The Objective Value of Subjective Value in project design negotiations

References

• Austin-Breneman, J., Yu, B. and Yang, M. (2014) Biased information passing between subsystems over time in complex system design, in ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K. and Mohammed, S. (2007) Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign, 3(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/15710880601170768
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. and Carroll, J. (1987) Negotiator cognition. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. and Neale, M. (1992) Negotiating Rationally, Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M., Magliozzi, T. and Neale, M. (1985) Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(3), 294–313. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90026-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M., Curhan, J., Moore, D. and Valley, K. (2000) Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 279–314. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky, C. and McGinn, K. (2010) Perspective—open to negotiation: phenomenological assumptions and knowledge dissemination. Organization Science, 21(3), 781–797. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blount, S. and Larrick, R. (2000) Framing the game: examining frame choice in bargaining. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(1), 43–71. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenger, C., Haymaker, J. and Ehrich, A. (2013) Design exploration assessment methodology: testing the guidance of design processes. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(3), 165–184. Empirical studies of designer thinking: past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(2). doi: 10.1080/09544828.2012.698256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curhan, J. and Brown, A. (2011) Parallel and divergent predictors of objective and subjective value in negotiation, in Cameron, K. and Spreitzer, G. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship, Oxford University Press, New York, 579–590.
   Google Scholar
• Curhan, J., Elfenbein, H. and Xu, H. (2006) What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 493–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curhan, J., Elfenbein, H. and Kilduff, G. (2009) Getting off on the right foot: subjective value versus economic value in predicting longitudinal job outcomes from job offer negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 524–534. doi: 10.1037/a0013746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curhan, J., Elfenbein, H. and Eisenkraft, N. (2010) The objective value of subjective value: a multi-round negotiation study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 690–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Andy (2005) The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies, 26(5), 445–461. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drolet, A. and Morris, M. (2000) Rapport in conflict resolution: accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1), 26–50. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, H., Curhan, J., Eisenkraft, N., Shirako, A. and Baccaro, L. (2008) Are some negotiators better than others? Individual differences in bargaining outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1463–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M., Moye, N. and Friedman, R. (2008) The lingering effects of the recruitment experience on the long-term employment relationship. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1(3), 246–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00015.x
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, S., Smith-Jentsch, K., Salas, E., Warner, N. and Letsky, M. (2010) Towards an understanding of macrocognition in teams: developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(4), 250–271. doi: 10.1080/14639221003729128
   Google Scholar
• Flager, F., Gerber, D. and Kallman, B. (2014) Measuring the impact of scale and coupling on solution quality for building design problems. Design Studies, 35(2), 180–199. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuno, M. and Ohbuchi, K. (1997) Cognitive biases in negotiation: the determinants of fixed-pie assumption and fairness bias. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 13(1), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M., Major, V., Raver, J., Nishii, L. and O’Brien, K. (2006) Negotiating relationally: the dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 427–451. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. (1994) Attribution and interpersonal perception, in Tesser, A. (ed.) Advanced Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 99–147.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, N., Shah, J. and Smith, S. (2007) Cognitive models of design ideation, in ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschi, N. and Frey, D. (2002) Cognition and complexity: an experiment on the effect of coupling in parameter design. Research in Engineering Design, 13(3), 123–131. doi: 10.1007/s00163-002-0011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda, T., Ciucci, F., Lewis, K. and Yang, M. (2015) Comparison of information passing strategies in system-level modeling. AIAA Journal, 53(5), 1121–1133. doi: 10.2514/1.J052568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iorio, J. and Taylor, J. (2014) Boundary object efficacy: the mediating role of boundary objects on task conflict in global virtual project networks. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D. and Robinson, R. (1997) Defending the status quo: power and bias in social conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(10), 1066–1077. doi: 10.1177/01461672972310007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2004) Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise. Design Studies, 25(5), 443–457. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, D. (1999) Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(1), 11–28. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. (1998) Toward a role-theoretic conception of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 92–125. doi: 10.1086/210003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, M. and Bazerman, M. (1985) The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargaining behaviors and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 34–49. doi: 10.2307/256060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osipova, E. (2014) Establishing cooperative relationships and joint risk management in construction projects: agency theory perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(6).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostergaard, K., Wetmore III, W., Divekar, A., Vitali, H. and Summers, J. (2005) An experimental methodology for investigating communication in collaborative design review meetings. CoDesign, 1(3), 169–185. doi: 10.1080/15710880500298520
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. and Kumaraswamy, M. (2004) Potential for implementing relational contracting and joint risk management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(4), 178–189. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2004)20:4(178)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B. and de Vreede, T. (2012) Team creativity and innovation: the effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition, in Mumford, M.D. (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Creativity, Academic Press, New York, pp. 295–326.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Bottom, W. and Elfenbein, H. (2013) On the role of personality, cognitive ability, and emotional intelligence in predicting negotiation outcomes: a meta-analysis. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(4), 293–336. doi: 10.1177/2041386613505857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1987) Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion. The Academy of Management Executive (1987–1989), 1(1), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. and Edkins, A. (2007) Relationship management in the management of PFI/PPP projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, H. and Pryke, S. (2009) Collaborative Relationships in Construction: Developing Frameworks and Networks, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester UK.
   Google Scholar
• Suprapto, M., Bakker, H., Mooi, H. and Moree, W. (2014) Sorting out the essence of owner–contractor collaboration in capital project delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 664–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (1998) The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. and Hastie, R. (1990) Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 98–123. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley, C., O’Connor, K. and Sullivan, B. (2002) Tough guys finish last: the perils of a distributive reputation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88(2), 621–642. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay, C. and Bazerman, M. (2009) A decision-making perspective to negotiation: a review of the past and a look to the future. Negotiation Journal, 25(4), 467–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2009.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valley, K., Moag, J. and Bazerman, M. (1998) ‘A matter of trust’: effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(2), 211–238. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00054-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., Weber, K. and Margolis, J. (2003) Social issues and management: our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00082-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Chen, P., Fu, K., Cagan, J. and Kotovsky, K. (2014) The role of design team interaction structure on individual and shared mental models, in Gero, J. (ed.) Design Computing and Cognition, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 209–226.
   Google Scholar