Willingness-to-pay for precautionary control of microplastics, a comparison of hybrid choice models

References

• Abate, T. G., T. Borger, M. Aanesen, J. Falk-Andersson, K. J. Wyles, and N. Beaumont. 2020. “Valuation of Marine Plastic Pollution in the European Arctic: Applying an Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model to Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 169: 106521. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowicz, W., D. Dupont, A. Krupnick, and J. Zhang. 2011. “Valuation of Cancer and Microbial Disease Risk Reductions in Municipal Drinking Water: An Analysis of Risk Context Using Multiple Valuation Methods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (2): 213–226. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldred, J. 2012. “Climate Change Uncertainty, Irreversibility and the Precautionary Principle.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (5): 1051–1072. doi:10.1093/cje/bes029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., and A. C. Fisher. 1974. “Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 76–84. doi:10.2307/1883074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. “Report of the N.O.A.A Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–4614. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arunrat, N., C. Wang, N. Pumijumnong, S. Sereenonchai, and W. Cai. 2017. “Farmers’ Intention and Decision to Adapt to Climate Change: A Case Study in the Yom and Nan Basins, Phichit Province of Thailand.” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 672–685. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M., J. Walker, A. T. Bernardino, D. A. Gopinath, T. Morikawa, and A. Polydoropoulou. 2002. “Integration of Choice and Latent Variable Models.” Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges, 431–470. http://www.joanwalker.com/uploads/3/6/9/5/3695513/benakivawalkeretal_iclv_chapter_2002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buckell, J., D. A. Hensher, and S. Hess. 2021. “Kicking the Habit is Hard: A Hybrid Choice Model Investigation Into the Role of Addiction in Smoking Behavior.” Health Economics 30 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1002/hec.4173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budziński, W., and M. Czajkowski. 2018. Hybrid Choice Models vs. Endogeneity of Indicator Variables: A Monte Carlo Investigation (No. 2018-21). https://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/files/6215/3933/4572/WNE_WP280.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, E. E., and A. B. Boxall. 2018. “Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment: Evidence for or Against Adverse Impacts and Major Knowledge Gaps.” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 37 (11): 2776–2796. doi:10.1002/etc.4268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, T. A. 2005. “Individual Option Prices for Climate Change Mitigation.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (2-3): 283–301. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272704000131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catarino, A. I., J. Kramm, C. Voelker, T. B. Henry, and G. Everaert. 2021. “Risk Posed by Microplastics: Scientific Evidence and Public Perception.” Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 29: 100467. doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., and M. Kroesen. 2014. “On the (Im-)Possibility of Deriving Transport Policy Implications from Hybrid Choice Models.” Transport Policy 36: 217–222. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courbage, C., B. Rey, and N. Treich. 2013. “Prevention and Precaution.” In Handbook of Insurance, 185–204. Springer. http://publications.ut-capitole.fr/15772/1/wp_tse_445.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., C. A. Vossler, W. Budziński, A. Wińniewska, and E. Zawojska. 2017. “Addressing Empirical Challenges Related to the Incentive Compatibility of Stated Preferences Methods.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 142: 47–63. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A., S. Hess, B. Patruni, D. Potoglou, and C. Rohr. 2012. “Using Ordered Attitudinal Indicators in a Latent Variable Choice Model: A Study of the Impact of Security on Rail Travel Behaviour.” Transportation 39 (2): 267–297. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, B., I. J. Bateman, R. T. Carson, D. Dupont, J. J. Louviere, S. Morimoto, R. Scarpa, and P. Wang. 2012. “Ordering Effects and Choice Set Awareness in Repeat-Response Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63 (1): 73–91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095069611001239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, T., S. Hess, R. Brouwer, and M. Hofkes. 2016. “Decision Uncertainty in Multiattribute Stated Preference Studies.” Resource and Energy Economics 43: 57–73. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duis, K., and A. Coors. 2016. “Microplastics in the Aquatic and Terrestrial Environment: Sources (With a Specific Focus on Personal Care Products), Fate and Effects.” Environmental Sciences Europe 28 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/s12302-015-0069-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2014. Stated-Preference Study to Examine the Economic Value of Benefits of Avoiding Selected Adverse Human Health Outcomes Due to Exposure to Chemicals in the European Union: Part I: Sensitization & Dose Toxicity. European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13630/study_economic_benefits_avoiding_adverse_health_outcomes_1_en.pdf/5c884e27-8ce7-4ffd-97dc-5e7875ee67e0.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2019. Annex XV Restriction Report Proposal for a Restriction. European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/12414bc7-6bb2-17e7-c9ec-652a20fa43fc.
   Google Scholar
• Faccioli, M., M. Czajkowski, K. Glenk, and J. Martin-Ortega. 2020. “Environmental Attitudes and Place Identity as Determinants of Preferences for Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Economics 174: 106600. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800919308626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccioli, M., L. Kuhfuss, and M. Czajkowski. 2019. “Stated Preferences for Conservation Policies Under Uncertainty: Insights on the Effect of Individuals’ Risk Attitudes in the Environmental Domain.” Environmental and Resource Economics 73 (2): 627–659. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-018-0276-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransson, N., and T. Garling. 1999. “Environmental Concern: Conceptual Definitions, Measurement Methods, and Research Findings.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 19 (4): 369–382. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Niklas_Fransson/publication/222252867_Environmental_Concern_Conceptual_Definitions_Measurement_Methods_and_Research_Findings/links/5a0c5866a6fdcc39e9bf6438/Environmental-Concern-Conceptual-Definitions-Measurement-Methods-and-Research-Findings.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollier, C., and N. Treich. 2003. “Decision-Making Under Scientific Uncertainty: The Economics of the Precautionary Principle.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27 (1): 77–103. doi:10.1023/A:1025576823096.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha-Duong, M. 1998. “Quasi-Option Value and Climate Policy Choices.” Energy Economics 20 (5-6): 599–620. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988398000115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W. M. 1989. “Information and the Concept of Option Value.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 16 (1): 23–37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0095069689900429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, C. 1974. “Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty: The ““Irreversibility Effect””.” The American Economic Review 64 (6): 1006–1012. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1815248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S., and N. Beharry-Borg. 2012. “Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago.” Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (1): 109–131. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007s10640-011-9522-6.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S., and D. Palma. 2019. “Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application.” Journal of Choice Modelling 32: 100170. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, S., I. Ankamah-Yeboah, S. O’Neill, K. Needham, B. B. Xuan, and C. Armstrong. 2020. “The Impact of Nature Documentaries on Public Environmental Preferences and Willingness to Pay: Entropy Balancing and the Blue Planet II Effect.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–29. doi:10.1080/09640568.2020.1828840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham, A., and A. Ulph. 2003. “Uncertainty, Irreversibility, Precaution and the Social Cost of Carbon.” Carbon 7. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.134.2117&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., K. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T. Cameron, W. Hanemann, et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405. http://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2164/10529/691697.pdf?sequence=1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelmans, A. A., A. Bakir, G. A. Burton, and C. R. Janssen. 2016. “Microplastic as a Vector for Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment: Critical Review and Model-Supported Reinterpretation of Empirical Studies.” Environmental Science & Technology 50 (7): 3315–3326. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b06069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401.
   Google Scholar
• Kosuth, M., S. A. Mason, and E. V. Wattenberg. 2018. “Anthropogenic Contamination of Tap Water, Beer, and Sea Salt.” PloS One 13 (4): e0194970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramm, J., S. Steinhoff, S. Werschmöller, B. Völker, and C. Völker. 2022. “Explaining Risk Perception of Microplastics: Results from a Representative Survey in Germany.” Global Environmental Change 73: 102485. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz-Duriseti, K. 2004. “Evaluating the Economic Value of the Precautionary Principle: Using Cost Benefit Analysis to Place a Value on Precaution.” Environmental Science & Policy 7 (4): 291–301. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901104000619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebreton, L., M. Egger, and B. Slat. 2019. “A Global Mass Budget for Positively Buoyant Macroplastic Debris in the Ocean.” Scientific Reports 9 (1): 1–10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-49413-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lebreton, L., B. Slat, F. Ferrari, B. Sainte-Rose, J. Aitken, R. Marthouse, S. Hajbane, et al. 2018. “Evidence That the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is Rapidly Accumulating Plastic.” Scientific Reports 8 (1): 4666. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lusher, A., P. Hollman, and J. Mendoza-Hill. 2017. Microplastics in Fisheries and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Office of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7677e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manne, A. S., A. S. Manne, R. G. Richels, and R. G. Richels. 1992. Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits. MIT Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=sLFdp89-dQcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=buying+greenhouse+insurance+manne+and+richels&ots=LlT99GikXx&sig=p0JhCzbQjbCLlsgCzuO2TZCAMZc.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., et al. 1973. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/reprints/mcfadden/zarembka.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nakatani, T., H. Aizaki, and K. Sato. 2021. “DCchoice: Analyzing Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data.” https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DCchoice/DCchoice.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rakotonarivo, O. S., M. Schaafsma, and N. Hockley. 2016. “A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments in Valuing Non-Market Environmental Goods.” Journal of Environmental Management 183: 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveau, S., M. F. Yáñez, and J. de Dios Ortúzar. 2012. “Practical and Empirical Identifiability of Hybrid Discrete Choice Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 46 (10): 1374–1383. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddel, M. 2011. “Uncertainty and Measurement Error in Welfare Models for Risk Changes.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (3): 341–354. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2010.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandorf, E. D., L. Persson, and T. Broberg. 2020. “Using an Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Model to Understand the Impact of “Professional” Respondents in a Stated Preference Survey.” Resource and Energy Economics, 101178. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2020.101178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scasny, M., and I. Zverinova. 2014. Stated-Preference Study to Examine the Economic Value of Benefits of Avoiding Selected Adverse Human Health Outcomes Due to Exposure to Chemicals in the European Union: Part II: Fertility and Developmental Toxicity. European Chemicals Agency. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13630/study_economic_benefits_avoiding_adverse_health_outcomes_2_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schaafsma, M., R. Brouwer, I. Liekens, and L. De Nocker. 2014. “Temporal Stability of Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Natural Areas in Choice Experiments: A Test–Retest.” Resource and Energy Economics 38: 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereenonchai, S., N. Arunrat, and D. Kamnoonwatana. 2020. “Risk Perception on Haze Pollution and Willingness to Pay for Self-Protection and Haze Management in Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand.” Atmosphere 11 (6): 600. doi:10.3390/atmos11060600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, M. 2009. “Precautionary Behavior and Willingness to Pay for a Mortality Risk Reduction: Searching for the Expected Relationship.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 39 (1): 65–85. doi:10.1007/s11166-009-9070-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. C., C. J. Moore, F. S. Vom Saal, and S. H. Swan. 2009. “Plastics, the Environment and Human Health: Current Consensus and Future Trends.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364 (1526): 2153–2166. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traeger, C. P. 2014. “On Option Values in Environmental and Resource Economics.” Resource and Energy Economics 37: 242–252. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765514000360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation. Cambridge University Press. https://eml.berkeley.edu/books/choice2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vij, A., and J. L. Walker. 2016. “How, When and Why Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Models are Latently Useful.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 90: 192–217. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, C. A., and S. B. Watson. 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86: 137–147. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268112002661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., and M. A. Ruano. 2020. “Estimating the Damage Cost of Plastic Waste in Galapagos Islands: A Contingent Valuation Approach.” Marine Policy 117: 103933. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X19309820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar