H., Sia, C. L., Lee, M. K. O., & Benbasat, I. (2006). Do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonati, S., Quiroga, B. F., Zehnder, C., & Antonakis, J. (2018). On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 64(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Lount, R. B., Zhong, C.-B., Sivanathan, N., & Murnighan, J. (2008). Getting off on the wrong foot: The timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1601–1612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208324512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, J. W. (2003). Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumineau, F. (2017). How contracts influence trust and distrust. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1553–1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314556656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70(3), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, F., Möllering, G., & Saunders, M. (2015). Introduction. Researching trust: The ongoing challenge of matching objectives and methods. In Handbook of research methods on trust (pp. 1–22). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, F., Möllering, G., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). Handbook of research methods on trust, (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(3), 534–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1997). The second face of trust: Reflections on the dark side of interpersonal trust in organizations. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6, 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, C. G. (1972). Social motivation—a set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17(5), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830170505
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, J. C., Summers, J. K., & Moore, K. (2014). The effect of facial piercing on perceptions of job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., Radzevick, J. R., & Weber, R. A. (2012). Whom do you distrust and how much does it cost? An experiment on the measurement of trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
   Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., Weber, R., Bicchieri, C., & Ho, V. (2002). Can groups be trusted? An experimental study of collective trust. Handbook of Trust Research.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S., Stephenson, M., & Perkowski, P. (2019). Culture of trust and division of labor in nonhierarchical teams. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1171–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellewigt, T., Thomas, A., Weller, I., & Zajac, E. J. (2017). Alliance or acquisition? A mechanisms-based, policy-capturing analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2353–2369. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mislin, A. A., Campagna, R. L., & Bottom, W. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooijman, M., van Dijk, W. W., van Dijk, E., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Leader power, power stability, and interpersonal trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 152, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments (STU (Student edition ed.). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayachi, K., & Watabe, M. (2005). Restoring trustworthiness after adverse events: The signaling effects of voluntary “hostage posting” on trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naquin, C. E., & Paulson, G. D. (2003). Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T., Shockley, E., & Schilke, O. (2016). The “dark side” of institutional trust (pp. 177–192).
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R. (1975). The impact of supervisory characteristics on goal acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/255677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parco, J. E., Rapoport, A., & Stein, W. E. (2002). Effects of financial incentives on the breakdown of mutual trust. Psychological Science, 13(3), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piff, P., Kraus, M., Côté, S., Cheng, B., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitesa, M., Goh, Z., & Thau, S. (2018). Mandates of dishonesty: The psychological and social costs of mandated attitude expression. Organization Science, 29(3), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2019). Experimental designs in management and leadership research: Strengths, limitations, and recommendations for improving publishability. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.31.4.621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, A., Sagy, Y., & Derfler-Rozin, R. (2008). Logos and initial compliance: A strong case of mindless trust. Organization Science, 19(6), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimann, M., Hüller, C., Schilke, O., & Cook, K. S. (2022). Impression management attenuates the effect of ability on trust in economic exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30), e2118548119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118548119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reypens, C., & Levine, S. S. (2017). To grasp cognition in action, combine behavioral experiments with protocol analysis. In R. J. Galavan, K. J. Sund, & G. P. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Methodological challenges and advances in managerial and organizational cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 123–146). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S. L., Sah, S., Dweik, R., Schmidt, C., Mercer, M., Mitchum, A., Kattan, M., Karafa, M., & Robertson, C. (2021). Patient responses to physician disclosures of industry conflicts of interest: A randomized field experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Ross, W. H., & Wieland, C. (1996). Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Conflicted advice and second opinions: Benefits, but unintended consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah, S., Malaviya, P., & Thompson, D. (2018). Conflict of interest disclosure as an expertise cue: Differential effects due to automatic versus deliberative processing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 147, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabram, K., Robinson, S. L., & Cruz, K. S. (2018). Honor among thieves: The interaction of team and member deviance on trust in the team. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., & Cook, K. S. (2013). A cross–level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012472096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., & Huang, L. (2018). Worthy of swift trust? How brief interpersonal contact affects trust accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(11), 1181–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Levine, S. S., Kacperczyk, O., & Zucker, L. G. (2019). Call for papers-special issue on experiments in organizational theory. Organization Science, 30(1), 232–234. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1257
   Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., & Lumineau, F. (2018). The double-edged effect of contracts on alliance performance. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2827–2858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316655872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2013). Effect of relationship experience on trust recovery following a breach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(38), 15236–15241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314857110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(42), 12950–12955. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517057112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2021). Trust in social relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-082120-082850
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Hershey, J. C., & Bradlow, E. T. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Ho, T.-H., & Zhang, X. (2018). How monitoring influences trust: A tale of two faces. Management Science, 64(1), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., & Luellen, J. K. (2005). Quasi-experimental designs. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.10020470013192.bsa521.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, R. H., & Swaminathan, V. (2008). Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. M. (1998). Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Science, 44(4), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.4.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniezek, J. A., & Van Swol, L. M. (2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke, F. A., & Notz, W. W. (1981). Pre- and post-intervention effects of conventional versus final offer arbitration. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 832–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/256180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the world wide web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. J. (2006). How hypertext links influence consumer perceptions to build and degrade trust online. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone-Romero, E. F. (2011). Research strategies in industrial and organizational psychology: Nonexperimental, quasi-experimental, and randomized experimental research in special purpose and nonspecial purpose settings. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Apa handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 1: Building and developing the organization (pp. 37–72). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., Vieider, F. M., Patil, S. V., & Grant, A. M. (2013). Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzieropoulos, H. (2013). The trust game in neuroscience: A short review. Social Neuroscience, 8(5), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.832375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werff, L., Legood, A., Buckley, F., Weibel, A., & de Cremer, D. (2019). Trust motivation: The self-regulatory processes underlying trust decisions. Organizational Psychology Review, 9(2-3), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386619873616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijke, M., De Cremer, D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. (2018). Ranking low, feeling high: How hierarchical position and experienced power promote prosocial behavior in response to procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijke, M., Mayer, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2010). The role of authority power in explaining procedural fairness effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, L. (2009). 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Murnighan, J. K. (2017). The dynamics of punishment and trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1385–1402. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, L., & Bauman, C. W. (2019). The cognitive and behavioral impact of promotion and prevention contracts on trust in repeated exchanges. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, M. B., & Navarro, D. J. (2012). Seeing is believing: Priors, trust, and base rate neglect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2020). A nonverbal signal of trustworthiness: An evolutionarily relevant model. Journal of Trust Research, 10(2), 134–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2021.1922912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Hashimoto, H., Horita, Y., Miura, A., Inukai, K., Tanida, S., Kiyonari, T., Takagishi, H., & Simunovic, D. (2013). Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Zhang, Z.-X., Brett, J., & Murnighan, J. K. (2017). Understanding the trust deficit in China: Mapping positive experience and trust in strangers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, J. A., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2016). Mad and misleading: Incidental anger promotes deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239. doi:10.2307/2393957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar