Kleptocracy, authoritarianism and democracy as ideal types of political power

References

• Alasuutari, P., 2018. Authority as epistemic capital Journal of Political Power, 11 (2), 165–190. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1468151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, J., 2013. Performance and Power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1998. Power trouble: performativity as critical theory Constellations, 5 (4), 456–471. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00108.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 1999. The power of feminist theory: domination, resistance. Solidarity. Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., 2021a. Critique on the Couch. New York, Columbia: Columbian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, A., et al., 2021b. Debating the dimensions: amy allen, rainer forst and isaac ariail reed in dialogue-review of the four dimensions of power by Mark Haugaard Journal of Political Power, 14 (3), 493–519. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2021.1972745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., 1983. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Á., 2007. Power and social ontology. Malmó: Bokbox.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1958. The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 1970. On violence. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H., 2004. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle, 1941. The politics. In: McKeon, R., ed. The basic works of aristotle. New York: Random House, 1127–1324.
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, J., et al., 1985. On Gilligan’s “In a Different Voice” Feminist Studies, 11 (1), 149–161. doi:10.2307/3180143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J.L., 1975. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S., 1962. The two faces of power The American Political Science Review, 56 (4), 947–952. doi:10.2307/1952796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestri, C. 2023. Economic notes on the concept of political power. Journal of Political Power, 16 (1). doi:10.1080/2158379X.2023.2178126.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., 1988. The nature of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I., 2002. Two concepts of liberty. In: I. Berlin, H. Hardy, eds. Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 166–217.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N., 1949. Discussions with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics. In: P. Schilpp, ed. Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist. Peru, IL: Open Court Publishing, 199–242.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1989. Distinction. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1997. The psychic life of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., 1989. Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. and Dull, L., 2023. Teaching about the feminist rights revolution: Ruth Bader Ginsburg as “the thurgood marshall of women’s rights”. American Historian. Available from: https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2017/november/teaching-about-the-feminist-rights-revolution-ruth-bader-ginsburg-as-the-thurgood-marshall-of-womens-rights/#fn6 09/1/2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1957. The concept of power Behavioural Science, 2 (3), 201–215. doi:10.1002/bs.3830020303.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A. 1968. Power. In: D.L. Shills, ed. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan, Vol. 12, 405–415.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M., 2010. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. 2nd edn ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1998. Science and society. In: L. Hichkman and T. Alexander, eds. The essential dewey, Volume1 pragmatism, education democracy, Volume1 pragmatism, education democracy. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 363–368.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É., 1989 [1897]. Suicide. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É., 2008 [1915]. The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., 1995. The civilizing process: the history of manners and state formation and civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fives, A., 2018. Paternalism and moral conflict: a pluralist analysis of parental power Journal of Political Power, 11 (2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1411434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2007. The right to justification. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R., 2015. Noumenal power The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (2), 111–127. doi:10.1111/jopp.12046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1979. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. C. Gordon, ed. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795. Summer, 1982. 10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1988. Politics. In: L.D. Kritzman, ed. Philosophy, culture: interviews and other writings 1977–1984. London: Routledge, 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F., 1992. The end of history and the last man. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E., 1983. Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E., 1989. Plough, Sword and Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1971. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A., 1973. Selections from prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Guardian. 2022. China’s Xi Jinping ‘unwilling’ to accept wester covid vaccines says US intelligence chief. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/dec/04/chinas-xi-jinping-unwilling-to
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 2001. The postnational constellation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagstróm, L. and H, N.A., 2020. China’s “Politics of harmony” and the quest for soft power in international politics International Studies Review, 22 (3), 507–525. doi:10.1093/isr/viz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haitiwaji, G. and Morgat, R., 2021. Our souls are dead’: how I survived a Chinese ‘re-education’ camp for Uyghurs. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/12/uighur-xinjiang-re-education-camp-china-gulbahar-haitiwaji. [Accessed 12January2021].
   Google Scholar
• Happiest Countries Index. 2022. Available from: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/happiest-countries-in-the-world. [Accessed 20 March 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 1997. The Constitution of Power. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2008. Sociological Lukes versus moral Lukes: reflections on the second edition of power: a radical view by Steven Lukes Journal of Power [Now Journal of Political Power], 1 (1), 99–106. doi:10.1080/17540290801943471.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2015. Concerted power over Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 22 (1), 147–158. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2016. Two types of freedom and four dimensions of power Revue internationale de philosophie, n° 275 (1), 37–65. doi:10.3917/rip.275.0037.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2018. What is authority? Journal of Classical Sociology, 18 (2), 104–132. doi:10.1177/1468795X17723737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2020. The four dimensions of power: understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2021. The four dimensions of power: conflict and democracy Journal of Political Power, 14 (1), 153–175. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2021.1878411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2022. Power and crime: a theoretical sketch Journal of Political Power, 15 (1), 14–28. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2022.2031112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. and Pettit, P., 2017. A conversation on power and republicanism: an exchange between Mark Haugaard and Philip Pettit Journal of Political Power, 10 (1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1286083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, C.R. and Lukes, S., 2008. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency Journal of Power [Now Journal of Political Power], 1 (1), 5–20. doi:10.1080/17540290801943364.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1914 [1651]. Leviathan. London: Dent, Everyman’s Library.
   Google Scholar
• Isackson, P. 2020. ‘Xi Jinping’s Tibetan summer of love’. Available from: https://www.fairobserver.com/region/asia_pacific/peter-isackson-xi-jinping-china-tibet-policy-history-harmony-news-13211/. [Accessed 1 September 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Javornicky, M., 2020. In the eye of the potentially non-confirm-structuring beholder: agent-centred reading of the four-dimensional model of power Journal of Political Power, 13 (1), 60–85. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2019.1632005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinping, X., 2018. The governance of China. London: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S., 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S., 1977. The essential tension: selected studies in scientific thought and change. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, P., 2013. The drowned and the saved. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 2008. Thinking about democracy: power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukacs, G., 2000. History and class consciousness: studies in marxist dialectics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 1974. Power: a radical view. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2021. Power: a radical view. 3rd ed. London: Red Globe press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 2013. The sources of social power, volume 4: globalizations, 1945-2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. and Engels, F., 2020. The communist manifesto. London: Independent Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mennell, S., 1989. Norbert Elias: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mennell, S., 2009. An exceptional civilizing process? Journal of Classical Sociology, 9 (1), 97–115. doi:10.1177/1468795X08098979.
   Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N. and Haugaard, M., 2020. The performance of citizen’s and organisational authority Journal of Classical Sociology, 20 (4), 309–334. doi:10.1177/1468795X19860111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2002. Power: a philosophical analysis. 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P., 2009. Power and liberalism. In: S. Clegg and M. Haugaard, eds. The sage handbook of power. London: Sage, 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mounk, Y., 2018. The people vs. democracy: why our freedom is in danger and how to save It. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J.-W., 2023. Is the US going to stand by while Israel becomes an autocracy? The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/14/israel-autocracy-benjamim-netanyahu-joe-biden Accessed 14 February2023.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J.-W. and L, S.K., 2008. Constitutional patriotism: an introduction International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6 (1), 67–71. doi:10.1093/icon/mom039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPR. 2021. ‘China’s communist party, with eye on history, gives Xi Jinping the same status as Mao’. Available from: https://www.npr.org/2021/11/11/1054646063/china-xi-jinping-communist-party?t=1647600569296. [Accessed 11 November 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M., 2011. Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M., 2000. Power and prosperity: outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships. London: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Ospina, E. and Rose, M. 2020. Our world data: trust. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/trust. Accessed 20 March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Pansardi, P., 2012. Power to and Power over: two distinct concepts? Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 73–89. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.658278.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., 1963. On the concept of political power Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107 (3), 232–262.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, O., 1982. Slavery and social death. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 1996. Freedom as antipower Ethics, 106 (3), 576–604. doi:10.1086/233648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2008. Dahl’s power and republican freedom Journal of Power [Now Journal of Political Power], 1 (1), 67–74. doi:10.1080/17540290801943422.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P., 2012. On the people’s terms: a republican theory of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H., 1972. Wittgenstein and Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K., 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K., 2003. The poverty of historicism. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, J.H., 2012. Is power zero-sum or variable-sum? Old arguments and new beginnings Journal of Political Power, 5 (1), 5–31. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2012.659865.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E., 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M., 1984. The procedural republic and the unencumbered self Political Theory, 12 (1), 81–96. doi:10.1177/0090591784012001005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., 2006. Political theology: four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J., 1996. The construction of social reality. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., 2001. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, P., 2022. Putin: his life and times. London: Bodleyhead.
   Google Scholar
• Tse-Tung, M., 2018. Quotations from chairman Mao Tse-Tung: the little red book. London: Independent publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1949. Objectivity of social science and policy. In: E. Shils and A Finch, eds. The Methodology of the Social Scineces. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1976. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. 2nd edn ed. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and Society (Vol. 1). In: G. Roth and C. Wittich, eds. An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2009. ‘Politics as a vocation’ in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. (ed.) Gerth H. H. and Mills C. W. Oxford: Routledge, 77–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R.G. and Pickett, K., 2009. The spirit level: why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allan Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1967. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M., 2014 [1792]. A vindication of the rights of women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdaninasab, M. and Khademnabi, M., 2023. Power and resistance: iranian day-laborers’ lived experience of power relations in the workplace Journal of Political Power, 16 (1), 81–100. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2023.2173395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar