Body, heart, mind and soul: power and personhood in an impersonal world

References

• Adair-Toteff, C., 2005. Max Weber’s charisma. Journal of Classical Sociology, 5 (2), 189–204. doi:10.1177/1468795X05053491.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, F., 2000. The new organon. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkow, J., Cosmines, L., and Tooby, J., eds, 1992. The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, R., 1960. Max Weber: an intellectual portrait. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Breuilly, J., 2011. Max Weber, charisma and nationalist leadership. Nations and Nationalism, 17 (3), 477–499. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00487.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R., 2020. Digital hyperconnectivity and the self. Theory and Society, 49 (5–6), 771–801. doi:10.1007/s11186-020-09405-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D.M., 1999. Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Carrithers, M., Collins, S., and Lukes, S., eds, 1985. The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero, 1971. On the good life. M. Grant, trans. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Cikara, M., 2021. Causes and consequences of coalitional cognition. In: B. Garwroinski, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology. Amsterdam: Elseveir, 65–128.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, G., 1970. Big men and cargo cults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A.P., 1994. Self consciousness: an alternative anthropology of identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R., 2000. The sociology of philosophies: a global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA, and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, B., 1988. The liberty of the ancients compared with that of the moderns. In: B. Fontana, ed. Constant: political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316–318.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, L., 1986. Essays on individualism: modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E., 1964. The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E., 1965. The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S.N., 2000. Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129 (1), 1–29. doi:10.1177/03058298000290031201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epictetus, 2008. Discourses and selected writings. R. Dobbin, trans. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E.E., 1937. Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, K.O., 2007. The sociology of celebrity. Sociology Compass, 1 (1), 371–384. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00019.x.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1979. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2000. Power, essential works of Michel Foucault, 1954-1984. J. D. Faubion, ed. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, M.L., 2010. The enlightenment of sympathy: justice and the moral sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, M., 1967. The evolution of political society: an essay in political anthropology. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Furedi, F., 2019. How fear works: culture of fear in the twenty-first century. London: Bloomsbury Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, E., 1991. Plough, sword and book: the structure of human history. London: Paladin.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, L., 1985. Reflections on two charismas. The British Journal of Sociology, 36 (1), 117–132. doi:10.2307/590409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosby, S., 1995. Territoriality: the transcendental, primordial feature of modern societies. Nations and Nationalism, 1 (2), 143–162. doi:10.1111/j.1354-5078.1995.00143.x.
   Google Scholar
• Grosby, S., 2005. Nationalism: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosby, S., 2011. Nationalism and social theory: the distinction between community and society. In: G. Delanty and S. Turner, eds. Handbook of contemporary social and political theory. London: Routledge, 280–289.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, P., 2017. The making of consumer culture in modern Britain. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gurri, M., 2018. The revolt of the public: and the crisis of authority in the new millennium. San Francisco: Stripe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., 2022. Why the past 10 years of American life have been uniquely stupid. The Atlantic, 11 April.
   Google Scholar
• Haldén, P., 2020. Family power: kinship, war and political orders in Eurasia, 500-2018. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M., 2020. The four dimensions of power: understanding domination, empowerment and democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2008. What’s wrong with domination? Journal of Power, 1 (1), 37–49. doi:10.1080/17540290801943406.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2012. Theorising power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J., 2023. The domestication of competition: the social evolution of liberal society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M. and Horne, C., 2003. Theories of social orderr: a reader. Stanford: Stanford Unversity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R., 1964. Ritual man in Africa. Africa, 34 (2), 85–104. doi:10.2307/1157900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D., 1978. A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, eds. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, M., 2020. The decline of magic: Britain in the Enlightenment. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R., 2001. On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzman, C., et al., 2007. Celebrity status. Sociological Theory, 25 (4), 347–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00313.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D., 2004. Emotion and social life: the lost heart of society. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D., 2006. Understanding social theory. 2nd edn ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd revised edn ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maine, H.S., 1986. Ancient law: its connection with the early history of society and its relation to modern ideas. USA: Dorset Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malešević, S., 2017. The rise of organised brutality: a historical sociology of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1986. The sources of social power , vol. 1: a history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W., 2010. World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36 (1), 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C.W., 1956. The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osterhammel, J. and Petersson, N.P., 2005. Globalization: a short history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, K., 1999. Max Weber’s reconceptualization of freedom. Political Theory, 27 (4), 523–544. doi:10.1177/0090591799027004005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., Bales, R., and Shils, E., 1953. Working papers in the theory of action. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, S., 2002. Nationalism, charisma, and plebiscitary leadership: the problem of democratization in Max weber’s political sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 72 (1), 81–107. doi:10.1111/1475-682X.00007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., 2002. The blank slate. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Poggi, G., 2000. Durkheim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poggi, G., 2001. Forms of power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Popitz, H., 2017. The phenomenon of power: authority, domination and violence. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K., 1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, J., 2021. The constitution of knowledge: a defense of truth. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M., 1963. Poor man, Rich man, Big-man, chief: political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5 (3), 285–303. doi:10.1017/S0010417500001729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J., 2001. Power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Service, E., 1966. The hunters. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E., 1958. The intellectuals and the powers: some perspectives for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 1 (1), 5–22. doi:10.1017/S0010417500000049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, E., 1982. The constitution of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shlapentok, V., 2006. Fear in contemporary society: its negative and positive effects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shlapentokh, V., 2006. Fear in contemporary society its negative and positive effects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Siedentop, L., 2015. Inventing the individual: the origins of western liberalism. London and USA: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 1981. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Vol. 2. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., 1982. The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A.D., 2000. Democracy in America. H. C. Mansfield and D. Winthrop, eds. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., 1999. The human adaptation for culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28 (1), 509–529. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.509.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., 2016. A natural history of human morality. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F., 2001. Community and civil society. J. Harris, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J.M., et al., 2020. Underestimating digital media harm. Nature Human Behaviour, 4 (4), 346–348. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0839-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twenge, J.M., et al., 2022. Specification curve analysis shows that social media use is linked to poor mental health, especially among girls. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103512. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, A.F.C., 1956. Revitalization movements. American Anthropologist, 58 (2), 264–281. doi:10.1525/aa.1956.58.2.02a00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1958. The social psychology of the world religions. In: H. Gerth and C.W. Mills, eds. From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press, 267–301.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1978. Economy and society. Vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 2005. A ‘casing of bondage’ and the rule of functionaries. In: S. Kalberg, ed. Max Weber, readings and commentary on modernity. London: Blackwell, 255–271.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 2019. Economy and society: a new translation. K. Tribe, ed. and trans. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, A., 2021. The aristocracy of talent: how meritocracy made the modern world. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Worsley, P., 1957. The trumpet shall sound. London: Paladin.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D. H, 1994. The problem of order: what untes and divides society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D.H., 2002. Power: its forms, bases and uses. 3rd edn ed. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar